Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT02927301
A Study of Atezolizumab as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) - Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC3)
A Phase 2 study testing Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Genentech, Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant atezolizumab in participants with resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of two 21-day cycles with atezolizumab. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 181 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2017to 5 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically documented Stage IB, II, IIIA, or selected IIIB, including T3N2 or T4 (by size criteria, not by mediastinal invasion) NSCLC
- Adequate pulmonary and cardiac function
- Available biopsy of primary tumor with adequate samples
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- NSCLC that is clinically T4 by virtue of mediastinal organ invasion or Stage IIIB by virtue of N3 disease
- Any prior therapy for lung cancer within 3 years.
- Prior treatment with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 therapies
- History or risk of autoimmune disease
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
United States19 sites
Emory University; Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
University Of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Dana Farber Cancer Institute; Brigham and Womens Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Commack
Commack, New York, 11725
Mass General/North Shore Cancer
Danvers, Massachusetts, 01923
Karmanos Cancer Inst; Hematology/Oncology
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Duarte, California, 91010
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at Westchester
Harrison, New York, 10604
Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Memorial Sloan Kettering - Monmouth
Middletown, New Jersey, 07748
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
New York University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10036
Memorial Sloan Kettering - Basking Ridge
New York, New York, 10065
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
UCLA Cancer Center
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Washington University; Wash Uni. Sch. Of Med
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau
Uniondale, New York, 11553
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Open-Label, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage IB, II, IIIA, or Selected IIIB Resectable and Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant atezolizumab in participants with resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of two 21-day cycles with atezolizumab. Following surgery, adjuvant therapy consisted of up to 12 months of atezolizumab in participants who demonstrate clinical benefit with neoadjuvant therapy. All participants who undergo surgery entered a surveillance period, which consisted of standardized blood sample collection and Chest CT Scans, for up to 2 years. All participants were monitored for disease recurrence and survival for up to 3 years after last dose of study drug.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibodyDrug
Also called RO5541267, MPDL3280A
Atezolizumab was given as 1200 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants received two cycles of atezolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery. Participants who demonstrated clinical benefit were eligible to receive up to 12 months of atezolizumab. Receives: Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR)
Major pathologic response was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells as scored by a pathologist, based on surgical resection as defined by prior studies. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: After surgery (approximately 10 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) for PD-L1-Positive Versus PD-L1-Negative Participants
ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator using RECIST v.1.1, assessed in the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive (participants with combined tumor cell (TC)/ immune cell (IC) score categorized as TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3) and PD-L1 negative (participants with TC/IC score was categorized as TC0 and IC0) groups. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions or any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) having a reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: Pre-surgery (Day 36 +/- 3 days), after 2 doses of neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response for PD-L1-Positive Versus PD-L1-Negative Participants
Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells, as scored by a pathologist, based on surgical resection as defined by prior studies. MPR was assessed based on participants tumor cell (TC) and immune cell (IC) score. The participants were considered as PD-L1- positive if their combined TC/IC score was categorized as TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 and the participants were considered PD-L1 negative if TC/IC score was categorized as TC0 and IC0. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: After surgery (approximately 10 weeks)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in participant administered a pharmaceutical product \& regardless of causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable \& unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom/disease temporally associated with use of investigational product, whether or not considered related to investigational product. AEs were reported based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs, version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE, v4.0).
Measured: From first study dose of atezolizumab until 90 days after the last study dose of atezolizumab (up to 18 months)
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Mutation Load
MPR was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells in the surgical resection as scored by a pathologist. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was run, and the consequences of each mutation were determined using Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (VEP). Mutation load (i.e. tumor mutation burden (TMB)) was defined as the number of variants altering protein sequence as outlined by VEP divided by 34 Megabase (MB) of assay target region. The final value was reported as number of mutations per megabase (mut/MB). It was divided into three groups: TMB <10 mut/MB; TMB ≥ 10 mut/MB to <16 mut/MB; and TMB ≥16 mut/MB. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Neoantigen Score
MPR was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells in the surgical resection as scored by a pathologist. MPR was analysed by neoantigen score, which was assessed based on the number of highly immunogenic, expressed neoantigens detected at baseline. Median splits were applied for analyses of MPR. Neoantigen scores >/= 73 (i.e. >/= 73 highly immunogenic, expressed neoantigens detected at baseline) were considered as high scores, and scores <73 (i.e. <73 highly immunogenic, expressed neoantigens detected at baseline) were considered as low neoantigen scores. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Gene Expression Signatures: Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA)
