Borderline Coronary Stenoses Assessment, Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque CompositionINTERFERENCT02985112
INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve (FFR) and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy (NIRS)
An observational study of Borderline Coronary Stenoses Assessment, Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Composition, run by S.M. Misericordia Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Revascularization of borderline coronary stenoses (40-70%) is usually driven by fractional flow reserve (FFR) which expresses the physiological significance of a lesion and tells the operator whether PCI may reduce the rate of adverse events as compared to medical therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Borderline Coronary Stenoses Assessment, Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Composition
- What is being tested?
- FFR and IVUS-NIRS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Mar 2015to Dec 2018
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1. Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma, age < 18 will be excluded.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1.
Who cannot join
- Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cardiology Unit, Misericordia Hospital
Grosseto, Italy, 58100
Andrea Picchi, Md, PhD, +390564483465, andre.picchi@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve (FFR) and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy (NIRS).
Revascularization of borderline coronary stenoses (40-70%) is usually driven by fractional flow reserve (FFR) which expresses the physiological significance of a lesion and tells the operator whether PCI may reduce the rate of adverse events as compared to medical therapy. Coronary stenoses with FFR value < 0.80 are indeed associated with a higher rate of adverse event and requires coronary revascularization whereas lesions with FFR > 0.80 show an excellent prognosis which cannot be improved by coronary stenting. Such a predictive value of FFR is theoretically based only on the degree of myocardial ischemia downstream from a given coronary stenosis: however, also plaque composition may play a crucial role in triggering future events especially in patients affected by acute coronary syndrome. Differences in plaque composition between FFR-positive and FFR negative lesions have never been assessed. Intracoronary Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) identifies lipid rich plaques that can potentially cause acute events. The aim of this study is to compare the lipid content expressed by LCBI (Lipid Core Burden Index) between functionally significant (FFR < 0.80) and non-significant (FFR > 0.80) stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. This is an observational, prospective, multicentric study where we plan to collect 150 coronary lesions.
Read the detailed description
Background Objective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of angiographically significant coronary stenoses in patients affected by stable or unstable coronary syndromes 1. When we face an intermediate stenosis (percentage diameter stenosis between 40% and 70%), revascularization is guided by the presence of inducible myocardial ischemia, detected by non - invasive stress tests or by assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR). FFR is an index of the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis and is defined as the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow. An FFR value of 0.80 or less identifies ischemia-causing coronary stenoses with an accuracy of more than 90%. FFR is a very accurate tool to identify functionally significant stenoses and to predict cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and solid evidences demonstrate that PCI of lesions with FFR > 0.80 can be safely deferred (incidence of MACE < 1% with medical treatment only). Conversely, stenoses with an FFR <0.80 have a poor prognosis and require treatment by PCI 2-4. The afore-mentioned indications come from studies that mainly involved patients affected by stable CAD, but the role of FFR in the setting of acute coronary sindrome (ACS) is less clear. Hakeem et al. have recently shown that deferring percutaneous coronary intervention on the basis of non-ischemic FFR in patients with an initial presentation of ACS is associated with significantly worse outcomes than stable patients5.
FFR indeed has the ability to identify vessels with reduced coronary flow, but cannot detect atherosclerotic plaques with unstable features, which may present without flow limitation (FFR > 0.80) but can cause acute coronary events 6, 7. Since the prevalence of features of plaque instability (plaque volume > 70%, minimum luminal area <4 mm2, presence of a "thin cap fibroatheroma") increase with the increase of the severity of the stenosis, the decision of performing PCI for stenoses of clear angiographic severity seems rational and supported by solid evidence 8. Conversely, delaying PCI of intermediate stenoses on the basis of a negative FFR can be problematic, particularly in patients with ACS, where the only functional evaluation with FFR may not be sufficient in the presence of unstable plaques.
Differences in plaque composition between physiologically significant vs non-significant lesions have never been assessed in either stable and ACS patients.
Intracoronary Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) identifies lipid-rich plaques (LRP) with high sensibility and specificity. The technique, validated on autopsy specimens, is an effective tool to detect LRP in vivo, identifying those coronary atheromas that can potentially cause acute events 9. The NIRS system consists of a 3.2-F rapid exchange catheter (InfraReDx, Burlington,Massachusetts), a pullback and rotation device, and a console. The measurement of the probability of LRP for each scanned arterial segment is displayed as a map, with the x-axis indicating the pullback position in millimeters and the y-axis the circumferential position of the measurement in degrees. The algorithm displays the probability of lipid content at the interrogation site by using a false color scale from red (low probability) to yellow (high probability). The entire display is termed a "chemogram". Pixels containing insufficient informations are displayed as black. The ratio between the number of yellow pixels to the whole number of pixels except the black ones, multiplied by one - thousand, is the "Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)" of the analyzed artery segment. A value of LCBImax > 400 identifies a high lipid content in a given segment. In an autopsy study conducted on human aortic specimens, the technique reached 90% sensibility and 93 % specificity in the detection of lipid rich plaques9, opening new horizons in terms of risk stratification and therapy10-15. To provide a quantitative target suitable for algorithm construction and validation, a lipid core plaque of interest was defined as a fibroatheroma with a lipid core > 60° in circumferential extent, >200 µm thick, with a fibrous cap having a mean thickness < 450 µm16.
