Beta-ThalassemiaPhase 3NCT02906202
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the LentiGlobin® BB305 Drug Product in Participants With Transfusion-Dependent β-Thalassemia, Who do Not Have a β0/β0 Genotype
A Phase 3 study testing LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product in people with Beta-Thalassemia, run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 8 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in 23 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), also known as β-thalassemia major, who do not have a β0 mutation at both alleles of the hemoglobin β (HBB) gene. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Beta-Thalassemia
- What is being tested?
- LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 8 Aug 2016to 31 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants <= 50 years of age at the time of consent or assent (as applicable), and able to provide written consent (adults, or legal guardians, as applicable) or assent (adolescents or children). Provided that the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) has approved enrolling participants younger than 5 years of age, participants younger than 5 years of age may be enrolled if they weigh a minimum of 6 kilograms (kg) and are reasonably anticipated to be able to provide at least the minimum number of cells required to initiate the manufacturing process.
- Diagnosis of TDT with a history of at least 100 milliliter per kilogram per year (mL/kg/year) of pRBCs in the 2 years preceding enrollment (all participants), or be managed under standard thalassemia guidelines with >= 8 transfusions of pRBCs per year in the 2 years preceding enrollment (participants >= 12 years).
- Clinically stable and eligible to undergo (HSCT).
- Treated and followed for at least the past 2 years in a specialized center that maintained detailed medical records, including transfusion history.
Who cannot join
- Presence of a mutation characterized as β0 mutation at both alleles of the β-globin gene HBB.
- Positive for presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C (HCV).
- A white blood cell (WBC) count less than (<) 3×10^9/Liter (L), and/or platelet count < 100×10^9/L not related to hypersplenism.
- Uncorrected bleeding disorder.
- Any prior or current malignancy.
- Immediate family member with a known Familial Cancer Syndrome.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Prior HSCT.
- Advanced liver disease.
- A cardiac T2* < 10 ms by MRI.
- Any other evidence of severe iron overload that, in the Investigator's opinion, warrants exclusion.
- Participation in another clinical study with an investigational drug within 30 days of Screening.
- Any other condition that would render the participant ineligible for HSCT, as determined by the attending transplant physician or investigator.
- Prior receipt of gene therapy.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding in a postpartum female or absence of adequate contraception for fertile participant.
- A known and available Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched family donor.
- Any contraindications to the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor during the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and any contraindications to the use of busulfan and any other medicinal products required during the myeloablative conditioning, including hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 6 countries.
8 sites in 6 countries
United States3 sites
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Oakland, California
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Single Arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy in Subjects With Transfusion-dependent β-Thalassemia, Who do Not Have a β0/β0 Genotype, by Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells Transduced Ex Vivo With a Lentiviral βA-T87Q-Globin Vector in Subjects ≤50 Years of Age
This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in 23 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), also known as β-thalassemia major, who do not have a β0 mutation at both alleles of the hemoglobin β (HBB) gene. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product.
- Conditions
- Beta-Thalassemia
- Being tested
- LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product
- Medical subject headings
- beta-Thalassemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductGenetic
Also called betibeglogene autotemcel
LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product | Experimental | Participants aged less than or equal to (<=) 50 years received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product at a dose of greater than or equal to (>=) 5.0*10^6 CD34 plus (+) cells per kilogram (cells/kg) following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan (termed the Transplant population). Receives: Genetic: LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Independence (TI)
TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.
Measured: From 14 to 24 months post-transplant
Secondary outcomes (24)
Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Independence (TI) at Month 24
TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion. Percentage of participants who met the definition of TI at Month 24 were evaluated
Measured: At Month 24 post-transplant
Duration of Transfusion Independence (TI)
Duration of TI was calculated as the time from the start of TI (that is (i.e.), first Hb >=9 with no transfusions in the preceding 60 days) up to the last available Hb at which the TI criteria are still met using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Duration of TI from start of TI up to Month 24 months was reported.
Measured: From start of TI up to Month 24
Time From Drug Product Infusion to Achievement of Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time from drug product infusion to achievement of TI was calculated as the time from drug product infusion to the first hemoglobin at which a participant can be declared as TI (that is to 'start of TI + >= 12 months', dependent on Hb lab schedule).
Measured: From 14 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Weighted Average Hemoglobin (Hb) During Transfusion Independence (TI)
Weighted average Hb was defined as the weighted average of Hb values without any pRBC transfusions in the proceeding 60 days. The ratio of the time between two Hb values and the time between the first and the last Hb values was used as the weight for calculation.
Measured: From 60 days after the last pRBC transfusion through Month 24
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Reduction of At Least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% in the Annualized pRBCs Transfusion Volume
Percentage of participants reduction in the annualized mL/kg pRBCs transfused from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 (approximately a 12-month period) of at least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% compared to the annualized mL/kg pRBC transfusion requirement during the 24 months prior to enrollment.
