Persistent Atrial FibrillationNO PERS-AFNCT03008811
Norwegian Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
A study testing Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. and Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation. in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 3 sites in Norway.
Trial summary
This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. and Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesNorway
- Study dates
- Nov 2016to May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients plan to undergo pulmonary vein isolation as the first procedure for symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (>7 days) and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (> 12 months, but ≤ 3 years) who are refractory to at least one class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug and required at least one electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion.
- Subject is at least 18 and ≤ 75 years old.
- Subject is able and willing to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subject has paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (< 7days) or persistent atrial fibrillation with duration > 3 years.
- Subject has any previous left atrial ablation procedure or surgery, including pulmonary vein isolation.
- Subject has presence of an intracavitary thrombus.
- Subject has uncontrolled heart failure.
- Subject has severe valvular disease.
- Subject has the left atrial diameter > 60 mm confirmed by echocardiography.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subject has contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or oral anticoagulants.
- Subject has known cryoglobulinaemia.
- Subject has severe renal dysfunction.
- Subject who is or may potentially be pregnant.
- Subject has unstable angina pectoris.
- Subject has history of previous myocardial infarction or percutaneous intervention during the last three months.
- Subject has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with detected pulmonary hypertension.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Norway3 sites
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen
University Hospital of North Norway
Tromsø
St Olavs Hospital
Trondheim
About this study
Official title: Norwegian Randomized Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (NO PERS-AF)
This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with either the second generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance™) or a radiofrequency ablation technique with an irrigated ablation catheter (TactiCath™ Quartz) . A total of 128 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomized for either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation treatment. With both techniques, pulmonary vein isolation will be performed and confirmed by a circular mapping catheter. The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.Treatment success will be evaluated by using 12-lead electrocardiography and 7-day Holter recording.
- Conditions
- Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter., Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter.Procedure or surgery
Device: Arctic Front Advance™ cardiac cryoablation catheter system.
Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.Procedure or surgery
Device: TactiCath™ Quartz irrigated ablation catheter (St. Jude Medical) with aid of 3-D mapping system (EnSite Precision, St. Jude Medical).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cryoballoon | Active comparator | Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. Receives: Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. |
| Radiofrequency | Active comparator | Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation catheter. Receives: Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months.
The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months (at least one episode of atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration > 30 seconds documented by 7-day Holter ECG, or any other printed ECG recording).
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Procedure duration
Procedure duration documented
Measured: 12 months
Fluoroscopy time
Fluoroscopy time documented
Measured: 12 months
Ablation time
Ablation time documented
Measured: 12 months
Quality of life - Short Form (SF-36) Heath Survey
Short Form (SF-36) Heath Survey filled in by patients.
Measured: 12 months.
Quality of life affected by atrial fibrillation.
The Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire will be filled in by patients.
Measured: 12 months.
Admittance to hospital or emergency services due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias.
Hospitalization after the procedre
Measured: 12 months.
The burden of atrial fibrillation
Total duration of atrial fibrillation recorded by 7-day Holter.
Measured: 12 months.
The occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and typical or atypical atrial flutter.
Atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter recorded by all types of ECG
Measured: 12 months.
Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation.
Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation documented
Measured: 12 months.
Serious adverse events.
Serious adverse events documented
Measured: 12 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2016
- Primary completionApr 2021
- Study completionMay 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Persistent Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Haukeland University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03008811
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016/27
- Acronym
- NO PERS-AF
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Camm AJ, Obel OA. Epidemiology and mechanism of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 17;78(8A):3-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00559-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 8903269Biblo LA, Yuan Z, Quan KJ, Mackall JA, Rimm AA. Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Feb 1;87(3):346-9, A9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01374-6.
PubMed 11165976Vidaillet H, Granada JF, Chyou Po, Maassen K, Ortiz M, Pulido JN, Sharma P, Smith PN, Hayes J. A population-based study of mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Am J Med. 2002 Oct 1;113(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01253-6.
PubMed 12401530Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):946-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946.
PubMed 9737513Wolf PA, Mitchell JB, Baker CS, Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB. Impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality, stroke, and medical costs. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 9;158(3):229-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.3.229.
