AzTrials
AzTrials

Congestive Heart FailureREACH IINCT02938052

Researching Emotions And Cardiac Health (REACH): Phase II

A study testing PP-based health behavior intervention in people with Congestive Heart Failure and Emotions, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of our customized positive psychology (PP)-based health behavior intervention in a group of patients with mild to moderate heart failure (HF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
PP-based health behavior intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Dec 2016to 10 Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients with NYHA class I, II, or III HF admitted to an MGH inpatient unit or outpatients at the MGH Heart Center. Patients with NYHA class IV HF have ongoing HF symptoms at rest, making it difficult for them to increase physical activity and other health behaviors; therefore, they will not be included. HF diagnosis will be confirmed via chart review and with the patient's treatment team as needed.
  • Suboptimal adherence to health behaviors. This will be defined as a total score of ≤15 on three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items regarding diet/exercise/medications. The MOS SAS has been used in multiple prior studies assessing adherence in cardiac patients, including our own studies in this population. This threshold score on the MOS SAS will ensure that all participants will have the potential to improve their health behaviors.

Who cannot join

  • Cognitive deficits impeding a participant's ability to provide informed consent or participate, assessed via a 6-item cognitive test that is sensitive and specific for screening for cognitive impairment in research participants.
  • Medical conditions precluding interviews or likely to lead to death within 6 months.
  • Inability to speak English, inability to read or write, inability to walk, or lack of a telephone.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Developing a Positive Psychology Intervention to Promote Health Behaviors in Heart Failure: proof-of Concept Trial

The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of our customized positive psychology (PP)-based health behavior intervention in a group of patients with mild to moderate heart failure (HF).

Read the detailed description

The investigators are proposing a study that will specifically and innovatively focus on the development of a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients with HF. The MGH inpatient units and MGH Heart Center outpatients will serve as the source of subjects for the study, with patients who have a diagnosis of HF serving as potential subjects. The investigators will enroll 10 HF patients, who will take part in an 10-week PP-based health behavior intervention.

In this project, the investigators hope to do the following:

  1. Test an 10-week, telephone-delivered health behavior intervention utilizing PP exercises and systematic goal-setting in a brief, non-randomized, proof-of-concept trial (N=10).
  2. Determine whether this initial intervention is feasible in a small cohort of HF patients.
  3. Explore potential benefits of the intervention on outcomes of interest (e.g., optimism, positive affect).

Baseline information about enrolled participants will be obtained from the patients, care providers, and the electronic medical record as required for characterization of our population. This information will include data regarding medical history (history of prior acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive HF, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and current smoking), current medical variables (renal function, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class), medications, and sociodemographic data (age, gender, race/ethnicity, living alone).

Participants will under go an initial visit during which they will meet with study staff in person (or if preferred over the phone).

  • They will fill out baseline questionnaires, and be provided a treatment manual with weekly exercises, along with a copy of Learning to Live with Heart Failure. The PP and goal-setting portions of the intervention will be introduced, and the first exercise will be assigned. Finally, participants will be provided an ActiGraph accelerometer to wear for 7 days, as well as a personal step counter to keep.

Participants will undergo weekly phone sessions for 10 weeks.

  • For the positive psychology segment the participant will review the previous week's exercise, discuss of the rationale of the next week's exercise, and be assigned the next week's exercise.
  • For the goal-setting segment the participant will review the health goal from the prior week, receive education about a health behavior, discuss ways to improve health behaviors, and set a goal for the next week.

Participants will undergo a follow-up phone call at 10 weeks that asks the same questions that were answered during the initial visit, as well as questions about their experience using the ActiGraph.

  • At Week 10, participants will wear another ActiGraph for 7 days.
Being tested
PP-based health behavior intervention
Keywords
Heart Failure, Positive Psychology, Adherence to Health Behaviors
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PP-based health behavior interventionBehavioural

    The positive psychology exercises include 3 modules: Gratitude-based activities, Strength-based activities, and Meaning-based activities. The goal setting exercises include 3 modules: Physical activity, Heart-healthy diet, and Medication adherence.

Study groups in NCT02938052
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention ArmExperimentalParticipants will all undergo a 10-week PP-based health behavior intervention and adherence measurements (baseline and Week 10). The participants will receive an ActiGraph accelerometer. They will be asked to begin wearing the accelerometer after their initial visit. Participants will wear the ActiGraph for 7 days at baseline and again at 10 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: PP-based health behavior intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of the PP-based Health Behavior Intervention

    Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of completed exercises.

