Pre-diabetesNCT02934425
Effects of Lean Pork, High Protein Breakfast on Satiety and Metabolic Health in Pre-diabetes
A study testing Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast and High pork protein breakfast in people with Pre-diabetes, run by Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to assess the effects of consumption of a lean pork-containing, high-protein breakfast versus a refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast on satiety and cardiometabolic parameters in overweight or obese adults with pre-diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pre-diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast and High pork protein breakfast
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to Feb 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Body mass index 25.0-39.9 kg/m2
- At least 1 of the following: a) capillary glycated hemoglobin 5.7-6.4%, b) fasting capillary glucose 100-125 mg/dL, or c) capillary glycated hemoglobin <5.7% and borderline fasting capillary glucose level 95-99 mg/dL and a subsequent fasting venous plasma glucose 100-125 mg/dL
- Self-identified "regular breakfast consumer" and willing to eat study foods as a breakfast meal
- Access to freezer and a food re-heating appliance
- Judged to be in good health on basis of medical history
Who cannot join
- Fasting laboratory test results of clinical significance (e.g., triglycerides ≥500 mg/dL, capillary glucose ≥126 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin ≥6.5%)
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Recent major trauma or surgical event
- Recent weight change ≥4.5 kg
- History or presence of clinically important endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, biliary, or gastrointestinal disorders
- Recent history or presence of cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer)
Show all 19Show fewer
- History of extreme dietary habits
- Vegan or vegetarian
- History of eating disorder diagnosed by health professional
- Known intolerance or sensitivity to study products
- Unstable use of medications intended to alter lipid profile (e.g., unstable use of statins, bile acid sequestrants, cholesterol absorption inhibitor, fibrates, niacin-drug form, or omega-3-acid ethyl ester drugs)
- Recent use of foods or dietary supplements that might alter lipid metabolism (e.g., omega-3 fatty acid supplements or fortified foods, sterol/stanol products, pantethine, viscous dietary fiber supplements, red yeast supplements, garlic supplements, soy isoflavone supplements, probiotic supplements, niacin or analogues at >200 mg/d)
- Recent use of medications known to influence carbohydrate metabolism (e.g., adrenergic blockers, diuretics, hypoglycemic medications, systemic corticosteroids)
- Recent use of weight-loss drugs (including over-the-counter) or programs
- Recent history or current use of supplements and/or medications known to influence, satiety, appetite, taste, sense of smell, or weight (e.g., hypoglycemic medications and systemic corticosteroids)
- Recent use of antibiotics
- Signs or symptoms of active infection of clinical relevance
- Current or recent history of drug or alcohol abuse
- Pregnant, planning to be pregnant, or lactating females or women of childbearing potential unwilling to commit to use of a medically approved form of contraception
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Illinois Institute of Technology - Institute for Food Safety and Health
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial to Assess the Effects of a Lean Pork-containing, High-protein Breakfast on Indices of Satiety and Metabolic Health in Men and Women With Pre-diabetes
The goal of this study is to assess the effects of consumption of a lean pork-containing, high-protein breakfast versus a refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast on satiety and cardiometabolic parameters in overweight or obese adults with pre-diabetes.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, crossover trial that includes two screening visits, one baseline visit, and two test periods of 2 weeks each, each ending with a test visit, separated by a 2-week washout. Subjects consume each day a refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast containing 8/66/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively (Control Condition), or a high pork protein breakfast containing 35/39/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively (Active Condition). Study products for daily breakfast consumption will be dispensed to the subjects at the beginning of each test period. Subjects will complete 3-day diet records at baseline and the end of each test period, and a daily Appetite Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Diary to asses perceived hunger and fullness each evening before retiring throughout each test period. VAS assessments of hunger, fullness, desire to eat, prospective food consumption, focus and energy will also be assessed at the clinic visit at the end of each test period, pre- and post-breakfast consumption (multiple time points). Subjects will also complete a palatability questionnaire at the each of each test period. Blood samples will be collected at fasting at baseline and pre- and post-breakfast consumption (multiple sampling) at the end of each test period to evaluate glucose, insulin, and lipoprotein lipid concentrations.
