Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal IntegrityAUCNCT02948686
Different Application Strategies When Using Ambar Universal in Class V Cavities
A study testing Self-Etching Application Strategy, Enamel Etching Application Strategy and Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy in people with Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, run by Universidade Federal Fluminense at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
- What is being tested?
- Self-Etching Application Strategy, Enamel Etching Application Strategy and Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2016to 30 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 4 non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), in different teeth, that need restoration. Those lesions must be non carious, must be more than 1 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility.
Who cannot join
- Volunteers with periodontal disease; with gingival bleeding; use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, 28625-650
About this study
Official title: Clinical Evaluation of Different Application Strategies When Using a Universal Adhesive System in Class V Cavities
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 38 enrolled patients will receive four Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group Self Etching (SET) (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with Light Emission Diode (LED) light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group SETT (Self-Etching with extended time): Similar to Group SET, but during the 2 applications, the adhesive systems will be brushed during 20 seconds, and not during 10 seconds as described in Group SET; Group SETL (Self-Etching with extended number of layers): The adhesive system will be applied as describe in Group SET, but the researchers will apply 4 layers, and not 2 layers, as described in Group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin, and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Read the detailed description
This is a Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. All 38 enrolled patients will receive Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 4 non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), in different teeth, that need restoration. Those lesions must be non carious, must be more than 1 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility. Firstly, the patient will be anesthetized locally with 3% Mepivacaine solution, followed by prophylaxis with pumice powder and water. All cavities will be washed and dried after these procedures for optimal selection of color, using a color scale. Then, the rubber dam isolation of the teeth to be restored will be held. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group SET (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group SETT: Similar to Group SET, but during the 2 applications, the adhesive systems will be brushed during 20 seconds, and not during 10 seconds as described in Group SET; Group SETL: The adhesive system will be applied as describe in Group SET, but the researchers will apply 4 layers, and not 2 layers, as described in Group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
- Being tested
- Self-Etching Application Strategy, Enamel Etching Application Strategy, Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy, Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy
- Keywords
- dentin bonding agents, tooth sensitivity, composite resin restoration
- Medical subject headings
- Dentin Sensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-Etching Application StrategyOther
In Group SET, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores.
Enamel Etching Application StrategyOther
In Group SEE, 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores.
Self Etching with Extended time Application StrategyOther
In Group SETT, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 20 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 20 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores
Self Etching with Extended layers number StrategyOther
In Group SETL, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SET (Self-Etching) | Active comparator | 55 teeth will receive restorations using Self-Etching Application Strategy Receives: Other: Self-Etching Application Strategy |
| SEE (Selective Enamel Etching) | Experimental | 55 teeth will receive restorations using Enamel Etching Application Strategy Receives: Other: Enamel Etching Application Strategy |
| SETT (Self-Etching, more time) | Experimental | 55 teeth will receive restorations using Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy Receives: Other: Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy |
| SETL (Self-Etching, more layers) | Experimental | 55 teeth will receive restorations using Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy Receives: Other: Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Restoration Loss
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of four years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups.
Measured: Four years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Marginal Pigmentation
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with marginal pigmentation in the period of four years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
Measured: Four years
Post-Operative Hypersensitivity
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the period of four years, verified by periodic clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the different groups.
Measured: Four years
Secondary Caries
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with secondary caries in the period of four years, verified by periodic radiographic examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with secondary caries in the different groups.
Measured: Four years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Aug 2016
- Primary completion1 Apr 2017
- Study completion30 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal IntegrityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal Fluminense
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, DDS, PHD, Study director, Universidade Federal Fluminense
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02948686
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UFFAMBAR2016
- Acronym
- AUC
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00104-4.
PubMed 11445211Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):113-27. doi: 10.2341/13-045-C. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
PubMed 23802645Erhardt MC, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):33-40; discussion 41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00448.x.
PubMed 15259541Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1459-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
PubMed 19665220Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2002 Oct;15(5):305-8.
PubMed 12537339Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):533-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
PubMed 16300826da Costa TR, Ferri LD, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Eighteen-month randomized clinical trial on the performance of two etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 2014 Dec;27(6):312-7.
PubMed 25707085Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Barceleiro MO. Six-month Follow-up of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):465-480. doi: 10.2341/15-309-C. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PubMed 27379834Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00050-6.
PubMed 11137632Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2007 Oct;57(5):300-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2007.tb00136.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 17992913Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
PubMed 20628774Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Jun;63(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350510019874.