    Measured: 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Changes in PANAS Scores

    The positive affect items on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a well-validated scale used in other intervention trials and in patients with HF, will be used to measure positive affect (Range: 10-50). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  2. Changes in LOT-R Scores

    Life Orientation Test-Revised is a well-validated 6-item instrument used to measure dispositional optimism (Range: 0-24). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.

    Measured: Change of score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  3. Changes in HADS-Anxiety Subscale Scores

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety subscale was be used to measure anxiety. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  4. Change in HADS-Depression Subscale Scores

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-depression subscale was be used to measure depression. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate worse outcome (i.e. greater levels of depression).

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  5. Changes in KCCQ Scores

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a well-validated questionnaire of health status in HF. The full scale will be used to measure HF-specific health-related QoL (HRQoL), and an eight-question subset of the KCCQ will be used as a measure of HF symptoms (QoL score range: 0-100; total symptom score range: 0-100). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher QoL scores indicate better HF specific health-related QoL, and higher total symptom scores indicate fewer symptoms.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  6. Changes in SF-12 Scores

    The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (SF-12) will be used to measure quality of life. This is an instrument which has been used in multiple cardiac studies in the past (SF-12 Mental Composite Score and Physical Composite Score Range: 0-100 each). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher level of health related QoL.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  7. Changes in MOS SAS Scores

    Three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items assessing medication, diet, and exercise, will be measured individually and as a composite score (Range: 3-18). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate better adherence to health behaviors.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  8. Changes in Daily Sodium Intake (as Measured With the SSQ)

    The Scored Sodium Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report scale that assesses the frequency with which participants consume a variety of sodium-containing foods, ranging from "Rarely or Never Eaten" to "At Least Once Daily." It is used to calculate daily sodium intake (Range: 0-215). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher sodium intake.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  9. Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA)

    The Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA) asks what percent of the time (in 10% increments) participants took all of their medications as prescribed in the past week and in the past 2 weeks (Range: 0-10). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks.

    Measured: Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks

  10. Change in Physical Activity

    Measured by Actigraph accelerometer, in number of steps per day.

    Measured: Baseline and 10 weeks

  11. Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (Actigraph)

    ActiGraph GT3X+ step counters are validated as measures of physical activity and have been used in numerous studies of physical activity in patients with medical illness. In this trial, participants will wear the accelerometer for one week at baseline and again for one week at 10 weeks to assess the feasibility of doing so and to ensure adequate capture of physical activity. Change was calculated by subtracting the MVPA at baseline from the MVPA at 10 weeks.

    Measured: Change in MVPA from Baseline to 10 weeks

  12. Feasibility of Actigraph

    Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of participants who use of the Actigraph.

    Measured: Baseline and 10 weeks

  13. Acceptability of the Exercises: Utility Score

    Participants will provide ratings of utility after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater utility of the exercise. Weekly utility ratings were averaged to provide an overall utility score of the exercises.

    Measured: Weeks 1-10

  14. Acceptability of the Exercises: Ease Score

    Participants will provide ratings of ease after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater ease of the exercise. Weekly ease ratings were averaged to provide an overall easy score of the exercises.

    Measured: Weeks 1-10

  15. Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Optimism Rating

    Participants will provide ratings of optimism before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of optimism were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise optimism score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.

    Measured: Weeks 1-10

  16. Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Positive Affect Rating

    Participants will provide ratings of positive affect, before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of happiness were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.

    Measured: Weeks 1-10

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start6 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion24 Jul 2017
  4. Study completion10 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02938052
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016P001443
Other IDs
1K23HL123607-01A1
Acronym
REACH II
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
14 Oct 2016
Last updated
1 Sep 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Celano CM, Freedman ME, Beale EE, Gomez-Bernal F, Huffman JC. A Positive Psychology Intervention to Promote Health Behaviors in Heart Failure: A Proof-of-Concept Trial. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Oct;206(10):800-808. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000883.

    PubMed 30273277

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PP-based health behavior intervention in people with Congestive Heart Failure and Emotions, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of the PP-based Health Behavior Intervention (time frame: 10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02938052, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
REACH II Clinical Trial NCT02938052 | AzTrials