AzTrials
AzTrials

VaccinationPhase 4PINCNCT02918708

Assessment of Novel Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Scheduled in UK Infants

A Phase 4 study testing Synflorix and Prevenar13 in people with Vaccination and Immunization, run by Public Health England at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium conducts Department of Health funded trials trials to provide information to underpin changes to the national immunisation and vaccination schedule. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 2 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vaccination, Immunization
What is being tested?
Synflorix and Prevenar13
Type of treatment
Vaccines
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Start not givento 1 Jan 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 2 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants due to receive their primary immunisations , aged up to 13 weeks on first vaccinations.
  • Written informed consent given by mother who is aged ≥>= 16 years [NB mother is preferable as consent also allows permission to record the date of pertussis immunisation in pregnancy, which may need to be verified in her medical record. Where mother is not available, consent may be taken from father or legal guardian and maternal pertussis status noted as not known]

Who cannot join

  • Bleeding disorder
  • Fulfil any of the contraindications to vaccination as specified in The Green Book [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england/series/immunisation-against-infectious-disease-the-green-book]

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Hertfordshire primary care

    Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire

  • Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Antibody Responses in UK Infants Given Two Doses of 10 or 13 Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) in Infancy and PCV13 in the Second Year of Life (Study Code: Pneumococcal in New Combinations (PINC))

The National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium conducts Department of Health funded trials trials to provide information to underpin changes to the national immunisation and vaccination schedule.

This study will assess how different schedules of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines work in providing protection to young infants. It is well established that vaccines can behave differently depending on which order they are given and alongside which other immunisations. This has been shown for Hib and MenC vaccines, which are similar in structure to the pneumococcal vaccines that will be studied here. The investigators will measure responses to the pneumococcal vaccines as well as to other routine immunisations, all of which will be provided by our study team. Infants will be recruited by dedicated study staff through primary care and will participate from their first vaccinations at 2 months of age, until the blood sample taken a month after their boosters at a year old, i.e. until 13 months of age.

Any child found to have antibody levels below that which indicates protection for Hib, MenC, MenB or pneumococcal in the blood sample taken at 13 months of age will be offered an extra dose of the relevant vaccine(s).

Read the detailed description

The UK Department of Health provides a routine vaccination schedule for children in the UK which is administered by GP surgeries. The schedule is updated by the addition of antigens and amendment of products and schedules over time to improve the protection afforded to the paediatric population and the overall cost-effectiveness of the programme.

It is now well established that the effects of giving different vaccines and antigens together, as well as the order and numbers of doses given for priming and boosting, can affect the immunological responses they elicit. For example co-administration of different polysaccharide conjugate vaccines may enhance responses as shown in a prior study by our group - the National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium (NVEC). This demonstrated that the tetanus-toxoid conjugated MCC vaccine enhanced the response to a co-administered Hib conjugate vaccine if it was also conjugated to tetanus toxoid . In some cases, more than one conjugate vaccine is available for the same disease, as occurred in the early days of the Hib programme when vaccines conjugated to tetanus toxoid or CRM - a natural nontoxigenic diphtheria protein- were both available. NVEC therefore conducted a study to assess the impact of interchanging the two different Hib conjugate vaccines for the three dose primary immunisation course. This showed that interchanging the two different Hib conjugates for primary immunisation did not compromise immune responses and some mixed schedules gave higher antibody responses than those in which all three doses were given with the same conjugate. However, when mixed schedules of MCC-TT and MCC-CRM were subsequently studied by NVEC a MCC-CRM/MCC-TT two dose schedule was shown to be inferior to those in which MCC-TT was given as the first priming dose.

Until now, the UK has used pneumococcal conjugate vaccines from Pfizer in the form of seven or 13 valent PCV, with the current schedule recommending vaccination with PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age (2+1 schedule). The 13 polysaccharide serotypes in PCV13 are conjugated to CRM. More recently a 10 valent conjugate vaccine manufactured by GSK (PCV10) has been licensed for use in the UK as a 2+1 schedule. The 10 serotypes in PCV10 are also in PCV13 but it lacks serotypes 3, 6A and 19A. No significant protection in vaccinated infants has been shown by PCV13 against serotype 3 [Andrews et al 2014] and for 6A and 19A PCV10 has been shown to provide some cross protection against these serotypes. Like PCV13, PCV10 is safe and efficacious and is in global use. Unlike PCV13, however, the proteins used for conjugation in PCV10 are a mixture of Haemophilus influenzae protein D, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. As with Hib and MCC conjugate vaccines, having two PCV products that could be used in the UK schedule would provide reassurance about vaccine supply and could improve cost effectiveness by reducing vaccine cost. However, if PCV10 vaccine is to be considered for use in the UK, particularly if a combination of PCV10 and PCV13 is used in the national schedule, this would require evidence of the adequate immunogenicity of a mixed schedule and this cannot be inferred from the experience with Hib and MCC conjugates.

