AzTrials
AzTrials

Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma NSCLCPhase 3NCT03003962

Study of Durvalumab Alone or Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer (PEARL)

A Phase 3 study testing Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Paclitaxel + carboplatin and Gemcitabine + cisplatin in people with Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma NSCLC, run by AstraZeneca at 92 sites in 12 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of durvalumab versus platinum-based SoC chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in patients who are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) wild-type and with… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 130 years
Conditions the study is for
Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma NSCLC
What is being tested?
Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Paclitaxel + carboplatin and Gemcitabine + cisplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
669 participants
Where
92 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
2 Jan 2017to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 130 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged at least 18 years
  • Documented evidence of Stage IV NSCLC
  • No sensitizing EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement
  • PD-L1 high expression
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1

Who cannot join

  • Prior chemotherapy or any other systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC
  • Prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy, including, but not limited to, other anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), anti-programmed cell death1 (PD-1), anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), or anti PD-L2 antibodies, excluding therapeutic anticancer vaccines
  • Brain metastases or spinal cord compression unless the patient is stable and off steroids for at least 14 days prior to start of study treatment
  • Mixed small-cell lung cancer and NSCLC histology, sarcomatoid variant
  • Active or prior documented autoimmune or inflammatory disorders (e.g., colitis or Crohn's disease]

Trial locations and contacts

92 sites in 12 countries.

92 sites in 12 countries

China34 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100032

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100142

  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100853

  • Research Site

    Bengbu, 233004

  • Research Site

    Changchun, 130000

  • Research Site

    Changsha, 410013

  • Research Site

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Research Site

    Chongqing, 400030

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, 510080

  • Research Site

    Guangzhou, 510095

  • Research Site

    Haikou, 570311

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310003

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310006

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310009

  • Research Site

    Hangzhou, 310022

  • Research Site

    Jinan, 250031

  • Research Site

    Linhai, 317000

  • Research Site

    Nanchang, 330006

  • Research Site

    Nanjing, 210009

  • Research Site

    Ningbo, 315010

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200030

  • Research Site

    Shenyang, 110042

  • Research Site

    Shijiazhuang, 050020

  • Research Site

    Ürümqi, 830000

  • Research Site

    Ürümqi, 830054

  • Research Site

    Wanzhou, 404000

  • Research Site

    Wenzhou, CN-325000

  • Research Site

    Wuhan, 430010

  • Research Site

    Wuhan, 430022

  • Research Site

    Wuhan, 430030

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, 710038

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, 710061

  • Research Site

    Zhengzhou, 450008

  • Research Site

    Zhuhai, 519099

Other trials in China

Russia11 sites
  • Research Site

    Arkhangelsk, 163045

  • Research Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Research Site

    Novosibirsk, 630108

  • Research Site

    Omsk, 644013

  • Research Site

    Rostov-on-Don, 344037

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 194291

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 196603

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197183

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197342

  • Research Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • Research Site

    Volgograd, 400138

Other trials in Russia

Hungary8 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1083

  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1121

  • Research Site

    Budapest, 1122

  • Research Site

    Deszk, 6772

  • Research Site

    Farkasgyepü, 8582

  • Research Site

    Gyöngyös - Mátraháza, 3200

  • Research Site

    Székesfehérvár, 8000

  • Research Site

    Törökbálint, 2045

Other trials in Hungary

Poland7 sites
  • Research Site

    Bialystok, 15-027

  • Research Site

    Grudziądz, 86-300

  • Research Site

    Koszalin, 75-581

  • Research Site

    Lublin, 20-090

  • Research Site

    Mrozy, 05-320

  • Research Site

    Warsaw, 02-781

  • Research Site

    Wroclaw, 53-413

Other trials in Poland

South Korea7 sites
  • Research Site

    Changwon-si, 51353

  • Research Site

    Cheongju-si, 28644

  • Research Site

    Daegu, 42415

  • Research Site

    Incheon, 21565

  • Research Site

    Jinju, 660-702

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 03722

  • Research Site

    Suwon, 16499

Other trials in South Korea

Vietnam6 sites
  • Research Site

    Can Tho, 900000

  • Research Site

    Hanoi, 100000

  • Research Site

    Hanoi, 10000

  • Research Site

    Ho Chi Minh City, 10000

  • Research Site

    Ho Chi Minh City, 700000

  • Research Site

    Ho Chi Minh City, 70000

Other trials in Vietnam

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Research Site

    Ankara, 06490

  • Research Site

    Istanbul, 34030

  • Research Site

    Istanbul, 34854

  • Research Site

    Malatya, 44100

  • Research Site

    Pamukkale, 20070

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Australia4 sites
  • Research Site

