Irritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaPhase 4NCT02959983
Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea in Patients With Inadequate Control of Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use
A Phase 4 study testing Eluxadoline in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea, run by Allergan at 83 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) versus placebo for the treatment of patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D) who report that the use of loperamide in the prior 12 months failed to provide control of their IBS-D symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- What is being tested?
- Eluxadoline
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 346 participants
- Where
- 83 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Oct 2016to 22 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Has a diagnosis of IBS-D, defined by the Rome III criteria as loose (mushy) or watery stools ≥25% and hard or lumpy stools ≤25% of bowel movements.
- Has had a colonoscopy performed within 5 years prior to Screening if they are at least 50 years of age, OR if they meet any of the following alarm features:
- Has documented weight loss within the past 6 months; or
- Has nocturnal symptoms; or
- Has a familial history of colon cancer; or
- Has blood mixed with their stool (excluding any blood from hemorrhoids)
- Patient reports use of loperamide in the 12 months prior to Screening for IBS-D symptoms and that loperamide did not provide adequate control of IBS-D symptoms.
- Has not used any loperamide rescue medication within 14 days prior to randomization.
Who cannot join
- Has a diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) with a subtype of constipation IBS, mixed IBS, or unsubtyped IBS.
- Has a history of inflammatory or immune-mediated gastrointestinal (GI) disorders including inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), microscopic colitis, or celiac disease.
- Has a history of diverticulitis within 3 months prior to screening.
- Has a documented history of lactose intolerance.
- Has a documented history of bile-acid malabsorption.
- Has a history of chronic or severe constipation or intestinal obstruction, stricture, toxic megacolon, GI perforation, fecal impaction, gastric banding, bariatric surgery, adhesions.
Show all 25Show fewer
- Has any of the following surgical history:
- Cholecystectomy or previously documented agenesis of gallbladder; or
- Any abdominal surgery within the 3 months prior to screening; or
- Major gastric, hepatic, pancreatic, or intestinal surgery (appendectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, or polypectomy greater than 3 months post-surgery are allowed).
- Has a history of cholecystitis within 6 months before screening.
- Has a history of pancreatitis or structural diseases of the pancreas, including known or suspected pancreatic duct obstruction.
- Has a history of known or suspected biliary duct obstruction or sphincter of Oddi disease or dysfunction, excluding a history of gallstones.
- Has a history or current evidence of laxative abuse within 5 years prior to screening.
- Has documented evidence of cirrhosis.
- Has a history of cardiovascular events, including stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to screening.
- Has an unstable renal, hepatic, metabolic, or hematologic condition.
- Has a history of malignancy within 5 years before screening (except squamous and basal cell carcinomas and cervical carcinoma in situ).
- Has a history of human immunodeficiency virus infection.
- Has a history of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision-defined substance dependency, excluding nicotine and caffeine, within 2 years prior to screening.
- Has a history of alcohol abuse, alcohol addiction, and alcoholism or drinks more than 3 alcoholic beverages per day.
- Has used aspirin or aspirin-containing medications (>325 mg of aspirin per day) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, when taken specifically for the symptoms of IBS, within 14 days of randomization.
- Has current (within 14 days of randomization) or expected use of any narcotic or opioid-containing agents, tramadol, docusate, enemas, GI preparations (including antacids containing aluminum or magnesium, antidiarrheal agents [except loperamide rescue medication after randomization]), antinausea agents, antispasmodic agents, bismuth, or prokinetic agents.
- Has current (within 28 days of randomization) use of rifaximin or other antibiotics (with the exception of topical antibiotics or a 1-day course with an antibiotic). Expected use of rifaximin or other antibiotics during the course of the study that is known at the time of randomization.
- Has an elective surgery planned or expects to need elective surgery at any time during the study.
Trial locations and contacts
83 sites in 2 countries.