The results of a clinical trial in which PCV13 was used for the two priming doses at 2 and 4 months followed by a PCV10 booster dose at 12 months has recently been reported. This showed that a protective antibody response post-booster (serotype specific antibody level by ELISA ≥0.35ug/mL) to 9 of the 13 PCV31 serotypes was achieved by at least 97% of infants boosted with PCV10 whereas PCV13 boosted infants achieved at least 97% protective responses to 11 of the 13 serotypes. For 10 of the 13 serotypes the geometric mean concentrations of antibodies were significantly higher in PCV13 boosted infants and for 3 serotypes were higher in PCV10 boosted infants. This study suggests that mixed PCV schedules in which the CRM-based vaccine is given first may not be optimal.

This study will build on this work, and will assess the alternative combination, which will be PCV10 for priming followed by PCV13 for boosting. The comparator arm will be the current standard of care. The study will therefore include two groups:

2+1 : PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age 2+1 PCV10 at 2 and 4 months of age followed by PCV13 at 12 months of age

All participants will receive all other vaccines as defined under the routine infant immunisation schedule.

This study will rapidly provide information to the JCVI on options for the UK schedule for pneumococcal immunisation of infants and how best the current options could be expanded whilst retaining appropriate protection as afforded through the current schedule.

This study is funded by the UK Department of Health and sponsored by Public Health England. Following written informed consent from their parent/ guardian, infants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups and will receive all their vaccinations to 12 months of age as well as having two blood samples. The first sample will be a month after completion of the primary series, at about five months of age, and the second a month after the booster doses, at about 13 months of age. Extra doses of MenB, MenC, Hib and/or pneumococcal vaccine(s) will be offered where the immune response measured in the post-booster blood is below the correlate of protection.

Information from the study will be presented to the Department of Health to underpin ongoing evolution of the national vaccination schedule. A manuscript will be submitted for publication to a peer reviewed journal and all participating families will receive a summary of the study findings by post.

Being tested
Synflorix, Prevenar13
Keywords
vaccination, immunisation, pneumococcal, conjugate

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SynflorixBiological

    Also called PCV10

    10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

  • Prevenar13Biological

    Also called PCV13

    13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

Study groups in NCT02918708
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
group 2 (Synflorix then Prevenar13)Active comparatorPCV10 given at 2 and 4 months of age, PCV13 given at 12 months of age
Receives: Biological: Synflorix; Biological: Prevenar13
group 1 (Prevenar13 only)Active comparatorPCV13 given at 2,4 and 13 months of age
Receives: Biological: Prevenar13

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pneumococcal proportions

    proportions with protective antibody levels to each serotype in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

    Measured: 13 months of age

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. pneumococcal GMC

    geometric mean concentration of each serotype included in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

    Measured: 13 months of age

  2. pneumococcal fold rise

    to estimate fold rises in antibody for each serotype included in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

    Measured: 13 months of age

  3. Men B proportions

    to estimate proportions with protective antibody levels against the three strains included in the vaccine

    Measured: 5 and 13 months of age

  4. Men B GMT

    to estimate the geometric mean titres of serum bactericidal antibody levels

    Measured: 5 and 13 months of age

  5. tetanus proportions

    to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels

    Measured: 5 months of age

  6. tetanus GMC

    to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against tetanus

    Measured: 5 months of age

  7. diphtheria GMC

    to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against diphtheria

    Measured: 5 months of age

  8. diphtheria proportions

    to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels

    Measured: 5 months of age

  9. pertussis GMC

    to estimate the geometric mean titres of antibody levels against pertussis components

    Measured: 5 months of age

  10. MenC proportions

    to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels

    Measured: 13 months of age

  11. MenC GMT

    to estimate the geometric mean titres of antibody levels against MenC

    Measured: 13 months of age

  12. Hib proportions

    to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels

    Measured: 5 and 13 months of age

  13. Hib GMC

    to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against Hib

    Measured: 5 and 13 months of age

  14. reactogenicity

    Assessment of reactogenicity of vaccines from parent completed health diaries for the week following each vaccination

    Measured: one week after each vaccination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Primary completion1 Jan 2017

Why it stopped: funding channel amended by UK department of health

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02918708
Sponsor's protocol ID
PINC trial
Acronym
PINC
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
12 Sep 2016
Last updated
28 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Synflorix and Prevenar13 in people with Vaccination and Immunization, run by Public Health England at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pneumococcal proportions (time frame: 13 months of age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in