Alzheimer's DiseaseARVA-MANCT02941289
Visuospatial Attention, Eye Movements and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) in Alzheimer's Disease
A study testing Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The aim is to understand which components of attentional deployment and selection are impaired in AD during searching in realistic scenes on a computer screen (Experiment 1) and in a natural setting (Experiment 2).The investigators will also examine how deficits in visual exploration may be related to impairments in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Alzheimer's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 27 Apr 2017to 12 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female
- Age between 65 and 75 years old
- MMSE score equal or > 27
- Normal visual acuity (with or without correction to normality)
- Subjects with a score of 0 on " tremors " and " rigidity " items of UPDRS III scale
- Subjects without major depression criteria according to DSM IV-R
Show all 14Show fewer
- No apathy according to diagnostic criteria of apathy
- Signed informed consent
- Male and female
- Age between 65 and 75 years old
- Probable diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with a mild impairment (MMSE 20-26) according to DSM IV diagnosis criteria
- Normal visual acuity (with or without correction to normality)
- Subjects with a zero score on " tremors " and " rigidity " items of UPDRS III scale
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Controls with neurological and/or psychiatric pathologies
- AD patients with neurological and/or psychiatric pathologies unrelated to AD
- AD patients with vascular dementia suspicion in addition to the probable diagnosis of AD
- AD patients with MMSE score < 20
- Individuals with abnormal visual acuity (i.e., glaucoma, cataract sufficiently severe that limited vision…)
- Individuals with motor disorders, Parkinsonism…
- Receiving drug treatments that could alter cognitive functions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movement Behaviour in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease When Searching in Realistic Scenes and a Natural Setting: Exploring Perceptual and Cognitive Mechanisms and Their Relationships With IADLs
The aim is to understand which components of attentional deployment and selection are impaired in AD during searching in realistic scenes on a computer screen (Experiment 1) and in a natural setting (Experiment 2).The investigators will also examine how deficits in visual exploration may be related to impairments in semantic, long-term memory (LTM) and working memory (WM) representations by manipulating the semantic consistency between the target and its visual surroundings, and the type of target cue (abstract vs. precise), respectively. Perceptual saliency of target and distractor objects will be also manipulated in Expt.1, In Expt.2, in order to determine how deficits in visual exploration may be involved in the IADL deficits shown by AD patients, participants at each trial will be required to search in a natural settings different types of targets and then to perform an IADL using five objects, among which one of the searched targets. Measures analysed: for the search tasks (Expt. 1 and 2): eye movements in different search phases, accuracy and response times; for IADLs tasks (Expt. 2): eye movements during action planning and execution, motor efficiency (number and types of action performed), time to terminate the activity. Compared to controls, the investigators expect that AD patients will have reduced ability using scene semantic LTM in order to locate the objects, greater attentional capture from highly salient features and greater search performance impairment when higher WM resources are required (abstract target cues). The investigators also expect that their performance at IADLs will be less efficient and, in particular, less organized than control, with reduced advantage of eye guidance.
Read the detailed description
It has been well established that visual attention declines early in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Little is known about visual search in AD, in particular in relation with functional autonomy. The crucial role of the parietal cortex in visuospatial attention and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and the presence of early parietal damage in AD suggest that IADLs may also be impaired early. The aim is to understand which components of attentional deployment and selection are specifically impaired in AD during searching in static realistic scenes presented on a computer screen (Experiment 1) and in a natural setting (Experiment 2: different regions of a room, furnished with different types of objects indicating different possible daily-living environments, like a kitchen or an office). More precisely, the investigators will examine how deficits in visual exploration during search for a target objects may be related to impairments in semantic, long-term memory (LTM) and in working memory (WM) representations by manipulating, respectively, semantic consistency between the target and type of its visual surrounding (scene context, in Expt. 1, or type of co-occurring objects, in Expt 2).and the type of prior information supplied about the target object (abstract - i.e., verbal - or precise, - i.e., pictorial), In Expt. 1 the investigators will also manipulate the perceptual salience (low-level feature: luminance, colour, orientation, etc.) of the target and the distractor objects within the scene. Second, to determine how deficits in visual exploration during search for specific objects may be involved in the deficits of IADL in AD, the investigators will analyse search behaviour in the natural setting, requiring location of three different targets (semantically consistent/related to an IADL, semantically consistent/ non-related to an IADL, semantically inconsistent/non-related). The investigators will required participants to perform an IADL after each search (four trial in total) using, among other four objects, the IADL-related searched target). In Expt. 1 the investigators will test three groups of participants: the AD group (at early stage of the disease), a matched control group of healthy elderly people and a control group of young, healthy individuals. The investigators will