83 sites in 2 countries
United States76 sites
Investigative Clinical Research
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Premier Family Physicians
Austin, Texas, 78735
Clinical Inquest Center Ltd
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45431
The Center for Clinical Trials
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531
Connecticut Clinical Research Foundation
Bristol, Connecticut, 06010
Drug Trials Brooklyn
Brooklyn, New York, 11230
NY Scientific
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
Investigators Research
Brownsburg, Indiana, 46112
RNA America, LLC
Buford, Georgia, 30518
Med Investigations
Carmichael, California, 95608
Family Medicine Associate of Texas
Carrollton, Texas, 75010
Charlotte Gastroenterology & Hepatology, PLLC
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
WR-ClinSearch, LLC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37421
Clinical Research Insititute of Michigan LLC
Chesterfield, Michigan, 48047
MGG Group Co. Inc. Chevy Chase Clinical Research
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Northwestern University Feinbery School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 606611
GW Research Inc
Chula Vista, California, 91910
Hometown Urgent Care and Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45215
Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Buckeye Health and Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43207
Hometown Urgent Care and Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Digestive Care of N. Broward
Coral Springs, Florida, 33065
Partners in Clinical Research
Cumberland, Rhode Island, 02864
Diagnamics Inc
Encinitas, California, 92024
Radiant Research, Inc.
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Clinical Research Advantage Inc/Radiant Research Inc.
Evansville, Indiana, 47725
Pharmakon Inc
Evergreen Park, Illinois, 60805
Gastroenterology Associates of Northern Virginia
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Long Island Gastrointestinal Group LLP
Great Neck, New York, 11023
Medical Research Center of Connecticut, LLC
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518
Peters Medical Research LLC
High Point, North Carolina, 27265
Homestead Medical Research
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Hometown Urgent Care and Research
Huber Heights, Ohio, 45424
Clinical Research Associates, LLC
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Behavioral Research Specialists, LLC
Irvine, California, 92606
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc.
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Health Awareness, Inc.
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
IMA Medical Research, PC
Kew Gardens, New York, 11415
New Phase Research & Development
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Advanced Biomedical Research of America
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89123
Precision Clinical Research LLC
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
North State Clincial Research PLLC
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645
Women's Clinic of Lincoln, P.C.
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Blue Ridge Medical Research
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502
CNS Healthcare
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Pharmax Research Clinic Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33126
Well Pharma Medical Research, Corp.
Miami, Florida, 33143
Ocean Blue Medical Research Center, Inc
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166
Central Sooner Research
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Bravo Health Care Center
North Bay Village, Florida, 33141
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Arkansas Gastroenterology
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117
Advanced Research Institute - Ogden
Ogden, Utah, 84405
Quality Clinical Research Inc.
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions Inc.
Orlando, Florida, 32801
Elite Clinical Studies
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Wake Research Associates LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Advanced Research Institute
Reno, Nevada, 89511
The Oregon Center for Clinical Investigations, INC.
Salem, Oregon, 97301
Wasatch Clinical Research, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107
Multi-Phase Trials LLC
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Health Texas Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas, 78228
Discovery Clinical Trials - Stone Oak
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
The Center for Clinical Trials
Saraland, Alabama, 36571
Gtc Research
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66218
Shahram Jacobs MD INC.
Sherman Oaks, California, 91403
Carl Meisner Medical Clinic
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478
Clinical Research of West Florida Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Meridien Research
Tampa, Florida, 33634
Westlake Medical Research
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360
Upland Clinical Research
Upland, California, 91786
MedVadis Research Corporation
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
Advanced RX Clinicial Research Group, Inc.
Westminster, California, 92683
Trial Management Associates, LLC
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403
Gastroenterology Associates of Western Michigan, PLC
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519
Canada7 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, T2N 1N4
Corunna Medical Research Centre
Corunna, Ontario, N0N 1G0
Manna Research
Etobicoke, Ontario, 7LM 4Y1
SKDS Research Inc
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8
Viable Clinical Research Corp.
Nova Scotia, B4V 3N2
Centre de reserche St Louis
Québec, G1W4R4
Dynamik Research Inc
Québec, H9R 3J1
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4 Multicenter, Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) in Patients Who Report Inadequate Control of IBS-D Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use (RELIEF)
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) versus placebo for the treatment of patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D) who report that the use of loperamide in the prior 12 months failed to provide control of their IBS-D symptoms.
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- Being tested
- Eluxadoline, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EluxadolineDrug
Also called VIBERZI™
Eluxadoline 100 mg oral tablets BID with food.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matching eluxadoline oral tablets BID with food.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Eluxadoline | Active comparator | Eluxadoline 100 mg oral tablets twice daily (BID) with food for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Eluxadoline |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo matching eluxadoline oral tablets BID with food for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Percentage of primary composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet both of the following daily composite criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entry: 1)Worst Abdominal Pain (WAP) score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) Bristol Stool Score (BSS) <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percentage of Stool Consistency Responders
Percentage of stool consistency responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily stool consistency response criteria: BSS <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with daily patient diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool). A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval.
