Arthritis Juvenile IdiopathicPhase 3NCT03000439
A Safety, Efficacy And Pharmacokinetics Study Of Tofacitinib In Pediatric Patients With sJIA
A Phase 3 study testing In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib in people with Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic, run by Pfizer at 52 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
A randomized withdrawal study in which responders to open-label treatment with tofacitinib will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to tofacitinib or placebo in a double-blind phase. In the double-blind phase "time to sJIA flare" will be evaluated as primary endpoint and subjects will be discontinued once they experience… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic
- What is being tested?
- In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 52 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- 10 May 2018to 27 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- active sJIA disease according to ILAR criteria before screening and at baseline (Day 1);
- Treatment with stable doses of methotrexate (MTX) ≤25 mg/week or ≤20 mg/m2/week, whichever is lower, is permitted;
- Treatment with a stable dose of oral prednisone ≤1 mg/kg/day up to a maximum of 30 mg/day, or equivalent, for at least 1 week before the first study drug dose is permitted.
Who cannot join
- Previous juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment with tofacitinib.
- Current symptoms or findings of myocarditis, endocarditis or more than minimal pericardial effusion associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Current symptoms or findings of more than minimal pleuritis with sJIA.
- Current infection or serious infection within 3 months of study enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
52 sites in 19 countries.
52 sites in 19 countries
China9 sites
Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University/Rheumatology Department
Beijing, 100045
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410011
Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610073
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 401122
Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510623
The Children's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310057
Children's Hospital of Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215003
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030
Xi'an Children's Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710003
United States5 sites
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York
New Hyde Park, New York, 11040
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Brazil5 sites
Faculdade de Medicina da UNESP
Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-686
UPECLIN Unidade de Pesquisa Clinica da Faculdade de Medicina da UNESP
Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-970
SPDM - Associacao Paulista para o Desenvolvimento da Medicina
São Paulo, 04024-002
SPDM - Associacao Paulista para o Desenvolvimento da Medicina
São Paulo, 04037-002
Instituto da Crianca do Hospital das Clinicas da FMUSP
São Paulo, 05409-011
India4 sites
Institute of Child Health
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700017
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research & SSKM Hospital
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700020
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital
Rajinder Nagar, NEW Delhi, 110060
Nirmal Hospital Pvt Ltd
Surat, Gujarat, 395002
Ukraine4 sites
Communal Institution "Dnipropetrovsk Specialized Clinical Medical Center of Mother and Child n.a.
Dnipro, 49006
Municipal non-Profit Enterprise
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76014
CNE of Lviv Regional Council "Western Ukrainian Specialized Pediatric
Lviv, 79035
Vinnytsia Regional Children's Clinical Hospital
Vinnytsia, 21000
Mexico3 sites
Clínica de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Obesidad, S.C.
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44650
Hospital Universitario "Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez"
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatologia e Investigacion del Potosi, S.C.
San Luis Potosí City, 78213
Argentina2 sites
Instituto CAICI SRL
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000PBJ
Centro Medico Privado de Reumatologia
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL
Canada2 sites
Alberta Children's Hospital/University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8
Research Institute of McGill University Health Center, Glen site
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Germany2 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054
St. Josef-Stift Sendenhorst
Sendenhorst, 48324
Israel2 sites
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, 3109601
Meir Medical Center - Pediatric Clinic
Kfar Saba, 4428164
Italy2 sites
Istituto Giannina Gaslini Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
Genova, Genoa, 16147
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, Milan, 20122
Russia2 sites
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Scientific and Research Rheumatology
Moscow, 115522
Clinic of FSBEI HE BSMU MoH RF
Ufa, Bashkortostan Republic, 450083
South Africa2 sites
Panorama Medical Centre
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7500
Enhancing Care Foundation
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4302
Spain2 sites
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06100
Istanbul Goztepe Prof. Dr. Suleyman Yalcin City Hospital Department of Pediatric Rheumatology
Kadikoy / Istanbul, 34722
Poland1 site
Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji im prof dr hab med Eleonory Reicher
Warsaw, 02-637
About this study
Official title: EFFICACY, SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF TOFACITINIB FOR TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS (SJIA) WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC FEATURES IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT SUBJECTS
A randomized withdrawal study in which responders to open-label treatment with tofacitinib will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to tofacitinib or placebo in a double-blind phase. In the double-blind phase "time to sJIA flare" will be evaluated as primary endpoint and subjects will be discontinued once they experience sJIA flare. An interim analysis for efficacy and futility will be conducted when at least 20 flares have been observed. If either criterion is met, the study will be stopped. If neither criterion is met, the study will continue until the requisite number of flares are observed as determined by the number of flares included in the interim analysis and a statistical penalty for conducting the interim analysis.
