Uterine FibroidsPhase 2/3MYOMIC1NCT02942537
Study of Volume Reduction of Uterine Fibroids After Embolization or Microwave Treatment
A Phase 2/3 study testing Microwave treatment and uterine artery embolization in people with Uterine Fibroids, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 55 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Uterine Fibroids
- What is being tested?
- Microwave treatment and uterine artery embolization
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 23 Jan 2017to Feb 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 55 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy women aged 30-55 with symptomatic fibromas (pressure, heaviness, bleeding, urgency)
- Premenopausal
- Fibromas with a maximum mean diameter of cm evaluated by trans vaginal or abdominal ultrasound
- Willing to comply with protocol
Who cannot join
- Current or future childwish
- Body Mass Index >35
- Treatment with anticoagulant
- Bleeding disorder which leads to increased risk of bleeding
- Patients with single fibroid more than 6cm mean diameter according to MRI.
- Contraindication for UAE or general anesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dnderyds Hospital
Stockholm, 18288
Helena Kopp Kallner, MD; PhD, helena.kopp-kallner@ki.se
About this study
Official title: Single Blinded Randomized Study of Volume Reduction of Uterine Fibroids After Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Computer Tomography or Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive methods for treatment. Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been shown to have good effect and acceptability has been high. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous or per vaginal microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Primary outcome
Read more
- Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (+/- 15 days) compared to pre treatment measured as mean volume reduction of the 3 largest fibroids evaluated by magnetic
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50%[11] in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than mean diameter 8cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation[7] during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment.
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously or vaginally using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system. Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days).
Read the detailed description
Background
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. Hysterectomy remains the reference standard in the treatment of uterine fibroids. However, it may cause long-term side effects such as pain and genitovaginal prolapse. It also carries a substantial risk of short term complications such as infections and organ damage. Myomectomy is another conventional treatment, but it is associated with a recurrence rate as high as 20% according to literature. It carries the same short term risks of complications as hysterectomy but at a lower frequency.
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive or non-invasive therapies with uterine preservation such as uterine arterial embolization (UAE), radiofrequency (RF), microwave treatment and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). RF ablation often requires the aid of a laparoscopic procedure, which is invasive. HIFU is effective in small myomas, but can be time consuming in large myomas with treatments for several hours. Ultrasound or computer tomography guided percutaneous microwave thermal ablation is minimally invasive, has low time requirements, is easy to perform, and has been broadly used for the treatment of solid tumours in organs other than the uterus with favourable effects.
Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been performed in China and Japan. The effect and acceptability has been high. The research team in this study has been to China to study the treatment. We have visited the clinic and studied the procedure as well as talked to patients pre- and post operatively . The equipment at Danderyd Hospital has the same output effects as the equipment in China. Danderyd Hospital as approved the method for use in uterine myomas. However, no randomized comparative study of other minimally invasive methods has been performed.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous CT- or ultrasound guided microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50% in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Recruitment and Randomization
Women fulfilling inclusion criteria and without exclusion criteria will be identified at the outpatient clinic of Danderyds Hospital. Advertisement may be placed in local newspapers or on social media (Facebook and Instagram) and relevant webpages or in gynecological clinics.
Women will be randomized after having been informed orally and in written and after having signed informed consent and after fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria after MRI-examination. Randomization will be in random permuted blocks of 6 at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization will be according to a computer generated randomization sequence. After patients have signed informed consent and fulfill inclusion without exclusion criteria after the initial magnetic resonance imaging they will be allocated to an intervention by consecutive opening of sealed opaque envelopes containing the randomization code.
Blinding
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
Method
Pre randomization evaluation
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than 6cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment. In addition a full blood panel will be evaluated.
As for uterine artery embolization no pathologist report will be performed before any treatment.
Microwave ablation
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system with a 30-90 Watts effect in 14-16 gauge needle with a ceramic tip using computer tomography with fusion technique or ultrasound for myoma imaging and needle guidance. After identification of the needle path with CT or peroperative ultrasound local anaesthesia (carbocain 1% with 0,05mg/ml adrenaline) will be given along the needle path and a small skin incision using a scalpel will made for the needle entry. Patients will be given intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous breathing or general anesthesia during treatment to minimize movement during ablation.
