AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood Donors, Traumatic Blood LossNCT02944851

Comparison of the Accuracy of Non-invasive Hemoglobin Measurement (SpHb) and Vena Cava Inferior Ultrasound

An observational study of Blood Donors, Traumatic Blood Loss, run by Haseki Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this work is determine the more successful noninvasive method by comparison of two noninvasive methods ( IVC ultrasound - noninvasive hemoglobin measurement (SpHb)) that used in the detection of patients with blood loss. The works were completed in 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Blood Donors, Traumatic Blood Loss
How many people
128 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
Mar 2016to Sep 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Voluntary donors for blood donation.

Who may be able to join

  • Who have volunteered to donate blood
  • Older than 18 years
  • Both sexes

Who cannot join

  • Known tricuspid valve regurgitation and right heart failure
  • Oral intake or the fluid loss (diarrhea and vomiting-urination) between the two measurements during the blood donation
  • Inappropriate echogenicity for vena cava inferior diameter measurement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Haseki Training and Reseurch Hospital

    Istanbul, 34096

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Noninvasive Two Methods to Monitoring Blood Loss; Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Ultrasound - Non-invasive Hemoglobin Measurement (SpHb)

The aim of this work is determine the more successful noninvasive method by comparison of two noninvasive methods ( IVC ultrasound - noninvasive hemoglobin measurement (SpHb)) that used in the detection of patients with blood loss.

The works were completed in 6 months. The study was conducted at the blood donation center and in Emergency department. Vital parameters were measured and recorded before making the voluntary blood donation. Following Masimo brand portable device fingers SpHb value was measured.Then IVC diameter of patients in the supine position were measured using ultrasonography. Then he left to donors return in routine blood donation programme. A unit (500ml) of blood were drawn from each donor. After the blood donation process measured and recorded the vital signs again. SpHb was measured noninvasively from finger again. Following these measurements were recorded again by measuring the diameter of IVC.

Keywords
Blood donors, blood donation, traumatic blood loss, Trauma
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02944851
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Prospective observationalThe changes of IVC diameter, SpHb and vital signs of blood donors were observed after blood donation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnosis of stage 1 hemorrhagic shock

    Changes in IVC diameter were observed with 500 ml blood loss. Measurement were made pre and post blood donation.

    Measured: 30 minute (15 minute blood donation, 15 minute rest time ).

  2. Diagnosis of stage 1 hemorrhagic shock

    Changes in SpHb were observed with 500 ml blood loss. Measurement were made pre and post blood donation.

    Measured: 30 minute (15 minute blood donation, 15 minute rest time ).

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Diagnosis of stage 1 hemorrhagic shock

    Changes in Pulse rate were observed with 500 ml blood loss. Measurement were made pre and post blood donation.

    Measured: 30 minute (15 minute blood donation, 15 minute rest time ).

  2. Diagnosis of stage 1 hemorrhagic shock

    Changes in Arterial blood pressure were observed with 500 ml blood loss. Measurement were made pre and post blood donation.

    Measured: 30 minute (15 minute blood donation, 15 minute rest time ).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
128 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02944851
Sponsor's protocol ID
336
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
26 Sep 2016
Last updated
16 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Blood Donors, Traumatic Blood Loss, run by Haseki Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnosis of stage 1 hemorrhagic shock (time frame: 30 minute (15 minute blood donation, 15 minute rest time ).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in