Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 3NCT02907359
Guadecitabine (SGI-110) vs Treatment Choice in Adults With MDS or CMML Previously Treated With HMAs
A Phase 3 study testing Guadecitabine and Treatment Choice in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic, run by Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 112 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
A Phase 3, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guadecitabine in participants with MDS or CMML who failed or relapsed after adequate prior treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, or both. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
- What is being tested?
- Guadecitabine and Treatment Choice
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 417 participants
- Where
- 112 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2017to 30 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants ≥18 years of age who are able to understand and comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent before any study-specific procedure.
- Cytologically or histologically confirmed diagnosis of MDS or CMML according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.
- Performance status (ECOG) of 0-2.
- Previously treated MDS or CMML, defined as prior treatment with at least one hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine and/or decitabine) for intermediate or high risk MDS or CMML whose disease progressed or relapsed as follows:
- Participant received HMA for at least 6 cycles and was still transfusion dependent.
- Participant received HMA for at least 2 complete cycles and had disease progression prior to Cycle 6 defined as
Show all 13Show fewer
- ≥50% increase in bone marrow blasts from pre-HMA-treatment levels or from nadir post-HMA-treatment levels to >5% (for participants with pretreatment or nadir blasts ≤5%) or to >10% (for participants with pretreatment or nadir blasts >5%), and/or ii. Transfusion dependent and ≥2 gram/deciliter (g/dL) reduction of Hgb from pre-HMA-treatment levels.
- Other prior treatments for MDS such as lenalidomide, cytarabine, intensive chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin and other growth factors, or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are allowed.
- Participants must have either:
- Bone marrow blasts >5% at randomization, OR
- Transfusion dependence, defined as having had transfusion (in the setting of active disease) of 2 or more units of RBC or platelets within 8 weeks prior to randomization.
- Creatinine clearance or glomerular filtration rate ≥30 milliliter/minute (mL/min) estimated by the Cockroft-Gault (C-G) or other medically acceptable formulas such as MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) or CKD-EPI (the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration).
- Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breastfeeding and must have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Women of childbearing potential and men with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to practice 2 highly effective contraceptive measures of birth control and must agree not to become pregnant or father a child (a) while receiving treatment with guadecitabine and for at least 3 months after completing treatment and (b) while receiving treatment with LDAC or IC and for at least 6 months after completing treatment or for the duration specified in local prescribing information, whichever is longer.
Who cannot join
- Participants who have been diagnosed as having AML with peripheral blood or bone marrow blasts of ≥20%.
- Participants who may still be sensitive to repeated treatment with decitabine or azacitidine such as participants who had response to prior decitabine or azacitidine treatment, but relapsed >6 months after stopping treatment with these agents.
- Prior treatment with guadecitabine.
- Hypersensitivity to decitabine, guadecitabine, or any of their excipients.
- Second malignancy currently requiring active therapy, except breast or prostate cancer stable on or responding to endocrine therapy.
- Treated with any investigational drug within 2 weeks of the first dose of study treatment.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Total serum bilirubin >2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) (except for participants with Gilbert's Syndrome for whom direct bilirubin is <2.5×ULN), or liver cirrhosis or chronic liver disease Child-Pugh Class B or C.
- Known active HIV, HBV, or HCV infection. Inactive hepatitis carrier status or low viral hepatitis titer on antivirals is allowed.
- Known significant mental illness or other condition such as active alcohol or other substance abuse or addiction that, in the opinion of the investigator, predisposes the participant to high risk of noncompliance with the protocol.
- Refractory congestive heart failure unresponsive to medical treatment, active infection resistant to all antibiotics, or advanced non-MDS associated pulmonary disease requiring >2 liters per minute oxygen.
- Life expectancy of less than one month
- Participants with TP53 mutations
Trial locations and contacts
112 sites in 14 countries.
