Wet Macular DegenerationPhase 4NCT02944227
Efficacy of Fixed Monthly Dosing of Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 4 study testing Lucentis in people with Wet Macular Degeneration, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive fixed monthly dosing of intravitreal Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) for the treatment of SRF and PED in neovascular AMD which is persistent to anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) monotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Wet Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- Lucentis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 3 Mar 2016to 21 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study.
- Age equal to or older than 50 years.
- Presence of SRF associated with PED in neovascular AMD (proven with OCT FA, and ICG) which is persistent despite consecutive anti-VEGF injections for at least 9 months (3 initial loading doses with 4 week interval followed by PRN regimen)
- A "persistent PED" is defined as a subject with < 50% reduction or increase in PED height
Who cannot join
- Administration of periocular, intravitreal, or systemic corticosteroid within 3 months prior to visit 1 in the study eye
- Prior treatment with photodynamic therapy in the study eye
- Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation involving the foveal center in the study eye
- Previous submacular surgery in the study eye
- History of vitrectomy in the study eye
- Epiretinal membranes (ERM)
- Submacular hemorrhage or fibrosis within 50% of entire PED.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Fixed Monthly Dosing of Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) on Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Associated With Persistent Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD): A Pilot Study
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive fixed monthly dosing of intravitreal Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) for the treatment of SRF and PED in neovascular AMD which is persistent to anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) monotherapy.
Read the detailed description
PEDs occur in up to 62% of eyes with advanced AMD. Numerous treatment options have been employed for PEDs in AMD, including laser therapies and intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF antibodies. However, eyes with PEDs were excluded from the larger clinical trials that used macular laser, photodynamic therapy, or ranibizumab to treat neovascular AMD; therefore, the efficacy of such options is still unclear for eyes with PEDs in neovascular AMD. Additionally, PED lesions have been reported to show less morphological and functional response to anti-VEGF monotherapy than eyes with other CNV lesions subtypes.
Based on the generally poor prognosis of PEDs and the lack of sufficient data in the literature regarding the effectiveness of fixed monthly dosing of Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) therapy, the investigators designed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of intensive fixed monthly dosing of Ranibizumab for the treatment of SRF associated with PED in neovascular AMD which is persistent to previous anti-VEGF monotherapy.
- Conditions
- Wet Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- Lucentis
- Medical subject headings
- Wet Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LucentisDrug
Also called Ranibizumab
Lucentis fixed-treatment arm
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lucentis | Experimental | Lucentis fixed treatment Receives: Drug: Lucentis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes of a pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Maximum height
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Changes of a pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Maximum diameter
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Changes of subretinal fluid (SRF)
Maximum height
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Changes of subretinal fluid (SRF)
Maximum diameter
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Changes in subfoveal thickness (SFT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) from baseline
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases maintaining vision and also who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having complete resolution of SRF associated with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having persistent or recurrent subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having persistent or recurrent subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
The incidence of ocular adverse events
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of cases experiencing leakage from neovascular AMD lesions
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start3 Mar 2016
- Primary completion16 Feb 2017
- Study completion21 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wet Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02944227
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-1512-107-728
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Chan CK, Abraham P, Sarraf D, Nuthi AS, Lin SG, McCannel CA. Earlier therapeutic effects associated with high dose (2.0 mg) Ranibizumab for treatment of vascularized pigment epithelial detachments in age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2015 Jan;29(1):80-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.233. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
PubMed 25277305Ersoy L, Ristau T, Kirchhof B, Liakopoulos S. Response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;252(6):889-97. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2519-9. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
PubMed 24271025Iordanous Y, Powell AM, Mao A, Hooper PL, Eng KT, Schwartz C, Kertes PJ, Sheidow TG. Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;49(4):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.05.010.
PubMed 25103655Arora S, McKibbin M. One-year outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for large, serous pigment epithelial detachment secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2011 Aug;25(8):1034-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.115. Epub 2011 May 20.