    Box Hill, 3128

  • Research Site

    Gosford, 2250

  • Research Site

    Kogarah, 2217

  • Research Site

    St Leonards, 2065

Other trials in Australia

Taiwan4 sites
  • Research Site

    Taichung, 402

  • Research Site

    Taichung, 40705

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 112

  • Research Site

    Taipei, 235

Other trials in Taiwan

Thailand4 sites
  • Research Site

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Research Site

    Bangkok, 10700

  • Research Site

    Muang, 50200

  • Research Site

    Songkhla, 90110

Other trials in Thailand

United States1 site
  • Research Site

    Anaheim, California, 92801

Other trials in United States

Netherlands1 site
  • Research Site

    Almelo, 7600SZ

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Versus Standard of Care (SoC) Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First Line Treatment in Patients With PD-L1-High Expression Advanced Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer

This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center Phase III study to determine the efficacy and safety of durvalumab versus platinum-based SoC chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC in patients who are epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) wild-type and with PD-L1 high expression (PEARL)

Read the detailed description

Patients with stage IV NSCLC will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment arms (durvalumab or SOC therapy). The dual primary objectives of this study are to assess the efficacy of durvalumab versus SoC in terms of OS (Overall Survival) in all randomized patients and in patients who are at low risk of EM (early mortality)

Being tested
Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Paclitaxel + carboplatin, Gemcitabine + cisplatin, Gemcitabine + carboplatin, Pemetrexed + cisplatin
Keywords
NSCLC, PD-L1, Durvalumab (MEDI4736), OS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Durvalumab (MEDI4736)Drug

    Anti-PD-L1 monoclonal Antibody monotherapy

  • Paclitaxel + carboplatinDrug

    Also called Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy Agents

  • Gemcitabine + cisplatinDrug

    Also called Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy Agents

  • Gemcitabine + carboplatinDrug

    Also called Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy Agents

  • Pemetrexed + cisplatinDrug

    Also called Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy Agent

  • Pemetrexed + carboplatinDrug

    Also called Platinum based Standard of Care Chemotherapy

    Chemotherapy Agent

Study groups in NCT03003962
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: DurvalumabExperimentalAnti-PD-L1 monoclonal Antibody monotherapy
Receives: Drug: Durvalumab (MEDI4736)
Arm 2: Standard of CareActive comparatorStandard of Care Platinum-Based chemotherapy
Receives: Drug: Paclitaxel + carboplatin; Drug: Gemcitabine + cisplatin; Drug: Gemcitabine + carboplatin; Drug: Pemetrexed + cisplatin; Drug: Pemetrexed + carboplatin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (date of death or censoring-date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From date of randomization until death due to any cause. Assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months [data cut-off (DCO) 27 October 2022]

  2. OS in Participants With LREM

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (date of death or censoring-date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From date of randomization until death due to any cause. Assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

Secondary outcomes (42)
  1. OS in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause (date of death or censoring-date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From date of randomization until death due to any cause. Assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  2. OS in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to ay cause (date of death or censoring-date of randomization + 1). Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive.

    Measured: From date of randomization until death due to any cause. Assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Investigator Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)

    The PFS (per RECIST 1.1) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death regardless of whether the participants withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression (i.e., date of PFS event or censoring - date of randomization +1). Progression of disease per RECIST 1.1, when either 1 of the criteria met: Target lesion (TL): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, for reference the smallest sum on study. In addition, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). Non-target lesion (NTL): Unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. It may be due to an important progression in 1 lesion only or in several lesions. In all cases the progression must be clinically significant for the physician to consider changing (or stopping) therapy. New lesions: the presence of 1 or more new lesions was assessed as progression.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months DCO 27 October 2022)

  4. PFS Based on Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 in LREM Analysis Set

    The PFS (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death regardless of whether the participants withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression (i.e., date of PFS event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  5. PFS Based on Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    The PFS (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death regardless of whether the participants withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression (i.e., date of PFS event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  6. PFS Based on Investigator Assessment According to RECIST 1.1 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    The PFS (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death regardless of whether the participants withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression (i.e., date of PFS event or censoring - date of randomization +1).