examine search performance (accuracy and response time) and oculomotor behaviour during the different search phases (initiation, scene scanning, target verification). They expect that AD patients will have reduced search performance compared to both control groups, which will be also reflected by reduced oculomotor efficiency during the overall search process. Moreover, they hypothesize that patients will be less able to use semantic memory of the type of scene in order to locate the target (reduced benefit of scene consistency), will be strongly disadvantaged in case of higher WM load (abstract target cue) and, finally, will be more influence by perceptual, low-level factors (stronger effect of salience). In Exp. 2, they will test an AD group and a control group of healthy, matched, old controls. With respect to the search tasks, they will analyse the effect of target semantic consistency, target relatedness to IADL and type of target cue (abstract vs. precise). In doing so, they will consider search performance (accuracy and response times) and oculomotor behaviour during search in terms of order and number of object fixated, and duration of their fixation. With respect to the IADLs, they will analyse eye guidance on current action and efficiency of the whole IADL in terms of type and number of actions performed and time to perform the overall activity. They expect that the patterns of eye movements in AD patients will be similar during search and IADLs, with numerous intrusions of distractors and frequent reselections of the same objects. Moreover, they expect that their performance at IADLs will be less efficient than controls, in terms of both action speed and organisation. The use of a natural setting and the analysis of spontaneous oculomotor behavior of patients will improve the ecological validity of research on attentional deficits in AD. This study can also contribute to innovative solutions for diagnosis and treatment, and help research on subjective change in attention and visuospatial function in AD
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Being tested
- Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes
- Medical subject headings
- Alzheimer Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenesProcedure or surgery
visual search performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Alzheimer's patient | Experimental | Probable diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with a mild impairment (MMSE 20-26) according to DSM IV diagnosis criteria Receives: Procedure: Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes |
| Control patient | Active comparator | patient with MMSE score equal or > 27 Receives: Procedure: Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total number of fixations during search
Oculomotor behavior and search performance in AD patients compared to elderly controls in a computerized visual search task using realistic scenes (Experiment 1), as well as when searching for specific objects in a real setting and during activities of daily living (Experiment 2).
Measured: at 2 weeks
Total duration of fixations during search
This is the eye movement parameters that the investigators will analyze in the data
Measured: at 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start27 Apr 2017
- Primary completion12 Apr 2018
- Study completion12 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Alzheimer's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02941289
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-AOI-06
- Acronym
- ARVA-MA
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 30 May 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ramzaoui H, Faure S, David R, Spotorno S. Top-down and bottom-up sources of eye-movement guidance during realistic scene search in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. 2022 Oct;36(7):597-613. doi: 10.1037/neu0000797. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
PubMed 35797174Ramzaoui H, Faure S, Spotorno S. Top-down and bottom-up guidance in normal aging during scene search. Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):433-451. doi: 10.1037/pag0000485.
PubMed 34124920
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movement Behaviour in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease When Searching in Realistic Scenes and a Natural Setting: Exploring Perceptual and Cognitive Mechanisms and Their Relationships With IADLs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02941289
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARVA-MA / 16-AOI-06
- Conditions
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim is to understand which components of attentional deployment and selection are impaired in AD during searching in realistic scenes on a computer screen (Experiment 1) and in a natural setting (Experiment 2).The investigators will also examine how deficits in visual exploration may be related to impairments in semantic, long-term memory (LTM) and working memory (WM) representations by manipulating the semantic consistency between the target and its visual surroundings, and the type of target cue (abstract vs. precise), respectively. Perceptual saliency of target and distractor objects will be also manipulated in Expt.1, In Expt.2, in order to determine how deficits in visual exploration may be involved in the IADL deficits shown by AD patients, participants at each trial will be required to search in a natural settings different types of targets and then to perform an IADL using five objects, among which one of the searched targets. Measures analysed: for the search tasks (Expt. 1 and 2): eye movements in different search phases, accuracy and response times; for IADLs tasks (Expt. 2): eye movements during action planning and execution, motor efficiency (number and types of action performed), time to terminate the activity. Compared to controls, the investigators expect that AD patients will have reduced ability using scene semantic LTM in order to locate the objects, greater attentional capture from highly salient features and greater search performance impairment when higher WM resources are required (abstract target cues). The investigators also expect that their performance at IADLs will be less efficient and, in particular, less organized than control, with reduced advantage of eye guidance.