Uterine artery embolization
Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief. A catheter will be inserted in the femoral artery to access the uterine artery during x-ray monitoring and during administration of contrast to visualize the fibroma and its supporting arterial supply. When the supporting arterial branch has been identified polyvinyl alcohol particles are released into the bloodstream. These particles cause a thrombosis in the vessel.
Evaluation post treatment
Women will estimate VAS maximum postoperative pain day of surgery and the following 7 days. In addition they will note how many days passed before all pain subsided, use of pain medication will be noted and period until resuming normal daily activities. The period of hospitalization will be noted. Menstrual blood loss (PBAC) will be noted the first menstruation, menstruation number 3 and 5 post treatment. PBAC is a validated instrument for menstrual blood loss quantification.
Follow-up visits will be after first menstruation at approximately 1 month and at 3 and 6-7 months post-treatment.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days). Women will then be asked to participate in a long-term follow up with evaluation of fibroma growth using ultrasound and recurrence of symptoms using PBAC yearly until retraction of consent.
Clinicial significance
Uterine myomas are a benign disease but have a significant impact on the lives of women. As many as 70% of women have myomas. However, the self-reported frequency of uterine myomas differs between countries and ranges from 4% to 15% in some countries- probably depending on the use of ultrasound in gynecological practice and the information given to women. Women with self reported uterine myomas are much more likely to report on symptoms which are known to be caused by myomas such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pressure symptoms, urinary urgency and pain (dysmenhorrea and dyspareunia). Myomas remain the leading cause of hysterectomies in most western countries. As hysterectomy is a highly invasive procedure with cost for women in terms of absence from work and short and long term complications, finding new minimally invasive treatments should remain a focus of health care.
- Conditions
- Uterine Fibroids
- Being tested
- Microwave treatment, uterine artery embolization
- Medical subject headings
- Leiomyoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Microwave treatmentDevice
Percutaneous or vaginal application of microwave antenna with microwave treatment of fibroma
uterine artery embolizationProcedure or surgery
Percutaneous applicaiton of a catheter into the femoral artery and embolization of uterine artery or branches thereof
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Microwave treatment Receives: Device: Microwave treatment |
| Control | Active comparator | Uterine artery embolization Receives: Procedure: uterine artery embolization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fibroma Volume reduction 6 months post treatment
Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (+/- 15 days) compared to pre treatment measured as mean volume reduction of the 3 largest fibroids evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Measured: 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Pain
Pain (measures as visual analogue scale, VAS)- maximum postoperative pain day of surgery and following 7 days)
Measured: 1-7 days post treatment
Symptoms of uterine fibroids
Reduction of symptoms as pressure, urgency and coital pain, score in UFS-QoL questionnaire
Measured: pre-treatment-6 months post treatment
Use of pain medication
Generic drug name, number of milligrams consumed
Measured: pre-treatment to 6 months post treatment
Period of sick leave
time away from work after treatment in both groups
Measured: post treament to one year
Period of hospitalization
number of days
Measured: post treatment to one year
Acceptability
measure as preferred method
Measured: at 3 months and 6 months
Days of menstrual bleeding
number of days of menstrual bleeding divided into fresh bleeding and spotting
Measured: pre and post treatment at 3 months and 6 months
Menstrual blood loss
Menstrual blood loss score evaluated by the validated Pictorial Bleeding assessment chart
Measured: pre and post treatment at 3 and 6 months
Quality of lite
Quality of life evaluated by score in the validated questionnaire Uterine Fibroid Symptoms. Quality of Life (UFS-QoL)
Measured: pre and post treatment at 3 and 6 months
Complications
Any complication occurring in women will be recorded and judged by the principal investigator as related, probably related, probably not related or not related
Measured: at any time after enrollment up to 6 months post treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start23 Jan 2017
- Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Uterine FibroidsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Helena Kopp Kallner, Karolinska Institutet
- Investigators
- Helena Kopp Kallner, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02942537
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MYOMIC1
- Acronym
- MYOMIC1
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kanaoka Y, Yoshida C, Fukuda T, Kajitani K, Ishiko O. Transcervical microwave myolysis for uterine myomas assisted by transvaginal ultrasonic guidance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Feb;35(1):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00872.x.