- Conditions
- Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic
- Being tested
- In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib, In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratio
- Keywords
- systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Xeljanz, Tofacitinib, sJIA, CP-690 550
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Juvenile
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinibDrug
Also called CP-690,550, Xeljanz
Treatment with investigational drug
In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratioDrug
Also called CP-690,550, Xeljanz
Treatment with investigational drug or placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Experimental | oral, twice daily, tablet or solution. Receives: Drug: In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib; Drug: In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratio |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratio |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) Disease Flare: Double-Blind Phase
Time to the disease flare=the number of days from randomization to flare in the DB phase and calculated as date of disease flare minus (-) date of randomization plus (+) 1. sJIA Flare=as at least one of the following criteria: Recurrence of fever >38 degree Celsius (C)/100.4 degree Fahrenheit (F) on 2 or more consecutive days) was considered due to SJIA activity. Worsening of 30 percent (%) or more in three or more of the six variables included: Number of joints with active arthritis and limited range of motion, disease activity, parent child evaluation of overall well-being, functional ability, childhood health assessment questionnaire ( CHAQ disability index), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) millimeter/ hour (mm/hr), of the JIA core set with no more than one variable of the JIA core set improving by 30% compared to the day of randomization into the withdrawal phase. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) based on Brookmeyer and Crowley Method.
Measured: From randomization up to 248 weeks
Secondary outcomes (64)
Probability of Occurrence of sJIA Disease Flare at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52: Double-Blind Phase
sJIA Flare was defined as at least one of the following criteria: recurrence of fever (>38° C/100.4 degree F) on 2 or more consecutive days) was considered due to SJIA activity. Worsening of 30% or more in three or more of the six variables: number of joints with active arthritis and limited range of motion, disease activity, parent child evaluation of overall well-being, functional ability (CHAQ Disability Index), ESR. of the JIA core set with no more than one variable of the JIA core set improving by 30% compared to the day of randomization into the withdrawal phase. Probability of occurrence of sJIA disease flare with 95% CI were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Successful Corticosteroid Tapering: at the End of Open-label Phase Part 2
A successfully tapered participant was considered as the one that completed part 2 of the OL by reaching their target corticosteroid dose and maintained an adapted JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30 response for four weeks on this dose. The target CS dose at the end of part 2 included less than equal to (<=) 0.5 milligram/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day) up to a maximum dose of 15 milligram/ day (mg/day) oral prednisone (or equivalent) for CS>0.8 mg/kg/day oral prednisone; reduction to <=0.3 mg/kg/day up to a maximum of 12 mg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent) for CS <=0.8 mg/kg/day to greater than equal to (>=) 0.5 mg/kg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent) and <=0.2 mg/kg/day up to a maximum dose of 10 mg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent) for CS <0.5 mg/kg/day-CS˃0.2 mg/kg/day oral prednisone (or equivalent). 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: From end of OL Part 1 to up to 24 weeks in OL Part 2
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Corticosteroid Dose of <= 0.2 mg/kg/Day or 10 mg/Day: at the End of Open-label Phase Part 2
95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: From end of OL Part 1 to up to 24 weeks in OL Part 2