112 sites in 14 countries
United States22 sites
University of Michigan Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010
Duke Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
North Shore Medical Center
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Cancer Specialists of North Florida
Fleming Island, Florida, 32003
Bon Secours Saint Francis Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607
John Theurer Cancer Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Franciscan Health Indianapolis
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
West Virginia University Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Desert Hematology Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
Swedish Cancer Institute
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Japan22 sites
Nippon Medical School Hospital
Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo
National Hospital Organization Kyushu
Fukuoka
Fukushima Medical University
Fukushima
Chugoku Central Hospital
Fukuyama-shi, Hiroshima
Gifu Municipal Hospital
Gifu
Kansai Medical University Hirakata
Hirakata, Osaka
Tokai University Hospital
Isehara, Kanagawa
Saitama Medical Center
Kawagoe, Saitama
The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research
Koto, Tokyo
National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center
Kumamoto
Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital
Kyoto
University Hospital-Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
Kyoto
Nagasaki University Hospital
Nagasaki, Nagasaki-shi
NHO Nagoya Medical Center
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Narita Red Cross Hospital
Narita, Chiba
Kindai University Hospital
Osakasayama-shi, Osaka
Kitasato University Hospital
Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa
NTT Medical Center Tokyo
Shinagawa, Tokyo
National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center
Tachikawa, Tokyo
Yamagata University Hospital
Yamagata
Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital
Yokohama, Kanagawa
University of Fukui Hospital
Yoshida, Fukui
Spain11 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona
Fundació Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
Cáceres
Hospital de León
León
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal
Madrid
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe de Valencia
Valencia
Canada9 sites
Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
Barrie, Ontario, L4M 6M2
Burnaby Hospital
Burnaby
Tom Baker Cancer Center
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3
Moncton Hospital
Moncton
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hôpital Service d'Hematologie et d'Oncologie Medicale
Montreal
Saskatchewan Cancer Agency
Regina
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C1
France8 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
La Tronche
Hôpital Dupuytren
Limoges
GHR Mulhouse Sud-Alsace
Mulhouse
Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu
Nantes
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice
Hôpital Saint Louis
Paris
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse
Toulouse
Italy8 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio E. Biagio E. Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
Alessandria
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
Florence
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
Genova
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan
AORN A. Cardarelli
Naples
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria-Maggiore della Carità di Novara
Novara
Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord
Pesaro
Ospedale S. Eugenio
Roma
South Korea6 sites
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 137-701
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, 44033
Czechia5 sites
Fakultní nemocnice Brno
Brno
Fakultni Nemocnice Hradec Králové
Hradec Králové
Fakultní nemocnice Ostrava
Ostrava
Fakultní Nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
Prague
Onkologická klinika Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze a 1
Prague
Germany5 sites
Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig
Braunschweig
Marien Hospital Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf
Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau
Universitätsklinikum Halle
Halle
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm
Denmark4 sites
Aalborg Universitetshospital
Aalborg
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Aarhus
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen
Odense University Hospital
Odense
United Kingdom4 sites
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Gillingham
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham
Belgium3 sites
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg
Antwerp
Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende
Bruges
Grand Hôpital de Charleroi - Notre Dame
Charleroi
Poland3 sites
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 w Lublinie
Lublin
Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologii
Warsaw
Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
Warsaw
Sweden2 sites
Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Östra sjukhuset
Gothenburg
Universitetssjukhuset Örebro
Örebro
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) Versus Treatment Choice in Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Previously Treated With Hypomethylating Agents
A Phase 3, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guadecitabine in participants with MDS or CMML who failed or relapsed after adequate prior treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, or both. This global study will be conducted in approximately 15 countries. Approximately 408 participants from approximately 100 study centers will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either guadecitabine (approximately 272 participants) or Treatment Choice (approximately 136 participants). The study consists of a 21-day screening period, a treatment period, a safety follow-up visit, and a long-term follow-up period. The study is expected to last more than 2 years, and the duration of individual participant participation will vary. Participants may continue to receive treatment for as long as they continue to benefit.
