Pulmonary AtelectasisNCT03009331
Descriptive and Comparative Study of Respiratory Function in the Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patient
A study testing Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position. and Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position. in people with Pulmonary Atelectasis, run by Sahlgrenska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The study comprises two different objectives. Longitudinal description of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in the cardiothoracic surgery patient, and the comparison of two different lungrecruitment strategies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Atelectasis
- What is being tested?
- Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position. and Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 25 Jul 2017to 25 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent
- Scheduled cardiac surgery (CABG or valve surgery)
- Cardiopulmonary bypass
Who cannot join
- Diagnose of obstructive or restrictive lung disease
- Medical therapy with bronchodilators
- Smoking or former smoking > 5 years
- Obesity (BMI > 30)
- Perioperative FiO2 >60% or PEEP >12
- Haemodynmic instability, use of inotropes (low dose vasopressors accepted)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Postop clinically significant bleeding (>100 ml/h, reoperation)
- Postoperative haemothorax or large pleural effusion detected with ultrasonography
- Postoperative clinically significant pneumothorax or large chestdrain airleak
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Department of cardiothoracic anaesthesia, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, 41345
About this study
The study comprises two different objectives. Longitudinal description of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in the cardiothoracic surgery patient, and the comparison of two different lungrecruitment strategies.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
Atelectasis and consolidation of lung tissue is a well recognized clinical scenario following anaesthesia, musclerelaxation and mechanical ventilation. In cardiac surgery during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the lungs are collapsed to a degree depending on surgical opening of the pleura, time on bypass, and gasmixture on termination of ventilation. Recruitment of the lungs on commencement of mechanical ventilation after CPB generally must be repeated before extubation. There are several different approaches to Recruitment Manoeuvers (RM). Increasing pressures in the ventilator (peak-pressures and PEEP), increasing tidal volumes and inspiratory hold are facilities offered by the ventilator. Different body positions by interaction of the abdomen and thorax through the diaphragm, and the action of gravity on the lungs and adjoining organs, are other principles. The contribution of spontaneous ventilatory efforts also play a major roll.
Study rationale:
The study comprises two different objectives. Longitudinal description of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in the cardiothoracic surgery patient, and the comparison of two different lungrecruitment strategies.
All patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery develops some degree of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (PPD), including hypoxemia, increased work of breathing, shallow respiration and ineffective cough. Respiratory symptoms of larger clinical significance are better investigated, known as postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), including pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumonia and ARDS. Pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial, and there is a continuum between PPD and PPC that has not yet been well explored. A large proportion of patients readmitted to CICU present respiratory failure, significantly accounting for morbidity, mortality, and costs.
Regarding lungrecruitment, supine position is compared to modified prone position with similar ventilator settings. Initial measurements preoperatively in the awake patient, then during sedation and ventilator treatment, followed up by measurements before discharge from the surgical ward on postoperative day 4-5.
Effect of RM is evaluated from ventilator measurement of compliance (C), arterial oxygenation and P/F-ratio from the arterial blood gas (ABG), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). EIT measures the impedance of a thoracic sagittal section by emitting and sampling electrical currents between 16 electrodes fixed on a submamillar belt. Radiology report from routine chest X-ray and ultrasonography of the lungs and pleura will be added.
Should RM in prone position prove to be more efficient, postoperative complications in terms of respiratory failure and pneumonia could be reduced, facilitating postoperative recovery and shortening convalescens. This would justify the increased burden of care in the cardiac ICU.
Study objectives:
The study aims to compare lung recruitment in two different body positions, supine (elevated 30 degrees) to left modified prone position (left side up, 120 degrees). Parameters investigated are global and regional pulmonary impedance (EIT), lungcompliance, and arterial oxygenation. Chest X-ray and lung ultrasound will be performed for additional analyses.
A descriptive longitudinal study of the 20 patients lungrecruited in supine position will also be performed.
Study design:
Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Two groups with 20 cardiac surgery patients in each.
Study procedure:
Protocol
Day -1:
1 day preop. EIT measurement in supine (30 degrees elevated) and modified left prone position (left side up, 120 degrees). Two measurements of each 2 min duration in both positions. ABG is performed after breathing through a Venturi-mask delivering FiO2 0.5 for 10 minutes. Randomization to either of the two groups.