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA ACR 30/50/70/90/100 Response at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Adapted JIA ACR 30,50,70,90,100 response=absence of fever due to sJIA in preceding 7 days along with improvement of >=30,50,70,90,100%, respectively in at least 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 JIA core set variable worsening by >=30%.Variables included: number of joints with active arthritis(any joint with swelling, or absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness);number of joints with limited range of motion; physician global evaluation of disease activity on VAS from 0=no disease activity to 10=very severe disease activity, higher scores:greater disease activity; parent/legal guardian/child evaluation of overall well-being on VAS from 0=very well to 10mm=very poor, higher scores: worsen condition; functional ability (Disability Index ranged from 0=no or minimal physical dysfunction, 3=very severe physical dysfunction, higher scores:more physical dysfunction;ESR (mm/hr).Missing response was imputed as non-response.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30/50/70/90/100 Response at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Adapted JIA ACR 30,50,70,90,100 response=absence of fever due to sJIA in preceding 7 days along with improvement of >=30,50,70,90,100%, respectively in at least 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 JIA core set variable worsening by >=30%.Variables included: number of joints with active arthritis(any joint with swelling, or absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness);number of joints with limited range of motion; physician global evaluation of disease activity on VAS from 0=no disease activity to 10=very severe disease activity, higher scores: greater disease activity; parent/legal guardian/child evaluation of overall well-being on VAS from 0=very well to 10mm=very poor, higher scores: worsen condition; functional ability (Disability Index ranged from 0=no or minimal physical dysfunction, 3=very severe physical dysfunction, higher scores: more physical dysfunction; ESR (mm/hr).
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA ACR 30/50/70/90/100 Response at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24: Open-label Phase Part 2
Adapted JIA ACR 30,50,70,90,100 response=absence of fever due to sJIA in preceding 7 days along with improvement of >=30,50,70,90,100%, respectively in at least 3 out of 6 JIA core set variables with no more than 1 JIA core set variable worsening by >=30%.Variables included: number of joints with active arthritis(any joint with swelling, or absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by either pain on motion or tenderness);number of joints with limited range of motion; physician global evaluation of disease activity on VAS from 0=no disease activity to 10=very severe disease activity, higher scores: greater disease activity; parent/legal guardian/child evaluation of overall well-being on VAS from 0=very well to 10mm=very poor, higher scores: worsen condition; functional ability (Disability Index ranged from 0=no or minimal physical dysfunction, 3=very severe physical dysfunction, higher scores: more physical dysfunction; ESR (mm/hr).
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Fever Attributed to sJIA at Part 1 Days 3, 7 and 14: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Fever was defined as an oral temperature of ˃38 degree Celsius/100.4 degree Fahrenheit. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: Part 1 Days 3, 7 and 14
Percentage of Participants With C-Reactive Protein (CRP) <= 10 mg/L at Baseline, Part 1 Days 3, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Percentage of participants with CRP <= 10 milligrams per liter (mg/L) along with 95% CI based on normal approximation is reported in this outcome.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of study treatment), Part 1 Days 3, 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percentage of Participants With C-Reactive Protein (CRP) <= 10 mg/L at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-label Phase Part 2
Percentage of participants with CRP <= 10 mg/L along with 95% CI based on normal approximation is reported in this outcome.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
Percentage of participants with absence of fever along with 95% CI based on normal approximation is reported in this outcome.
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Percentage of participants with absence of fever along with 95% CI based on normal approximation is reported in this outcome.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52: Double Blind Phase
Percentage of participants with absence of fever due sJIA is reported in this outcome. Missing response was imputed as non-response.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time to First Adapted JIA ACR 30 Response: Open-label Phase Part 1
Time to the first adapted JIA ACR 30 response was measured in number of days since Day 1 (day of adapted JIA ACR 30 response - Day 1 + 1) in the OL Phase Part 1. Participants that did not achieve an adapted JIA ACR30 response defined as absence of fever due to sJIA [temperature =<38 degree Celsius/100.4 degree F in the preceding 7 days along with an improvement of at least 30% from baseline (Day 1 of study drug before first tofacitinib administration) in at least 3 of the 6 JIA core components, with worsening of >=30 in no more than 1 of the remaining components, which in Part 1 (withdrew from the study) were censored at their last available response assessment in Part 1. 95% CI was based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley Method.
