ANCA-Associated VasculitisPhase 3ADVOCATENCT02994927
A Phase 3 Clinical Trial of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
A Phase 3 study testing Avacopan, Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide in people with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis, run by Amgen at 198 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
- What is being tested?
- Avacopan, Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 331 participants
- Where
- 198 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2017to 1 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) or microscopic polyangiitis
- Male and female subjects, aged at least 18 years, with newly-diagnosed or relapsed associated vasculitis (AAV) where treatment with cyclophosphamide or rituximab is needed; where approved by Regulatory Agencies, adolescents (12-17 year old) may be enrolled
- Use of adequate contraception
- Positive test for anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) or anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO)
- At least 1 major item, or at least 3 non-major items, or at least the 2 renal items of proteinuria and hematuria on Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 mL/minute/1.73 m^2 at screening
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Alveolar hemorrhage requiring pulmonary ventilation support at screening
- Any other known multi-system autoimmune disease
- Required dialysis or plasma exchange within 12 weeks prior to screening
- Have a kidney transplant
- Received cyclophosphamide within 12 weeks prior to screening; if on azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or methotrexate at the time of screening, these drugs must be withdrawn prior to receiving the cyclophosphamide or rituximab dose on Day 1
Show all 11Show fewer
- Received intravenous glucocorticoids, >3000 mg methylprednisolone equivalent, within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Have been taking an oral daily dose of a glucocorticoid of more than 10 mg prednisone-equivalent for more than 6 weeks continuously prior to screening
- Received rituximab or other B-cell antibody within 52 weeks of screening or 26 weeks provided B cell reconstitution has occurred (i.e., CD19 count > 0.01x10^9/L); received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment, abatacept, alemtuzumab, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), belimumab, tocilizumab, or eculizumab within 12 weeks prior to screening
- For patients scheduled to receive cyclophosphamide treatment, urinary outflow obstruction, active infection (especially varicella zoster infection), or platelet count <50,000/μL before start of dosing
- Participated previously in a CCX168 study
Trial locations and contacts
198 sites in 20 countries.
198 sites in 20 countries
United States41 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Clinical Trial Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Clinical Trial Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Clinical Trial Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Clinical Trial Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Clinical Trial Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Clinical Trial Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Clinical Trial Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Clinical Trial Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Clinical Trial Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Clinical Trial Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Clinical Trial Site
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Clinical Trial Site
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Clinical Trial Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Clinical Trial Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Clinical Trial Site
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Clinical Trial Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Clinical Trial Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Clinical Trial Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Clinical Trial Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Clinical Trial Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Clinical Trial Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Clinical Trial Site
Meridian, Idaho, 83605
Clinical Trial Site
Mineola, New York, 11501
Clinical Trial Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414
Clinical Trial Site
New York, New York, 10021
Clinical Trial Site
New York, New York, 10032
Clinical Trial Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Clinical Trial Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
Clinical Trial Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Clinical Trial Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15225
Clinical Trial Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Clinical Trial Site
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Clinical Trial Site
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Clinical Trial Site
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Clinical Trial Site
Seattle, Washington, 98101
Clinical Trial Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101
Clinical Trial Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Clinical Trial Site
