Cartilage InjuryPhase 3NCT02993510
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Chondro-Gide® to Microfracture Alone for Treatment of Knee Cartilage Defects.
A Phase 3 study testing Microfracture, Chondro-Gide sutured and Chondro-Gide glued in people with Cartilage Injury and Osteochondritis Dissecans, run by Geistlich Pharma AG at 7 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Chondro-Gide® collagen membrane either sutured or glued compared to microfracture alone in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cartilage Injury, Osteochondritis Dissecans
- What is being tested?
- Microfracture, Chondro-Gide sutured and Chondro-Gide glued
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Dec 2003to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female between 18 and 50
- One or two cartilage defects Grade III or IV according to Outerbridge classification
- Defect size between 2 and 10 cm2 (inclusive)
- Intact normal surrounding cartilage to suture the Chondro-Gide® membrane
- Informed consent
- Patient willing to fulfill a strict postoperative physiotherapy scheme
Who cannot join
- More than 2 defects
- Defects on both knees
- X-ray signs of osteoarthritis
- Bone lesion > 0.7 cm in the defect
- Knee instability, varus or valgus deformation, status after complete meniscus resection, status after mosaicplasty, patella dysplasia
- Rheumatoid, infectious disease
Show all 13Show fewer
- Skin lesion on the operated knee
- Treatment with cartilage building medication
- Drug and alcohol abuse
- Chronic heart disease, endocrine or metabolic disease, Haemophilia A/B
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Collagen allergy
- Participation in other Trials
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
Germany7 sites
University of Regensburg
Bad Abbach
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau
Universitätsklinikum Giessen
Giessen
Orthopedikum Hamburg
Hamburg
Unfallklinik Hannover
Hanover
University of Schleswig-Holstein
Lübeck
Sportklinik Ravensburg
Ravensburg
About this study
Official title: Randomised Multi-Center Study: Microfracturing With Chondro-Gide® for the Treatment of Isolated Cartilage Defects in the Knee Project-Nr.: 10830-003
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Chondro-Gide® collagen membrane either sutured or glued compared to microfracture alone in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.
Read the detailed description
- Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, open-label multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).
- All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Chondro-Gide® either sutured or glued or Microfracture alone.
- Eligible and consenting subjects are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using centralized randomization list to receive one of the following treatments: Group I: Microfracture alone; Group II: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane glued with fibrin glue (AMIC glued); Group III: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane sutured (AMIC sutured)
- All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (6 weeks, 3 months, and 1,2 and 5 years).
- Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.
- Measures to assess effectiveness and safety will be conducted at all follow-ups.
- Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.
- Conditions
- Cartilage Injury, Osteochondritis Dissecans
- Being tested
- Microfracture, Chondro-Gide sutured, Chondro-Gide glued
- Keywords
- microfracture, enhanced marrow stimulation, articular cartilage, Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis, Chondro-Gide®, knee surgery, AMIC
- Medical subject headings
- Osteochondritis Dissecans, Fractures, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MicrofractureProcedure or surgery
Microfracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot
Chondro-Gide suturedDevice
Implantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using atraumatic sutures following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy
Chondro-Gide gluedDevice
Implantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using Fibrin glue following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| microfracture | Active comparator | Microfracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair Receives: Procedure: Microfracture |
| Microfracture with Chondro-Gide sutured | Experimental | Microfracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using atraumatic sutures in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure Receives: Device: Chondro-Gide sutured |
| Microfracture with Chondro-Gide glued | Experimental | Microfracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using fibrin glue in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure Receives: Device: Chondro-Gide glued |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Histological evaluation of structural repair of evaluable biopsies harvested from the core of the index lesion during arthroscopy at 2 years
The macroscopically assessed integration, surface properties and extent of filling of the defect and the microscopically assessed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score
Measured: 2 years post-surgery
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) assessment of structural repair parameters.
Structural repair is assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5T) by an independent and blinded radiologist, with a focus on the extent, signal intensity and surface of the defect filling, integration to adjacent cartilage, and bone marrow lesion (BML).
Measured: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System.
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
Measured: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
Measured: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) "Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package".
The Change from Baseline will be evaluated.
Measured: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Adverse Events (AE) Review
The incidence, timing, severity, and relationship to treatment of all Adverse Events (AE), will be collected for all participants.
Measured: 5 years post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2003
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cartilage InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Geistlich Pharma AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sven Anders, MD, Principal investigator, University of Regensburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02993510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10830-003
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anders S, Volz M, Frick H, Gellissen J. A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC(R)) to Microfracture: Analysis of 1- and 2-Year Follow-Up Data of 2 Centers. Open Orthop J. 2013 May 3;7:133-43. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010133. Print 2013.
PubMed 23730377Volz M, Schaumburger J, Frick H, Grifka J, Anders S. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3391-0. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28108777Volz M, Schaumburger J, Gellissen J, Grifka J, Anders S. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC(R)) over microfracture: 10-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2429-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03948-0. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
PubMed 38630297
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Multi-Center Study: Microfracturing With Chondro-Gide® for the Treatment of Isolated Cartilage Defects in the Knee Project-Nr.: 10830-003
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02993510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10830-003
- Conditions
- Cartilage Injury, Osteochondritis Dissecans
- Keywords
- microfracture, enhanced marrow stimulation, articular cartilage, Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis, Chondro-Gide®, knee surgery, AMIC
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Geistlich Pharma AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2003
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using Chondro-Gide® collagen membrane either sutured or glued compared to microfracture alone in the treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee.
