AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-surgical Pain Following Extraction of Molar TeethPhase 3SDDPNCT02912650

A Safety And Efficacy Study of Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg In The Treatment Of Post-Surgical Dental Pain

A Phase 3 study testing Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg, Ibuprofen 250 mg and Acetaminophen 650 mg in people with Post-surgical Pain Following Extraction of Molar Teeth, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, single-center study in approximately 560 subjects to determine the overall analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose ibuprofen 250 mg / acetaminophen 500 mg formulation compared to ibuprofen 250 mg alone, acetaminophen 650 mg alone, and to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years
What is being tested?
Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg, Ibuprofen 250 mg and Acetaminophen 650 mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
568 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2015to Jun 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Outpatients who have undergone surgical extraction of 3 or more third molars, of which at least 2 must be a partial or complete bony mandibular impaction.
  • Subject must have at least moderate pain on the 4-point categorical scale, confirmed by at least 50 mm on the 100 mm VAS PSR scale within approximately 5 hours (i.e., less than or equal to 5 hours, 15 minutes) after surgery is completed.
  • Female subjects are not pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence or history of any significant hepatic, renal, endocrine, cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, hematologic, or metabolic disorder determined by the Investigator to place the subject at increased risk, including the presence or history within 2 years of screening.
  • Acute localized dental alveolar infection at the time of surgery that could confound the post-surgical evaluation.
  • Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen, naproxen, aspirin, or any other NSAID; or to APAP, tramadol, other opioids, or to their combinations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Jean Brown Research

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Safety And Efficacy Study Comparing A Single Oral Dose Of Ibuprofen (IBU) 250 Mg/Acetaminophen (APAP) 500 Mg (Administered As Two Tablets Of IBU/APAP 125 Mg/250 Mg) To Each Active Drug Monocomponent Alone And To Placebo In The Treatment Of Post-Surgical Dental Pain

This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, single-center study in approximately 560 subjects to determine the overall analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose ibuprofen 250 mg / acetaminophen 500 mg formulation compared to ibuprofen 250 mg alone, acetaminophen 650 mg alone, and to placebo. Subjects will be healthy males and females aged 18-40 years, inclusive, who are experiencing post-operative pain following surgical extraction of 3 or more third molar teeth. Following extraction, subjects must experience, within 5 hours, post-surgical pain of at least moderate severity (on a 4-point categorical scale), confirmed by a Visual Analog Pain Severity Rating Scale (VAS PSR) of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS PSR scale. Eligible subjects will be randomized to receive a single oral dose of study medication under double-blind conditions and then evaluated on site for 12 hours following administration of study medication. Subjects will provide self-ratings of pain severity and pain relief at various time points using categorical and numerical scales. Additionally, subjects will also evaluate the time to first perceptible relief and time to meaningful relief using a double stopwatch method. Finally, at 12 hours, subjects will complete a categorical Global Evaluation of the study medication. A review of any reported adverse events will also be completed.

Read the detailed description

This is a 12-hour, 4-arm, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, single-center study in approximately 560 subjects to determine the overall analgesic efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose ibuprofen 250 mg / acetaminophen 500 mg formulation (administered as two caplets of 125 mg/250 mg IBU/APAP) compared to ibuprofen 250 mg alone, acetaminophen 650 mg alone, and to placebo. Subjects will be healthy males and females aged 18-40 years, inclusive, otherwise healthy, who are experiencing post-operative pain following surgical extraction of 3 or more third molar teeth. Following extraction, subjects must experience, within 5 hours, post-surgical pain of at least moderate severity (on a 4-point categorical scale), confirmed by a Visual Analog Pain Severity Rating Scale (VAS PSR) of at least 50 mm on a 100 mm VAS PSR scale. Upon completion of the baseline scales, eligible subjects will be randomized to receive a single oral dose of study medication under double-blind conditions and then evaluated on site for 12 hours following administration of study medication. At 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 hours post dose time points, subjects will provide: self-ratings of pain severity using the numerical and categorical PSRs; and self-ratings of pain relief at each time point using a categorical pain relief rating scale. At 12 hours, subjects will also complete a 6-point categorical Global Evaluation of the study medication. Additionally, subjects will also evaluate the time to first perceptible relief and time to meaningful relief using a double stopwatch method up to 12 hours post-dose or until the time of first rescue medication use, whichever is sooner. A review of any reported adverse events will also be completed.