Measured: From Day 1 up to 16 weeks
Change From Open Label Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score was determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ) assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor], ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was determined based on four components: physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor]), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 ESR at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score was determined based on four components: physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor]), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was determined based on four components: physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor]), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in JADAS-27 ESR at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score was determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ) (assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor]), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: DB Baseline (at randomization on Day 1 in DB phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score was determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 [very well] to 10 [very poor]), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57. A higher score indicated more disease activity.
Measured: DB Baseline (at randomization on Day 1 in DB phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
The ACR defined a joint with active arthritis as a joint with swelling or, in the absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by pain on motion, or tenderness.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
The ACR defined a joint with active arthritis as a joint with swelling or, in the absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by pain on motion, or tenderness.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Limitation of motion were assessed in the following joints: Temporomandibular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP I-V), proximal interphalangeal (PIP I-V), distal interphalangeal (II-V), hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joints, intertarsal joints, metatarsophalangeal (MTP I-V), toe interphalangeal (I-V), cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Limitation of motion were assessed in the following joints: Temporomandibular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP I-V), proximal interphalangeal (PIP I-V), distal interphalangeal (II-V), hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joints, intertarsal joints, metatarsophalangeal (MTP I-V), Toe interphalangeal (I-V), cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was assessed on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity. Where higher scores indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was assessed on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximum disease activity. Where higher scores indicated more disease activity.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
ESR was determined using an ESR testing kit.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
ESR was determined using an ESR testing kit.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ- Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at Part 1 Days 3, 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
The CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall well-being. For assessment of overall well-being, the parent/legal guardian/participant were required to rate the overall well-being by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), on a 21-circle VAS where '0= very well and 10=very poorly. Where higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Days 3,7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ - Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
The CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall well-being. For assessment of overall well-being, the parent/legal guardian/participant were required to rate the overall well-being by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), on a 21-circle VAS where '0=Very Well and 10=Very Poorly. Where higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ - Disability Index at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall Well-being. CHAQ disability index consisted of 30 items in 8 areas: 1. dressing and grooming, 2. arising, 3. eating, 4. walking, 5. hygiene, 6. reach, 7. grip, and 8. activities distributed. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, scored from 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The eight areas of the CHAQ were averaged to calculate the total disability index score which ranged from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction), higher scores indicated more disability. A participant must have score for at least six of the eight areas, otherwise a CHAQ-DI score was not valid.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall well-being. CHAQ disability index consisted of 30 items in 8 areas, 1. dressing and grooming, 2. arising, 3. eating, 4. walking, 5. hygiene, 6. reach, 7. grip, and 8. activities distributed. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, scored from 0 (no difficulty) to-3 (unable to do). The eight areas of the CHAQ were averaged to calculate the total disability index score which ranged from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction), higher scores indicated more disability. A participant must have score for at least six of the eight areas, otherwise a CHAQ-DI score was not valid.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The ACR defined a joint with active arthritis as a joint with swelling or, in the absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by pain on motion, or tenderness.
Measured: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The ACR defined a joint with active arthritis as a joint with swelling or, in the absence of swelling, limitation of motion accompanied by pain on motion, or tenderness.
Measured: DB Baseline (randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The parents were asked to provide responses to questions designed to assessed function in 8 distributed, among a total of 30 items. Each question was rated on a four-point scale, scored from 0-3. The question with the highest score determined the score for the functional area. If aids or devices were used or assistance was required, the minimum score for that was 2. Each question was rated 0 for no difficulty, 1 for some difficulties, 2 for much difficulties, and 3 for unable to do. The 8 areas of the CHAQ were averaged to calculated disability index which was ranges from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction). A participant must have score for at least 6 of the 8 categories, otherwise a CHAQ-DI score was not valid.
