VaccinationPhase 4PINCNCT02918708
Assessment of Novel Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccination Scheduled in UK Infants
A Phase 4 study testing Synflorix and Prevenar13 in people with Vaccination and Immunization, run by Public Health England at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium conducts Department of Health funded trials trials to provide information to underpin changes to the national immunisation and vaccination schedule. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 2 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Vaccination, Immunization
- What is being tested?
- Synflorix and Prevenar13
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Start not givento 1 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 2 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Infants due to receive their primary immunisations , aged up to 13 weeks on first vaccinations.
- Written informed consent given by mother who is aged ≥>= 16 years [NB mother is preferable as consent also allows permission to record the date of pertussis immunisation in pregnancy, which may need to be verified in her medical record. Where mother is not available, consent may be taken from father or legal guardian and maternal pertussis status noted as not known]
Who cannot join
- Bleeding disorder
- Fulfil any of the contraindications to vaccination as specified in The Green Book [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england/series/immunisation-against-infectious-disease-the-green-book]
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Hertfordshire primary care
Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire
Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust
London
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Antibody Responses in UK Infants Given Two Doses of 10 or 13 Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) in Infancy and PCV13 in the Second Year of Life (Study Code: Pneumococcal in New Combinations (PINC))
The National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium conducts Department of Health funded trials trials to provide information to underpin changes to the national immunisation and vaccination schedule.
This study will assess how different schedules of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines work in providing protection to young infants. It is well established that vaccines can behave differently depending on which order they are given and alongside which other immunisations. This has been shown for Hib and MenC vaccines, which are similar in structure to the pneumococcal vaccines that will be studied here. The investigators will measure responses to the pneumococcal vaccines as well as to other routine immunisations, all of which will be provided by our study team. Infants will be recruited by dedicated study staff through primary care and will participate from their first vaccinations at 2 months of age, until the blood sample taken a month after their boosters at a year old, i.e. until 13 months of age.
Any child found to have antibody levels below that which indicates protection for Hib, MenC, MenB or pneumococcal in the blood sample taken at 13 months of age will be offered an extra dose of the relevant vaccine(s).
Read the detailed description
The UK Department of Health provides a routine vaccination schedule for children in the UK which is administered by GP surgeries. The schedule is updated by the addition of antigens and amendment of products and schedules over time to improve the protection afforded to the paediatric population and the overall cost-effectiveness of the programme.
It is now well established that the effects of giving different vaccines and antigens together, as well as the order and numbers of doses given for priming and boosting, can affect the immunological responses they elicit. For example co-administration of different polysaccharide conjugate vaccines may enhance responses as shown in a prior study by our group - the National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium (NVEC). This demonstrated that the tetanus-toxoid conjugated MCC vaccine enhanced the response to a co-administered Hib conjugate vaccine if it was also conjugated to tetanus toxoid . In some cases, more than one conjugate vaccine is available for the same disease, as occurred in the early days of the Hib programme when vaccines conjugated to tetanus toxoid or CRM - a natural nontoxigenic diphtheria protein- were both available. NVEC therefore conducted a study to assess the impact of interchanging the two different Hib conjugate vaccines for the three dose primary immunisation course. This showed that interchanging the two different Hib conjugates for primary immunisation did not compromise immune responses and some mixed schedules gave higher antibody responses than those in which all three doses were given with the same conjugate. However, when mixed schedules of MCC-TT and MCC-CRM were subsequently studied by NVEC a MCC-CRM/MCC-TT two dose schedule was shown to be inferior to those in which MCC-TT was given as the first priming dose.
Until now, the UK has used pneumococcal conjugate vaccines from Pfizer in the form of seven or 13 valent PCV, with the current schedule recommending vaccination with PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age (2+1 schedule). The 13 polysaccharide serotypes in PCV13 are conjugated to CRM. More recently a 10 valent conjugate vaccine manufactured by GSK (PCV10) has been licensed for use in the UK as a 2+1 schedule. The 10 serotypes in PCV10 are also in PCV13 but it lacks serotypes 3, 6A and 19A. No significant protection in vaccinated infants has been shown by PCV13 against serotype 3 [Andrews et al 2014] and for 6A and 19A PCV10 has been shown to provide some cross protection against these serotypes. Like PCV13, PCV10 is safe and efficacious and is in global use. Unlike PCV13, however, the proteins used for conjugation in PCV10 are a mixture of Haemophilus influenzae protein D, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. As with Hib and MCC conjugate vaccines, having two PCV products that could be used in the UK schedule would provide reassurance about vaccine supply and could improve cost effectiveness by reducing vaccine cost. However, if PCV10 vaccine is to be considered for use in the UK, particularly if a combination of PCV10 and PCV13 is used in the national schedule, this would require evidence of the adequate immunogenicity of a mixed schedule and this cannot be inferred from the experience with Hib and MCC conjugates.