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  7. Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment

    ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs). Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs had a reduction in short axis to < 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, with reference the baseline sum of diameters if criteria for PD are not met.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  8. ORR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments)was defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed response of CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, with reference the baseline sum of diameters if criteria for PD are not met.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  9. ORR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed response of CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, with reference the baseline sum of diameters if criteria for PD are not met.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  10. ORR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    ORR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the percentage of participants with an unconfirmed response of CR or PR. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs had a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of TLs, with reference the baseline sum of diameters if criteria for PD are not met.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  11. Duration of Response (DoR) as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment

    DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  12. DoR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >=25% LREM Analysis Set

    DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  13. DoR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >=50% Analysis Set

    DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  14. DoR as Per RECIST 1.1 Using Investigator Assessment in PD-L1 TC >=50% LREM Analysis Set

    DoR (per RECIST 1.1 using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression (i.e. date of PFS event or censoring - date of first response + 1). DoR was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) every 6 weeks for the first 48 weeks relative to the date of randomization and then every 8 weeks thereafter until confirmed objective disease progression (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  15. Alive and Progression-Free at 12 Months (APF12)

    The APF12 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of percentage of participants alive and progression free at 12 months based on PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed using Investigator assessments) analysis.

    Measured: From date of randomization until 12 months

  16. APF12 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    The APF12 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of percentage of participants alive and progression free at 12 months based on PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed using Investigator assessments) analysis.

    Measured: From date of randomization until 12 months

  17. APF12 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    The APF12 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of percentage of participants alive and progression free at 12 months based on PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed using Investigator assessments) analysis.

    Measured: From date of randomization until 12 months

  18. APF12 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    The APF12 was defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of percentage of participants alive and progression free at 12 months based on PFS (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed using Investigator assessments) analysis.

    Measured: From date of randomization until 12 months

  19. Time From Randomization to Second Progression (PFS2)

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression events defined according to local clinical practice (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death (i.e., date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization + 1). PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) until confirmed objective disease progression. Disease then assessed as per local practice until 2nd progression or death (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  20. PFS2 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression events defined according to local clinical practice (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death (i.e., date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization + 1). PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) until confirmed objective disease progression. Disease then assessed as per local practice until 2nd progression or death (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  21. PFS2 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression events defined according to local clinical practice (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death (i.e., date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization + 1). PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) until confirmed objective disease progression. Disease then assessed as per local practice until 2nd progression or death (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  22. PFS2 in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression events defined according to local clinical practice (subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS) or death (i.e., date of PFS2 event or censoring - date of randomization + 1). PFS2 was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

    Measured: Tumor assessments (per RECIST 1.1) until confirmed objective disease progression. Disease then assessed as per local practice until 2nd progression or death (up to a maximum of approximately 69 months)

  23. OS at 18 Months

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 18 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 18 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 18 months.

  24. OS at 18 Months in PD-L1 TC > = 25% LREM Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 18 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 18 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 18 months

  25. OS at 18 Months in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 18 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 18 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 18 months

  26. OS at 18 Months in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 18 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 18 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 18 months

  27. OS at 24 Months

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 24 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 24 months

  28. OS at 24 Months in PD-L1 TC > = 25% LREM Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 24 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 24 months

  29. OS at 24 Months in PD-L1 TC >= 50% Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 24 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 24 months

  30. OS at 24 Months in PD-L1 TC >= 50% LREM Analysis Set

    OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause. Any participant not known to have died at the time of analysis was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. The percentage of participants alive at 24 months were defined as the Kaplan-Meier estimate of OS at 24 months.

    Measured: From date of randomization till 24 months

  31. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3 (QLQ-C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions that were combined to produce 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), 5 individual items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and a global measure of health status. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. An outcome variable consisted of a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health status and functioning scales indicate better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items represent greater symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomization. The mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of EORTC QLQ-C30 considered all data from baseline to PD or 12 months.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  32. Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions that were combined to produce 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), 5 individual items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and a global measure of health status. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. An outcome variable consisted of a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on the global health status and functioning scales indicate better health status/function, but higher scores on symptom scales/items represent greater symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomization. The MMRM analysis of EORTC QLQ-C30 considered all data from baseline to PD or 12 months.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  33. Time to Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-C30

    Time to symptom deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date if the first clinically meaningful deterioration (a decrease in the function scales or the global health status/ health-related quality of life [HRQoL] from baseline of ≥10) that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from the study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to symptom deterioration. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions that were combined to produce 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), 5 individual items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and a global measure of health status. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual.

