AzTrials
AzTrials

Bordetella Pertussis, Whooping CoughPERILICNCT02983487

Pertussis Immunization Programs in Low Income Countries

An observational study of Bordetella Pertussis, Whooping Cough, run by Institut Pasteur at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Due to waning of infectious as well as vaccine immunity and lack of vaccination boosters, a large number of adolescents and adults are no longer immunized against Bordetella pertussis, the agent of whooping cough and consequently may contract whooping cough. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bordetella Pertussis, Whooping Cough
What is being tested?
Nasopharyngeal sampling and Blood Sampling
Type of treatment
Vaccines, Surgery or procedure
How many people
3,587 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
22 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Cohort 1 (WP1a): Infants under 6 months old coming to hospital with clinical signs of whooping cough syndrome. Cohort 2 (WP1b): Contact cases of confirmed infants included in the WP1a module Cohort 3 (WP2): Children from 3 to 15 years old included, without underlying illness, with complete pertussis primo-vaccination

Who may be able to join

  • Cohort 1 (WP1a)
  • Infants under 6 months old
  • Presenting clinical signs of a whooping cough syndrome
  • Written consent obtained from a parent/guardian of the child
  • Cohort 2 (WP1b)
  • People in regular and prolonged contact (>1h per day) with the index case for at least 5 days before the signs of whooping cough occurred in the infected child, living (or not) in the same household.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • For the adults, written consent obtained.
  • For minors under 7 yo: written consent obtained from a parent/guardian.
  • For minors over 7 yo: written consent obtained from parent/guardian and oral assent obtained from the child.
  • Cohort 3 (WP2)
  • Child aged between 3 and 15 yo
  • Up to date first pertussis vaccination (vaccination booklet or official register)
  • Last pertussis vaccination done more than one year before inclusion
  • For minors under 7 yo: written consent obtained from parent/guardian.
  • For minors over 7 yo: written consent obtained from parent/guardian and oral assent obtained from the child.

Who cannot join

  • Cohort 3 (WP2)
  • Pertussis vaccination done more than one year before inclusion

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

3 sites in 3 countries

Cambodia1 site
  • Institut Pasteur of Cambodia

    Phnom Penh

Other trials in Cambodia

Madagascar1 site
  • Institut Pasteur de Madagascar

    Antananarivo

Other trials in Madagascar

Togo1 site
  • Agence de Médecine Préventive

    Dapaong

About this study

Due to waning of infectious as well as vaccine immunity and lack of vaccination boosters, a large number of adolescents and adults are no longer immunized against Bordetella pertussis, the agent of whooping cough and consequently may contract whooping cough. Furthermore, these populations represent a reservoir of the infectious agent from which the dissemination to non-immune infants is possible, causing severe illness, or even death, in this age group.

Few studies have been carried out on whooping cough in developing countries (incidence, contaminator's age, etc.) and, specifically, none have assessed the duration of protection induced by the whole cell pertussis (wP) vaccine mainly presently used in these countries.

Read more

However, data on the duration of vaccine induced protection are essential to determine i) the usefulness of vaccine boosters and ii) the target age group for these boosters.

The aims of the present study are:

  • To evaluate the proportion of confirmed pertussis cases in infants presenting whooping cough syndrome (WP1a)
  • To evaluate the proportion of confirmed pertussis cases or healthy carriers among contact cases
  • To determine origin of the infant's contamination (WP1b)
  • To determine the duration of protection induced by the wP vaccines used in contact cases and the child population aged 3 to 15 yo (WP1b and WP2)
  • To bring new scientific evidences documenting the potential need for initiating boosters (WP1b and WP2)
  • To allow a comparison of the results with those obtained using the same methodology for the acellular pertussis vaccine and/or in other contexts. Potential implications for the use of pertussis vaccines in low and moderate income countries.
  • To increase local capabilities by the transfer of materials and expertise that will make the diagnosis of pertussis possible in the centres of reference and strengthen a pertussis monitoring network in the implicated countries.
  • To improve children's health through a better match of the vaccination schedule according to the reality of the situation.
Read the detailed description

Background:

