AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung CancerPCI2NCT03007953

Palliative Care Interventions for Outpatients Newly Diagnosed With Lung Cancer: Phase II

A study testing Palliative Care in people with Lung Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The focus of the study is to test a nurse-led telephone-based palliative care intervention on improving the delivery of care for patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. The study is a three site randomized control trial to determine the efficacy of the intervention on improving patients' quality of life, symptom… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Palliative Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
151 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
5 Dec 2016to 11 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed at the Puget Sound Health Care System, Birmingham VA, or Portland VA with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer that requires more than surgical resection:
  • diagnosed within 8 weeks of recruitment
  • must have telephone access
  • ability to understand English
  • able to participate in informed consent process

Who cannot join

  • Patients not eligible to participate in the study include those who are inpatients prior to randomization,
  • those who are under the care of palliative care or hospice at the time of randomization
  • those who have severe mental health disorders
  • those who are unable to speak directly with the nurse over the telephone
  • or those that have the inability to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-1927

  • VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

    Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532

Other trials in United States

About this study

The focus of the study is to test a nurse-led telephone-based palliative care intervention on improving the delivery of care for patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. The study is a three site randomized control trial to determine the efficacy of the intervention on improving patients' quality of life, symptom burden, and satisfaction of care. Additionally, the study will test an innovative care delivery model to improve patients' access to palliative care. The investigators will also determine the effect of the intervention on patient activation to discuss treatment preferences with their clinician and on clinician knowledge of patients' goals of care.

Read the detailed description

Patients meeting entry criteria will be randomized to the intervention arm, palliative care plus usual care, or the usual care arm. Patients randomized to the intervention arm will receive usual oncologic care and phone calls from a nurse. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline and at the end of the patients' primary cancer treatment. The study will be performed at the Puget Sound Health Care System, Birmingham VA and Portland VA. The investigators will recruit individuals (n=138) with lung cancer over 2.5 years. The primary objective is to determine the efficacy of the nurse-led telephone-based palliative intervention on improving patients' quality of life, symptom burden, and satisfaction of care. In addition, using validated instruments, the investigators will assess the effect of the intervention on patient activation to discuss treatment preferences with their clinician and on clinician knowledge of patients' goals of care. The results of this study will inform a future effectiveness/implementation study.

Conditions
Lung Cancer
Being tested
Palliative Care
Keywords
Palliative Care, Supportive Care
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Palliative CareBehavioural

    Also called Supportive Care

    Care delivered by a nurse, including symptom assessment and management, patient education on lung cancer and treatment options, discussion and communication about preferences for care, psychosocial assessment (including referrals to ancillary services), and patient-centered resources. A personalized treatment plan based on the patient's lung cancer stage, treatment, symptoms and psychosocial needs will be developed by the palliative care team (physician, study nurse) with input from the patient and family member. The study nurse will assess patient's symptoms, implement and monitor the treatment plan applying established End-of- Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC) for Veterans protocols.

Study groups in NCT03007953
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionExperimentalThis is a nurse-led telephone-based program integrating palliative care into usual oncologic care for patients diagnosed within 2 months of any type and stage of lung cancer, who will receive therapy other than solely surgical resection. The intervention lasts for the duration of patients' primary lung cancer treatment (usually 3-4 months).
Receives: Behavioral: Palliative Care
Usual CareNo interventionSubjects randomized to the usual care arm will receive medical oncology, radiation oncology, pulmonary, CT surgery, as indicated by the type and stage of cancer. At the completion of their primary lung cancer treatment, they will be disenrolled from the study.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Total Outcome Index Score at Final Visit

    Patient Quality of Life including symptoms as measured by the FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Scale). The FACT-L outcome measure reported is the mean change in the TOI subscale (Total Outcome Index) of the instrument, computed as the differences between final and baseline visit scores. The TOI subscale range is 0-84, with a higher score indicating a better quality of life. Among patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer, provision of a telephone-based palliative care intervention will be associated with a change in FACT-L TOI score. The investigators will assess the difference in FACT-L TOI scores between the intervention and control subjects.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 Months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change From Baseline in Patient Satisfaction of Care at Final Visit

    Patient satisfaction with care will be assessed by using the FAMCARE-Patient Survey 13 (full unabbreviated scale name). The FAMCARE is a 13 item, 5 point likert-scale validated questionnaire measuring patient satisfaction with cancer care and assessing interactions with health care providers, performance status and symptom burden. Only total score are reported (no subscales). Scores range from 13-65 with scores of 52 > being satisfied with care. In full randomized clinical trials the estimated MID is 5 points from baseline to 12 weeks. Among patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer, provision of a telephone-based palliative care intervention will be associated with a change in FAMCARE-P13 score. The investigators will assess the difference in FAMCARE-P13 scores between the intervention and control subjects.

    Measured: Baseline and 3 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jan 2017 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion11 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion11 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03007953
Sponsor's protocol ID
NRI 15-456
Acronym
PCI2
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
19 Dec 2016
Last updated
27 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Reinke LF, Meier DE. Research Priorities in Subspecialty Palliative Care: Policy Initiatives. J Palliat Med. 2017 Aug;20(8):813-820. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0303.

    PubMed 28777716
  • Aslakson RA, Reinke LF, Cox C, Kross EK, Benzo RP, Curtis JR. Developing a Research Agenda for Integrating Palliative Care into Critical Care and Pulmonary Practice To Improve Patient and Family Outcomes. J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):329-343. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0567.

    PubMed 28379812
  • Reinke LF, Vig EK, Tartaglione EV, Backhus LM, Gunnink E, Au DH. Protocol and pilot testing: The feasibility and acceptability of a nurse-led telephone-based palliative care intervention for patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jan;64:30-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 23. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29175560
  • Sullivan DR, Chan B, Lapidus JA, Ganzini L, Hansen L, Carney PA, Fromme EK, Marino M, Golden SE, Vranas KC, Slatore CG. Association of Early Palliative Care Use With Survival and Place of Death Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer Receiving Care in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1702-1709. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3105.

    PubMed 31536133
  • Sullivan DR, Ganzini L, Delorit MA, Slatore CG, Vranas KC, Golden SE, Hansen L. Transcending silos and building relationships: A qualitative study of palliative care use and integration in a national health system. [Abstract]. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2020 Nov 1; 201(B22):A2820.

  • Sullivan DR, Slatore CG, Stone K, Nugent S, Kern J, Farris M, Roszenweig K, Swanson S, J Wisnivesky JP. Associations between Treatment and Team Composition with Decisional Regret among Patients with Early Stage Lung Cancer. [Abstract]. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2020 Nov 1; 201(B22):A4726.

  • Vranas KC, Plinke W, Bourne D, Kansagara D, Lee RY, Kross EK, Slatore CG, Sullivan DR. The influence of POLST on treatment intensity at the end of life: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3661-3674. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17447. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

    PubMed 34549418
  • Hedstrom GH, Hooker ER, Howard M, Shull S, Golden SE, Deffebach ME, Gorman JD, Murphy K, Fabbrini A, Melzer AC, Slatore CG. The Chain of Adherence for Incidentally Detected Pulmonary Nodules after an Initial Radiologic Imaging Study: A Multisystem Observational Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1379-1389. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1220OC.

    PubMed 35167780

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Palliative Care in people with Lung Cancer, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Total Outcome Index Score at Final Visit (time frame: Baseline and 3 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03007953, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in