Read the detailed description
Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study of guadecitabine vs Treatment Choice (TC). Approximately 408 participants will be randomly assigned 2:1 to either guadecitabine or TC.
- Guadecitabine: approximately 272 participants.
- TC: approximately 136 participants.
Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
- Low dose cytarabine (LDAC).
- Standard Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) of a 7+3 regimen.
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) only. BSC will be provided to all participants as per standard and institutional practice. Participants randomized to TC will not be allowed to cross over to guadecitabine. Data will be reviewed by an independent Data Monitoring Committee at regular intervals, primarily to evaluate safety during study conduct. Randomization will be stratified by disease category (MDS vs CMML), bone marrow (BM) blasts (BM blasts >10% vs BM blasts ≤10%), TC option (LDAC vs IC vs BSC), and study center region.
Guadecitabine: 60 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) given subcutaneously (SC) daily on Days 1-5 in 28-day cycles (delayed as needed to allow blood count recovery). Treatment should be given for at least 6 total cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression requiring alternative therapy. Beyond 6 cycles, treatment should continue as long as the participant continues to benefit. BSC should be given according to standard and institutional practice.
Treatment Choice (TC): Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
- Low dose cytarabine (LDAC) given as 20 mg/m^2 SC or intravenously (IV) once daily for 14 days in 28-day cycles (delayed as needed to allow blood count recovery). Treatment should be given for at least 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Standard Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) of a 7+3 regimen: given as cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day given as continuous infusion for 7 days and an anthracycline given as per institutional standard practice such as daunorubicin (45-60 mg/m^2/day), or idarubicin (9-12 mg/m^2/day), or mitoxantrone (8-12 mg/m^2/day) by intravenous infusion for 3 days.
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) only: given according to standard and institutional practice. BSC includes, but is not limited to blood transfusions (Red blood cells [RBCs] or platelets), growth factors including erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), granulocyte stimulating factors (GSFs), iron chelating therapy, and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals.
- Being tested
- Guadecitabine, Treatment Choice
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GuadecitabineDrug
Also called SGI-110
Treatment ChoiceOther
- BSC: according to standard/institutional practice; included RBC or platelet transfusions; growth factors, i.e. erythropoiesis stimulating agents, granulocyte stimulating factors, iron chelating therapy; broad spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals.
- LDAC: 20 mg/m^2 SC or IV once daily (QD) for 14 days in 28-day cycles. Other schedules were allowed per institutional practice. Treatment for ≥4 cycles absent disease progression/toxicity. BSC per institutional/standard practice.
- Standard Intensive Chemotherapy: recommended regimen of 7+3 was given as cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day continuous infusion for 7 days and an anthracycline for 3 days. Anthracyclines per institutional practice included daunorubicin (45-60 mg/m^2/day) or idarubicin (9-12 mg/m^2/day) or mitoxantrone (8-12 mg/m^2/day) by IV infusion. Participants with complete or partial response after IC induction received ≥1 additional cycles with reduced cytotoxic doses then BSC per standard /institutional practice.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Guadecitabine | Experimental | Participants received Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, on Days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle for at least 6 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression requiring alternative therapy. Participants received Guadecitabine treatment beyond 6 cycles as long as the participant continued to benefit based on investigator judgment and participant response and tolerability (or up to a maximum of 36 cycles). Receives: Drug: Guadecitabine |
| Treatment Choice | Active comparator | Participants received one of the three treatment choice options:
1. LDAC 20 mg/m^2 SC/IV once daily for 14 days of each 28-day cycles for at least 4 cycles in absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Participants who were responding or had stable disease were to continue treatment as per standard institutional practice.
2. Standard IC of a 7+3 regimen:Cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day given as continuous infusion for 7 days and anthracycline(daunorubicin(45-60 mg)/idarubicin(9-12 mg)/mitoxantrone(8-12 mg)/m^2) by IV infusion for 3 days of each 28-day cycles.