Day 0:
Day of surgery. Standard periop care in coherence with department routines. Preoxygenation using FiO2 1.0 during induction of anaesthesia, and before commencing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Inhalational anaesthetics during surgical preparation, and again after weaning from CPB. Apnoea without PEEP or intermittent ventilation during CPB. Before weaning from CPB manual lung recruitment with the APL-valve set to 30 cm H2O, and visual guidance of the lungparenchyma or pleura. After chest closure, FiO2 is set to 0.5, volume controlled ventilation 4-6 ml/Kg titrated according to pCO2, and PEEP is set to 5 cm H2O. Patient ventilation circuit will be broken twice in conjugation with the use of a transport ventilator device before arrival in the CICU. Ventilator settings in the CICU is pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (VKTS), tidal volumes of 4-6 ml/Kg titrated according to pCO2, respiratory frequency of 14/min, and PEEP 8 cm H2O.
Recruitment maneuver (RM) is performed within 10 min on arrival in the CICU. Patient must be stabile in hemodynamic parameters, including volume status. PEEP is set to 20 cm H2O, pressure controlled ventilation with peak pressure 40 cm H2O for 30 s (5 inspirations), thereafter PEEP-trial starting from 15 cm H2O for optimal PEEP using the "Open Lung Tool" (Maquet Flow-i software). During the PEEP-trial, VKTS for tidal volumes of 6 ml/Kg is used.
Supine position group: RM in supine position. EIT, ABG and lung compliance measurements in supine position before RM (30 degrees elevation), then immediately and 30 min after RM, and again 30 minutes after extubation. FiO2 0.5 at all ABG measuring points.
Modified prone position group: RM in modified prone position (120 degrees, left side up). EIT, ABG and lung compliance measurements in supine position before RM (30 degrees elevation), and then immediately after RM when turned back to supine position (30 degrees elevation), and 30 minutes after RM. Finally, measurements 30 minutes after extubation. FiO2 0.5 at all ABG measuring points.
Day 4-5:
Supine and prone position groups: EIT in supine position (30 degrees elevation) and ABG repeated at day 4-5 postop. ABG is performed after breathing through a Venturi-mask delivering FiO2 0.5 for 10 minutes. Ultrasonography of the pleurae. Chest-X-ray performed routinely on the day after chest-drain removal.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Atelectasis
- Being tested
- Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position., Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position.
- Keywords
- Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction, Postoperative pulmonary complication, Recruitment manouver, Prone position
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Atelectasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position.Procedure or surgery
Also called "Prone Lungrecruitment in ventilator"
Postoperative lungrecruitment in prone position, pressure-controlled ventilation peak inspiratory pressure 40 cm H2O combined with PEEP 20 cm H2O during 60 seconds.
Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position.Procedure or surgery
Also called "Supine Lungrecruitment in ventilator"
Postoperative lungrecruitment in supine position, pressure-controlled ventilation peak inspiratory pressure 40 cm H2O combined with PEEP 20 cm H2O during 60 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prone position | Experimental | Intervention: Lungrecruitment in prone position. Device: Ventilator Flow-i, Peak inspiratory pressure 40 cmH2O, PEEP 20 cm H2O during 30 s. Receives: Procedure: Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position. |
| Supine position | Active comparator | Intervention: Lungrecruitment in supine position. Device: Ventilator Flow-i, Peak inspiratory pressure 40 cmH2O, PEEP 20 cm H2O during 30 s. Clinical routine. Receives: Procedure: Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Electrical impedance
Electrical impedance tomography, thoracical transverse plane measurment. Dräger Pulmovista device is used for collecting the data. Data will be transferred to a personal computer, and processed in Excel.
Measured: 5 days
Lungcompliance (ml/cm H2O)
Pulmonary dynamic compliance, ventilator measurment.
Measured: 2 hours
P/F ratio
Oxygenation ratio, pO2 divided by FiO2, indication of pulmonary shunt
Measured: 5 days
Ultrasonography
Lungultrasound to exclude pleural effusion.
Measured: 5 days
Chest X-ray
Chest X-ray to exclude pneumothorax
Measured: 5 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start25 Jul 2017
- Primary completion25 Nov 2024
- Study completion25 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary AtelectasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andreas Martinsson, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
- Investigators
- Sven-Erik Ricksten, Professor, Study chair, The Salgrenska Academy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009331
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AMartinssonthorax
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 15 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Martinsson A, Houltz E, Wallinder A, Magnusson J, Lindgren S, Stenqvist O, Thoren A. Inspiratory and end-expiratory effects of lung recruitment in the prone position on dorsal lung aeration - new physiological insights in a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. BJA Open. 2022 Nov 21;4:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100105. eCollection 2022 Dec.