- Conditions
- Pre-diabetes
- Being tested
- Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast, High pork protein breakfast
- Keywords
- Pork, Refined carbohydrates, Satiety, Glucose, Insulin, Breakfast, Lipoprotein lipids
- Medical subject headings
- Glucose Intolerance, Insulin Resistance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfastOther
Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast containing approximately 8/66/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively
High pork protein breakfastOther
High pork protein breakfast containing approximately 35/39/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast | Placebo comparator | Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast Receives: Other: Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast |
| High pork protein breakfast | Experimental | High pork protein breakfast Receives: Other: High pork protein breakfast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Net incremental area under the curve (AUC) appetite VAS ratings
Difference between test conditions in net incremental AUC from pre-consumption (t = -15 minutes) to t = 240 minutes for VAS ratings for appetite (fullness, hunger, desire to eat, prospective food consumption)
Measured: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Net incremental AUC focus and energy VAS ratings
Difference between test conditions in net incremental AUC from pre-consumption (t = -15 minutes) to t = 240 minutes for VAS ratings for focus and energy
Measured: 2 weeks
Total AUC VAS ratings
Difference between test conditions in total AUC from pre-consumption (t = -15 minutes) to t = 240 minutes for VAS ratings for appetite, focus and energy
Measured: 2 weeks
Individual time points for VAS ratings
Difference between test conditions in fullness, hunger, desire to eat, prospective food consumption, and focus at individual time points from t = -15 minutes to t = 240 minutes
Measured: 2 weeks
Energy intake at lunch
Difference between test conditions in the energy intake (kcal) at the lunch meal served at t = 240 minutes at the clinic visit at the end of each test period
Measured: 2 weeks
Glucose total AUC and incremental AUC
Difference between test conditions in glucose total AUC and incremental AUC from 0 to 120 minutes and 0 to 240 minutes (the t = -15 minutes time point will be counted as t = 0 for this calculation)
Measured: 2 weeks
Insulin total AUC and incremental AUC
Difference between test conditions in insulin total AUC and incremental AUC from 0 to 120 minutes and 0 to 240 minutes (the t = -15 minutes time point will be counted as t = 0 for this calculation)
Measured: 2 weeks
Homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-%S)
Difference between test conditions in HOMA-%S calculated from glucose and insulin values in samples collected at the end of each test period
Measured: 2 weeks
Homeostasis model assessment of pancreatic beta-cell function (HOMA-%B)
Difference between test conditions in HOMA-%B calculated from glucose and insulin values in samples collected at the end of each test period
Measured: 2 weeks
Lipoprotein lipids
Difference between test conditions in percent changes from baseline (day 0) to the end of each test condition (days 14 and 42) in triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
Measured: 2 weeks
Triglyceride postprandial total AUC and incremental AUC
Difference between test conditions in postprandial total AUC and incremental AUC for triglycerides from 0 to 120 minutes and 0 to 240 minutes (the t = -15 minutes time point will be counted as t = 0 for this calculation)
Measured: 2 weeks
Composite daily hunger and fullness VAS ratings
Difference between test conditions in the composite hunger and fullness VAS ratings from the daily Appetite VAS Dairy
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionFeb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pre-diabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Pork Board
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Indika Edirisinghe, PhD, Principal investigator, Illinois Institute of TechnologyKevin C Maki, PhD, Study director, Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02934425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MC-1601
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 15 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial to Assess the Effects of a Lean Pork-containing, High-protein Breakfast on Indices of Satiety and Metabolic Health in Men and Women With Pre-diabetes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02934425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MC-1601
- Conditions
- Pre-diabetes
- Keywords
- Pork, Refined carbohydrates, Satiety, Glucose, Insulin, Breakfast, Lipoprotein lipids
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular ResearchUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Pork Board