The results of a clinical trial in which PCV13 was used for the two priming doses at 2 and 4 months followed by a PCV10 booster dose at 12 months has recently been reported. This showed that a protective antibody response post-booster (serotype specific antibody level by ELISA ≥0.35ug/mL) to 9 of the 13 PCV31 serotypes was achieved by at least 97% of infants boosted with PCV10 whereas PCV13 boosted infants achieved at least 97% protective responses to 11 of the 13 serotypes. For 10 of the 13 serotypes the geometric mean concentrations of antibodies were significantly higher in PCV13 boosted infants and for 3 serotypes were higher in PCV10 boosted infants. This study suggests that mixed PCV schedules in which the CRM-based vaccine is given first may not be optimal.
This study will build on this work, and will assess the alternative combination, which will be PCV10 for priming followed by PCV13 for boosting. The comparator arm will be the current standard of care. The study will therefore include two groups:
2+1 : PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age 2+1 PCV10 at 2 and 4 months of age followed by PCV13 at 12 months of age
All participants will receive all other vaccines as defined under the routine infant immunisation schedule.
This study will rapidly provide information to the JCVI on options for the UK schedule for pneumococcal immunisation of infants and how best the current options could be expanded whilst retaining appropriate protection as afforded through the current schedule.
This study is funded by the UK Department of Health and sponsored by Public Health England. Following written informed consent from their parent/ guardian, infants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups and will receive all their vaccinations to 12 months of age as well as having two blood samples. The first sample will be a month after completion of the primary series, at about five months of age, and the second a month after the booster doses, at about 13 months of age. Extra doses of MenB, MenC, Hib and/or pneumococcal vaccine(s) will be offered where the immune response measured in the post-booster blood is below the correlate of protection.
Information from the study will be presented to the Department of Health to underpin ongoing evolution of the national vaccination schedule. A manuscript will be submitted for publication to a peer reviewed journal and all participating families will receive a summary of the study findings by post.
- Conditions
- Vaccination, Immunization
- Being tested
- Synflorix, Prevenar13
- Keywords
- vaccination, immunisation, pneumococcal, conjugate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SynflorixBiological
Also called PCV10
10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Prevenar13Biological
Also called PCV13
13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group 2 (Synflorix then Prevenar13) | Active comparator | PCV10 given at 2 and 4 months of age, PCV13 given at 12 months of age Receives: Biological: Synflorix; Biological: Prevenar13 |
| group 1 (Prevenar13 only) | Active comparator | PCV13 given at 2,4 and 13 months of age Receives: Biological: Prevenar13 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pneumococcal proportions
proportions with protective antibody levels to each serotype in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Measured: 13 months of age
Secondary outcomes (14)
pneumococcal GMC
geometric mean concentration of each serotype included in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Measured: 13 months of age
pneumococcal fold rise
to estimate fold rises in antibody for each serotype included in pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Measured: 13 months of age
Men B proportions
to estimate proportions with protective antibody levels against the three strains included in the vaccine
Measured: 5 and 13 months of age
Men B GMT
to estimate the geometric mean titres of serum bactericidal antibody levels
Measured: 5 and 13 months of age
tetanus proportions
to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels
Measured: 5 months of age
tetanus GMC
to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against tetanus
Measured: 5 months of age
diphtheria GMC
to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against diphtheria
Measured: 5 months of age
diphtheria proportions
to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels
Measured: 5 months of age
pertussis GMC
to estimate the geometric mean titres of antibody levels against pertussis components
Measured: 5 months of age
MenC proportions
to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels
Measured: 13 months of age
MenC GMT
to estimate the geometric mean titres of antibody levels against MenC
Measured: 13 months of age
Hib proportions
to estimate proportions achieving the protective antibody levels
Measured: 5 and 13 months of age
Hib GMC
to estimate the geometric mean concentration of antibody levels against Hib
Measured: 5 and 13 months of age
reactogenicity
Assessment of reactogenicity of vaccines from parent completed health diaries for the week following each vaccination
Measured: one week after each vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jan 2017
Why it stopped: funding channel amended by UK department of health
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for VaccinationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Public Health England
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London, Institute of Child Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elizabeth Coates, PhD, Study chair, Public Health England
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02918708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PINC trial
- Acronym
- PINC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Antibody Responses in UK Infants Given Two Doses of 10 or 13 Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) in Infancy and PCV13 in the Second Year of Life (Study Code: Pneumococcal in New Combinations (PINC))
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02918708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PINC / PINC trial
- Conditions
- Vaccination, Immunization
- Keywords
- vaccination, immunisation, pneumococcal, conjugate
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: funding channel amended by UK department of health
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Public Health EnglandOther government
- Collaborators
- Imperial College London, Institute of Child Health
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium conducts Department of Health funded trials trials to provide information to underpin changes to the national immunisation and vaccination schedule.