PubMed 37588783Martinsson A, Houltz E, Wallinder A, Lindgren S, Thoren A. Lung recruitment in the prone position after cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.039. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
PubMed 33602580
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Descriptive and Comparative Study of Respiratory Function in the Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patient
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03009331
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMartinssonthorax
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Atelectasis
- Keywords
- Postoperative pulmonary dysfunction, Postoperative pulmonary complication, Recruitment manouver, Prone position
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sahlgrenska University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study comprises two different objectives. Longitudinal description of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in the cardiothoracic surgery patient, and the comparison of two different lungrecruitment strategies.
Detailed description
Introduction:
Atelectasis and consolidation of lung tissue is a well recognized clinical scenario following anaesthesia, musclerelaxation and mechanical ventilation. In cardiac surgery during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), the lungs are collapsed to a degree depending on surgical opening of the pleura, time on bypass, and gasmixture on termination of ventilation. Recruitment of the lungs on commencement of mechanical ventilation after CPB generally must be repeated before extubation. There are several different approaches to Recruitment Manoeuvers (RM). Increasing pressures in the ventilator (peak-pressures and PEEP), increasing tidal volumes and inspiratory hold are facilities offered by the ventilator. Different body positions by interaction of the abdomen and thorax through the diaphragm, and the action of gravity on the lungs and adjoining organs, are other principles. The contribution of spontaneous ventilatory efforts also play a major roll.
Study rationale:
The study comprises two different objectives. Longitudinal description of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in the cardiothoracic surgery patient, and the comparison of two different lungrecruitment strategies.
All patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery develops some degree of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (PPD), including hypoxemia, increased work of breathing, shallow respiration and ineffective cough. Respiratory symptoms of larger clinical significance are better investigated, known as postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), including pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumonia and ARDS. Pathophysiology is complex and multifactorial, and there is a continuum between PPD and PPC that has not yet been well explored. A large proportion of patients readmitted to CICU present respiratory failure, significantly accounting for morbidity, mortality, and costs.
Regarding lungrecruitment, supine position is compared to modified prone position with similar ventilator settings. Initial measurements preoperatively in the awake patient, then during sedation and ventilator treatment, followed up by measurements before discharge from the surgical ward on postoperative day 4-5.
Effect of RM is evaluated from ventilator measurement of compliance (C), arterial oxygenation and P/F-ratio from the arterial blood gas (ABG), and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). EIT measures the impedance of a thoracic sagittal section by emitting and sampling electrical currents between 16 electrodes fixed on a submamillar belt. Radiology report from routine chest X-ray and ultrasonography of the lungs and pleura will be added.
Should RM in prone position prove to be more efficient, postoperative complications in terms of respiratory failure and pneumonia could be reduced, facilitating postoperative recovery and shortening convalescens. This would justify the increased burden of care in the cardiac ICU.
Study objectives:
The study aims to compare lung recruitment in two different body positions, supine (elevated 30 degrees) to left modified prone position (left side up, 120 degrees). Parameters investigated are global and regional pulmonary impedance (EIT), lungcompliance, and arterial oxygenation. Chest X-ray and lung ultrasound will be performed for additional analyses.
A descriptive longitudinal study of the 20 patients lungrecruited in supine position will also be performed.
Study design:
Prospective, randomized clinical trial. Two groups with 20 cardiac surgery patients in each.
Study procedure:
Protocol
Day -1:
1 day preop. EIT measurement in supine (30 degrees elevated) and modified left prone position (left side up, 120 degrees). Two measurements of each 2 min duration in both positions. ABG is performed after breathing through a Venturi-mask delivering FiO2 0.5 for 10 minutes. Randomization to either of the two groups.
Day 0:
Day of surgery. Standard periop care in coherence with department routines. Preoxygenation using FiO2 1.0 during induction of anaesthesia, and before commencing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Inhalational anaesthetics during surgical preparation, and again after weaning from CPB. Apnoea without PEEP or intermittent ventilation during CPB. Before weaning from CPB manual lung recruitment with the APL-valve set to 30 cm H2O, and visual guidance of the lungparenchyma or pleura. After chest closure, FiO2 is set to 0.5, volume controlled ventilation 4-6 ml/Kg titrated according to pCO2, and PEEP is set to 5 cm H2O. Patient ventilation circuit will be broken twice in conjugation with the use of a transport ventilator device before arrival in the CICU. Ventilator settings in the CICU is pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation (VKTS), tidal volumes of 4-6 ml/Kg titrated according to pCO2, respiratory frequency of 14/min, and PEEP 8 cm H2O.
Recruitment maneuver (RM) is performed within 10 min on arrival in the CICU. Patient must be stabile in hemodynamic parameters, including volume status. PEEP is set to 20 cm H2O, pressure controlled ventilation with peak pressure 40 cm H2O for 30 s (5 inspirations), thereafter PEEP-trial starting from 15 cm H2O for optimal PEEP using the "Open Lung Tool" (Maquet Flow-i software). During the PEEP-trial, VKTS for tidal volumes of 6 ml/Kg is used.