PubMed 19215562Zhang J, Feng L, Zhang B, Ren J, Li Z, Hu D, Jiang X. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for symptomatic uterine fibroid treatment--a clinical study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(5):510-6. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2011.562872.
PubMed 21756048Wang F, Zhang J, Han ZY, Cheng ZG, Zhou HY, Feng L, Hu DM. Imaging manifestation of conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):2947-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
PubMed 22341698Yang Y, Zhang J, Han ZY, Yu MA, Ma X, Zhou HY, Hao YL, Zhao L, Dong XJ, Ge HL. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for submucosal uterine fibroids. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
PubMed 24316137Zhao WP, Han ZY, Zhang J, Liang P. A retrospective comparison of microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):413-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
PubMed 25572326Kanaoka Y, Hirai K, Ishiko O. Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia caused by large submucous myomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Dec;31(6):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00338.x.
PubMed 16343261Reid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):320-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13225.x.
PubMed 10740326Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
PubMed 11814511Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB. The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 12;6:99. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-99.
PubMed 19014505Jonsdottir G, Beermann M, Lundgren Cronsioe A, Hasselrot K, Kopp Kallner H. Ultrasound guided microwave ablation compared to uterine artery embolization treatment for uterine fibroids - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):341-347. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2034991.
PubMed 35134317
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Single Blinded Randomized Study of Volume Reduction of Uterine Fibroids After Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Computer Tomography or Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02942537
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MYOMIC1 / MYOMIC1
- Conditions
- Uterine Fibroids
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive methods for treatment. Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been shown to have good effect and acceptability has been high. This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous or per vaginal microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Primary outcome
- Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (+/- 15 days) compared to pre treatment measured as mean volume reduction of the 3 largest fibroids evaluated by magnetic
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50%[11] in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than mean diameter 8cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation[7] during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment.
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously or vaginally using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system. Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days).
Detailed description
Background
Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that occur most commonly in women of reproductive age. Symptoms of uterine fibroids may be heavy menstrual bleeding which may lead to anemia, pressure symptoms, bowel symptoms or urinary urgency. Hysterectomy remains the reference standard in the treatment of uterine fibroids. However, it may cause long-term side effects such as pain and genitovaginal prolapse. It also carries a substantial risk of short term complications such as infections and organ damage. Myomectomy is another conventional treatment, but it is associated with a recurrence rate as high as 20% according to literature. It carries the same short term risks of complications as hysterectomy but at a lower frequency.
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of minimally invasive or non-invasive therapies with uterine preservation such as uterine arterial embolization (UAE), radiofrequency (RF), microwave treatment and high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). RF ablation often requires the aid of a laparoscopic procedure, which is invasive. HIFU is effective in small myomas, but can be time consuming in large myomas with treatments for several hours. Ultrasound or computer tomography guided percutaneous microwave thermal ablation is minimally invasive, has low time requirements, is easy to perform, and has been broadly used for the treatment of solid tumours in organs other than the uterus with favourable effects.
Microwave ablation of myomas and endometrium has been performed in China and Japan. The effect and acceptability has been high. The research team in this study has been to China to study the treatment. We have visited the clinic and studied the procedure as well as talked to patients pre- and post operatively . The equipment at Danderyd Hospital has the same output effects as the equipment in China. Danderyd Hospital as approved the method for use in uterine myomas. However, no randomized comparative study of other minimally invasive methods has been performed.
This study aims to compare the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of percutaneous CT- or ultrasound guided microwave ablation and uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine myomas in a randomized single blind study.
Power calculation
To be able to show a difference between the groups in myoma shrinkage at 6 months of 75% in microwave ablation and 50% in the embolization group with a standard deviation of 25% with a alpha of 0.05 and a power of 80% we would need 16 women in each group and thus need to randomize 32 women.
In order to compensate for loss to follow-up or drop out a total of 36 women will be randomized.
Recruitment and Randomization
Women fulfilling inclusion criteria and without exclusion criteria will be identified at the outpatient clinic of Danderyds Hospital. Advertisement may be placed in local newspapers or on social media (Facebook and Instagram) and relevant webpages or in gynecological clinics.