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Clinical Trial Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Clinical Trial Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
United Kingdom25 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Aberdeen
Clinical Trial Site
Basildon
Clinical Trial Site
Birmingham
Clinical Trial Site
Bristol
Clinical Trial Site
Cambridge
Clinical Trial Site
Canterbury
Clinical Trial Site
Cardiff
Clinical Trial Site
Carshalton
Clinical Trial Site
Dorchester
Clinical Trial Site
Dudley
Clinical Trial Site
Exeter
Clinical Trial Site
Glasgow
Clinical Trial Site
Inverness
Clinical Trial Site
Kirkcaldy
Clinical Trial Site
Leeds
Clinical Trial Site
Leicester
Clinical Trial Site
Liverpool
Clinical Trial Site
London
Clinical Trial Site
Manchester
Clinical Trial Site
Newcastle
Clinical Trial Site
Nottingham
Clinical Trial Site
Oxford
Clinical Trial Site
Reading
Clinical Trial Site
Salford
Clinical Trial Site
Westcliff-on-Sea
Germany20 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Aachen
Clinical Trial Site
Bad Bramstedt
Clinical Trial Site
Berlin
Clinical Trial Site
Cologne
Clinical Trial Site
Dresden
Clinical Trial Site
Essen
Clinical Trial Site
Freiburg im Breisgau
Clinical Trial Site
Fulda
Clinical Trial Site
Hamburg
Clinical Trial Site
Hanover
Clinical Trial Site
Heidelberg
Clinical Trial Site
Jena
Clinical Trial Site
Kirchheim unter Teck
Clinical Trial Site
Leipzig
Clinical Trial Site
Lübeck
Clinical Trial Site
Ludwigshafen
Clinical Trial Site
Mannheim
Clinical Trial Site
Munich
Clinical Trial Site
Tübingen
Clinical Trial Site
Villingen-Schwenningen
Japan19 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Aichi
Clinical Trial Site
Akita
Clinical Trial Site
Chiba
Clinical Trial Site
Hiroshima
Clinical Trial Site
Hokkaido
Clinical Trial Site
Ishikawa
Clinical Trial Site
Kagawa
Clinical Trial Site
Kanagawa
Clinical Trial Site
Kobe
Clinical Trial Site
Miyazaki
Clinical Trial Site
Nagoya
Clinical Trial Site
Okayama
Clinical Trial Site
Osaka
Clinical Trial Site
Saitama
Clinical Trial Site
Shimane
Clinical Trial Site
Shizuoka
Clinical Trial Site
Tokyo
Clinical Trial Site
Toyama
Clinical Trial Site
Yokohama
Australia15 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Adelaide
Clinical Trial Site
Auchenflower
Clinical Trial Site
Brisbane
Clinical Trial Site
Clayton
Clinical Trial Site
Concord
Clinical Trial Site
Heidelberg
Clinical Trial Site
Liverpool
Clinical Trial Site
Nambour
Clinical Trial Site
Nedlands
Clinical Trial Site
Randwick
Clinical Trial Site
Saint Albans
Clinical Trial Site
Southport
Clinical Trial Site
St Leonards
Clinical Trial Site
Westmead
Clinical Trial Site
Woolloongabba
France15 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Angers
Clinical Trial Site
Bordeaux
Clinical Trial Site
Boulogne-sur-Mer
Clinical Trial Site
Brest
Clinical Trial Site
Bron
Clinical Trial Site
Caen
Clinical Trial Site
Colmar
Clinical Trial Site
Grenoble
Clinical Trial Site
Marseille
Clinical Trial Site
Metz
Clinical Trial Site
Nantes
Clinical Trial Site
Nîmes
Clinical Trial Site
Paris
Clinical Trial Site
Toulouse
Clinical Trial Site
Valenciennes
Italy9 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Ancona
Clinical Trial Site
Florence
Clinical Trial Site
Genova
Clinical Trial Site
Milan
Clinical Trial Site
Monza
Clinical Trial Site
Parma
Clinical Trial Site
Reggio Emilia
Clinical Trial Site
Torino
Clinical Trial Site
Udine
Canada8 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Calgary
Clinical Trial Site
Greenfield Park
Clinical Trial Site
Hamilton
Clinical Trial Site
Montreal
Clinical Trial Site
Québec
Clinical Trial Site
Sherbrooke
Clinical Trial Site
Toronto
Clinical Trial Site
Vancouver
Spain6 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Badalona
Clinical Trial Site
Barcelona
Clinical Trial Site
Burela de Cabo
Clinical Trial Site
Lleida
Clinical Trial Site
Madrid
Clinical Trial Site
San Sebastián
Switzerland6 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Basel
Clinical Trial Site
Bern
Clinical Trial Site
Fribourg
Clinical Trial Site
Lausanne
Clinical Trial Site
Sankt Gallen
Clinical Trial Site
Zurich
Denmark5 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Aalborg
Clinical Trial Site
Aarhus
Clinical Trial Site
Copenhagen
Clinical Trial Site
Odense
Clinical Trial Site
Roskilde
New Zealand5 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Christchurch
Clinical Trial Site
Dunedin
Clinical Trial Site
Grafton
Clinical Trial Site
Hamilton
Clinical Trial Site
Takapuna
Sweden5 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Linköping
Clinical Trial Site
Lund
Clinical Trial Site
Örebro
Clinical Trial Site
Stockholm
Clinical Trial Site
Uppsala
Belgium4 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Antwerp
Clinical Trial Site
Brussels
Clinical Trial Site
Leuven
Clinical Trial Site
Liège
Austria3 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Feldkirch
Clinical Trial Site
Graz
Clinical Trial Site
Innsbruck
Netherlands3 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Groningen
Clinical Trial Site
Leiden
Clinical Trial Site
Rotterdam
Norway3 sites
Clinical Trial Site
Nordbyhagen
Clinical Trial Site
Oslo
Clinical Trial Site
Tromsø
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab.