Supine position group: RM in supine position. EIT, ABG and lung compliance measurements in supine position before RM (30 degrees elevation), then immediately and 30 min after RM, and again 30 minutes after extubation. FiO2 0.5 at all ABG measuring points.
Modified prone position group: RM in modified prone position (120 degrees, left side up). EIT, ABG and lung compliance measurements in supine position before RM (30 degrees elevation), and then immediately after RM when turned back to supine position (30 degrees elevation), and 30 minutes after RM. Finally, measurements 30 minutes after extubation. FiO2 0.5 at all ABG measuring points.
Day 4-5:
Supine and prone position groups: EIT in supine position (30 degrees elevation) and ABG repeated at day 4-5 postop. ABG is performed after breathing through a Venturi-mask delivering FiO2 0.5 for 10 minutes. Ultrasonography of the pleurae. Chest-X-ray performed routinely on the day after chest-drain removal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prone position | Experimental | Procedure: Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position.Intervention: Lungrecruitment in prone position. Device: Ventilator Flow-i, Peak inspiratory pressure 40 cmH2O, PEEP 20 cm H2O during 30 s. |
| Supine position | Active comparator | Procedure: Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position.Intervention: Lungrecruitment in supine position. Device: Ventilator Flow-i, Peak inspiratory pressure 40 cmH2O, PEEP 20 cm H2O during 30 s. Clinical routine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Signed informed consent
- Scheduled cardiac surgery (CABG or valve surgery)
- Cardiopulmonary bypass
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Diagnose of obstructive or restrictive lung disease
- Medical therapy with bronchodilators
- Smoking or former smoking > 5 years
- Obesity (BMI > 30)
- Perioperative FiO2 >60% or PEEP >12
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position.Also: "Prone Lungrecruitment in ventilator"Postoperative lungrecruitment in prone position, pressure-controlled ventilation peak inspiratory pressure 40 cm H2O combined with PEEP 20 cm H2O during 60 seconds. | Procedure or surgery | Prone position |
| Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position.Also: "Supine Lungrecruitment in ventilator"Postoperative lungrecruitment in supine position, pressure-controlled ventilation peak inspiratory pressure 40 cm H2O combined with PEEP 20 cm H2O during 60 seconds. | Procedure or surgery | Supine position |
Primary outcome
Electrical impedance
Time frame: 5 days
Electrical impedance tomography, thoracical transverse plane measurment. Dräger Pulmovista device is used for collecting the data. Data will be transferred to a personal computer, and processed in Excel.
Lungcompliance (ml/cm H2O)
Time frame: 2 hours
Pulmonary dynamic compliance, ventilator measurment.
P/F ratio
Time frame: 5 days
Oxygenation ratio, pO2 divided by FiO2, indication of pulmonary shunt
Ultrasonography
Time frame: 5 days
Lungultrasound to exclude pleural effusion.
Chest X-ray
Time frame: 5 days
Chest X-ray to exclude pneumothorax
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37588783Martinsson A, Houltz E, Wallinder A, Magnusson J, Lindgren S, Stenqvist O, Thoren A. Inspiratory and end-expiratory effects of lung recruitment in the prone position on dorsal lung aeration - new physiological insights in a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. BJA Open. 2022 Nov 21;4:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2022.100105. eCollection 2022 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33602580Martinsson A, Houltz E, Wallinder A, Lindgren S, Thoren A. Lung recruitment in the prone position after cardiac surgery: a randomised controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1067-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.039. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pulmonary Atelectasis
Active, not recruiting
Stepwise PEEP vs Sustained Inflation in Bariatric Surgery Patients
Recruitment, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Not yet recruiting
Bedside Assessment of Right Ventricular Output Lying in Prone Or Supine
Right Ventricular Function, Prone Position
Recruiting
Bronchoscopic Airway Clearance for Improving Lung Aeration in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Atelectasis
Atelectasis, Mechanical Ventilation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Chest Ultrasound as Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool in Neonatal RDS
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Neonatal Respiratory Distress
Not yet recruiting
Brief Bronchial Suction for Lung Collapse During Uniportal VATS
Lung Collapse, One-lung Ventilation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sven-Erik Ricksten, Professor study chair
The Salgrenska Academy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lungrecruitment manoeuver in prone position. and Lungrecruitment manoeuver in supine position. in people with Pulmonary Atelectasis, run by Sahlgrenska University Hospital at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Electrical impedance (time frame: 5 days). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03009331, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2025.