AzTrials
AzTrials

MigraineNCT02964741

Investigation and Modulation of the Mu-Opioid Mechanisms in Migraine (in Vivo)

A study testing Active Comparator in people with Migraine, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates whether non-invasive brain stimulation, given for 20 minutes/once per day for ten days (M-F) can reduce migraine pain. Thirty patients will receive this treatment, while thirty will receive a "sham" procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Migraine
What is being tested?
Active Comparator
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Feb 2017to 1 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Episodic migraine (ICHD-3-beta) for at least 6 months, with at least one attack per month and less than 15 attacks per month
  • No intake of opiate medication for the past six months
  • No overuse of analgesic medication, defined as regular intake on ≥15 days per month for more than 3 months
  • Willing to limit the introduction of new treatments for headache management

Who cannot join

  • Presence of any other systemic or chronic pain disorder
  • History or current evidence of a psychotic disorder (e.g. schizophrenia) or substance abuse; bipolar or severe major depression, as evidenced by Beck Depression score of ≥ 30
  • History of neurological disorder (e.g. epilepsy, stroke, neuropathy, neuropathic pain)
  • Prior use of tDCS
  • Current use of opioid pain medications

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Michigan School of Dentistry

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5720

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study investigates whether non-invasive brain stimulation, given for 20 minutes/once per day for ten days (M-F) can reduce migraine pain. Thirty patients will receive this treatment, while thirty will receive a "sham" procedure. Up to thirty healthy volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data may be used from a prior study (NINDS-K23062946 project [IRBMED #HUM00027383; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]).

Read the detailed description

Migraine is a debilitating chronic condition that affects most of the patient's existence, from childhood to late adulthood. During frequent headache attacks, its sufferers show marked increased sensitivity to noxious (hyperalgesia) and even non-noxious stimuli, a phenomenon called cutaneous allodynia that affects 63% of the patients. Although MRI-based techniques have provided insights into some brain mechanisms of migraine, many questions regarding its molecular impact in the brain are still unanswered. The overall goal of this project is to provide a detailed understanding of the µ-opioid receptor mediated transmission in the brain of migraine patients, one of the most important central pain regulatory systems in humans, with the long-term objective of developing more focused neuromechanism-driven methods for migraine research and therapy.

Preliminary studies from an earlier project (NINDS-NIHK23 NS0629946) using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C] carfentanil, a selective radiotracer for μ-opioid receptor (μOR), have indicated that there is a decrease in µOR availability (non-displaceable binding potential; BPND) in the brain of migraine patients during the headache attacks and allodynia, including areas like thalamus and periaqueductal gray matter (PAG). µOR BPND is an objective measurement, in vivo, of endogenous μ-opioid availability, and its acute reduction reflects the activation of this neurotransmitter system. This is arguably one of the neuromechanisms most centrally involved in pain regulation, affecting multiple elements of the pain experience. Moreover, MRI-based reports have found that those findings co-localize with neuroplastic changes in migraine patients. Conventional therapies are unable to selectively target those dysfunctional brain regions, and there is a paucity of data on how to reverse embedded neuroplastic molecular mechanisms when available medications and surgical therapies fail. Several studies with motor cortex stimulation (MCS) have shown that epidural electrodes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are effective in providing analgesia in patients with refractory central. The rationale for MCS stimulation is based in part on the thalamic dysfunction noticed in chronic pain and migraine, and also on studies demonstrating that MCS significantly changes thalamic activity. Evidently, the invasive nature of such a procedure limits its indication to highly severe chronic pain disorders. New non-invasive brain neuromodulatory methods for M1, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can now safely modulate and activate the µOR system, providing relatively lasting pain relief in chronic pain patients and migraine. However, the electric fields generated by its most conventional analgesic montage are widely spread across the brain, lacking specificity on the pain-related structures directly targeted. Recently, a novel high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montage created by our group was able to reduce exclusively "contralateral" sensory-discriminative clinical pain measures (pain intensity/area) in chronic patients by targeting more precisely the putative M1 region. It is hoped that this montage will provide durable relief of pain for this episodic migraine population.