3. BSC as needed during the treatment included,but was not limited to,blood transfusions(RBCs or platelets),growth factors including erythropoiesis stimulating agents,granulocyte stimulating factors,iron chelating therapy,and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals.
Duration for treatment choice was as per locally approved prescribing information and institutional standard practice or up to a maximum 30 cycles. Receives: Other: Treatment Choice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the number of days from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death due to any cause. Survival time was censored on the last date the participant is known alive with no event of death. OS time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization up to death (up to approximately 38.6 months)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence for Any 8 Consecutive Weeks
Transfusion independence rate was calculated as the number of participants with neither RBC nor platelet transfusion for any period of 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment (or cycle 1 day 1 { C1D1} visit date for participants randomized to BSC or randomization date for participants not treated) and up to treatment discontinuation (or 180 days for participants discontinuing the treatment within 6 months), while maintaining haemoglobin (Hgb) ≥8 gram per deciliter (g/dL) and platelets ≥20×10^9/liter (L) divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy analysis. RBC or Platelet transfusion independence rate was defined similarly as above. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the single decimal point.
Measured: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Percentage of Participants With Marrow Complete Response (mCR) Along With Transfusion Independence Rate
mCR was defined as per 2006 Myelodysplastic Syndromes International Council for Harmonisation (MDS IWG) criteria as reduction of bone marrow (BM) blasts to ≤5% and decrease by 50% or more with or without normalization of peripheral counts. Transfusion independence rate was calculated as the number of participants with neither RBC nor platelet transfusion for any period of 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment (or C1D1 visit date for participants randomized to BSC or randomization date for participants not treated) and up to treatment discontinuation (or 180 days for participants discontinuing the treatment within 6 months), while maintaining Hgb ≥8 g/dL and platelets ≥20×10^9/L divided by the total number of participants included in the efficacy analysis. The percentage of participants who achieved mCR and transfusion independence simultaneously in the same period were calculated for each group. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the single decimal point.
Measured: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Survival Rate at 1 Year After Randomization
One year survival rate was defined as the percentage of participants that survived at the end of the first year from randomization. Participants who did not have death in record were censored on the last date known to be alive. Percentage of participants are rounded off to the nearest whole number.
Measured: From randomization up to 12 months
Leukemia-free Survival
Leukemia-free survival was defined as the number of days from randomization to the earliest date when participants have bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) blasts ≥20%, conversion to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or death of any cause. Participants with no events in leukemia-free survival were censored on the last date of BM or PB blasts assessment, whichever is later. Survival time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From randomization up to 46.6 months
Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital (NDAOH)
The date of each hospital admission and discharge was collected for each participant for up to 6 months, unless the participant died or withdrew consent prior to that time. Duration of each hospital stay in days was calculated as date of discharge minus date of admission. The NDAOH within first 6 month period was calculated as: NDAOH 6M=180 -total duration of all hospital stays within 180 days from the first treatment -number of death days before Day 180. For participants who were lost to follow-up within 6 months, the NDAOH was calculated conservatively assuming that the participant would have died the day after the last contact day.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Disease Response (DR) Rate
DR: Complete Response(CR), Partial Response(PR),Marrow Complete Response(mCR), and Hematological Improvement(HI) including HI with Erythroid (HI-E), HI with Neutrophil (HI-N), or HI with Platelet (HI-P) based on IWG 2006 criteria. CR: BM:≤5% myeloblasts, Peripheral blood: Hgb≥11g/dL, Platelets(PLTs)≥100x10^9/L, Neutrophils≥1.0x10^9/L, Blasts 0%. PR: All CR criteria if abnormal before treatment except BM blasts decreased ≥50% over pretreatment but still>5%, Cellularity, morphology not relevant. HI responses:1) HI-E: Hgb increase ≥1.5g/dL, Relevant reduction of RBC units transfusions by absolute ≥4 RBC transfusions/8 week(wk) compared with pretreatment transfusion number previous 8wk. Only RBC transfusions given for Hgb≤9.0g/dL. 2) HI-P: Absolute increase≥30x10^9/L starting>20x10^9/L PLTs; Increase from<20x10^9/L to>20x10^9/L and by≥100%. 3) HI-N: ≥100% increase, absolute increase>0.5x10^9/L.