Measured: Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of Pain Responders
Percentage of pain responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily pain response criteria: WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline for ≥50% of days with diary entries over a certain time period. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. A participant must have had a minimum of 20 days of diary entries over any 4-week interval.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of Monthly Composite Responders
Percentage of monthly composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet the daily composite response criteria for at least 50% of days with diary entry for a minimum of 20 days during each 4-week interval (weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12). Composite response includes both of the following criteria: 1) WAP score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) BSS <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool).
Measured: Weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study start25 Oct 2016
- Primary completion22 Jan 2018
- Study completion22 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With DiarrheaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 346 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Esther Jo, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02959983
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMO-US-GI-0429
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4 Multicenter, Multinational, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy of Eluxadoline in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D) in Patients Who Report Inadequate Control of IBS-D Symptoms With Prior Loperamide Use (RELIEF)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02959983
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMO-US-GI-0429
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 346 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Feb 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of eluxadoline 100 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) versus placebo for the treatment of patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea (IBS-D) who report that the use of loperamide in the prior 12 months failed to provide control of their IBS-D symptoms.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Eluxadoline | Active comparator | Drug: EluxadolineEluxadoline 100 mg oral tablets twice daily (BID) with food for 12 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo matching eluxadoline oral tablets BID with food for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Has a diagnosis of IBS-D, defined by the Rome III criteria as loose (mushy) or watery stools ≥25% and hard or lumpy stools ≤25% of bowel movements.
- Has had a colonoscopy performed within 5 years prior to Screening if they are at least 50 years of age, OR if they meet any of the following alarm features:
- Patient reports use of loperamide in the 12 months prior to Screening for IBS-D symptoms and that loperamide did not provide adequate control of IBS-D symptoms.
- Has not used any loperamide rescue medication within 14 days prior to randomization.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Has a diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) with a subtype of constipation IBS, mixed IBS, or unsubtyped IBS.
- Has a history of inflammatory or immune-mediated gastrointestinal (GI) disorders including inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis), microscopic colitis, or celiac disease.
- Has a history of diverticulitis within 3 months prior to screening.
- Has a documented history of lactose intolerance.
- Has a documented history of bile-acid malabsorption.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EluxadolineAlso: VIBERZI™Eluxadoline 100 mg oral tablets BID with food. | Drug | Eluxadoline |
| PlaceboPlacebo matching eluxadoline oral tablets BID with food. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12
Percentage of primary composite responders is defined as the percentage of participants who meet both of the following daily composite criteria for at least 50% of the days with diary entry: 1)Worst Abdominal Pain (WAP) score improved by ≥40% compared to Baseline. The participant records their WAP score in the past 24 hours each day in a daily patient diary where: 0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain. 2) Bristol Stool Score (BSS) <5; or the absence of a bowel movement if accompanied by ≥40% improvement in WAP compared to Baseline. The participant records their stool consistency each day in a daily patient diary using the BSS on a scale from 1 (hard stool) to 7 (watery stool).
3 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Stool Consistency Responders
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of Pain Responders
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12 and 4-week intervals (Weeks 1 to 4, Weeks 5 to 8 and Weeks 9 to 12)
Percentage of Monthly Composite Responders
Time frame: Weeks 1 to 4, 5 to 8, and 9 to 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Recruiting
Lactic Acid Bacteria in Functional Diarrheal Disorders
IBS-D (Diarrhea-predominant), IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Huanghou Zhixie Diwan in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Mechanistic Evaluation of Hewei Anchang Formula for Overlapping Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients With Coexisting Functional Dyspepsia and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Functional Dyspepsia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Jingfang Granules in Treating Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Cold-Dampness Disturbing Spleen Syndrome
Diarrhea-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Esther Jo study director
Allergan
83 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Eluxadoline in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea, run by Allergan at 83 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 83 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Feb 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Were Composite Responders Based on Improvements From Baseline in Daily Worst Abdominal Pain And Daily Stool Consistency Scores (time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1 to 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.