AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory FailurePhase 4DEX-PCH-VMNINCT02958150

Dexmedetomidine Versus Standard Clinical Practice During Non Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Standard Clinical Practice in people with Acute Respiratory Failure, run by Basque Health Service at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as a sedative drug during NIV and the different strategies routinely used in patients with ARF of different aetiologies. Efficacy will be assessed based on absence of intubation, short term prognosis, and occurrence of medical complications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
Dexmedetomidine and Standard Clinical Practice
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Oct 2016to Oct 2022
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 18 years of age.
  • Competent or with legal representative able to sign inform consent.
  • Reversible ARF secondary to heart failure, COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, or at risk of pot-extubation failure* who meet the criteria for starting NIV.
  • Signs and symptoms of respiratory distress or
  • Moderate to severe dyspnoea, grater than usual and/or
  • Respiratory rate greater than 25 in COPD or greater than 30 in hypoxemic ARF and/or
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Use of accessory muscles and/or paradoxical breathing and/or
  • Hypercapnic encephalopathy
  • And changes in gas exchange
  • PaCO2>45 mmHg, pH<7.35 and/or
  • PaO2/FiO2 between 300 and 150.
  • Patients at risk of post-extubation failure: Patients who meet at least one of the following criteria.
  • Impaired consciousness.
  • Age over 65 years
  • Heart failure with EF >30%
  • Severe disease with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APSCHE) score >12.
  • Protracted weaning before extubation

Who cannot join

  • Respiratory arrest, direct indication of OTI and IMV.
  • Severe unstable comorbidity (myocardial ischemia with ejection fraction <30%, arrythmia, uncontrolled hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg with doses of norepinephrine>0.5 mcg/kg/min and/or dobutamine>10 mcg/kg/min).
  • Inability to protect the airway: bronchial aspiration.
  • Fixed upper airway obstruction.
  • Tracheostomy.
  • Undrained pneumothorax.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Severe agitation or lack of collaboration of the patient despite medication administered.
  • Facial burns or trauma.
  • Facial surgery or anatomical changes which prevent mask fitting.
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.
  • Allergy to eggs, soya, or peanuts.
  • HR< 50 bpm not induced by beta- blockers.
  • Advanced heart block (grade 2 or 3) unless paced.
  • Acute cerebrovascular conditions.
  • Increased intracranial pressure.
  • Closed angle glaucoma.
  • Myasthenia gravis.
  • Concurrent use of CYP3A4 inhibitors (amprenavir, atazanavir, or ritonavir).
  • Refuse to participate in the trial.
  • Pregnant or nursing patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Araba University Hospital

    Vitoria-Gasteiz, Álava, 01009

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Randomised Clinical Trial: Dexmedetomidine Versus Standard Clinical Practice During Non Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

This study compare the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as a sedative drug during NIV and the different strategies routinely used in patients with ARF of different aetiologies. Efficacy will be assessed based on absence of intubation, short term prognosis, and occurrence of medical complications.

Being tested
Dexmedetomidine, Standard Clinical Practice

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02958150
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DexmedetomidineExperimentalDexmedetomidine according to the stablished protocol
Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine
Standard Clinical PracticeActive comparatorThe physician in charge will decide the treatment to be administered (if deemed necessary) in accordance with the protocol established at the department
Receives: Procedure: Standard Clinical Practice

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determinate the percentage of orotracheal intubations, and thus the need for NIV during the trial.

    Need for intubation is defined as the presence of any of the following: SpO2<80% or P aO2/FiO2<150, seizures, poor secretion management, hypercapnia and pH<7.20, hypotension: systolic blood pressure (SBP)<80 mmHg refractory despite administration of vasoactive amines or electrocardiogram (ECG) with ischaemic changes or ventricular arrhythmia resulting from myocardial hypoxia.

    Measured: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. To determinate NIV duration of NIV in each group.

    Number of hours the patient will be on NIV.

    Measured: 72 hours

  2. To analyse stay at the ICU in each group.

    Number of days patients stay at the ICU until they are discharged home or die.

    Measured: An average of 5 days

  3. To analyse hospital stay in each group

    Number of days patients remain at the hospital until they are discharged home or die.

    Measured: 15 days

  4. To compare all-cause mortality at the ICU in both groups.

    Percentage of all deaths from any cause in patients with ARF on NIV at the ICU in both study groups.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 years

  5. To compare specific mortality at the ICU in both groups.

    Percentage of deaths attributable to ARF in patients on NIV at the ICU in both study groups.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 years

  6. To analyse hospital-specific mortality.

    Percentage of all deaths attributable to ARF in patients on NIV at the ICU discharged to a ward in the 2 study groups.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 years

  7. To analyse all-cause hospital mortality.

    Percentage of all deaths from any aetiology of ARF in patients treated with NIV in the ICU discharged to a ward in the 2 study groups.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 years

  8. To report the course of ARF in each group.

    Based on the presence before the start of NIV

    Measured: 1 and 24 hours after NIV

  9. To report NIV tolerance during administration of dexmedetomidine versus SCP.

    Nausea and/or vomiting, Aspiration pneumonia, delirium, agitation, interface tolerance or pain secondary to use of interface.

    Measured: During administration of dexmedetomidine/SCP and up to 24 hours after drug infusion/SCP is completed.

  10. To report the adverse effects of dexmedetomidine.

    Bradycardia, hypotension, tachycardia, hypertension and/or transient respiratory depression.

    Measured: During drug administration and up to 24 hours after drug infusion is completed.

  11. To asses patient satisfaction with dexmedetomidine as compared to SCP

    Patient satisfaction with use of dexmedetomidine as compared to drugs used in SCP will be estimated once NIV and dexmedetomidine/SCP infusion have been completed, using a Likert type questionnaire.

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02958150
Sponsor's protocol ID
DEX-PCH-VMNI
Acronym
DEX-PCH-VMNI
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
27 Oct 2016
Last updated
11 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Dexmedetomidine and Standard Clinical Practice in people with Acute Respiratory Failure, run by Basque Health Service at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determinate the percentage of orotracheal intubations, and thus the need for NIV during the trial. (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in