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to assess the effects of consumption of a lean pork-containing, high-protein breakfast versus a refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast on satiety and cardiometabolic parameters in overweight or obese adults with pre-diabetes.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, crossover trial that includes two screening visits, one baseline visit, and two test periods of 2 weeks each, each ending with a test visit, separated by a 2-week washout. Subjects consume each day a refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast containing 8/66/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively (Control Condition), or a high pork protein breakfast containing 35/39/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively (Active Condition). Study products for daily breakfast consumption will be dispensed to the subjects at the beginning of each test period. Subjects will complete 3-day diet records at baseline and the end of each test period, and a daily Appetite Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Diary to asses perceived hunger and fullness each evening before retiring throughout each test period. VAS assessments of hunger, fullness, desire to eat, prospective food consumption, focus and energy will also be assessed at the clinic visit at the end of each test period, pre- and post-breakfast consumption (multiple time points). Subjects will also complete a palatability questionnaire at the each of each test period. Blood samples will be collected at fasting at baseline and pre- and post-breakfast consumption (multiple sampling) at the end of each test period to evaluate glucose, insulin, and lipoprotein lipid concentrations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast | Placebo comparator | Other: Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfastRefined carbohydrate-rich breakfast |
| High pork protein breakfast | Experimental | Other: High pork protein breakfastHigh pork protein breakfast |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Body mass index 25.0-39.9 kg/m2
- At least 1 of the following: a) capillary glycated hemoglobin 5.7-6.4%, b) fasting capillary glucose 100-125 mg/dL, or c) capillary glycated hemoglobin <5.7% and borderline fasting capillary glucose level 95-99 mg/dL and a subsequent fasting venous plasma glucose 100-125 mg/dL
- Self-identified "regular breakfast consumer" and willing to eat study foods as a breakfast meal
- Access to freezer and a food re-heating appliance
- Judged to be in good health on basis of medical history
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Fasting laboratory test results of clinical significance (e.g., triglycerides ≥500 mg/dL, capillary glucose ≥126 mg/dL, glycated hemoglobin ≥6.5%)
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Recent major trauma or surgical event
- Recent weight change ≥4.5 kg
- History or presence of clinically important endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, biliary, or gastrointestinal disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfastRefined carbohydrate-rich breakfast containing approximately 8/66/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively | Other | Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast |
| High pork protein breakfastHigh pork protein breakfast containing approximately 35/39/26% kcal from protein/carbohydrate/fat, respectively | Other | High pork protein breakfast |
Primary outcome
Net incremental area under the curve (AUC) appetite VAS ratings
Time frame: 2 weeks
Difference between test conditions in net incremental AUC from pre-consumption (t = -15 minutes) to t = 240 minutes for VAS ratings for appetite (fullness, hunger, desire to eat, prospective food consumption)
11 secondary outcomes
Net incremental AUC focus and energy VAS ratings
Time frame: 2 weeks
Total AUC VAS ratings
Time frame: 2 weeks
Individual time points for VAS ratings
Time frame: 2 weeks
Energy intake at lunch
Time frame: 2 weeks
Glucose total AUC and incremental AUC
Time frame: 2 weeks
Insulin total AUC and incremental AUC
Time frame: 2 weeks
Homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-%S)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Homeostasis model assessment of pancreatic beta-cell function (HOMA-%B)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Lipoprotein lipids
Time frame: 2 weeks
Triglyceride postprandial total AUC and incremental AUC
Time frame: 2 weeks
Composite daily hunger and fullness VAS ratings
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 May 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pre-diabetes
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Food-i-Sense Analytics: Integrating AI Into Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis for Precision Nutrition.
Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance), Artificial Intelligence Mobile Application
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Participants With Overweight at Risk of Development of Obesity-Related Complications or Progression to Class 1 Obesity
Overweight, Prediabetic State
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Enrolling by invitationEarly Phase 1
Truway Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care
Chronic Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Indika Edirisinghe, PhD principal investigator
Illinois Institute of Technology
Kevin C Maki, PhD study director
Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Refined carbohydrate-rich breakfast and High pork protein breakfast in people with Pre-diabetes, run by Midwest Center for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Research at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Net incremental area under the curve (AUC) appetite VAS ratings (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2018.