Read the detailed description
Complement 5a and its receptor C5aR (CD88) are involved in the pathogenesis of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis.
This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orally-administered, selective C5aR inhibitor CCX168 (avacopan) in inducing and sustaining remission in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated concomitantly with Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine.
Study acquired by Amgen and all disclosures were done by previous sponsor ChemoCentryx.
- Conditions
- ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
- Being tested
- Avacopan, Prednisone, Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, Azathioprine
- Keywords
- ANCA-associated vasculitis, complement, vasculitis, C5aR, avacopan, CCX168, MPA, GPA
- Medical subject headings
- Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis, Vasculitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AvacopanDrug
Also called CCX168
Avacopan 30 mg twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):
- Three 10 mg avacopan capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.
Oral prednisone-matching placebo tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):
- Prednisone-matching placebo capsules equivalent to 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was <55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to a protocol-specified schedule.
- Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone-matching placebo dose of 30 mg per day.
PrednisoneDrug
Avacopan-matching placebo twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days):
- Three avacopan-matching placebo capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose.
Oral prednisone tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days):
- Prednisone 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was <55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to the protocol-specified schedule.
- Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone dose of 30 mg per day.
CyclophosphamideDrug
Orally or intravenously administered
RituximabBiological
Intravenously administered
AzathioprineDrug
Orally administered
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prednisone group | Active comparator | Avacopan-matching placebo plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus a full starting dose of prednisone. Receives: Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Biological: Rituximab; Drug: Azathioprine |
| Avacopan group | Experimental | Avacopan plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus prednisone-matching placebo. Receives: Drug: Avacopan; Drug: Cyclophosphamide; Biological: Rituximab; Drug: Azathioprine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Disease Remission at Week 26
Disease remission at Week 26 was defined as:
- Achieving a BVAS of 0 as determined by the Adjudication Committee;
- No administration of glucocorticoids given for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 26;
- No BVAS >0 during the 4 weeks prior to Week 26 (if collected for an unscheduled assessment).
Measured: Week 26
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52
Sustained remission at Week 52 was defined as:
- Disease remission at Week 26 as defined above;
- Disease remission at Week 52 defined as a BVAS of 0 at Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee and no administration of glucocorticoids for treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 52;
- No disease relapse between Week 26 and Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (26)
Subject Incidence of Treatment-emergent SAEs, AEs, and Withdrawals Due to AEs
AEs=Adverse events
SAEs=Serious adverse events
TEAE=Treatment-emergent adverse event
Measured: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Glucocorticoid-induced Toxicity as Measured by Change From Baseline Over the First 26 Weeks in the GTI
GTI-CWS=Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index Cumulative Worsening Score;
GTI-AIS=Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index Aggregate Improvement Score;
The Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) was developed to score glucocorticoid toxicity. The GTI includes: the Cumulative Worsening Score (CWS) that captures cumulative toxicity, both permanent and transient, over the course of time (serves as a cumulative record of toxicity); and the Aggregate Improvement Score that captures both improvement and worsening of toxicity over time (serves as a record of both improving and worsening toxicity). Both scores range from 0 (best health) to 100 (worst health).