Being tested
Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg, Ibuprofen 250 mg, Acetaminophen 650 mg, Placebo
Keywords
ibuprofen, acetaminophen, pain, molar extraction
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mgDrug

    Also called IBU 250 / APAP 500

    2 caplets of Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg

  • Ibuprofen 250 mgDrug

    Also called IBU 250

    2 caplets of Ibuprofen 125 mg

  • Acetaminophen 650 mgDrug

    Also called APAP 650

    2 tablets of Acetaminophen 325 mg

  • PlaceboDrug

    2 caplets of Placebo

Study groups in NCT02912650
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mgExperimental2 caplets of Ibuprofen 125 mg / Acetaminophen 250 mg
Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg
Ibuprofen 250 mgActive comparator2 caplets of IBU 125 mg
Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen 250 mg
Acetaminophen 650 mgActive comparator2 tablets of APAP 325 mg
Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen 650 mg
PlaceboActive comparator2 caplets of Placebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Scores on 11-Point Numerical Scale From 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose (SPID11 [0-8])

    Pain intensity was assessed on an 11-point numerical pain severity rating scale. SPID11 (0-8): Time-weighted sum of pain intensity difference (PID) scores over 8 hours. SPID11 score range was -40 (worst score) to 80 (best score) for SPID 0-8. PID was calculated by subtracting the pain intensity score at given post-dose time points (pain severity score range: 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain) from the baseline pain intensity scores (score range: 5 =moderate pain to 10 =worst possible pain; as participants with baseline pain score of at least moderate were included in study). Total possible score range for PID: -5 (worst score) to 10 (best score).

    Measured: 0 to 8 hours post-dose

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Scores on 11-Point Numerical Scale From 6 to 8 Hours Post-dose (SPID11 [6-8])

    Pain intensity was assessed on an 11-point numerical pain severity rating scale. SPID11 (6-8): Time-weighted sum of PID scores over 6 to 8 hours. SPID11 score range was -15 (worst score) to 30 (best score) for SPID 6-8. PID was calculated by subtracting the pain intensity score at given post-dose time points (pain severity score range: 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain) from the baseline pain intensity scores (score range: 5 =moderate pain to 10 =worst possible pain; as participants with baseline pain score of at least moderate were included in study). Total possible score range for PID: -5 (worst score) to 10 (best score).

    Measured: 6 to 8 hours post-dose

  2. Time-weighted Sum of Pain Relief Rating (TOTPAR) From 0 to 8 Hours and 6 to 8 Hours Post-dose

    TOTPAR: Time-weighted sum of Pain Relief Rating (PRR) scores over 0 to 8 and 6 to 8 hours. TOTPAR total score range: 0 (worst score) to 32 (best score) for TOTPAR 0-8 and 0 (worst score) to 12 (best score) for TOTPAR 6-8 hours. PRR was assessed on a 5-point categorical pain relief rating scale which ranges from 0 =no relief to 4 =complete relief.

    Measured: 0 to 8 hours, 6 to 8 hours post-dose

  3. Time to Treatment Failure

    Time to treatment failure was defined as the time interval from the study drug administration up to the first documentation of treatment failure. Treatment failure was defined as taking the rescue medication or discontinuation of the participants from the study due to lack of efficacy, whichever came first. Participants were censored at 12 hours or at their final assessment time, whichever came first.

    Measured: 0 to 12 hours post-dose

  4. Cumulative Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure at 6 and 8 Hours

    Treatment failure was defined as taking the rescue medication or discontinuation of the participants from the study due to lack of efficacy, whichever came first. Participants were censored at 12 hours or at their final assessment time, whichever came first. Percentage of participants who had treatment failure were reported.

    Measured: 6 hours, 8 hours post-dose

  5. Time to Onset of Meaningful Pain Relief

    Participants evaluated time to meaningful relief by stopping a second stopwatch labelled as "meaningful relief" at the moment they first began to experience meaningful relief. Stopwatch was active up to 12 hours after dosing or until stopped by participant, or participant became treatment failure prior to depressing the second stopwatch. Treatment failure was defined as participant taking rescue medication, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy.

    Measured: 0 to 12 hours post-dose

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
568 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02912650
Sponsor's protocol ID
B5061003
Other IDs
GEMINI SDDP
Acronym
SDDP
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
7 Jan 2016
Last updated
30 Aug 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg, Ibuprofen 250 mg and Acetaminophen 650 mg in people with Post-surgical Pain Following Extraction of Molar Teeth, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time-weighted Sum of Pain Intensity Difference Scores on 11-Point Numerical Scale From 0 to 8 Hours Post-dose (SPID11 [0-8]) (time frame: 0 to 8 hours post-dose). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in