Measured: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double Blind Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The parents were asked to provide responses to questions designed to assessed function in 8 distributed, among a total of 30 items. Each question was rated on a four-point scale, scored from 0-3. The question with the highest score determined the score for the functional area. If aids or devices were used or assistance was required, the minimum score for that was 2. Each question was rated 0 for no difficulty, 1 for some difficulties, 2 for much difficulties, and 3 for unable to do. The 8 areas of the CHAQ were averaged to calculated disability index which was ranges from 0 (no or minimal physical dysfunction) to 3 (very severe physical dysfunction). A participant must have score for at least 6 of the 8 categories, otherwise a CHAQ-DI score was not valid.
Measured: DB Baseline (randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Limitation of motion were assessed in the following joints: Temporomandibular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP I-V), proximal interphalangeal (PIP I-V), distal interphalangeal (II-V), hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joints, intertarsal joints, metatarsophalangeal (MTP I-V), toe interphalangeal (I-V), cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine.
Measured: OL baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Limitation of motion were assessed in the following joints: Temporomandibular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP I-V), proximal interphalangeal (PIP I-V), distal interphalangeal (II-V), hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joints, intertarsal joints, metatarsophalangeal (MTP I-V), toe interphalangeal (I-V), cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine.
Measured: DB Baseline (values at randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was assessed on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no disease activity and 10=maximum disease activity, where higher scores indicated more disease activity.
Measured: OL label Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Physician global evaluation of disease activity was assessed on a 21-numbered circle VAS ranging from 0 to 10, where 0= no disease activity and 10=maximum disease activity, where higher scores indicated more disease activity.
Measured: DB label Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
ESR was determined using an ESR testing kit.
Measured: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in ESR at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
ESR was determined using an ESR testing kit.
Measured: DB Baseline (values at randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ -Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall well-being. For assessment of overall well-being, the parent/legal guardian/participant were required to rate the overall well-being by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), on a 21-circle VAS where '0'= very well' and '10= very poorly, where higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: OL label Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in CHAQ -Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The CHAQ, derived from the adult health assessment questionnaire, comprised of two indices disability and discomfort, and parent global assessment of overall well-being. For assessment of overall well-being, the parent/legal guardian/participant were required to rate the overall well-being by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), on a 21-circle VAS where '0'= very well' and '10=very poorly.
Measured: DB Baseline (value at randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ) Responses at End of Open-Label Phase Part 1
The CHQ is a validated general pediatric quality of life instrument. The CHQ assessed for 14 physical and psychosocial domains: general health perceptions (global health perception), physical functioning, role/social physical functioning, bodily pain, role/social emotional functioning, role/social behavioral functioning, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-time, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-emotional, self-esteem, mental health, behavior, family activities, family cohesion, and change in health. The response options for the CHQ are ordinal scales that vary by the item. Each item consisted of 4-6 response options. The CHQ score was determined based on the parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver's questionnaire responses. Range on subscales and the overall scale is 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible health state and 100 the best possible health state.