Measured: Baseline, Week 13 and 26
Percentage of Participants With BVAS of 0 at Week 4, Regardless of Whether the Subjects Received Glucocorticoids During This Period of Time and Based on Assessment by the Blinded AC
AC=Adjudication Committee; BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;
The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health).
Measured: Week 4
Change From Baseline Over 52 Weeks in Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Domains and Component Scores of the SF-36v2 and EQ-5D-5L VAS and Index
SF-36v2: Measure of health- related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 version 2)
EQ-5D-5L: EuroQuality of Life-5 Domains-5 Levels
The SF-36v2 component scores and the EQ-5D-5L VAS score range from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health). The EQ-5D-5L Index Score ranges from 0 (worst health) to 1 (best health).
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Percentage of Subjects and Time to Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving Remission at Week 26 in the Study
The median time to relapse was not estimable because of small number of relapsed subjects.
A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:
- having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or
- having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period
ANCA=anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody; BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health).
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Subjects and Time to Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving BVAS=0 at Any Time During the Treatment Period
The median time to relapse was not estimable because of small number of relapsed subjects.
A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:
- having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or
- having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period
The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health).
Measured: Week 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Change in eGFR From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
Change from baseline in kidney function, as measured by eGFR (based on the MDRD equation), was measured in subjects with renal disease based on the BVAS renal component.
eGFR=estimated glomerular filtration rate
BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score
MDRD=Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease and Albuminuria at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Percent Change in UACR From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score
UACR=Urinary albumin:creatinine ratio
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 26 and 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Percent Change in Urinary MCP-1:Creatinine Ratio From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score
MCP-1=monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change in the VDI From Baseline Over 52 Weeks, Including the Week 26 and Week 52 Time Points
VDI=Vasculitis Damage Index; The VDI is comprised of 64 items of damage, grouped into 11 organ-based systems or categorizations. Damage is defined as the presence of non-healing scars and does not give any indication of current disease activity. Damage is also defined as having been present or currently present for at least 3 months. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 64 (worst health).
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (1/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (2/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (3/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (4/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (5/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Serum Chemistry (1/2)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Serum Chemistry (2/2)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (1/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (2/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (3/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (4/5)
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (5/5)
BMI=Body Mass Index
Measured: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant ECG Changes From Baseline
Clinical significance was assessed by the individual reading of the ECGs
ECG=Electrocardiogram
Measured: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Number of Subjects Where a Relationship Between Avacopan/Placebo, Glucocorticoid Use, Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, and Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Use to an AE Was Determined by the Investigator
AE=Adverse Event
Measured: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Certain Safety Endpoints of Interest: Infections, Hepatic System Abnormalities, WBC Count Decreases, and Hypersensitivity
WBC=White Blood Cell
TEAE=Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
Measured: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving BVAS=0 During the Study
BVAS=Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score;
A relapse was defined as occurrence of at least one major item in the BVAS, or three or more minor items in the BVAS, or one or two minor items in the BVAS recorded at two consecutive visits, after:
- having achieved remission at Week 26 (BVAS=0 and no glucocorticoids for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks) or
- having achieved BVAS=0 at any time during the treatment period
The BVAS form is divided into 9 organ-based systems, with each section including symptoms/signs that are typical of that particular organ involvement in systemic vasculitis. The clinician only scores features believed to be due to active vasculitis. Completion of the form provides a numerical score, which ranges from 0 (best health) to 63 (worst health).
Measured: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study start15 Mar 2017
- Primary completion7 Sep 2019
- Study completion1 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ANCA-Associated VasculitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 331 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02994927
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL010_168
- Other IDs
- ADVOCATE
- Acronym
- ADVOCATE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Publications
Geetha D, Neumann T, Karras A, Cid MC, Merkel PA, Bray S, Bozeman AM, Jayne DRW; Members of the ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan for treatment of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving cyclophosphamide. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 5;11(4):e005743. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005743.