PubMed 9472202Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, Josephson RA, Kellen JC, Klein RC, Krahn AD, Mickel M, Mitchell LB, Nelson JD, Rosenberg Y, Schron E, Shemanski L, Waldo AL, Wyse DG; AFFIRM Investigators. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12):1509-13. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121736.16643.11. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
PubMed 15007003Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
PubMed 9725923Verma A, Marrouche NF, Natale A. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation: intracardiac echocardiography-guided technique. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Nov;15(11):1335-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.04428.x.
PubMed 15574190Oral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, Hall B, Cheung P, Good E, Veerareddy S, Pelosi F Jr, Morady F. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation. Circulation. 2003 Nov 11;108(19):2355-60. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095796.45180.88. Epub 2003 Oct 13.
PubMed 14557355Saad EB, Rossillo A, Saad CP, Martin DO, Bhargava M, Erciyes D, Bash D, Williams-Andrews M, Beheiry S, Marrouche NF, Adams J, Pisano E, Fanelli R, Potenza D, Raviele A, Bonso A, Themistoclakis S, Brachmann J, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Natale A. Pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: functional characterization, evolution, and influence of the ablation strategy. Circulation. 2003 Dec 23;108(25):3102-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000104569.96907.7F. Epub 2003 Nov 17.
PubMed 14623799Pappone C, Rosanio S, Augello G, Gallus G, Vicedomini G, Mazzone P, Gulletta S, Gugliotta F, Pappone A, Santinelli V, Tortoriello V, Sala S, Zangrillo A, Crescenzi G, Benussi S, Alfieri O. Mortality, morbidity, and quality of life after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: outcomes from a controlled nonrandomized long-term study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jul 16;42(2):185-97. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00577-1.
PubMed 12875749Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Wazni O, Gillinov AM, Klein A, Bhargava M, Saad E, Bash D, Yamada H, Jaber W, Schweikert R, Tchou P, Abdul-Karim A, Saliba W, Natale A. Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact on outcome and complications. Circulation. 2003 Jun 3;107(21):2710-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070541.83326.15. Epub 2003 May 19.
PubMed 12756153Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Arentz T, Kalusche D, Takahashi A, Garrigue S, Hocini M, Peng JT, Clementy J. Catheter ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation targeting the reinitiating triggers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;11(1):2-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00727.x.
PubMed 10695453Ullah W, Hunter RJ, Haldar S, McLean A, Dhinoja M, Sporton S, Earley MJ, Lorgat F, Wong T, Schilling RJ. Comparison of robotic and manual persistent AF ablation using catheter contact force sensing: an international multicenter registry study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;37(11):1427-35. doi: 10.1111/pace.12501. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
PubMed 25220575Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.
PubMed 25946280
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Norwegian Randomized Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (NO PERS-AF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03008811
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NO PERS-AF / 2016/27
- Conditions
- Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway
- Study start
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.
Detailed description
The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with either the second generation cryoballoon (Arctic Front Advance™) or a radiofrequency ablation technique with an irrigated ablation catheter (TactiCath™ Quartz) . A total of 128 patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation will be randomized for either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation treatment. With both techniques, pulmonary vein isolation will be performed and confirmed by a circular mapping catheter. The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months.Treatment success will be evaluated by using 12-lead electrocardiography and 7-day Holter recording.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cryoballoon | Active comparator | Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter.Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. |
| Radiofrequency | Active comparator | Procedure: Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation catheter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients plan to undergo pulmonary vein isolation as the first procedure for symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (>7 days) and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (> 12 months, but ≤ 3 years) who are refractory to at least one class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug and required at least one electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion.
- Subject is at least 18 and ≤ 75 years old.
- Subject is able and willing to give informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subject has paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (< 7days) or persistent atrial fibrillation with duration > 3 years.
- Subject has any previous left atrial ablation procedure or surgery, including pulmonary vein isolation.
- Subject has presence of an intracavitary thrombus.
- Subject has uncontrolled heart failure.
- Subject has severe valvular disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter.Device: Arctic Front Advance™ cardiac cryoablation catheter system. | Procedure or surgery | Cryoballoon |
| Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.Device: TactiCath™ Quartz irrigated ablation catheter (St. Jude Medical) with aid of 3-D mapping system (EnSite Precision, St. Jude Medical). | Procedure or surgery | Radiofrequency |
Primary outcome
The freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint is freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months (at least one episode of atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration > 30 seconds documented by 7-day Holter ECG, or any other printed ECG recording).
