AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal CancerPhase 1/2NCT02963831

A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies

A Phase 1/2 study testing ONCOS-102, Durvalumab and Cyclophosphamide in people with Colorectal Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a two-part Phase 1/2 dose escalation and dose expansion study of an Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus), ONCOS-102, in combination with anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, durvalumab, in adult subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
ONCOS-102, Durvalumab and Cyclophosphamide
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
67 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
7 Sep 2017to 25 Jun 2022
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior standard chemotherapy and have histologic confirmation of epithelial ovarian cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) including cancer originating from the appendix.
  • Subject is willing to undergo a core needle biopsy during screening and Cycle 2, Study Week 5. Archival tumor samples are requested but are not required for eligibility.
  • Previously treated for advanced cancer with no additional therapy options available known to prolong survival.
  • Laboratory parameters for vital functions should be in the normal range or not clinically significant.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 1.

Who cannot join

  • Treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks of starting study treatment or prior treatment with a checkpoint inhibitor (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4], programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] antibodies).
  • Subject has known active central nervous system metastasis, glioma and nervous system malignancies including carcinomatous meningitis. Subjects with asymptomatic brain metastases or spinal cord compression who have been treated, are considered stable, and who have not received corticosteroids or anticonvulsants for at least 28 days prior to screening may be included. Subject has other active malignancy.
  • Known immunodeficiency or known to have evidence of acute or chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C or other uncontrolled inter-current illnesses.
  • Ongoing bowel perforation or presence of bowel fistula or abscess or history of small or large bowel obstruction within 3 months of registration, including subjects with palliative gastric drainage catheters. Subjects with palliative diverting ileostomy or colostomy are allowed if they have been symptom-free for more than 3 months.
  • Subjects with clinically significant cardiovascular disease, history of organ transplant or allogeneic bone marrow transplant, active known or history of autoimmune disease that might recur or major surgery within 28 days prior to the first dose or still recovering from prior surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Research Facility

    Buffalo, New York, 14263

  • Research Facility

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903

  • Research Facility

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Research Facility

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Research Facility

    San Diego, California, 92093-0698

  • Research Facility

    Toledo, Ohio, 43614

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 1/2 Dose Escalation Study With Expansion Cohorts to Investigate the Safety, Biologic and Anti-tumor Activity of ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies

This is a two-part Phase 1/2 dose escalation and dose expansion study of an Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus), ONCOS-102, in combination with anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, durvalumab, in adult subjects with peritoneal disease who have failed prior standard chemotherapy and have histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Read the detailed description

ONCOS-102 will be administered intraperitoneally (IP) at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.

A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) will be administered intravenously (IV) 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. Durvalumab will be administered by IV infusion once every four weeks (Q4W) for a total of 12 four-week cycles.

Phase 1 of the study is a dose escalation phase, which will use a 3+3 design to evaluate the safety of ONCOS-102 monotherapy before initiation of durvalumab and to identify the recommended combination dose (RCD) of a fixed dose of durvalumab (1500 mg) + ONCOS-102 at 2 dose levels (1 x 10^11 viral particles (VPs) and 3 x 10^11 VPs).

Subjects treated at the RCD of 3 x 10^11 VPs ONCOS-102 will be included in the Phase 2 expansion cohort based on their tumor diagnosis.

Phase 2 of the study is the dose expansion phase, which will further explore the safety and anti-tumor activity for the RCD in 2 expansion cohorts with peritoneal disease:

  1. Epithelial ovarian cancer
  2. Metastatic colorectal cancer

Simon's 2-Stage MINIMAX Design will be used in Phase 2 for Expansion Cohorts 1 and 2. In the first stage, 18 subjects will be enrolled in Cohort 1 and 13 subjects in Cohort 2 (including the 6 subjects at the RCD from the dose escalation phase).

If 5 or more subjects in Cohort 1, or one or more subjects in Cohort 2, demonstrate clinical benefit (defined as percentage of subjects who are not in progression at end of Week 24), 15 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 1, and 14 additional subjects will be enrolled in Stage 2 of Cohort 2.

The primary endpoint is the percentage of subjects who are not in progression at the end of Week 24 as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).

Being tested
ONCOS-102, Durvalumab, Cyclophosphamide
Keywords
Oncos-102, Durvalumab, Peritoneal, Cyclophosphamide
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Appendiceal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ONCOS-102Biological

    Also called Adenovirus Vector (Ad5/3-D24-GMCSF), Expressing GM-CSF (GM-CSF-encoding adenovirus)

    ONCOS-102 was administered by intraperitoneal infusion at weekly intervals for 6 weeks.