PubMed 16191912
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Evaluation of Different Application Strategies When Using a Universal Adhesive System in Class V Cavities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02948686
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AUC / UFFAMBAR2016
- Keywords
- dentin bonding agents, tooth sensitivity, composite resin restoration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal FluminenseUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 38 enrolled patients will receive four Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group Self Etching (SET) (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with Light Emission Diode (LED) light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group SETT (Self-Etching with extended time): Similar to Group SET, but during the 2 applications, the adhesive systems will be brushed during 20 seconds, and not during 10 seconds as described in Group SET; Group SETL (Self-Etching with extended number of layers): The adhesive system will be applied as describe in Group SET, but the researchers will apply 4 layers, and not 2 layers, as described in Group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin, and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Detailed description
This is a Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a new Universal Adhesive system, Ambar Universal (FGM, Joinville, Brazil). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. All 38 enrolled patients will receive Class V dental restorations, made in four different ways, one from each experimental group, using the same universal self-etching adhesive system, which is the tested material in this study. All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 4 non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), in different teeth, that need restoration. Those lesions must be non carious, must be more than 1 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility. Firstly, the patient will be anesthetized locally with 3% Mepivacaine solution, followed by prophylaxis with pumice powder and water. All cavities will be washed and dried after these procedures for optimal selection of color, using a color scale. Then, the rubber dam isolation of the teeth to be restored will be held. Non-carious cervical lesions will receive the applied adhesive system in 4 different protocols separated by groups. Group SET (control): no conditioning, the adhesive system will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; Group SEE (Selective enamel etching): 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions, as described in group SET; Group SETT: Similar to Group SET, but during the 2 applications, the adhesive systems will be brushed during 20 seconds, and not during 10 seconds as described in Group SET; Group SETL: The adhesive system will be applied as describe in Group SET, but the researchers will apply 4 layers, and not 2 layers, as described in Group SET. After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SET (Self-Etching) | Active comparator | Other: Self-Etching Application Strategy55 teeth will receive restorations using Self-Etching Application Strategy |
| SEE (Selective Enamel Etching) | Experimental | Other: Enamel Etching Application Strategy55 teeth will receive restorations using Enamel Etching Application Strategy |
| SETT (Self-Etching, more time) | Experimental | Other: Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy55 teeth will receive restorations using Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy |
| SETL (Self-Etching, more layers) | Experimental | Other: Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy55 teeth will receive restorations using Self Etching with Extended layers number Strategy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients must have at only 20 teeth in function, must have at only 4 non carious cervical lesions (NCCL), in different teeth, that need restoration. Those lesions must be non carious, must be more than 1 mm deep, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel. Teeth should not present periodontal mobility.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Volunteers with periodontal disease; with gingival bleeding; use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Etching Application StrategyIn Group SET, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, according to the manufacturer's instructions, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. | Other | SET (Self-Etching) |
| Enamel Etching Application StrategyIn Group SEE, 37% phosphoric acid will be applied during 15 seconds, only in enamel in 55 teeth. This acid will be removed using water, the cavity will be air-dried, and then, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. | Other | SEE (Selective Enamel Etching) |
| Self Etching with Extended time Application StrategyIn Group SETT, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 20 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 20 seconds, air-dried during 10 seconds and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores | Other | SETT (Self-Etching, more time) |
| Self Etching with Extended layers number StrategyIn Group SETL, the adhesive system Ambar Universal will be used in 55 teeth, in the self-etching mode. The adhesive system will be brushed during 10 seconds in the cavity, will be air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, brushed again during 10 seconds, air-dried during 5 seconds, and activated during 10 seconds with LED light; After applying the adhesive, the restorations will be made with composite resin Opallis (FGM, Joinville, Brazil), and evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, staining or recurrent caries, using scores | Other | SETL (Self-Etching, more layers) |
Primary outcome
Restoration Loss
Time frame: Four years
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of four years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups.
3 secondary outcomes
Marginal Pigmentation
Time frame: Four years
Post-Operative Hypersensitivity
Time frame: Four years
Secondary Caries
Time frame: Four years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Dec 2023.
- Background: PubMed 11445211Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):430-44. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00104-4.
- Background: PubMed 23802645Perdigao J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, Loguercio AD. A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;39(2):113-27. doi: 10.2341/13-045-C. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 15259541Erhardt MC, Cavalcante LM, Pimenta LA. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16(1):33-40; discussion 41. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00448.x.
- Background: PubMed 19665220Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2009 Nov;25(11):1459-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 12537339Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2002 Oct;15(5):305-8.
- Background: PubMed 16300826Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):533-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 25707085da Costa TR, Ferri LD, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Eighteen-month randomized clinical trial on the performance of two etch-and-rinse adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent. 2014 Dec;27(6):312-7.
- Background: PubMed 27379834Lopes LS, Calazans FS, Hidalgo R, Buitrago LL, Gutierrez F, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Barceleiro MO. Six-month Follow-up of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):465-480. doi: 10.2341/15-309-C. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Background: PubMed 11137632Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, Bayne SC, May KN Jr, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00050-6.
- Background: PubMed 17992913Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Int Dent J. 2007 Oct;57(5):300-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2007.tb00136.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20628774Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
- Background: PubMed 16191912Dalton Bittencourt D, Ezecelevski IG, Reis A, Van Dijken JW, Loguercio AD. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Jun;63(3):173-8. doi: 10.1080/00016350510019874.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Short Dentin Etching
Hypersensitivity Dentin, Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk Fill Composite Restorations Associated to Universal Adhesive System
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Active, not recruiting
Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Recruiting
Clinical Performance of Full Coverage Hybrid Ceramic Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, Poor Aesthetic of Existing Restoration of Tooth
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
Secondary Caries, Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, DDS, PHD study director
Universidade Federal Fluminense
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Self-Etching Application Strategy, Enamel Etching Application Strategy and Self Etching with Extended time Application Strategy in people with Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, run by Universidade Federal Fluminense at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Restoration Loss (time frame: Four years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02948686, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2023.