    Measured: From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  34. Time to Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-C30 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    Time to symptom deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date if the first clinically meaningful deterioration a decrease in the function scales or the global health status/ HRQoL from baseline of ≥10) that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from the study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to symptom deterioration. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions that were combined to produce 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting), 5 individual items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and a global measure of health status. The EORTC QLQ-C30 was scored according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual.

    Measured: From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  35. Change From Baseline in EORTC 13-Item Lung Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-LC13)

    The QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC for lung cancer that comprised of 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and site-specific pain), treatment-related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication. An outcome variable consisted of a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on symptom scales represent greater symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomization. The MMRM analysis of EORTC QLQ-LC13 considered all data from baseline to PD or 12 months.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  36. Change From Baseline in EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    The QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC for lung cancer that comprised of 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and site-specific pain), treatment-related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication. An outcome variable consisted of a score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on symptom scales represent greater symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to randomization. The MMRM analysis of EORTC QLQ-LC13 considered all data from baseline to PD or 12 months.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 months

  37. Time to Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-LC13

    Time to symptom deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date if the first clinically meaningful symptom deterioration a decrease in the function scales or the global health status/ HRQoL from baseline of ≥10) that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from the study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to symptom deterioration. The QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC for lung cancer that comprised of 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and site-specific pain), treatment-related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication.

    Measured: From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, assessed up to maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  38. Time to Deterioration of EORTC QLQ-LC13 in PD-L1 TC >= 25% LREM Analysis Set

    Time to symptom deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date if the first clinically meaningful symptom deterioration a decrease in the function scales or the global health status/ HRQoL from baseline of ≥10) that was confirmed at a subsequent visit or death (by any cause) in the absence of a clinically meaningful symptom deterioration, regardless of whether the participant withdraws from the study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to symptom deterioration. The QLQ-LC13 is a lung cancer specific module from the EORTC for lung cancer that comprised of 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, and site-specific pain), treatment-related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia), and pain medication.

    Measured: From randomization until date of first symptom deterioration that is confirmed, assessed up to maximum of approximately 69 months (DCO 27 October 2022)

  39. Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

    ECOG performance status was assessed at the times specified based on the following and scored as 0: fully active: able to carry out all usual activities without restrictions. 1: Restricted in strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled; unable to carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair and 5: death. Data for only participants with restricted activity has been reported.

    Measured: From Baseline and until follow-up period of 57 months

  40. Number of Participants With ECOG Performance Status in PD-L1 TC >=25% LREM Analysis Set

    ECOG performance status was assessed at the times specified based on the following and scored as 0: fully active: able to carry out all usual activities without restrictions. 1: Restricted in strenuous activity, but ambulatory and able to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled; unable to carry out any self-care and totally confined to bed or chair and 5: death. Data for only participants with restricted activity has been reported.

    Measured: From Baseline and until follow-up period of 57 months

  41. Percentage of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Durvalumab

    Treatment-emergent ADA positive was defined as either treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following study drug administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at least 2 post-baseline assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive.

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks

  42. Percentage of Participants With ADA Response to Durvalumab in LREM Analysis Set

    Treatment-emergent ADA positive was defined as either treatment-induced or treatment-boosted ADA. Treatment-boosted ADA was defined as a baseline positive ADA titer that was boosted to a 4-fold or higher-level following study drug administration. Persistently positive was defined as positive at least 2 post-baseline assessments with at least 16 weeks between the first and last positive assessment or positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive was defined as having at least 1 post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of persistently positive.

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
669 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03003962
Sponsor's protocol ID
D419AC00002
Other IDs
2018-001375-21, 2018
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
15 Dec 2016
Last updated
11 Jun 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All request will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment: https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Durvalumab (MEDI4736), Paclitaxel + carboplatin and Gemcitabine + cisplatin in people with Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma NSCLC, run by AstraZeneca at 92 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 92 sites in China, Russia, Hungary, Poland, South Korea and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: From date of randomization until death due to any cause. Assessed up to a maximum of approximately 69 months [data cut-off (DCO) 27 October 2022]). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in