MPR was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells in the surgical resection as scored by a pathologist. MPR was analysed by gene set variation analysis (GSVA) scores. Bulk ribonucleic acid (RNA) from baseline tumor samples were assessed using GSVA for a T effector cell (Teff) signature comprising the following genes: cluster of differentiation 8A (CD8A), eomesodermin (EOMES), granzyme A (GZMA), T-box transcription factor 21 (TBX21), interferon-gamma (IFNG), granzyme B (GZMB), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10). Tertile splits were applied to GSVA scores, categorized as lower, middle, and upper scores, which indicated the relative levels of gene set expression in the baseline tumor samples. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Gene Expression Signatures: xCell Immune Score
MPR was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells in the surgical resection as scored by a pathologist. MPR was analysed by gene expression signatures. Bulk RNA from baseline tumor samples were assessed using xCell immune score. Tertile splits were applied to xCell immune scores, categorized as lower, middle, and upper scores, which indicated the relative levels of immune cell gene expression in the baseline tumor samples. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
Measured: Up to 13 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start20 Apr 2017
- Primary completion7 May 2020
- Study completion5 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Genentech, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02927301
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML39236
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Dacic S, Travis WD, Giltnane JM, Kos F, Abel J, Hilz S, Fujimoto J, Sholl L, Ritter J, Khalil F, Liu Y, Taylor-Weiner A, Resnick M, Yu H, Hirsch FR, Bunn PA Jr, Carbone DP, Rusch V, Kwiatkowski DJ, Johnson BE, Lee JM, Hennek SR, Wapinski I, Nicholas A, Johnson A, Schulze K, Kris MG, Wistuba II. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Patients With NSCLC: Results From the LCMC3 Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2024 May;19(5):719-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.12.010. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
PubMed 38070597Chaft JE, Oezkan F, Kris MG, Bunn PA, Wistuba II, Kwiatkowski DJ, Owen DH, Tang Y, Johnson BE, Lee JM, Lozanski G, Pietrzak M, Seweryn M, Byun WY, Schulze K, Nicholas A, Johnson A, Grindheim J, Hilz S, Shames DS, Rivard C, Toloza E, Haura EB, McNamee CJ, Patterson GA, Waqar SN, Rusch VW, Carbone DP; LCMC study investigators. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2155-2161. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01962-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
PubMed 36097216
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Open-Label, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Atezolizumab as Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Stage IB, II, IIIA, or Selected IIIB Resectable and Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02927301
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML39236
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 May 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant and adjuvant atezolizumab in participants with resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of two 21-day cycles with atezolizumab. Following surgery, adjuvant therapy consisted of up to 12 months of atezolizumab in participants who demonstrate clinical benefit with neoadjuvant therapy. All participants who undergo surgery entered a surveillance period, which consisted of standardized blood sample collection and Chest CT Scans, for up to 2 years. All participants were monitored for disease recurrence and survival for up to 3 years after last dose of study drug.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibodyParticipants received two cycles of atezolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery. Participants who demonstrated clinical benefit were eligible to receive up to 12 months of atezolizumab. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pathologically documented Stage IB, II, IIIA, or selected IIIB, including T3N2 or T4 (by size criteria, not by mediastinal invasion) NSCLC
- Adequate pulmonary and cardiac function
- Available biopsy of primary tumor with adequate samples
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- NSCLC that is clinically T4 by virtue of mediastinal organ invasion or Stage IIIB by virtue of N3 disease
- Any prior therapy for lung cancer within 3 years.
- Prior treatment with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 therapies
- History or risk of autoimmune disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibodyAlso: RO5541267, MPDL3280AAtezolizumab was given as 1200 milligrams (mg) via intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. | Drug | Atezolizumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR)
Time frame: After surgery (approximately 10 weeks)
Major pathologic response was defined as ≤10% of viable tumor cells as scored by a pathologist, based on surgical resection as defined by prior studies. Percentages have been rounded off to the nearest decimal point.
7 secondary outcomes
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) for PD-L1-Positive Versus PD-L1-Negative Participants
Time frame: Pre-surgery (Day 36 +/- 3 days), after 2 doses of neoadjuvant treatment with atezolizumab
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response for PD-L1-Positive Versus PD-L1-Negative Participants
Time frame: After surgery (approximately 10 weeks)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
Time frame: From first study dose of atezolizumab until 90 days after the last study dose of atezolizumab (up to 18 months)
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Mutation Load
Time frame: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Neoantigen Score
Time frame: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Gene Expression Signatures: Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA)
Time frame: Up to 13 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) by Gene Expression Signatures: xCell Immune Score
Time frame: Up to 13 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38070597Dacic S, Travis WD, Giltnane JM, Kos F, Abel J, Hilz S, Fujimoto J, Sholl L, Ritter J, Khalil F, Liu Y, Taylor-Weiner A, Resnick M, Yu H, Hirsch FR, Bunn PA Jr, Carbone DP, Rusch V, Kwiatkowski DJ, Johnson BE, Lee JM, Hennek SR, Wapinski I, Nicholas A, Johnson A, Schulze K, Kris MG, Wistuba II. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Assessment of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Patients With NSCLC: Results From the LCMC3 Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2024 May;19(5):719-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.12.010. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36097216Chaft JE, Oezkan F, Kris MG, Bunn PA, Wistuba II, Kwiatkowski DJ, Owen DH, Tang Y, Johnson BE, Lee JM, Lozanski G, Pietrzak M, Seweryn M, Byun WY, Schulze K, Nicholas A, Johnson A, Grindheim J, Hilz S, Shames DS, Rivard C, Toloza E, Haura EB, McNamee CJ, Patterson GA, Waqar SN, Rusch VW, Carbone DP; LCMC study investigators. Neoadjuvant atezolizumab for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, single-arm phase II trial. Nat Med. 2022 Oct;28(10):2155-2161. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01962-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A), an engineered anti-PD-L1 antibody in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Genentech, Inc. at 19 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Major Pathologic Response (MPR) (time frame: After surgery (approximately 10 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02927301, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.