This is a phase 2, single center, two-arm, double-masked, randomized investigation and modulation of the µ-opioid mechanisms in migraine (in vivo). We will enroll 60 patients with episodic migraine (30 for the active M1 HD-tDCS group and 30 for a sham group). Each participant will undergo a sequence of events and evaluations that will include baseline assessments, 10 days of HD-tDCS, pre- and post-PET and MRI scans, and questionnaires to evaluate pain and quality of life.

Conditions
Migraine
Being tested
Active Comparator, Sham Comparator
Keywords
Episodic Migraine, Headache, Opioid
Medical subject headings
Migraine Disorders, Headache

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active ComparatorDevice

    Also called HD-tDCS (active protocol)

    non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol)

  • Sham ComparatorDevice

    Also called HD-tDCS (sham protocol)

    non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol)

Study groups in NCT02964741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Migraine Patients Active GroupActive comparatorEpisodic migraine patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). *Active Comparator
Receives: Device: Active Comparator
Migraine Patients Sham GroupSham comparatorEpisodic migraine patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). *Sham Comparator
Receives: Device: Sham Comparator
Healthy Control GroupNo interventionHealthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n </= 10) may be used from a prior study (NINDS-K23062946 project [IRBMED #HUM00027383; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Consent to use data for a future study was obtained in the informed consent document at the time of participation.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Days With Moderate-to-severe Headache

    Moderate to severe headache is defined by the pain over 3 in an Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10 between end of treatment and one month follow-up.

    Measured: End of treatment - over 1 month follow-up

  2. Responder Rate

    Number of participants who showed a 50% reduction of days with moderate-to-severe headache compared to baseline.

    Measured: End of treatment - over 1 month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Pain Intensity Level Measured by the Visual Analog Scale in Migraineurs (Active or Sham)

    Visual Analog Scale measures pain on a 0 to 10 scale, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst possible pain"

    Measured: Approximately 45 days (Screening Visit [Original Baseline] to Follow Up #2 [28-days post-HD-tDCS treatment])

  2. Moderate to Severe Headache

    Percentage of participants having moderate-to-severe headache between end of treatment and one month follow-up.

    Defined as a response greater than 3 on the (0-10) NRS scale

    Measured: End of treatment - over 1 month follow-up

  3. Use of Rescue Medication

    Percentage of participants who used rescue medication between end of treatment and one month follow-up

    Measured: End of treatment - over 1 month follow-up

  4. Change in Mu-opioid Receptor Non-displaceable Binding Potential (BPND) in the Brains of Migraineurs During Sustained Thermal Pain Threshold Stress Challenge Subsequent to Treatment by HD-tDCS (Active or Sham).

    Mu-opioid receptor BPND at PET #2 will be subtracted from mu-opioid receptor BPND at PET #1.

    PET #1 occurs during the week before HD-tDCS treatment begins. PET #2 occurs during the week after the final HD-tDCS treatment is completed.

    Measured: Time between PET #1 and PET #2 is typically 21 days (minimum 17 days; maximum 42 days).

  5. Change in Mu-opioid Receptor Non-displaceable Binding Potential (BPND) in the Brains of Migraineurs at Rest Subsequent to Treatment by HD-tDCS (Active or Sham).

    Mu-opioid receptor BPND at PET #2 will be subtracted from mu-opioid receptor BPND at PET #1.

    PET #1 occurs during the week before HD-tDCS treatment begins. PET #2 occurs during the week after the final HD-tDCS treatment is completed.

    Measured: Time between PET #1 and PET #2 is typically 21 days (minimum 17 days; maximum 42 days).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2021
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2021

Why it stopped: due to COVID-19

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02964741
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM00107286
Other IDs
R01NS094413
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
7 Oct 2016
Last updated
26 Aug 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lim M, Kim DJ, Nascimento TD, DaSilva AF. High-definition tDCS over primary motor cortex modulates brain signal variability and functional connectivity in episodic migraine. Clin Neurophysiol. 2024 May;161:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

    PubMed 38460220
  • DaSilva AF, Kim DJ, Lim M, Nascimento TD, Scott PJH, Smith YR, Koeppe RA, Zubieta JK, Kaciroti N. Effect of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Headache Severity and Central micro-Opioid Receptor Availability in Episodic Migraine. J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 21;16:2509-2523. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S407738. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37497372

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Comparator in people with Migraine, run by University of Michigan at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Days With Moderate-to-severe Headache (time frame: End of treatment - over 1 month follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02964741, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in