Measured: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Duration of Complete Response (CR)
Duration of complete response (in number of days) was calculated from the first time a CR was observed to the date of the earliest of the following three events: 1) relapse/disease progression, 2) start of alternative therapy (except Hematopoietic Cell Transplant [HCT]) or 3) death. In the absence of any event, the duration of CR was censored at the last available time point (BM assessment, PB assessment, or safety/long-term follow-up visit) at which an event was not observed. Duration of complete response was analysed using a Kaplan-Meier method for participants who achieved a CR during the study. CR: BM: ≤5% myeloblasts (all cell lines normal maturation), Peripheral blood: Hgb ≥11g/dL, PLTs ≥100x10^9/L, Neutrophils ≥1.0x10^9/L, Blasts 0%.
Measured: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Time to First Response, Complete Response (CR) and Best Response
Time to first response was the time(days) from randomization to first date when any response was achieved. Time to CR was the time(days) from randomization to first date when CR was achieved. Time to best response was the time(days) from randomization to first date when participant's best response (CR,PR,mCR or HI) was achieved. CR:BM:≤5% myeloblasts, Peripheral blood:Hgb≥11g/dL,PLTs≥100x10^9/L,Neutrophils≥1.0x10^9/L,Blasts 0%. PR: All CR criteria except BM blasts decreased≥50% over pretreatment but still >5%,Cellularity,morphology not relevant. mCR: Reduction of BM blasts to≤5%; decrease ≥50% with/without normalization of peripheral counts. HI responses:1)HI-E:Hgb increase≥1.5 g/dL, Relevant reduction of RBC units transfusions by absolute≥4 RBC transfusions/8wk compared with pretreatment transfusion number previous 8wk. 2)HI-P:Absolute increase≥30x10^9/L starting>20x10^9/L PLTs; Increase from≤20 to>20x10^9/L and by≥100% 3)HI-N:≥100% granulocyte increase, absolute increase>0.5x10^9/L.
Measured: From study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response was first documented (up to approximately 46.6 months)
Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) and Platelet Transfusions
The total number of RBCs transfused or, separately, the total number of platelets transfused up to the 6-month time point for each participant was counted from the date of randomization to Day 180, the date of last contact, or date of death, whichever occurred earlier. One RBC or platelet transfusion was defined as one unit, and a single bag of RBCs or platelets was considered one unit. The mean total number of RBC or platelet units transfused per participant is presented.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) By EuroQol 5-level 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) Summary Index
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. There are two components to the EQ-5D-5L, first component is a descriptive system five-item health state profile that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression used to obtain an Index Utility Score, as well as a second component visual analogue scale (VAS) that measures health state. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 5 indicates extreme problems. The health status is converted to an index value using the country-specific weighted scoring algorithm for England. The summary index value for the England ranges from a worst score of -0.281 to a best score of 1. An increase in the EQ-5D-5L total score indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health-related QOL: EuroQOL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score
The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported health status questionnaire that consists of six questions used to calculate a health utility score for use in health economic analysis. The second component, EQ VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine).
Measured: Baseline to Month 6
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participants administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An SAE is defined any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is congenital anomaly; is suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product or is medically important. Treatment emergent AEs which are those with onset date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug on C1D1 until 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or the start of an alternative anticancer treatment, whichever occurs first.
Measured: From first dose through end of study (up to approximately 46.6 months)
30-day and 60-day All-cause Mortality
Number of deaths, regardless of cause, within 30 or 60 days from the first study dose divided by the total number of participants included in the Safety Analysis Set. Participants who died within 30 days were also included in the 60-day mortality calculations.