This study will assess how different schedules of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines work in providing protection to young infants. It is well established that vaccines can behave differently depending on which order they are given and alongside which other immunisations. This has been shown for Hib and MenC vaccines, which are similar in structure to the pneumococcal vaccines that will be studied here. The investigators will measure responses to the pneumococcal vaccines as well as to other routine immunisations, all of which will be provided by our study team. Infants will be recruited by dedicated study staff through primary care and will participate from their first vaccinations at 2 months of age, until the blood sample taken a month after their boosters at a year old, i.e. until 13 months of age.
Any child found to have antibody levels below that which indicates protection for Hib, MenC, MenB or pneumococcal in the blood sample taken at 13 months of age will be offered an extra dose of the relevant vaccine(s).
Detailed description
The UK Department of Health provides a routine vaccination schedule for children in the UK which is administered by GP surgeries. The schedule is updated by the addition of antigens and amendment of products and schedules over time to improve the protection afforded to the paediatric population and the overall cost-effectiveness of the programme.
It is now well established that the effects of giving different vaccines and antigens together, as well as the order and numbers of doses given for priming and boosting, can affect the immunological responses they elicit. For example co-administration of different polysaccharide conjugate vaccines may enhance responses as shown in a prior study by our group - the National Vaccine Evaluation Consortium (NVEC). This demonstrated that the tetanus-toxoid conjugated MCC vaccine enhanced the response to a co-administered Hib conjugate vaccine if it was also conjugated to tetanus toxoid . In some cases, more than one conjugate vaccine is available for the same disease, as occurred in the early days of the Hib programme when vaccines conjugated to tetanus toxoid or CRM - a natural nontoxigenic diphtheria protein- were both available. NVEC therefore conducted a study to assess the impact of interchanging the two different Hib conjugate vaccines for the three dose primary immunisation course. This showed that interchanging the two different Hib conjugates for primary immunisation did not compromise immune responses and some mixed schedules gave higher antibody responses than those in which all three doses were given with the same conjugate. However, when mixed schedules of MCC-TT and MCC-CRM were subsequently studied by NVEC a MCC-CRM/MCC-TT two dose schedule was shown to be inferior to those in which MCC-TT was given as the first priming dose.
Until now, the UK has used pneumococcal conjugate vaccines from Pfizer in the form of seven or 13 valent PCV, with the current schedule recommending vaccination with PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age (2+1 schedule). The 13 polysaccharide serotypes in PCV13 are conjugated to CRM. More recently a 10 valent conjugate vaccine manufactured by GSK (PCV10) has been licensed for use in the UK as a 2+1 schedule. The 10 serotypes in PCV10 are also in PCV13 but it lacks serotypes 3, 6A and 19A. No significant protection in vaccinated infants has been shown by PCV13 against serotype 3 [Andrews et al 2014] and for 6A and 19A PCV10 has been shown to provide some cross protection against these serotypes. Like PCV13, PCV10 is safe and efficacious and is in global use. Unlike PCV13, however, the proteins used for conjugation in PCV10 are a mixture of Haemophilus influenzae protein D, tetanus toxoid and diphtheria toxoid. As with Hib and MCC conjugate vaccines, having two PCV products that could be used in the UK schedule would provide reassurance about vaccine supply and could improve cost effectiveness by reducing vaccine cost. However, if PCV10 vaccine is to be considered for use in the UK, particularly if a combination of PCV10 and PCV13 is used in the national schedule, this would require evidence of the adequate immunogenicity of a mixed schedule and this cannot be inferred from the experience with Hib and MCC conjugates.