Detailed description
- Prospective, randomized, active treatment-controlled, open-label multicenter study (up to 40 sites in the US and EU).
- All subjects that meet preoperative screening eligibility criteria will be randomized to treatment with Chondro-Gide® either sutured or glued or Microfracture alone.
- Eligible and consenting subjects are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using centralized randomization list to receive one of the following treatments: Group I: Microfracture alone; Group II: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane glued with fibrin glue (AMIC glued); Group III: Microfracture covered with a Chondro-Gide® membrane sutured (AMIC sutured)
- All subjects will be assessed at intervals post-procedure (6 weeks, 3 months, and 1,2 and 5 years).
- Subjects will be required to follow a strict pre-specified post-surgery rehabilitation protocol specific to the defect location.
- Measures to assess effectiveness and safety will be conducted at all follow-ups.
- Safety will be assessed by the collection of adverse events at all timepoints.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| microfracture | Active comparator | Procedure: MicrofractureMicrofracture is an arthroscopic surgical technique involving placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect to provide stem cells and growth factors from the bone marrow to aid cartilage repair |
| Microfracture with Chondro-Gide sutured | Experimental | Device: Chondro-Gide suturedMicrofracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using atraumatic sutures in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure |
| Microfracture with Chondro-Gide glued | Experimental | Device: Chondro-Gide gluedMicrofracture covered with a collagen membrane (Chondro-Gide®) using fibrin glue in a one-step mini-arthrotomy procedure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female between 18 and 50
- One or two cartilage defects Grade III or IV according to Outerbridge classification
- Defect size between 2 and 10 cm2 (inclusive)
- Intact normal surrounding cartilage to suture the Chondro-Gide® membrane
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- More than 2 defects
- Defects on both knees
- X-ray signs of osteoarthritis
- Bone lesion > 0.7 cm in the defect
- Knee instability, varus or valgus deformation, status after complete meniscus resection, status after mosaicplasty, patella dysplasia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MicrofractureMicrofracture is a well-established arthroscopic surgical technique for cartilage repair which involves several systematic steps, including debridement to a stable cartilage margin, careful removal of the calcified cartilage layer, and homogeneous placement of microfracture penetrations within the cartilage defect, with resultant complete defect fill by a well-anchored clot | Procedure or surgery | microfracture |
| Chondro-Gide suturedImplantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using atraumatic sutures following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy | Device | Microfracture with Chondro-Gide sutured |
| Chondro-Gide gluedImplantation of Chondro-Gide membrane using Fibrin glue following microfracture via mini-arthrotomy | Device | Microfracture with Chondro-Gide glued |
Primary outcome
Histological evaluation of structural repair of evaluable biopsies harvested from the core of the index lesion during arthroscopy at 2 years
Time frame: 2 years post-surgery
The macroscopically assessed integration, surface properties and extent of filling of the defect and the microscopically assessed using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score
MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) assessment of structural repair parameters.
Time frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Structural repair is assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 1.5T) by an independent and blinded radiologist, with a focus on the extent, signal intensity and surface of the defect filling, integration to adjacent cartilage, and bone marrow lesion (BML).
4 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System.
Time frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Change from Baseline in the patient's evaluation of overall knee condition using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) "Cartilage Injury Evaluation Package".
Time frame: 6 months and 1,2 and 5 years post-surgery
Adverse Events (AE) Review
Time frame: 5 years post-surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 23730377Anders S, Volz M, Frick H, Gellissen J. A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC(R)) to Microfracture: Analysis of 1- and 2-Year Follow-Up Data of 2 Centers. Open Orthop J. 2013 May 3;7:133-43. doi: 10.2174/1874325001307010133. Print 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 28108777Volz M, Schaumburger J, Frick H, Grifka J, Anders S. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis over microfracture at five years. Int Orthop. 2017 Apr;41(4):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3391-0. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38630297Volz M, Schaumburger J, Gellissen J, Grifka J, Anders S. A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC(R)) over microfracture: 10-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2429-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03948-0. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cartilage Injury
Recruiting
Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Revision Cartilage Tympanoplasty
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Chronic Otitis Media
Not yet recruiting
DEXA Bone Density Analysis of the CoreHip® Prosthesis System
Primary Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Degeneration
RecruitingObservational study
Knee Cartilage Repair Registry
Knee Injuries, Joint Surface Knee Lesions
Not yet recruiting
Outcomes of Cartilage Tympanoplasty in Children
Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Conductive Hearing Loss
RecruitingPhase 1
AMIC Compared With Microfracture for Focal Articular Cartilage Damage of the Hip
Hip Arthroscopy, Articular Cartilage Defect
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sven Anders, MD principal investigator
University of Regensburg
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Microfracture, Chondro-Gide sutured and Chondro-Gide glued in people with Cartilage Injury and Osteochondritis Dissecans, run by Geistlich Pharma AG at 7 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Histological evaluation of structural repair of evaluable biopsies harvested from the core of the index lesion during arthroscopy at 2 years (time frame: 2 years post-surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02993510, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.