Measured: From first dose until 60 days after study treatment initiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Jan 2017
- Primary completion31 Mar 2020
- Study completion30 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 417 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yuri Sano, MD, PhD, Study director, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02907359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SGI-110-07
- Other IDs
- 2015-005257-12, 2015
- Status last verified
- Jul 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 27 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) Versus Treatment Choice in Adults With Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) Previously Treated With Hypomethylating Agents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02907359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SGI-110-07
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 417 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 May 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Phase 3, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of guadecitabine in participants with MDS or CMML who failed or relapsed after adequate prior treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, or both. This global study will be conducted in approximately 15 countries. Approximately 408 participants from approximately 100 study centers will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either guadecitabine (approximately 272 participants) or Treatment Choice (approximately 136 participants). The study consists of a 21-day screening period, a treatment period, a safety follow-up visit, and a long-term follow-up period. The study is expected to last more than 2 years, and the duration of individual participant participation will vary. Participants may continue to receive treatment for as long as they continue to benefit.
Detailed description
Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study of guadecitabine vs Treatment Choice (TC). Approximately 408 participants will be randomly assigned 2:1 to either guadecitabine or TC.
- Guadecitabine: approximately 272 participants.
- TC: approximately 136 participants.
Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
- Low dose cytarabine (LDAC).
- Standard Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) of a 7+3 regimen.
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) only. BSC will be provided to all participants as per standard and institutional practice. Participants randomized to TC will not be allowed to cross over to guadecitabine. Data will be reviewed by an independent Data Monitoring Committee at regular intervals, primarily to evaluate safety during study conduct. Randomization will be stratified by disease category (MDS vs CMML), bone marrow (BM) blasts (BM blasts >10% vs BM blasts ≤10%), TC option (LDAC vs IC vs BSC), and study center region.
Guadecitabine: 60 milligrams per square meter (mg/m^2) given subcutaneously (SC) daily on Days 1-5 in 28-day cycles (delayed as needed to allow blood count recovery). Treatment should be given for at least 6 total cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression requiring alternative therapy. Beyond 6 cycles, treatment should continue as long as the participant continues to benefit. BSC should be given according to standard and institutional practice.
Treatment Choice (TC): Before randomization, the investigator will assign each participant to one of the following TC options:
- Low dose cytarabine (LDAC) given as 20 mg/m^2 SC or intravenously (IV) once daily for 14 days in 28-day cycles (delayed as needed to allow blood count recovery). Treatment should be given for at least 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Standard Intensive Chemotherapy (IC) of a 7+3 regimen: given as cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day given as continuous infusion for 7 days and an anthracycline given as per institutional standard practice such as daunorubicin (45-60 mg/m^2/day), or idarubicin (9-12 mg/m^2/day), or mitoxantrone (8-12 mg/m^2/day) by intravenous infusion for 3 days.
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) only: given according to standard and institutional practice. BSC includes, but is not limited to blood transfusions (Red blood cells [RBCs] or platelets), growth factors including erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), granulocyte stimulating factors (GSFs), iron chelating therapy, and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Guadecitabine | Experimental | Drug: GuadecitabineParticipants received Guadecitabine 60 mg/m^2, SC, on Days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle for at least 6 cycles in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression requiring alternative therapy. Participants received Guadecitabine treatment beyond 6 cycles as long as the participant continued to benefit based on investigator judgment and participant response and tolerability (or up to a maximum of 36 cycles). |
| Treatment Choice | Active comparator | Other: Treatment ChoiceParticipants received one of the three treatment choice options: 1. LDAC 20 mg/m^2 SC/IV once daily for 14 days of each 28-day cycles for at least 4 cycles in absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Participants who were responding or had stable disease were to continue treatment as per standard institutional practice. 2. Standard IC of a 7+3 regimen:Cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day given as continuous infusion for 7 days and anthracycline(daunorubicin(45-60 mg)/idarubicin(9-12 mg)/mitoxantrone(8-12 mg)/m^2) by IV infusion for 3 days of each 28-day cycles. 3. BSC as needed during the treatment included,but was not limited to,blood transfusions(RBCs or platelets),growth factors including erythropoiesis stimulating agents,granulocyte stimulating factors,iron chelating therapy,and broad-spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals. Duration for treatment choice was as per locally approved prescribing information and institutional standard practice or up to a maximum 30 cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Adult participants ≥18 years of age who are able to understand and comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent before any study-specific procedure.
