Nasal ObstructionNCT02952313
Spirox Latera™ Implant Support of Lateral Nasal Wall Cartilage (LATERAL-OR) Study
A study testing Nasal Implant in people with Nasal Obstruction, run by Spirox, Inc. at 12 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study is being conducted to obtain outcomes data in subjects with severe to extreme class NOSE scores undergoing placement of the Spirox Latera Implant with or without concurrent septoplasty and/or turbinate reduction procedures in an operating room setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasal Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- Nasal Implant
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2016to Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject has Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score ≥55.
- The subject has dynamic lateral nasal wall insufficiency as confirmed by Positive Modified Cottle Maneuver22.
- The subject is ≥18 years of age.
- The subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with the study protocol.
- The subject is seeking treatment for nasal airway obstruction due to Nasal Valve Collapse (NVC) and is willing to undergo nasal Implant procedure alone or with septoplasty and/or a turbinate reduction procedure in an operating room setting.
- The subject has appropriate nasal and facial anatomy to receive Latera Implant.
- The subject agrees to follow-up examinations through twelve (12) months post operatively.
- The subject has failed a trial of appropriate maximal medical management [e.g., nasal steroids (at least 4 weeks); antihistamines; oral decongestants; nasal strips, stents, or cones]. Failure of maximal medical management may be from lack of effectiveness or inability of subject to tolerate.
Who cannot join
- The subject is having a concurrent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) or sinuplasty.
- The subject has had rhinoplasty within the past twelve (12) months.
- The subject is planning to have other concurrent rhinoplasty procedure.
- The subject is planning to have other rhinoplasty procedures or will use external dilators within twelve (12) months after the index procedure.
- The subject has had septoplasty and/or inferior turbinate reduction within the past six (6) months.
- The subject has, in the view of the clinician, inappropriate fixation on their nasal airway.
Show all 20Show fewer
- The subject plans to have any surgical or non-surgical treatment of their nasal valve, other than the index procedure, within twelve (12) months of the study.
- The subject has a permanent Implant or dilator in the nasal area.
- The subject has concomitant inflammatory or infectious skin conditions or unhealed wounds in the treatment area.
- The subject currently has active nasal vestibulitis.
- The subject has a history of nasal vasculitis.
- The subject is a chronic systemic steroid or recreational intra-nasal drug user.
- The subject has had a cancerous or pre-cancerous lesion and/or has had radiation exposure in the treatment area or chemotherapy.
- The subject has polyps or pathology other than septal deviation and/or turbinate hypertrophy and/or lateral wall insufficiency that would contribute to airway obstruction.
- The subject has a history of a significant bleeding disorder(s) that would prevent healing of the treatment area post procedure.
- The subject has a known or suspected allergy to poly lactic acid (PLA) or other absorbable materials.
- The subject has a significant systemic disease such as poorly controlled diabetes which, in the investigator's opinion, could pre-dispose the subject to poor wound healing.
- The subject is currently using nasal oxygen or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
- The subject is not a candidate for procedures conducted under general anesthesia, managed anesthesia care (MAC) or conscious sedation.
- If female, subject is known or suspected to be pregnant or is lactating.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
United States12 sites
ENT of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
ENT & Allergy Center of Austin
Austin, Texas, 78746
Beverly Hills Aesthetic Surgical Institute
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
ENT Assoc. of South Florida
Boca Raton, Florida, 33487
The Center for Sinus, Allergy & Sleep Wellness
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Chicago Nasal & Sinus Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 606611
Collin County ENT
Frisco, Texas, 75034
ENT New Orelans
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Madison ENT & Facial Plastic Surgery
New York, New York, 10016
Ogden Clinic
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Piedmont ENT
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
This study is being conducted to obtain outcomes data in subjects with severe to extreme class NOSE scores undergoing placement of the Spirox Latera Implant with or without concurrent septoplasty and/or turbinate reduction procedures in an operating room setting.
- Conditions
- Nasal Obstruction
- Being tested
- Nasal Implant
- Medical subject headings
- Nasal Obstruction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nasal ImplantDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Latera Implant | Other | All participants have unilateral or bilateral placement of LATERA Nasal Implants. Receives: Device: Nasal Implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Percent of Treatment Responders
Responder is defined as a participant who has improvement of at least 1 Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) class or at least 20% NOSE score reduction. NOSE scores. NOSE scores can range from 5 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. Classes are mild (5-25), moderate (30-50), severe (55-75), and severe (80-100).
Measured: 6 months post procedure
Primary Safety Endpoint: Nasal Procedure and Latera™ Device-related Adverse Events
Number of participants with a device-related or procedure-related adverse event
Measured: 6 months post procedure
Secondary outcomes (4)
Percent of Treatment Responders
Responder is defined as a participant who has improvement of at least 1 Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) class or at least 20% NOSE score reduction. NOSE scores. NOSE scores can range from 5 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. Classes are mild (5-25), moderate (30-50), severe (55-75), and severe (80-100).