Vaccination of infants and young children with a whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine dramatically decreased the mortality and morbidity due to B. pertussis. However, twenty-five years of "honeymoon" period, after the introduction of high vaccination coverage, reappearance of whooping cough cases in industrialized countries was observed in infants contaminated by adolescents and adults. This modification in transmission of the disease after the introduction of the wP vaccine indicated that the immunity provided by the vaccine is not lifelong, just like that provided by natural infection, and that it decreases7-9 years after the first vaccination and the first booster. Due to secondary effects, wP vaccines cannot be used for boosters. Moreover, the wP vaccines have been shown to be different in terms of efficacy (varying from 30 to 95%). Acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines consisting of purified and inactivated bacterial proteins, have therefore been developed and commercialized. These vaccines induce much fewer side effects and may therefore be used for primary-vaccination as well as for vaccine boosters. They are expensive but have more reproducible manufacturing. The humoral and long-term cell-mediated immunities granted by the aP vaccines have been shown to be comparable to the immunity granted by the wP vaccines, effective for 6-7 years after the booster vaccine in the second year of life, also inducing different cell immunity. Since 2007, the proportion of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis isolates no longer producing vaccine antigen(s) has increased in the industrialized countries that use aP vaccines. These isolates may decrease the efficacy of the aP vaccines. Does this type of isolates circulate in the Low income countries still using wP vaccines ? Does it reduce the efficacy of the wP vaccines? Moreover, the wP vaccines used in the Southern countries have not been assessed like the ones used in the Northern countries. In particular, the duration of protection after the primary-vaccination and a vaccine booster is not known.

Rational:

For various reasons, a large difference exits between the monitoring systems across the world: awareness of the disease is variable depending on the population; differences in the immunization coverage and strategies; diverse compositions of the vaccines used; but overall the large differences between the vaccines in terms of immunity against the disease, protection against infection and/or decrease in the transmission of the pathogen. The underestimation of pertussis is recognized by the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the (Global Pertussis Initiative) who highlight the problem of the reliability of the declared data.

This situation is the result of i) limited use of biological diagnostics (problems in isolating the bacteria in the laboratories); ii) diagnostic errors due to the fact that diagnosis is mainly clinical ; iii) inadequate monitoring of the illness ; iv) a lack of awareness among physicians. Pertussis is not considered when it is comes to identifying the respiratory pathogen: most clinicians continue to consider it as only a child illness and ignore adult infections. The absence of an available tool allowing a reliable diagnostic to be made makes difficult to assess the real impact of this pathogen in child respiratory syndromes.

Several studies have been performed on the duration of protection induced by the wP and aP vaccines in Australia, the USA and in Europe. However, few studies have been performed on the wP vaccines used in middle and low income countries and none in Cambodia, Madagascar and Togo. This is one of the objectives of our study. This will allow the vaccination strategy of each region concerned to be adapted when needed, as recommended by the WHO.

Expected Outcomes:

Impact on vaccination strategy:This study, as well as the analysis of data from other national programs for the surveillance of Pertussis, may raise public health authorities' awareness and help them adapting their assessment method for national vaccination programs by including the duration of protection induced by their national wP vaccine and their data on vaccine coverage, on the basis of the information in vaccination booklets, as recommended by WHO.

Impact on the improvement the children's health: The results of our study should raise the public health authorities' awareness on vaccine-preventable diseases, especially whooping cough. This raising of awareness will focus on the surveillance/monitoring and diagnosis of this disease. Moreover, the development of reliable biological diagnostic tools for pertussis will help the clinicians to confirm pertussis diagnosis and to adapt the therapeutic approach accordingly, thus improving the care of the infected person and to stop transmission of the disease which is very contagious.

Impact on the surveillance of the disease by developing an hospital-based surveillance,Training, technology transfer and strengthening of the surveillance network: For the first time, the detection and identification techniques for the other species of Bordetella genus (i.e. B. parapertussis and B. holmesii) will be transferred to laboratories in low income countries. The diagnosis of the different Bordetella species by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the measure of anti-pertussis toxin Immunoglobulin G (IgG) level by serological tests will be set up in the laboratories participating in this study. These laboratories could further be used by the national surveillance network and thus improve the quality of the data available for the local health authorities and for WHO. Thus, this study will allow the establishment of an effective monitoring of pertussis in the countries participating in the study through the raising of the population's awareness, the training of local doctors on the clinical screening of this disease, and finally via the transfer of diagnostic techniques within the laboratories.

