AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure InfectionsPhase 4NCT02961764

Evaluation of a New Critical Pathway for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)

A Phase 4 study testing Dalbavancin in people with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections, run by Allergan at 11 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate a new critical pathway (use of guideline-based patient identification criteria and for those who meet these criteria, use of dalbavancin) for the treatment of ABSSSI compared to usual care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Dalbavancin
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
313 participants
Where
11 sitesUnited States
Study dates
29 Nov 2016to 29 Mar 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Presents to the Emergency Department (ED) and meets the clinical definition for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
  • Known or suspected gram-positive infection.

Who cannot join

  • Known or suspected gram-negative infections, anaerobic infections, or fungemia
  • Known or suspected infections that are severe, life threatening or are not included in the ABSSSI Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance
  • Injection drug users with a fever
  • Severe neurological disorder leading to immobility or confined to a wheelchair
  • Bilateral Lower extremity involvement of the suspected infection.

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

United States11 sites
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • Henry Ford Hospital

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Wayne State University

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Hartford Hospital

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06102

  • Truman Medical Centers

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64108

  • ProMedica Monroe Regional Hospital

    Monroe, Michigan, 48162

  • Maricopa Medical Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85008

  • Olive View-UCLA Medical Center

    Sylmar, California, 91342

  • Tampa General Hospital

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

  • University of Massachusetts

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pragmatic Trial Designed to Evaluate a New Critical Pathway for Treatment of Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

This study will evaluate a new critical pathway (use of guideline-based patient identification criteria and for those who meet these criteria, use of dalbavancin) for the treatment of ABSSSI compared to usual care.

Being tested
Usual Care, Dalbavancin
Keywords
Critical Pathways, Health Facilities, Clinical Protocols, Patient Satisfaction, Absenteeism, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Quality of Life, Economics, Medical, Health Resources, Health resource utilization, Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI)
Medical subject headings
Patient Satisfaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Usual CareDrug

    Usual care as prescribed by the physician as standard of care in clinical practice for the treatment of ABSSSI.

  • DalbavancinDrug

    Also called Dalvance®

    Dalbavancin administered as a single IV dose of 1500 mg over 30 minutes.

Study groups in NCT02961764
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Usual CareActive comparatorParticipants who receive Usual Care as prescribed by the physician as standard of care in clinical practice for the treatment of ABSSSI.
Receives: Drug: Usual Care
New Critical PathwayActive comparatorThe New Critical Pathway under study is defined as (1) use of guideline-based patient identification criteria, and, for those who meet these criteria, (2) use of dalbavancin, administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose of 1500 mg over 30 minutes for the treatment of ABSSSI.
Receives: Drug: Dalbavancin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital Admission Rate at Initial Episode of Care

    Measured: 44 Days

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. Number of Total Admitted Hospital Days

    Number of days during the initial hospitalization (for those initially hospitalized) and all other hospitalizations

    Measured: 44 Days

  2. Total Length of Stay in Emergency Department (ED) During the Initial Episode of Care

    Time spent in ED in hours from triage to release (either admitted to the hospital, admitted to observation, or released to home)

    Measured: Initial Care: 14 Days

  3. Number of Participants With Infection-related Major Surgical Interventions That Required Operating Room Time

    Number of all major surgical interventions unexpected or expected that required operating room time

    Measured: 44 Days

  4. Number of Infection-related Total Admitted Hospital Days

    Measured: 44 Days

  5. Number of Participants With Infection-related Hospitalizations

    Number of days of hospitalization during the initial hospitalization (for those initially hospitalized) and all other infection-related hospitalizations

    Measured: 44 Days

  6. Number of Participants With Infection-related Hospitalizations During Initial Care and Follow-up That Resulted in Admission to Intensive Care Unit

    Measured: 44 Days

  7. Number of Participants With All Cause Hospitalizations in the 30 Days Post Discharge From the Hospital or Release From the ED