Measured: 1, 3 12, 18, and 24 months post procedure.
Change in Nasal Airway Obstruction From Baseline Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Change from baseline in VAS score for ability to breathe through the nose. Participants provide scores on a scale of 0 (easy to breathe through the nose) to 100 (unable to breathe through the nose). Negative values for the change from baseline indicate improvement in symptoms.
Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post procedure
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Participants rate whether they are satisfied or not satisfied with the procedure and cosmetic appearance after the procedure. The percent of participants reporting satisfaction with the procedure is reported.
Measured: 6 months
Procedure and Device Related Adverse Events
Number of participants who experience procedure or device-related adverse events.
Measured: After 6 months and up to 24 months post procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2016
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionAug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasal ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Spirox, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952313
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPI-CP-301
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Stolovitzky P, Sidle DM, Ow RA, Nachlas NE, Most SP. A prospective study for treatment of nasal valve collapse due to lateral wall insufficiency: Outcomes using a bioabsorbable implant. Laryngoscope. 2018 Nov;128(11):2483-2489. doi: 10.1002/lary.27242. Epub 2018 May 14.
PubMed 29756407Sidle DM, Stolovitzky P, O'Malley EM, Ow RA, Nachlas NE, Silvers S. Bioabsorbable Implant for Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse with or without Concomitant Procedures. Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;37(5):673-680. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726464. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PubMed 33853139
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spirox Latera™ Implant Support of Lateral Nasal Wall Cartilage (LATERAL-OR) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02952313
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPI-CP-301
- Conditions
- Nasal Obstruction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Spirox, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is being conducted to obtain outcomes data in subjects with severe to extreme class NOSE scores undergoing placement of the Spirox Latera Implant with or without concurrent septoplasty and/or turbinate reduction procedures in an operating room setting.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Latera Implant | Other | Device: Nasal ImplantAll participants have unilateral or bilateral placement of LATERA Nasal Implants. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- The subject has Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Score ≥55.
- The subject has dynamic lateral nasal wall insufficiency as confirmed by Positive Modified Cottle Maneuver22.
- The subject is ≥18 years of age.
- The subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with the study protocol.
- The subject is seeking treatment for nasal airway obstruction due to Nasal Valve Collapse (NVC) and is willing to undergo nasal Implant procedure alone or with septoplasty and/or a turbinate reduction procedure in an operating room setting.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- The subject is having a concurrent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) or sinuplasty.
- The subject has had rhinoplasty within the past twelve (12) months.
- The subject is planning to have other concurrent rhinoplasty procedure.
- The subject is planning to have other rhinoplasty procedures or will use external dilators within twelve (12) months after the index procedure.
- The subject has had septoplasty and/or inferior turbinate reduction within the past six (6) months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nasal Implant | Device | Latera Implant |
Primary outcome
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Percent of Treatment Responders
Time frame: 6 months post procedure
Responder is defined as a participant who has improvement of at least 1 Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) class or at least 20% NOSE score reduction. NOSE scores. NOSE scores can range from 5 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. Classes are mild (5-25), moderate (30-50), severe (55-75), and severe (80-100).
Primary Safety Endpoint: Nasal Procedure and Latera™ Device-related Adverse Events
Time frame: 6 months post procedure
Number of participants with a device-related or procedure-related adverse event
4 secondary outcomes
Percent of Treatment Responders
Time frame: 1, 3 12, 18, and 24 months post procedure.
Change in Nasal Airway Obstruction From Baseline Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time frame: 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post procedure
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time frame: 6 months
Procedure and Device Related Adverse Events
Time frame: After 6 months and up to 24 months post procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 29756407Stolovitzky P, Sidle DM, Ow RA, Nachlas NE, Most SP. A prospective study for treatment of nasal valve collapse due to lateral wall insufficiency: Outcomes using a bioabsorbable implant. Laryngoscope. 2018 Nov;128(11):2483-2489. doi: 10.1002/lary.27242. Epub 2018 May 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33853139Sidle DM, Stolovitzky P, O'Malley EM, Ow RA, Nachlas NE, Silvers S. Bioabsorbable Implant for Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse with or without Concomitant Procedures. Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;37(5):673-680. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726464. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nasal Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Recruiting
Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction
Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Prospective Study Comparing VivAer to Alternative Surgical Procedures to Treat Nasal Airway Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Valve Dysfunction.
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Recruiting
Measuring Nasal Airway Changes After VivAer Treatment Using AI Analysis
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Recruiting
Post-Market Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of REFLEX ULTRA 45 for Coblation Inferior Turbinate Reduction in China
Nasal Obstruction Due to Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nasal Implant in people with Nasal Obstruction, run by Spirox, Inc. at 12 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Percent of Treatment Responders (time frame: 6 months post procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02952313, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2020.