PubMed 41052893Geetha D, Dua A, Yue H, Springer J, Salvarani C, Jayne D, Merkel P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving rituximab in a randomised trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):223-232. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224816.
PubMed 37979959Soulsby WD. Journal Club Review of "Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis". ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;4(7):558-561. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11412. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
PubMed 35167187Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, Bekker P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):599-609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023386.
PubMed 33596356Merkel PA, Jayne DR, Wang C, Hillson J, Bekker P. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avacopan, a C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(4):e16664. doi: 10.2196/16664.
PubMed 32088663
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of CCX168 (Avacopan) in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02994927
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADVOCATE / CL010_168
- Conditions
- ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
- Keywords
- ANCA-associated vasculitis, complement, vasculitis, C5aR, avacopan, CCX168, MPA, GPA
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 331 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Sep 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of CCX168 (avacopan) to induce and sustain remission in patients with active anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), when used in combination with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine, or in combination with rituximab.
Detailed description
Complement 5a and its receptor C5aR (CD88) are involved in the pathogenesis of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis.
This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orally-administered, selective C5aR inhibitor CCX168 (avacopan) in inducing and sustaining remission in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) treated concomitantly with Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine.
Study acquired by Amgen and all disclosures were done by previous sponsor ChemoCentryx.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prednisone group | Active comparator | Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Biological: Rituximab, Drug: AzathioprineAvacopan-matching placebo plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus a full starting dose of prednisone. |
| Avacopan group | Experimental | Drug: Avacopan, Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Biological: Rituximab, Drug: AzathioprineAvacopan plus cyclophosphamide/azathioprine or rituximab plus prednisone-matching placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) or microscopic polyangiitis
- Male and female subjects, aged at least 18 years, with newly-diagnosed or relapsed associated vasculitis (AAV) where treatment with cyclophosphamide or rituximab is needed; where approved by Regulatory Agencies, adolescents (12-17 year old) may be enrolled
- Use of adequate contraception
- Positive test for anti-proteinase 3 (PR3) or anti-myeloperoxidase (MPO)
- At least 1 major item, or at least 3 non-major items, or at least the 2 renal items of proteinuria and hematuria on Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS)
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Alveolar hemorrhage requiring pulmonary ventilation support at screening
- Any other known multi-system autoimmune disease
- Required dialysis or plasma exchange within 12 weeks prior to screening
- Have a kidney transplant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AvacopanAlso: CCX168Avacopan 30 mg twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days): - Three 10 mg avacopan capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose. Oral prednisone-matching placebo tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days): * Prednisone-matching placebo capsules equivalent to 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was <55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to a protocol-specified schedule. * Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone-matching placebo dose of 30 mg per day. | Drug | Avacopan group |
| PrednisoneAvacopan-matching placebo twice daily orally for 52 weeks (364 days): - Three avacopan-matching placebo capsules in the morning, preferably with food, and three in the evening, preferably with food, approximately 12 hours after the morning dose. Oral prednisone tapering regimen over 20 weeks (140 days): * Prednisone 60 mg per day if the subject's body weight was ≥55 kg, or 45 mg per day if the subject's body weight was <55 kg, starting on Day 1 with tapering according to the protocol-specified schedule. * Adolescents who weighed ≤37 kg started at a prednisone dose of 30 mg per day. | Drug | Prednisone group |
| CyclophosphamideOrally or intravenously administered | Drug | Avacopan group, Prednisone group |
| RituximabIntravenously administered | Biological | Avacopan group, Prednisone group |
| AzathioprineOrally administered | Drug | Avacopan group, Prednisone group |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Disease Remission at Week 26
Time frame: Week 26
Disease remission at Week 26 was defined as: * Achieving a BVAS of 0 as determined by the Adjudication Committee; * No administration of glucocorticoids given for ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 26; * No BVAS >0 during the 4 weeks prior to Week 26 (if collected for an unscheduled assessment).
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Sustained Disease Remission at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Sustained remission at Week 52 was defined as: * Disease remission at Week 26 as defined above; * Disease remission at Week 52 defined as a BVAS of 0 at Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee and no administration of glucocorticoids for treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis within 4 weeks prior to Week 52; * No disease relapse between Week 26 and Week 52 as determined by the Adjudication Committee.