PubMed 21597485
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Fixed Monthly Dosing of Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) on Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Associated With Persistent Pigment Epithelial Detachment (PED) in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD): A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02944227
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-1512-107-728
- Conditions
- Wet Macular Degeneration
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of intensive fixed monthly dosing of intravitreal Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) for the treatment of SRF and PED in neovascular AMD which is persistent to anti-VEGF (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) monotherapy.
Detailed description
PEDs occur in up to 62% of eyes with advanced AMD. Numerous treatment options have been employed for PEDs in AMD, including laser therapies and intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF antibodies. However, eyes with PEDs were excluded from the larger clinical trials that used macular laser, photodynamic therapy, or ranibizumab to treat neovascular AMD; therefore, the efficacy of such options is still unclear for eyes with PEDs in neovascular AMD. Additionally, PED lesions have been reported to show less morphological and functional response to anti-VEGF monotherapy than eyes with other CNV lesions subtypes.
Based on the generally poor prognosis of PEDs and the lack of sufficient data in the literature regarding the effectiveness of fixed monthly dosing of Lucentis® (Ranibizumab) therapy, the investigators designed a prospective study to evaluate the effect of intensive fixed monthly dosing of Ranibizumab for the treatment of SRF associated with PED in neovascular AMD which is persistent to previous anti-VEGF monotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lucentis | Experimental | Drug: LucentisLucentis fixed treatment |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study.
- Age equal to or older than 50 years.
- Presence of SRF associated with PED in neovascular AMD (proven with OCT FA, and ICG) which is persistent despite consecutive anti-VEGF injections for at least 9 months (3 initial loading doses with 4 week interval followed by PRN regimen)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Administration of periocular, intravitreal, or systemic corticosteroid within 3 months prior to visit 1 in the study eye
- Prior treatment with photodynamic therapy in the study eye
- Previous subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation involving the foveal center in the study eye
- Previous submacular surgery in the study eye
- History of vitrectomy in the study eye
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LucentisAlso: RanibizumabLucentis fixed-treatment arm | Drug | Lucentis |
Primary outcome
Changes of a pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Maximum height
Changes of a pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Maximum diameter
Changes of subretinal fluid (SRF)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Maximum height
Changes of subretinal fluid (SRF)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Maximum diameter
9 secondary outcomes
Change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Changes in subfoveal thickness (SFT) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases maintaining vision and also who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having complete resolution of SRF associated with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having persistent or recurrent subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The proportion of cases having persistent or recurrent subretinal fluid (SRF) associated with fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The incidence of ocular adverse events
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The proportion of cases experiencing leakage from neovascular AMD lesions
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 25277305Chan CK, Abraham P, Sarraf D, Nuthi AS, Lin SG, McCannel CA. Earlier therapeutic effects associated with high dose (2.0 mg) Ranibizumab for treatment of vascularized pigment epithelial detachments in age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2015 Jan;29(1):80-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.233. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 24271025Ersoy L, Ristau T, Kirchhof B, Liakopoulos S. Response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with subretinal fluid and pigment epithelial detachment on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;252(6):889-97. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2519-9. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 25103655Iordanous Y, Powell AM, Mao A, Hooper PL, Eng KT, Schwartz C, Kertes PJ, Sheidow TG. Intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;49(4):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.05.010.
- Background: PubMed 21597485Arora S, McKibbin M. One-year outcome after intravitreal ranibizumab for large, serous pigment epithelial detachment secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2011 Aug;25(8):1034-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.115. Epub 2011 May 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Wet Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Safety Study For Patients In B4711001
Age Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS-101 in Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration(nAMD)
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety and Efficacy Study of IVB103 Injection in Subjects With Neovascular (Wet) Agerelated Macular Degeneration (nAMD).
nAMD
RecruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of AIV007 Periocular Injection in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lucentis in people with Wet Macular Degeneration, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes of a pigment epithelial detachment (PED) (time frame: Baseline and 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02944227, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2018.