Women will be randomized after having been informed orally and in written and after having signed informed consent and after fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria after MRI-examination. Randomization will be in random permuted blocks of 6 at a ratio of 1:1. The randomization will be according to a computer generated randomization sequence. After patients have signed informed consent and fulfill inclusion without exclusion criteria after the initial magnetic resonance imaging they will be allocated to an intervention by consecutive opening of sealed opaque envelopes containing the randomization code.
Blinding
Patients and investigators will not be blinded. The MRI will be performed and evaluated by a blinded radiologist.
Method
Pre randomization evaluation
After having signed informed consent but before randomization patients will undergo MRI of the uterine fibroids. Patients with a single fibroid measuring more than 6cm will be excluded from further participation in the study.
All women included in the study after MRI examination will fill in a PBAC evaluation during the menses preceding treatment. Women will fill a VAS for maximal pain during 1 month prior to treatment. In addition a full blood panel will be evaluated.
As for uterine artery embolization no pathologist report will be performed before any treatment.
Microwave ablation
Microwave ablation will be performed percutaneously using a Covidien Emprint microwave ablation system with a 30-90 Watts effect in 14-16 gauge needle with a ceramic tip using computer tomography with fusion technique or ultrasound for myoma imaging and needle guidance. After identification of the needle path with CT or peroperative ultrasound local anaesthesia (carbocain 1% with 0,05mg/ml adrenaline) will be given along the needle path and a small skin incision using a scalpel will made for the needle entry. Patients will be given intravenous anesthesia with spontaneous breathing or general anesthesia during treatment to minimize movement during ablation.
Uterine artery embolization
Embolization will be performed in conscious women with an epidural catheter for pain relief. A catheter will be inserted in the femoral artery to access the uterine artery during x-ray monitoring and during administration of contrast to visualize the fibroma and its supporting arterial supply. When the supporting arterial branch has been identified polyvinyl alcohol particles are released into the bloodstream. These particles cause a thrombosis in the vessel.
Evaluation post treatment
Women will estimate VAS maximum postoperative pain day of surgery and the following 7 days. In addition they will note how many days passed before all pain subsided, use of pain medication will be noted and period until resuming normal daily activities. The period of hospitalization will be noted. Menstrual blood loss (PBAC) will be noted the first menstruation, menstruation number 3 and 5 post treatment. PBAC is a validated instrument for menstrual blood loss quantification.
Follow-up visits will be after first menstruation at approximately 1 month and at 3 and 6-7 months post-treatment.
At follow up visit 1, 3 months and 6 months post treatment acceptability will be assessed as overall satisfaction of treatment on a scale from 1-7 and if the woman would recommend the treatment to a friend.
A new MRI scan will be performed 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days). Women will then be asked to participate in a long-term follow up with evaluation of fibroma growth using ultrasound and recurrence of symptoms using PBAC yearly until retraction of consent.