Aim of the study
- To compare lipid content expressed by LCBImax value between functionally significant (FFR < 0.80) and non-significant (FFR > 0.80) stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- To evaluate the correlation between functional significance (expressed by FFR value) and lipid content (expressed by LCBImax value) of coronary lesions in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Design of the study This is an observational, prospective, multicentric study: at present time, two centers (Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto and San Giovanni Hospital, Rome) are going to take part in the study.
Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1.
Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma, age < 18 will be excluded.
Endpoints
- Primary endpoint: percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400 in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80. .
- Secondary endpoints: 1) lipid content expressed as LCBImax (mean ± SD) in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80. 2) Correlation between lipid content (as LCBI max), and functional significance (as FFR) of the index lesion.
Sample size The sample size will be calculated to demonstrate a decrease in the primary end point (percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400) from 36% in FFR positive lesions to 18% in FFR negative lesions, as inferred by previous findings showing a 36% vs 18% prevalence of thin cap fibroatheroma in lesions with a >70% vs <70% diameter stenosis17. Using chi-square test for 2 x 2 tables and a 1-sided alpha value of 0.05, a sample of 150 lesions will provide the study 80% power to meet the primary end point.
- Being tested
- FFR and IVUS-NIRS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FFR and IVUS-NIRSDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with FFR > 0.80 | Group of patients with physiologically non-significant coronary stenoses who will not undergo coronary revascularization Receives: Device: FFR and IVUS-NIRS | |
| Patients with FFR < 0.80 | Group of patients with physiologically significant coronary stenoses who will undergo coronary revascularization Receives: Device: FFR and IVUS-NIRS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400 in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2015
- Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Borderline Coronary Stenoses Assessment, Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque CompositionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- S.M. Misericordia Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Picchi, S.M. Misericordia Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02985112
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- USL9-2015-007-NIRS
- Acronym
- INTERFERE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Picchi A, Campo G, Misuraca L, Baratta P, Biancofiore A, Calabria P, Massoni A, Limbruno U. INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy: The INTERFERE Study. J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 25;14(19):6769. doi: 10.3390/jcm14196769.
PubMed 41095849
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve (FFR) and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy (NIRS).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02985112
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTERFERE / USL9-2015-007-NIRS
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- S.M. Misericordia HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
- Study start
- Mar 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Revascularization of borderline coronary stenoses (40-70%) is usually driven by fractional flow reserve (FFR) which expresses the physiological significance of a lesion and tells the operator whether PCI may reduce the rate of adverse events as compared to medical therapy. Coronary stenoses with FFR value < 0.80 are indeed associated with a higher rate of adverse event and requires coronary revascularization whereas lesions with FFR > 0.80 show an excellent prognosis which cannot be improved by coronary stenting. Such a predictive value of FFR is theoretically based only on the degree of myocardial ischemia downstream from a given coronary stenosis: however, also plaque composition may play a crucial role in triggering future events especially in patients affected by acute coronary syndrome. Differences in plaque composition between FFR-positive and FFR negative lesions have never been assessed. Intracoronary Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) identifies lipid rich plaques that can potentially cause acute events. The aim of this study is to compare the lipid content expressed by LCBI (Lipid Core Burden Index) between functionally significant (FFR < 0.80) and non-significant (FFR > 0.80) stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. This is an observational, prospective, multicentric study where we plan to collect 150 coronary lesions.
Detailed description
Background Objective of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of angiographically significant coronary stenoses in patients affected by stable or unstable coronary syndromes 1. When we face an intermediate stenosis (percentage diameter stenosis between 40% and 70%), revascularization is guided by the presence of inducible myocardial ischemia, detected by non - invasive stress tests or by assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR). FFR is an index of the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis and is defined as the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow. An FFR value of 0.80 or less identifies ischemia-causing coronary stenoses with an accuracy of more than 90%. FFR is a very accurate tool to identify functionally significant stenoses and to predict cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and solid evidences demonstrate that PCI of lesions with FFR > 0.80 can be safely deferred (incidence of MACE < 1% with medical treatment only). Conversely, stenoses with an FFR <0.80 have a poor prognosis and require treatment by PCI 2-4. The afore-mentioned indications come from studies that mainly involved patients affected by stable CAD, but the role of FFR in the setting of acute coronary sindrome (ACS) is less clear. Hakeem et al. have recently shown that deferring percutaneous coronary intervention on the basis of non-ischemic FFR in patients with an initial presentation of ACS is associated with significantly worse outcomes than stable patients5.