10 secondary outcomes
Procedure duration
Time frame: 12 months
Fluoroscopy time
Time frame: 12 months
Ablation time
Time frame: 12 months
Quality of life - Short Form (SF-36) Heath Survey
Time frame: 12 months.
Quality of life affected by atrial fibrillation.
Time frame: 12 months.
Admittance to hospital or emergency services due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias.
Time frame: 12 months.
The burden of atrial fibrillation
Time frame: 12 months.
The occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and typical or atypical atrial flutter.
Time frame: 12 months.
Symptoms related to atrial fibrillation.
Time frame: 12 months.
Serious adverse events.
Time frame: 12 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 8903269Camm AJ, Obel OA. Epidemiology and mechanism of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Oct 17;78(8A):3-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00559-0. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11165976Biblo LA, Yuan Z, Quan KJ, Mackall JA, Rimm AA. Risk of stroke in patients with atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Feb 1;87(3):346-9, A9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01374-6.
- Background: PubMed 12401530Vidaillet H, Granada JF, Chyou Po, Maassen K, Ortiz M, Pulido JN, Sharma P, Smith PN, Hayes J. A population-based study of mortality among patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Am J Med. 2002 Oct 1;113(5):365-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01253-6.
- Background: PubMed 9737513Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1998 Sep 8;98(10):946-52. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.10.946.
- Background: PubMed 9472202Wolf PA, Mitchell JB, Baker CS, Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB. Impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality, stroke, and medical costs. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 9;158(3):229-34. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.3.229.
- Background: PubMed 15007003Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Geller N, Greene HL, Josephson RA, Kellen JC, Klein RC, Krahn AD, Mickel M, Mitchell LB, Nelson JD, Rosenberg Y, Schron E, Shemanski L, Waldo AL, Wyse DG; AFFIRM Investigators. Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation. 2004 Mar 30;109(12):1509-13. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121736.16643.11. Epub 2004 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 9725923Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
- Background: PubMed 15574190Verma A, Marrouche NF, Natale A. Pulmonary vein antrum isolation: intracardiac echocardiography-guided technique. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Nov;15(11):1335-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.04428.x.
- Background: PubMed 14557355Oral H, Scharf C, Chugh A, Hall B, Cheung P, Good E, Veerareddy S, Pelosi F Jr, Morady F. Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation. Circulation. 2003 Nov 11;108(19):2355-60. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095796.45180.88. Epub 2003 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 14623799Saad EB, Rossillo A, Saad CP, Martin DO, Bhargava M, Erciyes D, Bash D, Williams-Andrews M, Beheiry S, Marrouche NF, Adams J, Pisano E, Fanelli R, Potenza D, Raviele A, Bonso A, Themistoclakis S, Brachmann J, Saliba WI, Schweikert RA, Natale A. Pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: functional characterization, evolution, and influence of the ablation strategy. Circulation. 2003 Dec 23;108(25):3102-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000104569.96907.7F. Epub 2003 Nov 17.
- Background: PubMed 12875749Pappone C, Rosanio S, Augello G, Gallus G, Vicedomini G, Mazzone P, Gulletta S, Gugliotta F, Pappone A, Santinelli V, Tortoriello V, Sala S, Zangrillo A, Crescenzi G, Benussi S, Alfieri O. Mortality, morbidity, and quality of life after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: outcomes from a controlled nonrandomized long-term study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jul 16;42(2):185-97. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00577-1.
- Background: PubMed 12756153Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Wazni O, Gillinov AM, Klein A, Bhargava M, Saad E, Bash D, Yamada H, Jaber W, Schweikert R, Tchou P, Abdul-Karim A, Saliba W, Natale A. Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact on outcome and complications. Circulation. 2003 Jun 3;107(21):2710-6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000070541.83326.15. Epub 2003 May 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
CONVERGE Post-Approval Study (PAS)
Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
A Study of Dual Energy THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF Catheter With TRUPULSE™ Generator in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Standard Treatment for Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Without Hypertension
Atrial Fibrillation (Persistent), Catheter Ablation
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruiting
A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter and TRUPULSE Generator With VARIPULSE Pro Software in Participants With PAF or PsAF
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. and Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation. in people with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 3 sites in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The freedom of any atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03008811, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2021.