Measured: OL Baseline up to 16 weeks
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHQ Responses at End of Open-Label Phase Part 2
The CHQ is a validated general pediatric quality of life instrument. The CHQ assessed for 14 physical and psychosocial domains: general health perceptions (global health perception), physical functioning, role/social physical functioning, bodily pain, role/social emotional functioning, role/social behavioral functioning, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-time, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-emotional, self-esteem, mental health, behavior, family activities, family cohesion, and change in health. The response options for the CHQ are ordinal scales that vary by the item. Each item consisted of 4-6 response options. The CHQ score was determined based on the parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver's questionnaire responses. Range on subscales and the overall scale is 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible health state and 100 the best possible health state.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase) up to 24 weeks
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in CHQ Responses at DB Weeks 24, 48: Double-Blind Phase
The CHQ is a validated general pediatric quality of life instrument. The CHQ assessed for 14 physical and psychosocial domains: general health perceptions (global health perception), physical functioning, role/social physical functioning, bodily pain, role/social emotional functioning, role/social behavioral functioning, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-time, parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver impact-emotional, self-esteem, mental health, behavior, family activities, family cohesion, and change in health. The response options for the CHQ are ordinal scales that vary by the item. Each item consisted of 4-6 response options. The CHQ score was determined based on the parent/legal guardian/adult caregiver's questionnaire responses. Range on subscales and the overall scale is 0 to 100, where 0 is the worst possible health state and 100 the best possible health state.
Measured: DB Baseline (values at randomization), DB Weeks 24, 48
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ-Discomfort Index at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
For the assessment of discomfort, the parent/legal guardian or adult caregiver who interacted daily with the participant were required to rate the overall pain the participant had due to illness by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'no pain' and '10' as 'very severe pain' on a 21-circle VAS, where higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase) Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-label Baseline in CHAQ-Discomfort Index at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
For the assessment of discomfort, the parent/legal guardian or adult caregiver who interacted daily with the participant were required to rate the overall pain the participant had due to illness by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'no pain' and '10' as 'very severe pain' on a 21-circle VAS, where higher scores indicated more pain.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase) Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in CHAQ-Discomfort Index at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
For the assessment of discomfort, the parent/legal guardian or adult caregiver who interacted daily with the participant were required to rate the overall pain the participant had due to illness by entering a number from 0 to 10 (in 0.5 increments), with '0' as 'no pain' and '10' as 'very severe pain' on a 21-circle VAS, where higher scores indicated more severe pain.
Measured: DB Baseline (value at randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=2.
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=2.
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=2.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=2.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. Score were determined based on four components:Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores:more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27,where higher scores:more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57,where higher scores:more disease activity.Inactive disease activity based on JADAS-27 CRP score was defined as: For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of:<=1.For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=1.
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. Score were determined based on four components:physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity);parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores:more inflammation and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores:more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores:more disease activity. Inactive Disease activity based on JADAS-27 ESR score was defined as for participants with polyarthritis(>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of:<=1. For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=1.
Measured: Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA.Score were determined based on four components:physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity);parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores: more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27,where higher scores:more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57,where higher scores: more disease activity.Inactive disease activity based on JADAS-27 CRP score was defined as: For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of:<=1.For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=1.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. Score were determined based on four components:physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity);parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores:more inflammation and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores:more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores:more disease activity. Inactive Disease activity based on JADAS-27 ESR score was defined as for participants with polyarthritis(>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of:<=1. For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=1.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 CRP score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=2.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With Minimum Disease Activity Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. JADAS-27 ESR score were determined based on four components: Physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores indicated more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicated more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores indicated more disease activity. For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of: <= 3.8. For participants with oligoarthritis (<= 4 active joints) minimal disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=2.