Clinicial significance
Uterine myomas are a benign disease but have a significant impact on the lives of women. As many as 70% of women have myomas. However, the self-reported frequency of uterine myomas differs between countries and ranges from 4% to 15% in some countries- probably depending on the use of ultrasound in gynecological practice and the information given to women. Women with self reported uterine myomas are much more likely to report on symptoms which are known to be caused by myomas such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pressure symptoms, urinary urgency and pain (dysmenhorrea and dyspareunia). Myomas remain the leading cause of hysterectomies in most western countries. As hysterectomy is a highly invasive procedure with cost for women in terms of absence from work and short and long term complications, finding new minimally invasive treatments should remain a focus of health care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Device: Microwave treatmentMicrowave treatment |
| Control | Active comparator | Procedure: uterine artery embolizationUterine artery embolization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthy women aged 30-55 with symptomatic fibromas (pressure, heaviness, bleeding, urgency)
- Premenopausal
- Fibromas with a maximum mean diameter of cm evaluated by trans vaginal or abdominal ultrasound
- Willing to comply with protocol
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Current or future childwish
- Body Mass Index >35
- Treatment with anticoagulant
- Bleeding disorder which leads to increased risk of bleeding
- Patients with single fibroid more than 6cm mean diameter according to MRI.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Microwave treatmentPercutaneous or vaginal application of microwave antenna with microwave treatment of fibroma | Device | Intervention |
| uterine artery embolizationPercutaneous applicaiton of a catheter into the femoral artery and embolization of uterine artery or branches thereof | Procedure or surgery | Control |
Primary outcome
Fibroma Volume reduction 6 months post treatment
Time frame: 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days)
Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (+/- 15 days) compared to pre treatment measured as mean volume reduction of the 3 largest fibroids evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
10 secondary outcomes
Pain
Time frame: 1-7 days post treatment
Symptoms of uterine fibroids
Time frame: pre-treatment-6 months post treatment
Use of pain medication
Time frame: pre-treatment to 6 months post treatment
Period of sick leave
Time frame: post treament to one year
Period of hospitalization
Time frame: post treatment to one year
Acceptability
Time frame: at 3 months and 6 months
Days of menstrual bleeding
Time frame: pre and post treatment at 3 months and 6 months
Menstrual blood loss
Time frame: pre and post treatment at 3 and 6 months
Quality of lite
Time frame: pre and post treatment at 3 and 6 months
Complications
Time frame: at any time after enrollment up to 6 months post treatment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19215562Kanaoka Y, Yoshida C, Fukuda T, Kajitani K, Ishiko O. Transcervical microwave myolysis for uterine myomas assisted by transvaginal ultrasonic guidance. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009 Feb;35(1):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00872.x.
- Background: PubMed 21756048Zhang J, Feng L, Zhang B, Ren J, Li Z, Hu D, Jiang X. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for symptomatic uterine fibroid treatment--a clinical study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27(5):510-6. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2011.562872.
- Background: PubMed 22341698Wang F, Zhang J, Han ZY, Cheng ZG, Zhou HY, Feng L, Hu DM. Imaging manifestation of conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):2947-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.037. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
- Background: PubMed 24316137Yang Y, Zhang J, Han ZY, Yu MA, Ma X, Zhou HY, Hao YL, Zhao L, Dong XJ, Ge HL. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for submucosal uterine fibroids. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):436-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
- Background: PubMed 25572326Zhao WP, Han ZY, Zhang J, Liang P. A retrospective comparison of microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Mar;84(3):413-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.041. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
- Background: PubMed 16343261Kanaoka Y, Hirai K, Ishiko O. Microwave endometrial ablation for menorrhagia caused by large submucous myomas. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Dec;31(6):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00338.x.
- Background: PubMed 10740326Reid PC, Coker A, Coltart R. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG. 2000 Mar;107(3):320-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13225.x.
- Background: PubMed 11814511Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
- Background: PubMed 19014505Harding G, Coyne KS, Thompson CL, Spies JB. The responsiveness of the uterine fibroid symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire (UFS-QOL). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Nov 12;6:99. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-99.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35134317Jonsdottir G, Beermann M, Lundgren Cronsioe A, Hasselrot K, Kopp Kallner H. Ultrasound guided microwave ablation compared to uterine artery embolization treatment for uterine fibroids - a randomized controlled trial. Int J Hyperthermia. 2022;39(1):341-347. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2034991.
Related trials for Uterine Fibroids
Active, not recruiting
Prospective Study of TVRFA Treatment for FIGO Type 3-5 Uterine Fibroids
Leiomyoma (Uterine Fibroids)
RecruitingObservational study
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Cancer - Study of the Genetic Cause and the Predisposition to Renal Cancer
Renal Tumor Histology, Cutaneous Leiomyoma
Active, not recruiting
Life Study: Lifestyle Intervention in Fibroid Elimination
Uterine Fibroid
Not yet recruiting
Office Hysteroscopy Versus Operating-room Hysteroscopy for Uterine Lesions
Uterine Polyps, Uterine Fibroids
RecruitingObservational study
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large and Very Large Uteri
Uterine Fibroids, Hysterectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helena Kopp Kallner, MD, PhD principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Microwave treatment and uterine artery embolization in people with Uterine Fibroids, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fibroma Volume reduction 6 months post treatment (time frame: 6 months post treatment (+/-15 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02942537, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2018.