Being tested
Nasopharyngeal sampling, Blood Sampling
Keywords
Bordetella Pertussis, Whooping Cough, vaccine
Medical subject headings
Whooping Cough

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nasopharyngeal samplingProcedure or surgery

    Nasopharyngeal sample by aspiration or swabbing

  • Blood SamplingProcedure or surgery

    Blood sample by the tip of a finger (fingerprick)

Study groups in NCT02983487
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Index case (WP1a)Infant under 6 months old with clinical signs of whooping cough syndrome. Nasopharyngeal sampling: A nasopharyngeal sample collected from each nostril by aspiration or swabbing
Receives: Procedure: Nasopharyngeal sampling
Control case (WP1b)Contact cases of infant with a positive diagnosis for whooping cough. Nasopharyngeal sampling: A nasopharyngeal sample collected from each nostril by aspiration or swabbing Blood sampling: A blood sample collected by fingerprick
Receives: Procedure: Nasopharyngeal sampling; Procedure: Blood Sampling
Seroepidemiological cohort (WP2)Children between 3 and 15 years old with complete primo-vaccination against B.Pertussis Blood sampling: A blood sample collected by fingerprick
Receives: Procedure: Blood Sampling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of biologically confirmed cases of pertussis in patients under 6 months old admitted into hospital with clinical signs corresponding to whooping cough syndrome.

    Primary Outcome of WP1a (Cohort 1)

    Measured: November 2018

  2. Proportion of cases tested positive for B.Pertussis given by the presence of B. pertussis DNA in the nasopharyngeal sample or by the presence of an anti-pertussis toxin IgG level >100 IU/mL in the serum.

    Primary Outcome of WP1b (Cohort 2)

    Measured: November 2018

  3. Proportion of cases tested positive given by the presence of an anti-pertussis toxin IgG level >100 IU/mL in the serum.

    Primary Outcome of WP2 (Cohort 3)

    Measured: November 2018

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Estimation of the relative risk of the disease occurring in the contact patients based on their immunization status and age groups

    Measured: April 2019

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion25 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
3,587 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02983487
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-055
Acronym
PERILIC
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
17 Nov 2016
Last updated
1 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Guiso N, Wirsing von Konig CH. Surveillance of pertussis: methods and implementation. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016 Jul;14(7):657-67. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1190272. Epub 2016 May 31.

    PubMed 27224518
  • Tubiana S, Belchior E, Guillot S, Guiso N, Levy-Bruhl D; Renacoq Participants. Monitoring the Impact of Vaccination on Pertussis in Infants Using an Active Hospital-based Pediatric Surveillance Network: Results from 17 Years' Experience, 1996-2012, France. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Aug;34(8):814-20. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000739.

    PubMed 25955837
  • Guiso N. Pertussis vaccination and whooping cough: and now what? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014 Oct;13(10):1163-5. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2014.941816. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

    PubMed 25020131
  • Heininger U, Andre P, Chlibek R, Kristufkova Z, Kutsar K, Mangarov A, Meszner Z, Nitsch-Osuch A, Petrovic V, Prymula R, Usonis V, Zavadska D. Comparative Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pertussis in 10 Central and Eastern European Countries, 2000-2013. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0155949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155949. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27257822
  • Guiso N, Taieb F. Pertussis in Low and Medium Income Countries: A Pragmatic Approach. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1183:137-149. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_409.

    PubMed 31342458
  • Noel G, Badmasti F, Nikbin VS, Zahraei SM, Madec Y, Tavel D, Ait-Ahmed M, Guiso N, Shahcheraghi F, Taieb F. Transversal sero-epidemiological study of Bordetella pertussis in Tehran, Iran. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0238398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238398. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32870922
  • Noel G, Lotfi MN, Mirshahvalad S, Mahdi S, Tavel D, Zahraei SM, Ghanaie RM, Heidary T, Goudarzi A, Kazemi A, Karimi A, Nateghian A, Ait-Ahmed M, Guiso N, Shahcheraghi F, Taieb F. Hospital-based prospective study of pertussis in infants and close contacts in Tehran, Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 18;21(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06266-6.

    PubMed 34144678
  • Noel G, Borand L, Leng C, Keang C, Botr C, Dim B, Kerleguer A, Peng YS, Sreng N, Ork V, Ait-Ahmed M, Guiso N, Taieb F. Circulation of Bordetella pertussis in vaccinated Cambodian children: A transversal serological study. Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

    PubMed 33766688

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bordetella Pertussis, Whooping Cough, run by Institut Pasteur at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Cambodia, Madagascar, Togo. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of biologically confirmed cases of pertussis in patients under 6 months old admitted into hospital with clinical signs corresponding to whooping cough syndrome. (time frame: November 2018). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02983487, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in