AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasolabial FoldNCT02918721

Pain and Safety of Restylane With and Without Lidocaine for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds

A study testing Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Galderma R&D at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety associated with injections of Restylane Lidocaine compared to Restylane using a visual analogue scale. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasolabial Fold
What is being tested?
Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
8 Feb 2017to 11 May 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed informed consent
  • Men or women aged 18 years or older of Chinese origin
  • Subjects willing to abstain from any other facial plastic surgical or cosmetic procedures below the level of the lower orbital rim for the duration of the study
  • Intent to undergo correction of both nasolabial folds(NLF) with a wrinkle severity in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) of either 3 on both sides or 4 on both sides

Who cannot join

  • Previous use of any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent facial tissue augmentation therapy or autologous fat below the level of the lower orbital rim
  • Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy below the level of the lower orbital rim within 12 months before treatment
  • Previous tissue revitalisation treatment with laser or light, mesotherapy radiofrequency, chemical peeling or dermabrasion in the midface within 6 months before treatment
  • Scars or deformities, active skin disease, inflammation or related conditions near or in the area to be treated
  • Other condition preventing the subject from entering the study in the Investigator's opinion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Q-Med AB

    Shanghai

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Multi-center, Subject and Evaluator-blinded Study Comparing Pain and Safety Profile Associated With Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds Using Restylane With and Without Addition of 0.3% Lidocaine Hydrochloride

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pain and safety associated with injections of Restylane Lidocaine compared to Restylane using a visual analogue scale.

Conditions
Nasolabial Fold
Being tested
Restylane Lidocaine, Restylane
Keywords
Hyaluronic Acid, Nasolabial Fold, Lidocaine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Restylane LidocaineDevice

    Intradermal injection

  • RestylaneDevice

    Intradermal injection

Study groups in NCT02918721
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Restylane LidocaineExperimentalRestylane Lidocaine will be injected into one side nasolabial fold on Day 1
Receives: Device: Restylane Lidocaine
RestylaneActive comparatorRestylane will be injected into the opposite side nasolabial fold on Day 1
Receives: Device: Restylane

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Treatment Difference in Pain (Restylane Lidocaine Side - Restylane Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)

    Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Restylane-Lido compared to Restylane at the time of injection.

    VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the right end. The distance in mm from the left end (no pain) to the participant's VAS mark is measured with a standard ruler.

    Measured: Up to 60 minutes after Injection on Day of Treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Treatment Differences in Pain (Restylane Side - Restylane Lidocaine Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Subjects that reported at least 10 mm less VAS pain associated with injections of Restylane-Lido compared to Restylane at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after injection. VAS=Visual Analogue Scale. The VAS is a subjective scale to measure pain intensity. The participant is instructed to put a vertical mark, approximating the pain experienced during the procedure, on a 100 mm (millimeter) horizontal line labelled "no pain" at the left end and "the worst pain you can imagine" at the rig

    Measured: 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after injection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion27 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion11 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02918721
Sponsor's protocol ID
43CH1504
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
22 Sep 2016
Last updated
1 Jun 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Restylane Lidocaine and Restylane in people with Nasolabial Fold, run by Galderma R&D at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Treatment Difference in Pain (Restylane Lidocaine Side - Restylane Side) as Measured by a Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) (time frame: Up to 60 minutes after Injection on Day of Treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in