FFR indeed has the ability to identify vessels with reduced coronary flow, but cannot detect atherosclerotic plaques with unstable features, which may present without flow limitation (FFR > 0.80) but can cause acute coronary events 6, 7. Since the prevalence of features of plaque instability (plaque volume > 70%, minimum luminal area <4 mm2, presence of a "thin cap fibroatheroma") increase with the increase of the severity of the stenosis, the decision of performing PCI for stenoses of clear angiographic severity seems rational and supported by solid evidence 8. Conversely, delaying PCI of intermediate stenoses on the basis of a negative FFR can be problematic, particularly in patients with ACS, where the only functional evaluation with FFR may not be sufficient in the presence of unstable plaques.
Differences in plaque composition between physiologically significant vs non-significant lesions have never been assessed in either stable and ACS patients.
Intracoronary Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy (NIRS) identifies lipid-rich plaques (LRP) with high sensibility and specificity. The technique, validated on autopsy specimens, is an effective tool to detect LRP in vivo, identifying those coronary atheromas that can potentially cause acute events 9. The NIRS system consists of a 3.2-F rapid exchange catheter (InfraReDx, Burlington,Massachusetts), a pullback and rotation device, and a console. The measurement of the probability of LRP for each scanned arterial segment is displayed as a map, with the x-axis indicating the pullback position in millimeters and the y-axis the circumferential position of the measurement in degrees. The algorithm displays the probability of lipid content at the interrogation site by using a false color scale from red (low probability) to yellow (high probability). The entire display is termed a "chemogram". Pixels containing insufficient informations are displayed as black. The ratio between the number of yellow pixels to the whole number of pixels except the black ones, multiplied by one - thousand, is the "Lipid Core Burden Index (LCBI)" of the analyzed artery segment. A value of LCBImax > 400 identifies a high lipid content in a given segment. In an autopsy study conducted on human aortic specimens, the technique reached 90% sensibility and 93 % specificity in the detection of lipid rich plaques9, opening new horizons in terms of risk stratification and therapy10-15. To provide a quantitative target suitable for algorithm construction and validation, a lipid core plaque of interest was defined as a fibroatheroma with a lipid core > 60° in circumferential extent, >200 µm thick, with a fibrous cap having a mean thickness < 450 µm16.
Aim of the study
- To compare lipid content expressed by LCBImax value between functionally significant (FFR < 0.80) and non-significant (FFR > 0.80) stenoses in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- To evaluate the correlation between functional significance (expressed by FFR value) and lipid content (expressed by LCBImax value) of coronary lesions in patients undergoing coronary angiography because of stable CAD and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Design of the study This is an observational, prospective, multicentric study: at present time, two centers (Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto and San Giovanni Hospital, Rome) are going to take part in the study.
Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1.
Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma, age < 18 will be excluded.
Endpoints
- Primary endpoint: percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400 in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80. .
- Secondary endpoints: 1) lipid content expressed as LCBImax (mean ± SD) in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80. 2) Correlation between lipid content (as LCBI max), and functional significance (as FFR) of the index lesion.
Sample size The sample size will be calculated to demonstrate a decrease in the primary end point (percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400) from 36% in FFR positive lesions to 18% in FFR negative lesions, as inferred by previous findings showing a 36% vs 18% prevalence of thin cap fibroatheroma in lesions with a >70% vs <70% diameter stenosis17. Using chi-square test for 2 x 2 tables and a 1-sided alpha value of 0.05, a sample of 150 lesions will provide the study 80% power to meet the primary end point.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with FFR > 0.80 | – | Device: FFR and IVUS-NIRSGroup of patients with physiologically non-significant coronary stenoses who will not undergo coronary revascularization |
| Patients with FFR < 0.80 | – | Device: FFR and IVUS-NIRSGroup of patients with physiologically significant coronary stenoses who will undergo coronary revascularization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1. Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma, age < 18 will be excluded.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects undergoing coronary angiography for stable CAD and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina will be enrolled. Patients included must have evidence of at least one angiographically borderline stenosis (≥ 40, <70% by Quantitative Coronary Angiography, QCA) with normal antegrade flow (TIMI 3). The index lesion will be evaluated by FFR; afterwards, plaque composition and lesion characteristics will be evaluated by IVUS - NIRS. PCI will be performed according to current guidelines on myocardial revascularization1.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with hemodynamic instability, ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, known allergy to antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs, history of previous CABG, significant left main disease, life expectancy < 1 year, severe renal failure, malignancy, scheduled valve surgery, inability to provide informed consent, known bronchial asthma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FFR and IVUS-NIRS | Device | Patients with FFR < 0.80, Patients with FFR > 0.80 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400 in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80.
Time frame: Baseline
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41095849Picchi A, Campo G, Misuraca L, Baratta P, Biancofiore A, Calabria P, Massoni A, Limbruno U. INTegrated Assessment of intERmediate Coronary Stenoses by Fractional Flow rEserve and Near-infraREd Spectroscopy: The INTERFERE Study. J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 25;14(19):6769. doi: 10.3390/jcm14196769.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Borderline Coronary Stenoses Assessment, Fractional Flow Reserve, Plaque Composition, run by S.M. Misericordia Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Andrea Picchi (+390564483465, andre.picchi@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of coronary plaques with LCBImax > 400 in lesions with FFR > 0.80 vs lesions with FFR < 0.80. (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02985112, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2016.