Detailed description
It has been well established that visual attention declines early in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Little is known about visual search in AD, in particular in relation with functional autonomy. The crucial role of the parietal cortex in visuospatial attention and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and the presence of early parietal damage in AD suggest that IADLs may also be impaired early. The aim is to understand which components of attentional deployment and selection are specifically impaired in AD during searching in static realistic scenes presented on a computer screen (Experiment 1) and in a natural setting (Experiment 2: different regions of a room, furnished with different types of objects indicating different possible daily-living environments, like a kitchen or an office). More precisely, the investigators will examine how deficits in visual exploration during search for a target objects may be related to impairments in semantic, long-term memory (LTM) and in working memory (WM) representations by manipulating, respectively, semantic consistency between the target and type of its visual surrounding (scene context, in Expt. 1, or type of co-occurring objects, in Expt 2).and the type of prior information supplied about the target object (abstract - i.e., verbal - or precise, - i.e., pictorial), In Expt. 1 the investigators will also manipulate the perceptual salience (low-level feature: luminance, colour, orientation, etc.) of the target and the distractor objects within the scene. Second, to determine how deficits in visual exploration during search for specific objects may be involved in the deficits of IADL in AD, the investigators will analyse search behaviour in the natural setting, requiring location of three different targets (semantically consistent/related to an IADL, semantically consistent/ non-related to an IADL, semantically inconsistent/non-related). The investigators will required participants to perform an IADL after each search (four trial in total) using, among other four objects, the IADL-related searched target). In Expt. 1 the investigators will test three groups of participants: the AD group (at early stage of the disease), a matched control group of healthy elderly people and a control group of young, healthy individuals. The investigators will examine search performance (accuracy and response time) and oculomotor behaviour during the different search phases (initiation, scene scanning, target verification). They expect that AD patients will have reduced search performance compared to both control groups, which will be also reflected by reduced oculomotor efficiency during the overall search process. Moreover, they hypothesize that patients will be less able to use semantic memory of the type of scene in order to locate the target (reduced benefit of scene consistency), will be strongly disadvantaged in case of higher WM load (abstract target cue) and, finally, will be more influence by perceptual, low-level factors (stronger effect of salience). In Exp. 2, they will test an AD group and a control group of healthy, matched, old controls. With respect to the search tasks, they will analyse the effect of target semantic consistency, target relatedness to IADL and type of target cue (abstract vs. precise). In doing so, they will consider search performance (accuracy and response times) and oculomotor behaviour during search in terms of order and number of object fixated, and duration of their fixation. With respect to the IADLs, they will analyse eye guidance on current action and efficiency of the whole IADL in terms of type and number of actions performed and time to perform the overall activity. They expect that the patterns of eye movements in AD patients will be similar during search and IADLs, with numerous intrusions of distractors and frequent reselections of the same objects. Moreover, they expect that their performance at IADLs will be less efficient than controls, in terms of both action speed and organisation. The use of a natural setting and the analysis of spontaneous oculomotor behavior of patients will improve the ecological validity of research on attentional deficits in AD. This study can also contribute to innovative solutions for diagnosis and treatment, and help research on subjective change in attention and visuospatial function in AD
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Alzheimer's patient | Experimental | Procedure: Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenesProbable diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease with a mild impairment (MMSE 20-26) according to DSM IV diagnosis criteria |
| Control patient | Active comparator | Procedure: Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenespatient with MMSE score equal or > 27 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Male and female
- Age between 65 and 75 years old
- MMSE score equal or > 27
- Normal visual acuity (with or without correction to normality)
- Subjects with a score of 0 on " tremors " and " rigidity " items of UPDRS III scale
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Controls with neurological and/or psychiatric pathologies
- AD patients with neurological and/or psychiatric pathologies unrelated to AD
- AD patients with vascular dementia suspicion in addition to the probable diagnosis of AD
- AD patients with MMSE score < 20
- Individuals with abnormal visual acuity (i.e., glaucoma, cataract sufficiently severe that limited vision…)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenesvisual search performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes | Procedure or surgery | Alzheimer's patient, Control patient |
Primary outcome
Total number of fixations during search
Time frame: at 2 weeks
Oculomotor behavior and search performance in AD patients compared to elderly controls in a computerized visual search task using realistic scenes (Experiment 1), as well as when searching for specific objects in a real setting and during activities of daily living (Experiment 2).
Total duration of fixations during search
Time frame: at 2 weeks
This is the eye movement parameters that the investigators will analyze in the data
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 35797174Ramzaoui H, Faure S, David R, Spotorno S. Top-down and bottom-up sources of eye-movement guidance during realistic scene search in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology. 2022 Oct;36(7):597-613. doi: 10.1037/neu0000797. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34124920Ramzaoui H, Faure S, Spotorno S. Top-down and bottom-up guidance in normal aging during scene search. Psychol Aging. 2021 Jun;36(4):433-451. doi: 10.1037/pag0000485.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
Nabilone for Agitation Blinded Intervention Trial
Alzheimer Disease, Agitation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Biomarker Effects of RO7269162 in Participants at Risk for or at the Prodromal Stage of Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Alzheimer's Disease
Recruiting
HEARS-NPS: Addressing Hearing Loss as a Common Unmet Contributor of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingObservational study
PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)
Aging
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Performance of everyday objects in realistic scenes in people with Alzheimer's Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total number of fixations during search (time frame: at 2 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02941289, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.