The results of a clinical trial in which PCV13 was used for the two priming doses at 2 and 4 months followed by a PCV10 booster dose at 12 months has recently been reported. This showed that a protective antibody response post-booster (serotype specific antibody level by ELISA ≥0.35ug/mL) to 9 of the 13 PCV31 serotypes was achieved by at least 97% of infants boosted with PCV10 whereas PCV13 boosted infants achieved at least 97% protective responses to 11 of the 13 serotypes. For 10 of the 13 serotypes the geometric mean concentrations of antibodies were significantly higher in PCV13 boosted infants and for 3 serotypes were higher in PCV10 boosted infants. This study suggests that mixed PCV schedules in which the CRM-based vaccine is given first may not be optimal.
This study will build on this work, and will assess the alternative combination, which will be PCV10 for priming followed by PCV13 for boosting. The comparator arm will be the current standard of care. The study will therefore include two groups:
2+1 : PCV13 at 2, 4 and 12 months of age 2+1 PCV10 at 2 and 4 months of age followed by PCV13 at 12 months of age
All participants will receive all other vaccines as defined under the routine infant immunisation schedule.
This study will rapidly provide information to the JCVI on options for the UK schedule for pneumococcal immunisation of infants and how best the current options could be expanded whilst retaining appropriate protection as afforded through the current schedule.
This study is funded by the UK Department of Health and sponsored by Public Health England. Following written informed consent from their parent/ guardian, infants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups and will receive all their vaccinations to 12 months of age as well as having two blood samples. The first sample will be a month after completion of the primary series, at about five months of age, and the second a month after the booster doses, at about 13 months of age. Extra doses of MenB, MenC, Hib and/or pneumococcal vaccine(s) will be offered where the immune response measured in the post-booster blood is below the correlate of protection.
Information from the study will be presented to the Department of Health to underpin ongoing evolution of the national vaccination schedule. A manuscript will be submitted for publication to a peer reviewed journal and all participating families will receive a summary of the study findings by post.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group 2 (Synflorix then Prevenar13) | Active comparator | Biological: Synflorix, Biological: Prevenar13PCV10 given at 2 and 4 months of age, PCV13 given at 12 months of age |
| group 1 (Prevenar13 only) | Active comparator | Biological: Prevenar13PCV13 given at 2,4 and 13 months of age |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 2 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Infants due to receive their primary immunisations , aged up to 13 weeks on first vaccinations.
- Written informed consent given by mother who is aged ≥>= 16 years [NB mother is preferable as consent also allows permission to record the date of pertussis immunisation in pregnancy, which may need to be verified in her medical record. Where mother is not available, consent may be taken from father or legal guardian and maternal pertussis status noted as not known]
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Bleeding disorder
- Fulfil any of the contraindications to vaccination as specified in The Green Book [https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/public-health-england/series/immunisation-against-infectious-disease-the-green-book]
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SynflorixAlso: PCV1010-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine | Biological | group 2 (Synflorix then Prevenar13) |
| Prevenar13Also: PCV1313-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine | Biological | group 1 (Prevenar13 only), group 2 (Synflorix then Prevenar13) |
Primary outcome
pneumococcal proportions
Time frame: 13 months of age
proportions with protective antibody levels to each serotype in the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
14 secondary outcomes
pneumococcal GMC
Time frame: 13 months of age
pneumococcal fold rise
Time frame: 13 months of age
Men B proportions
Time frame: 5 and 13 months of age
Men B GMT
Time frame: 5 and 13 months of age
tetanus proportions
Time frame: 5 months of age
tetanus GMC
Time frame: 5 months of age
diphtheria GMC
Time frame: 5 months of age
diphtheria proportions
Time frame: 5 months of age
pertussis GMC
Time frame: 5 months of age
MenC proportions
Time frame: 13 months of age
MenC GMT
Time frame: 13 months of age
Hib proportions
Time frame: 5 and 13 months of age
Hib GMC
Time frame: 5 and 13 months of age
reactogenicity
Time frame: one week after each vaccination
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vaccination
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Comparing Immune Response of 2 vs 3 HPV Doses (27-45 Years Old)
Immunization, HPV Infection
Recruiting
Assessment of Communication Interventions on Vaccination Knowledge and Acceptance
Vaccination Knowledge and Acceptance, Informed Vaccine-decision Making
Active, not recruiting
Working Towards Empowered Community-driven Approaches to Increase Vaccination and Preventive Care Engagement
COVID-19
RecruitingPhase 2
Long-Term Immunogenicity of the altSonflex1-2-3 Shigella Vaccine in African Children
Diarrhoea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth Coates, PhD study chair
Public Health England
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Synflorix and Prevenar13 in people with Vaccination and Immunization, run by Public Health England at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pneumococcal proportions (time frame: 13 months of age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.