  • DurvalumabDrug

    Also called MEDI4736, Imfinzi®

    Durvalumab was administered by IV infusion once every four weeks for a total of 10 (Cohort A) or 12 four-week cycles.

  • CyclophosphamideDrug

    Also called Cytoxan®

    A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102.

Study groups in NCT02963831
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort A: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationExperimentalONCOS-102, 1 x 10^11 viral particles (VPs) monotherapy for 6 weeks, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 71. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered intravenously (IV) 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused intraperitoneally (IP) in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL sodium chloride [NaCl] in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 10 cycles, starting on Day 71. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
Receives: Biological: ONCOS-102; Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Cohort B: ONCOS-102 Dose EscalationExperimentalONCOS-102, 1 x 10^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
Receives: Biological: ONCOS-102; Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Cohort 1: Epithelial Ovarian CancerExperimentalONCOS-102, 3 x 10^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
Receives: Biological: ONCOS-102; Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Cyclophosphamide
Cohort 2: Metastatic Colorectal CancerExperimentalONCOS-102, 3 x 10^11 VPs + durvalumab 1500 mg starting on Day 15. A bolus dose of 300 mg cyclophosphamide (CPO) was administered IV 1 to 3 days before the first infusion of ONCOS-102. ONCOS-102 was infused IP in a total volume of 500 mL saline (0.9 mg/mL NaCl in water for injection) by gravity feed or per institutional procedures for IP infusions. ONCOS-102 was to be administered weekly for a total of 6 weeks, starting on Day 1. Durvalumab was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion at a fixed dose of 1500 mg in either 0.9% (w/v) saline or dextrose Q4W for 12 cycles, starting on Day 15. Optional durvalumab treatment extension beyond the initial 12-cycle treatment period was allowed for subjects who complete the 12-cycle treatment period with Stable Disease or better.
Receives: Biological: ONCOS-102; Drug: Durvalumab; Drug: Cyclophosphamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    All Adverse events (AEs) were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 19.0 and classified by MedDRA system organ class (SOC) and preferred term. The severity of AEs was assessed according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events (AEs) were reported based on clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and any other medically indicated assessments, including subject interviews, from the time informed consent was signed through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment. TEAEs are those that occurred or worsened after administration of the first dose of study treatment.

    Deaths within the AE Reporting Period included all deaths that occurred during the study treatment period, or up to 90 days after the administration of the last dose of study drug or initiation of a new treatment.

    Measured: up to 31 months (90 days after the last dose of study medication).

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

    PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.

    Measured: Up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Using Kaplan-Meier Method

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

    PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions or the development of new lesions.

    Measured: Up to 29 months

  2. Objective Response Rate as Measured by as Measured by Response Evaluation in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to RECIST 1.1 at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per RECIST 1.1, target lesions were categorized as follows: complete response (CR): disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR): ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; PD: ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; stable disease (SD): small changes that do not meet above criteria.

    Measured: Up to 15 months

  3. Progression-free Survival (PFS) at Week 24 as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the Total Measurable Tumor Burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.

    PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.

    Measured: Up to 24 Weeks

  4. Median Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5,7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.

    PFS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per irRECIST, irPD is defined as a ≥ 20% increase from nadir in the TMTB.

    Measured: Up to 39 months

  5. Objective Response Rate as Measured by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)

    Tumor responses were evaluated using appropriate imaging and categorized according to irRECIST at Screening (up to 28 days before the first dose of study treatment), at cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 during study treatment, and during on-study follow-up starting 8 weeks after the last disease assessment. Per irRECIST, measurable lesions were categorized as follows: immune-related complete response (irCR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions; immune-related partial response (irPR): ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in the total measurable tumor burden (TMTB); immune-related progressive disease (irPD): ≥ 20% increase from nadir in TMTB; immune-related stable disease (irSD): not meeting above criteria.

    Measured: Up to 15 months

  6. Median Overall Survival (OS) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method

    After completion of treatment, all subjects were followed for survival every 6 months up to 3 years following initiation of study treatment or until June 25, 2022 when all post-study follow-up was completed. OS was measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of death or last follow-up (June 25, 2022 when the last follow-up data was collected or earlier). Subjects lost to follow-up are censored on the date when they were last known to be alive.

    Measured: Up to 39 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start7 Sep 2017
  3. Primary completion25 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion25 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Model description
The Phase 1 cohorts were enrolled sequentially. In Phase 2, the two expansion cohorts are enrolled in parallel.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
67 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02963831
Sponsor's protocol ID
LUD2015-008
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
10 Nov 2016
Last updated
22 Dec 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing ONCOS-102, Durvalumab and Cyclophosphamide in people with Colorectal Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) (time frame: up to 31 months (90 days after the last dose of study medication).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in