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 CRP Score at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA.Score were determined based on four components:physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity); parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor),CRP (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores:more inflammation) and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores:more disease activity).The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores:more disease activity. Inactive disease activity based on JADAS-27 CRP score was defined as: For participants with polyarthritis (>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of:<=1.For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 CRP score of <=1.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease Status Calculated From JADAS-27 ESR Score at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
JADAS-27 is a validated composite disease activity measure for JIA. Score were determined based on four components:physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on a VAS of 0 (no activity) to 10 (maximum activity);parent/legal guardian global assessment of well-being (from the CHAQ assessed on a VAS of 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor), ESR (value normalized to 0 to 10 scale, where higher scores:more inflammation and number of joints with active disease (27 joint assessment ranging from 0 to 27, where higher scores:more disease activity). The overall JADAS-27 score was sum of the 4 components and it ranged from 0 to 57, where higher scores:more disease activity. Inactive Disease activity based on JADAS-27 ESR score was defined as for participants with polyarthritis(>4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of:<=1. For participants with oligoarthritis (<=4 active joints) inactive disease activity was defined as a JADAS-27 ESR score of <=1.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR Inactive Disease Status at Part 1 Days 3, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
The ACR clinical inactive disease was defined as follows: no joints with active arthritis; no fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA; no active uveitis; normal ESR (within normal limits of the method used where tested) or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA; physician global assessment of disease activity score of 'best possible' on the 21-numbered circle VAS scale used (VAS from 0 to 10), higher scores indicated more disease activity; duration of morning stiffness of <=15 minutes. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase) Part 1 Days 3, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR Inactive Disease Status at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
The ACR clinical inactive disease was defined as follows: no joints with active arthritis; no fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA; no active uveitis; normal ESR (within normal limits of the method used where tested) or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA; physician global assessment of disease activity score of 'best possible' on the 21-numbered circle VAS scale used (VAS from 0 to 10), higher scores indicated more disease activity; duration of morning stiffness of <=15 minutes. 95% CI was based on normal approximation. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With JIA ACR Inactive Disease Status at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
The ACR clinical inactive disease was defined as follows: no joints with active arthritis; no fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to sJIA; no active uveitis; normal ESR (within normal limits of the method used where tested) or, if elevated, not attributable to JIA; physician global assessment of disease activity score of 'best possible' on the 21-numbered circle VAS scale used (VAS from 0 to 10), higher scores indicated more disease activity; duration of morning stiffness of <=15 minutes. 95% CI was based on normal approximation. 95% CI was based on normal approximation.
Measured: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start10 May 2018
- Primary completion27 Mar 2024
- Study completion27 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthritis Juvenile IdiopathicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03000439
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921165
- Other IDs
- 2017-002018-29, 2017
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EFFICACY, SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF TOFACITINIB FOR TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS (SJIA) WITH ACTIVE SYSTEMIC FEATURES IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENT SUBJECTS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03000439
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921165
- Conditions
- Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic
- Keywords
- systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Xeljanz, Tofacitinib, sJIA, CP-690 550
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized withdrawal study in which responders to open-label treatment with tofacitinib will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to tofacitinib or placebo in a double-blind phase. In the double-blind phase "time to sJIA flare" will be evaluated as primary endpoint and subjects will be discontinued once they experience sJIA flare. An interim analysis for efficacy and futility will be conducted when at least 20 flares have been observed. If either criterion is met, the study will be stopped. If neither criterion is met, the study will continue until the requisite number of flares are observed as determined by the number of flares included in the interim analysis and a statistical penalty for conducting the interim analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tofacitinib 5 mg BID | Experimental | Drug: In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib, Drug: In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratiooral, twice daily, tablet or solution. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratio |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- active sJIA disease according to ILAR criteria before screening and at baseline (Day 1);
- Treatment with stable doses of methotrexate (MTX) ≤25 mg/week or ≤20 mg/m2/week, whichever is lower, is permitted;
- Treatment with a stable dose of oral prednisone ≤1 mg/kg/day up to a maximum of 30 mg/day, or equivalent, for at least 1 week before the first study drug dose is permitted.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment with tofacitinib.
- Current symptoms or findings of myocarditis, endocarditis or more than minimal pericardial effusion associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Current symptoms or findings of more than minimal pleuritis with sJIA.
