Dry Eye SyndromesNCT02910713
Evaluation of Dry Eye Symptoms in CAE With Application of Intranasal Neurostimulation
A study testing Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator in people with Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Allergan at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) relating to symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment model. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2016to 31 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate to severe dry eye disease
- Normal lid/lash anatomy, blinking function and closure as determined by the Investigator
- Literate, able to speak English, and able to complete questionnaires independently
Who cannot join
- Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to risk of clinically significant increased bleeding
- Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma to these areas
- Implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator
- Corneal transplant in either or both eyes
- A woman who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy at the Screening Visit
- Be currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study or have used an investigational drug or device within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Eye Care Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40206
Total Eye Care, PA
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Nashville Vision Associates
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
About this study
Official title: Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Masked, Cross-Over Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dry Eye Symptoms With Application of the Oculeve Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator During Exposure to a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®)
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) relating to symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment model.
Read the detailed description
Participants will be randomized to a single application sequence, either sequence "A" (intranasal application followed by control application) or sequence "B" (control application followed by intranasal application) using the device. Upon entering the CAE, participants will complete dry eye questionnaires every five minutes and will administer the device either intranasally or extranasally in randomized sequence when a certain level of ocular discomfort has been reached.
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Being tested
- Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator
- Medical subject headings
- Dry Eye Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intranasal Tear NeurostimulatorDevice
The device delivers small electrical currents, activating nerves that stimulate the body's natural tear production system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intranasal Application | Experimental | Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally device (active), intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure. Receives: Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator |
| Extranasal Application | Sham comparator | Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator device applied extranasally (control) for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure. Receives: Device: Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The participant rated their eye dryness (both eyes simultaneously) at all visits and every 5 minutes during CAE exposure by placing a vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal line to indicate the level of eye dryness. 0 corresponds to "no dryness" and 100 corresponds to "maximal dryness". A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A cross-over linear model was used with symptom relief as the response variable; sequence, application location, period, and the application location by period interaction as fixed effects; and participant (sequence) as a random effect.
Measured: Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score
The participant graded their eye discomfort prior to CAE entry, during CAE exposure to threshold, then starting 1 minute after treatment application every 5 minutes in each eye separately using the Ora Calibra ODS where: 0=no discomfort to 4=constant discomfort. Data from the analysis eye was used to determine effectiveness. The analysis eye was defined as the eye that reached the threshold triggering the first application or if both eyes reach the threshold at the same time, the eye with the higher discomfort score or if both eyes are the same, the right eye was used. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A cross-over linear model was used with symptom relief as the response variable; sequence, application location, period, and the application location by period interaction as fixed effects; and participant (sequence) as a random effect.
Measured: Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start30 Sep 2016
- Primary completion31 Oct 2016
- Study completion31 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Dry Eye SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Michelle Senchyna, Study chair, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02910713
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OCUN-011
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Masked, Cross-Over Clinical Trial to Evaluate Dry Eye Symptoms With Application of the Oculeve Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator During Exposure to a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02910713
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OCUN-011
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Syndromes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Jan 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) compared with the same device applied extranasally (control) relating to symptoms of dry eye exacerbated by the Controlled Adverse Environment model.
Detailed description
Participants will be randomized to a single application sequence, either sequence "A" (intranasal application followed by control application) or sequence "B" (control application followed by intranasal application) using the device. Upon entering the CAE, participants will complete dry eye questionnaires every five minutes and will administer the device either intranasally or extranasally in randomized sequence when a certain level of ocular discomfort has been reached.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intranasal Application | Experimental | Device: Intranasal Tear NeurostimulatorIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator applied intranasally device (active), intranasal application for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure. |
| Extranasal Application | Sham comparator | Device: Intranasal Tear NeurostimulatorIntranasal Tear Neurostimulator device applied extranasally (control) for approximately 3 minutes on Day 0 when the participant experienced an ODS ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during the CAE exposure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Moderate to severe dry eye disease
- Normal lid/lash anatomy, blinking function and closure as determined by the Investigator
- Literate, able to speak English, and able to complete questionnaires independently
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to risk of clinically significant increased bleeding
- Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma to these areas
- Implanted metallic or electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator
- Corneal transplant in either or both eyes
- A woman who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy at the Screening Visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intranasal Tear NeurostimulatorThe device delivers small electrical currents, activating nerves that stimulate the body's natural tear production system. | Device | Extranasal Application, Intranasal Application |
Primary outcome
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
The participant rated their eye dryness (both eyes simultaneously) at all visits and every 5 minutes during CAE exposure by placing a vertical mark on the 100 mm horizontal line to indicate the level of eye dryness. 0 corresponds to "no dryness" and 100 corresponds to "maximal dryness". A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. A cross-over linear model was used with symptom relief as the response variable; sequence, application location, period, and the application location by period interaction as fixed effects; and participant (sequence) as a random effect.
1 secondary outcome
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in the Ora Calibra Ocular Discomfort Scale (ODS) Score
Time frame: Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dry Eye Syndromes
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC) Injection Therapy for Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Unresponsive to Conventional Treatments
Dry Eye Disease (DED), Graft-Versus-Host Disease(GVHD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michelle Senchyna study chair
Allergan
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intranasal Tear Neurostimulator in people with Dry Eye Syndromes, run by Allergan at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jan 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Pre-Application to Post-Application in Eye Dryness Score (EDS) Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Pre-application to Post-application on Day 0). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2020.