AzTrials
AzTrials

Preterm DeliveryPhase 3NCT02989519

Efficacy of Oral Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone After Tocolytic Therapy in Threatened Preterm Labor

A Phase 3 study testing dydrogesterone and Micronized progesterone in people with Preterm Delivery, run by Sanpasitthiprasong Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy of vaginal and oral progesterone after tocolytic therapy in threatened preterm labor Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Preterm Delivery
What is being tested?
dydrogesterone and Micronized progesterone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
231 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Aug 2015to 1 Mar 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Single pregnancies of 28 to 33 weeks and 6 days who had been experienced for threatened or preterm labor with intact membrane

Who cannot join

  • Proven membranes ruptured
  • Ultrasonographically found placenta previa, multiple pregnancy, fetal anomaly
  • Aneuploidy detected.
  • Had emergency condition that required for emergency delivery such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis, prolapsed cord

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Piyawadee Wuttikonsammakit

    Nai Muang, Changwat Ubon Ratchathani, 34000

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Efficacy of Oral Progesterone and Vaginal Progesterone After Tocolytic Therapy in Threatened Preterm Labor

The purpose of this study is to determine efficacy of vaginal and oral progesterone after tocolytic therapy in threatened preterm labor

Read the detailed description

A randomized controlled trial was conducted from August 2015 through December 2016. All pregnant women with single pregnancies of 28 to 33 weeks and 6 days who had been experienced for threatened or preterm labor with intact membrane as in inclusion criteria were approached and ask for enrollment. The gestational age of all patients was confirmed by antenatal record review and ultrasonographic confirmation. Threatened preterm labor was defined as the presence of regular uterine contractions without significant cervical changes as determined by digital pelvic examination. Preterm labor was defined as the simultaneous presence of regular uterine contractions and cervical changes, shortening and/or softening, or dilatation, as determined by digital pelvic examination. The women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. The patients who had proven membranes ruptured, and ultrasonographically found placenta previa, multiple pregnancy, fetal anomaly or aneuploidy would excluded. The participants had emergency condition that required for emergency delivery such as fetal distress, chorioamnionitis were also excluded. Participants were randomized into three groups which generated by computer programme to receive whether oral progesterone (dydrogesterone 10 mg; Duphaston™) per oral three times a day or vaginal progesterone (micronized progesterone 200 mg; Utrogestan™) or no progesterone (controlled group). All patients were digitally pelvic examined for evaluation of Bishop score and assessed cervical length by transvaginal ultrasound at enrollment and follow up visit at two weeks apart. Cervical length was measured by standard technique with a covered probe inserted into vagina after each woman had emptied her bladder. Excessive pressure on cervix was avoided. The mean value of 3 consecutive measurements was used for analysis. Informed consent and demographic data were obtained at the enrollment. Primary outcomes were preterm delivery before 34 and 37 weeks. Secondary outcomes include time until delivery (latency period,days), change of cervical length (cervical attenuation), maternal outcome, neonatal outcome, and side effects of drugs were collected. The main outcomes of preterm delivery, gestational age at parturition and birthweight were also collected by telephone call in case of out-side-hospital born or in case loss to follow up. Monitoring of all patients was evaluated every follow up visit for drug side effect, allergic response, and adverse events Statistical analysis Sample size was calculated according to the results of two studies by Dorota AgataBomba - Opon and Manju Choudhary which showed significant decreased preterm delivery <34 weeks (9.8% vs 35.3%,p=0.002) in vaginal progesterone group, and significant decreased preterm birth (33% vs 58% ; p= 0.034) in oral progesterone group. The sample size of 231 was used to evaluate the primary outcome of both drugs. Descriptive statistics were carried out using mean, median, standard deviation, interquartile range. Categorical data were tested for significance with the χ2tests. Continuous data were evaluated for normal distribution and tested for significance with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test. Student t test and Man-Whitney U test were used to test significance between groups in case there is significant detection in ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis test among groups. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Being tested
dydrogesterone, Micronized progesterone
Keywords
preterm labor, progesterone efficacy, threatened preterm labor
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Obstetric Labor, Premature

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • dydrogesteroneDrug

    Also called Duphaston

  • Micronized progesteroneDrug

    Also called Utrogestan

Study groups in NCT02989519
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
no progesteroneNo interventionAll women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation
oral progesteroneExperimentalAll women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. All women in this arm received oral progesterone (dydrogesterone 10 mg; Duphaston™) per oral three times a day
Receives: Drug: dydrogesterone
vaginal progesteroneExperimentalAll women with preterm labor underwent standard tocolysis, which was administered for at least 48 hours, to allow corticosteroid promote fetal lung maturation. All women in this arm received vaginal progesterone (micronized progesterone 200 mg; Utrogestan™) at bed time.
Receives: Drug: Micronized progesterone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. preterm delivery before 34 and 37 weeks

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. change of cervical length

    Measured: 2 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completion5 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
231 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02989519
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPS2016-01
Status last verified
Oct 2017
First submitted
7 Dec 2016
Last updated
10 Oct 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing dydrogesterone and Micronized progesterone in people with Preterm Delivery, run by Sanpasitthiprasong Hospital at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

preterm delivery before 34 and 37 weeks (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in