- Current infection or serious infection within 3 months of study enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinibAlso: CP-690,550, XeljanzTreatment with investigational drug | Drug | Tofacitinib 5 mg BID |
| In double-blind phase: treatment with tofacitinib or placebo in 1:1 ratioAlso: CP-690,550, XeljanzTreatment with investigational drug or placebo | Drug | Placebo, Tofacitinib 5 mg BID |
Primary outcome
Time to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) Disease Flare: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: From randomization up to 248 weeks
Time to the disease flare=the number of days from randomization to flare in the DB phase and calculated as date of disease flare minus (-) date of randomization plus (+) 1. sJIA Flare=as at least one of the following criteria: Recurrence of fever >38 degree Celsius (C)/100.4 degree Fahrenheit (F) on 2 or more consecutive days) was considered due to SJIA activity. Worsening of 30 percent (%) or more in three or more of the six variables included: Number of joints with active arthritis and limited range of motion, disease activity, parent child evaluation of overall well-being, functional ability, childhood health assessment questionnaire ( CHAQ disability index), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) millimeter/ hour (mm/hr), of the JIA core set with no more than one variable of the JIA core set improving by 30% compared to the day of randomization into the withdrawal phase. 95% Confidence Interval (CI) based on Brookmeyer and Crowley Method.
64 secondary outcomes
Probability of Occurrence of sJIA Disease Flare at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Successful Corticosteroid Tapering: at the End of Open-label Phase Part 2
Time frame: From end of OL Part 1 to up to 24 weeks in OL Part 2
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Corticosteroid Dose of <= 0.2 mg/kg/Day or 10 mg/Day: at the End of Open-label Phase Part 2
Time frame: From end of OL Part 1 to up to 24 weeks in OL Part 2
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA ACR 30/50/70/90/100 Response at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 30/50/70/90/100 Response at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Percentage of Participants With Adapted JIA ACR 30/50/70/90/100 Response at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24: Open-label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Fever Attributed to sJIA at Part 1 Days 3, 7 and 14: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Part 1 Days 3, 7 and 14
Percentage of Participants With C-Reactive Protein (CRP) <= 10 mg/L at Baseline, Part 1 Days 3, 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of study treatment), Part 1 Days 3, 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percentage of Participants With C-Reactive Protein (CRP) <= 10 mg/L at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Absence of Fever Due to sJIA at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52: Double Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Time to First Adapted JIA ACR 30 Response: Open-label Phase Part 1
Time frame: From Day 1 up to 16 weeks
Change From Open Label Baseline in Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27) Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 ESR at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in JADAS-27 ESR at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Baseline (at randomization on Day 1 in DB phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in JADAS-27 CRP at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Baseline (at randomization on Day 1 in DB phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ- Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at Part 1 Days 3, 7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Days 3,7, Part 1 Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ - Parental Evaluation of Overall Well-being at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ - Disability Index at Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16: Open-Label Phase Part 1
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 1 Day 7, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24: Open-Label Phase Part 2
Time frame: Baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), Part 2 Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Active Arthritis at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Baseline (randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double Blind Baseline in CHAQ-Disability Index at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Baseline (randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: OL baseline (last value collected prior to day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Number of Joints With Limited Range of Motion at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB Baseline (values at randomization), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: OL label Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Double-Blind Baseline in Physician Global Evaluation of Disease Activity at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: DB label Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Change From Open-Label Baseline in ESR at DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52: Double-Blind Phase
Time frame: OL Baseline (last value collected prior to Day 1 of tofacitinib administration in OL phase), DB Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Baricitinib in Participants From 1 Year to Less Than 18 Years Old With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Recruiting
The Use of Infrared Cameras for Detecting Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Infrared Thermography
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Withdrawal Versus Continued TNF Inhibitor Monotherapy Treatment in Children With Inactive Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
RecruitingObservational study
Tofacitinib in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)
RecruitingPhase 3
An Open-label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Bimekizumab in Pediatric Study Participants With Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Subtypes Enthesitis-related Arthritis (Including Juvenile-onset Ankylosing Spondylitis) and Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Enthesitis-related Arthritis, Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
52 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing In open-label phase: treatment with tofacitinib in people with Arthritis Juvenile Idiopathic, run by Pfizer at 52 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 52 sites in China, United States, Brazil, India, Ukraine and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) Disease Flare: Double-Blind Phase (time frame: From randomization up to 248 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2025.