26 secondary outcomes
Subject Incidence of Treatment-emergent SAEs, AEs, and Withdrawals Due to AEs
Time frame: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Glucocorticoid-induced Toxicity as Measured by Change From Baseline Over the First 26 Weeks in the GTI
Time frame: Baseline, Week 13 and 26
Percentage of Participants With BVAS of 0 at Week 4, Regardless of Whether the Subjects Received Glucocorticoids During This Period of Time and Based on Assessment by the Blinded AC
Time frame: Week 4
Change From Baseline Over 52 Weeks in Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by the Domains and Component Scores of the SF-36v2 and EQ-5D-5L VAS and Index
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Percentage of Subjects and Time to Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving Remission at Week 26 in the Study
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Subjects and Time to Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving BVAS=0 at Any Time During the Treatment Period
Time frame: Week 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Change in eGFR From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease and Albuminuria at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Percent Change in UACR From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 26 and 52
In Subjects With Renal Disease at Baseline (Based in the BVAS Renal Component), the Percent Change in Urinary MCP-1:Creatinine Ratio From Baseline Over 52 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change in the VDI From Baseline Over 52 Weeks, Including the Week 26 and Week 52 Time Points
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (1/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (2/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (3/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (4/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Hematology (5/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Serum Chemistry (1/2)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline and Shifts From Baseline in All Safety Laboratory Parameters - Serum Chemistry (2/2)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (1/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (2/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (3/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (4/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (5/5)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 26 and 52
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant ECG Changes From Baseline
Time frame: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Number of Subjects Where a Relationship Between Avacopan/Placebo, Glucocorticoid Use, Cyclophosphamide, Rituximab, and Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Use to an AE Was Determined by the Investigator
Time frame: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Certain Safety Endpoints of Interest: Infections, Hepatic System Abnormalities, WBC Count Decreases, and Hypersensitivity
Time frame: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Number of Subjects Experiencing a Relapse After Previously Achieving BVAS=0 During the Study
Time frame: From day 1 throughout the study period (day 421/week 60)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41052893Geetha D, Neumann T, Karras A, Cid MC, Merkel PA, Bray S, Bozeman AM, Jayne DRW; Members of the ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan for treatment of patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving cyclophosphamide. RMD Open. 2025 Oct 5;11(4):e005743. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005743.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37979959Geetha D, Dua A, Yue H, Springer J, Salvarani C, Jayne D, Merkel P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Efficacy and safety of avacopan in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis receiving rituximab in a randomised trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 Jan 11;83(2):223-232. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224816.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35167187Soulsby WD. Journal Club Review of "Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis". ACR Open Rheumatol. 2022 Jul;4(7):558-561. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11412. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33596356Jayne DRW, Merkel PA, Schall TJ, Bekker P; ADVOCATE Study Group. Avacopan for the Treatment of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):599-609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023386.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32088663Merkel PA, Jayne DR, Wang C, Hillson J, Bekker P. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Avacopan, a C5a Receptor Inhibitor, in Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis Treated Concomitantly With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide/Azathioprine: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(4):e16664. doi: 10.2196/16664.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Related trials for ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
Not yet recruiting
MYTP01 for Immune-Mediated Diseases
IgA Nephropathy, Kidney Transplant Recipients
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Tarperprumig in Adult Participants With Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)-Associated Vasculitis
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study of NKX019 in Subjects With Immune-Mediated Diseases (Ntrust-2)
Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Trial of VIS954 in the Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-associated Vasculitis
Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-associated Vasculitis
RecruitingObservational study
Studies of the Natural History, Pathogenesis, and Outcome of Idiopathic Systemic Vasculitis
Takayasu's Arteritis, Giant Cell Arteritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
198 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Avacopan, Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide in people with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis, run by Amgen at 198 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 198 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Australia and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Disease Remission at Week 26 (time frame: Week 26). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02994927, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2025.