- Cytologically or histologically confirmed diagnosis of MDS or CMML according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification.
- Performance status (ECOG) of 0-2.
- Previously treated MDS or CMML, defined as prior treatment with at least one hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine and/or decitabine) for intermediate or high risk MDS or CMML whose disease progressed or relapsed as follows:
- Other prior treatments for MDS such as lenalidomide, cytarabine, intensive chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin and other growth factors, or hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) are allowed.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Participants who have been diagnosed as having AML with peripheral blood or bone marrow blasts of ≥20%.
- Participants who may still be sensitive to repeated treatment with decitabine or azacitidine such as participants who had response to prior decitabine or azacitidine treatment, but relapsed >6 months after stopping treatment with these agents.
- Prior treatment with guadecitabine.
- Hypersensitivity to decitabine, guadecitabine, or any of their excipients.
- Second malignancy currently requiring active therapy, except breast or prostate cancer stable on or responding to endocrine therapy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GuadecitabineAlso: SGI-110 | Drug | Guadecitabine |
| Treatment Choice* BSC: according to standard/institutional practice; included RBC or platelet transfusions; growth factors, i.e. erythropoiesis stimulating agents, granulocyte stimulating factors, iron chelating therapy; broad spectrum antibiotics and/or antifungals. * LDAC: 20 mg/m^2 SC or IV once daily (QD) for 14 days in 28-day cycles. Other schedules were allowed per institutional practice. Treatment for ≥4 cycles absent disease progression/toxicity. BSC per institutional/standard practice. * Standard Intensive Chemotherapy: recommended regimen of 7+3 was given as cytarabine 100-200 mg/m^2/day continuous infusion for 7 days and an anthracycline for 3 days. Anthracyclines per institutional practice included daunorubicin (45-60 mg/m^2/day) or idarubicin (9-12 mg/m^2/day) or mitoxantrone (8-12 mg/m^2/day) by IV infusion. Participants with complete or partial response after IC induction received ≥1 additional cycles with reduced cytotoxic doses then BSC per standard /institutional practice. | Other | Treatment Choice |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From randomization up to death (up to approximately 38.6 months)
OS was defined as the number of days from the day the participant was randomized to the date of death due to any cause. Survival time was censored on the last date the participant is known alive with no event of death. OS time will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Transfusion Independence for Any 8 Consecutive Weeks
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Percentage of Participants With Marrow Complete Response (mCR) Along With Transfusion Independence Rate
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Survival Rate at 1 Year After Randomization
Time frame: From randomization up to 12 months
Leukemia-free Survival
Time frame: From randomization up to 46.6 months
Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital (NDAOH)
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Disease Response (DR) Rate
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Duration of Complete Response (CR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 46.6 months
Time to First Response, Complete Response (CR) and Best Response
Time frame: From study Day 1 to the earliest date that a response was first documented (up to approximately 46.6 months)
Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) and Platelet Transfusions
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (QOL) By EuroQol 5-level 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) Summary Index
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Health-related QOL: EuroQOL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) Score
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From first dose through end of study (up to approximately 46.6 months)
30-day and 60-day All-cause Mortality
Time frame: From first dose until 60 days after study treatment initiation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Aug 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yuri Sano, MD, PhD study director
Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
112 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Guadecitabine and Treatment Choice in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic, run by Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 112 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 112 sites in United States, Japan, Spain, Canada, France and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: From randomization up to death (up to approximately 38.6 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Aug 2024.