    Measured: Follow-up: 30 Days

  8. Number of Participants With Infection-related Emergency Department (ED) Visits

    Measured: 44 Days

  9. Number of Participants With Infection-related Outpatient Healthcare Visits

    Measured: 44 Days

  10. Use of a Peripherally-Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Line or Central Line to Administer Antibiotic Therapy

    Measured: 44 Days

  11. Number of Participants With Infection-related Healthcare Visits Due to PICC Line or Central Line Used to Administer Antibiotic Therapy

    Measured: 44 Days

  12. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Measured: 44 Days

  13. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Overall Health

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  14. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Wait in Emergency Room

    Patients rated their satisfaction on a 10-point scale, where 0 was the worst experience possible and 10 the best experience possible.

    Measured: Day 14

  15. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Hospitalization

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  16. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Satisfaction With Hospital Stay

    Patients rated their satisfaction on a 10-point scale, where 0 was the worst experience possible and 10 the best experience possible.

    Measured: Day 14

  17. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Factors for Dissatisfaction With Your Hospital Stay

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  18. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Received IV Antibiotic Therapy for Skin Infections

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  19. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Satisfaction With Receiving IV Antibiotic Therapy

    Patients rated their satisfaction on a 10-point scale, where 0 was the worst experience possible and 10 the best experience possible.

    Measured: Day 14

  20. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Factors Contributing to Satisfaction With Receiving IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  21. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Factors Contributing to Dissatisfaction With Receiving IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: 14 Days

  22. Patient Satisfaction With Care: IV Therapy Hindering Normal Activities of Daily Living

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  23. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Concerned About Receiving Your IV Therapy

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  24. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Satisfied With the Number of IV Infusions Received Per Day

    Patients rated their satisfaction on a 10-point scale, where 0 was the worst experience possible and 10 the best experience possible.

    Measured: Day 14

  25. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Satisfaction With the Average Time to Administer Each IV

    Patients rated their satisfaction on a 10-point scale, where 0 was the worst experience possible and 10 the best experience possible.

    Measured: Day 14

  26. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Time to Travel to Appointments to Receive IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: 14 days

  27. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Average Time to be Seen by a Healthcare Provider

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: 14 days

  28. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Healthcare Setting Preferred if Treated Again for a Skin Infection With IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: 14 Days

  29. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Factors Contributing to Preference for Outpatient Care

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: 14 Days

  30. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Regimen Preferred if Treated Again for a Similar Skin Infection With IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  31. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Time Willing to Spend Receiving Each IV

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  32. Patient Satisfaction With Care: Find Value in a Physician

    Patient satisfaction with care as assessed through the ABSSSI Patient Satisfaction Survey (patient reported).

    Measured: Day 14

  33. Patient Work and Productivity Loss as Assessed Through the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire

    Number of days with lost/reduced productivity during follow-up, as measured with Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire

    Measured: Day 14

  34. Patient Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by the Short Form 12 (SF-12) 12-Item Patient Questionnaire

    The SF-12 yields a physical and a mental health component summary score (referred to as physical component summary score [PCS] and mental component summary score [MCS]). The PCS and MCS follow a t-score distribution, i.e. mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 in the general US population, meaning all scores above or below 50 are above and below the average, respectively, in the US general population.

    Measured: Day 14

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start29 Nov 2016
  3. Primary completion29 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion29 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
313 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02961764
Sponsor's protocol ID
CMO-US-ID-0476
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
7 Nov 2016
Last updated
10 Apr 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Talan DA, Mower WR, Lovecchio FA, Rothman RE, Steele MT, Keyloun K, Gillard P, Copp R, Moran GJ. Pathway with single-dose long-acting intravenous antibiotic reduces emergency department hospitalizations of patients with skin infections. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1108-1117. doi: 10.1111/acem.14258. Epub 2021 May 5.

    PubMed 33780567

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Dalbavancin in people with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections, run by Allergan at 11 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Apr 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital Admission Rate at Initial Episode of Care (time frame: 44 Days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02961764, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in