Measured: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized Number of pRBC Transfusions
Annualized number of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 were reported.
Measured: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized Volume of pRBC Transfusions
Annualized volume of pRBC transfusions from 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24 was reported.
Measured: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Time From Drug Product Infusion to Last pRBC Transfusion
Time from drug product infusion to last pRBC transfusion was reported.
Measured: From start of drug product infusion up to Month 24
Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to Month 24
Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to Month 24 was reported.
Measured: From last pRBC Transfusion up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)
Weighted Average Nadir Hemoglobin (Hb)
The weighted average nadir Hb was defined as the most recent Hb prior to each pRBC transfusion, on the day of transfusion or within 3 days and, if there was a period of more than 60 days without transfusion, all Hb records between Day 61 and last follow-up or next transfusion (inclusive) was included. The weighted average nadir Hb during the period of 12 months post-drug product infusion to Month 24 was compared to the weighted average nadir Hb during the 24 months prior to enrollment.
Measured: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Unsupported Total Hb Levels at Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Unsupported total Hb level was defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.
Measured: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants With Unsupported Total Hb Levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
The number of participants with unsupported total Hb levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) meeting the thresholds were reported at at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24. Participants were evaluable if they had an unsupported total Hb measurement at the specific timepoint, where unsupported total Hb level is defined as the total Hb measurement level without any acute or chronic pRBC transfusions within 60 days prior to the measurement date.
Measured: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Have Not Received Chelation Therapy for At Least 6 Months Following Drug Product Infusion
Percentage of participants who have not received chelation therapy for at least 6 months following drug product infusion were reported.
Measured: Up to Month 24
Time From Last Iron Chelation Use to Last Follow-up
Time from last iron chelation use to last follow-up to 24 months was reported. Participants were evaluable for this outcome if they had not received iron chelation therapy for at least 6 months following drug product infusion.
Measured: Time from last iron chelation up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)
Percentage of Participants Who Used Therapeutic Phlebotomy Post Drug Product (DP) Infusion
Therapeutic phlebotomy could be used in lieu of chelation in participants who had Hb consistently >= 11 g/dL and who were no longer receiving regular transfusions, at the discretion of the investigator. Percentage of participants who used therapeutic phlebotomy post DP infusion for up to Month 24 were reported.
Measured: Up to Month 24
Annualized Phlebotomy Therapy Usage Following Drug Product Infusion
Annualized phlebotomy therapy usage (number of procedures per year, calculated from DP infusion through last follow-up) were reported.
Measured: Up to Month 24
Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Concentration by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Change From Baseline in liver Iron Content by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Months 12 and 24 were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI
Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI at baseline, Month 12 and 24 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin at Months 12 and 24
Serum ferritin was commonly used for an indirect estimation of body iron stores. Although sensitive, it is not specific for iron overload as it can be elevated in a variety of infectious and inflammatory states, and in the presence of cytolysis. Change from baseline in serum ferritin at Months 12 and 24 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Total Scores at Months 12 and 24
PedsQL GCS designed to measure health-related quality of life in pediatric and adolescents (2 to 18 years). It encompassed 4 dimensions of functioning (physical [8 items], emotional [5 items], social [5 items], school [3 items]). Age groups: Toddler (2-4 years), Young pediatric (5-7 years), Pediatric (8-12 years), Teens (13-18 years). The questionnaire was also completed by parent/caregiver to assess parents' perceptions of their children's quality of life. The Toddler group consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); all other groups consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for young pediatric, a 5-point Likert scale for pediatric and teens groups. All reported scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 for each domain where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores correspond with higher quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Health Status at Months 12 and 24
EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. EQ-5D-Y was a version of instrument specifically developed and validated for use by youths aged 12 through 17 years. The EQ-5D-Y visual analog scale (VAS) consisted of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 ("worst imaginable health state") and 100 ("best imaginable health state"). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they felt most accurately reflected their current health state. The VAS was reported (raw data) on a scale of 0-100 where 0= death and 100= perfect health. Higher scores equated to better outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Adult Scale (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Heath Status Score at Months 12 and 24
EQ-5D is a validated, standardized, generic instrument that was most widely used preference based health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire in cost effectiveness and health technologies assessment. Participants age >=18 at time of informed consent were eligible to complete the EQ-5D-3L which is a visual analog scale (VAS) which consists of a 20-cm vertical VAS, with anchors of 0 ("worst imaginable health state") and 100 ("best imaginable health state"). Respondents were asked to rate their own health state today by drawing a line from a box containing these words to the point on the scale that they feel most accurately reflects their current health state.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Score
FACT-BMT is assessed bone marrow transplant related quality of life in adults. It. Total score was sum of sub-scale scores for 5 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, and Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale. Each item scored on a 5-point Likert scale based on participant agreement with each statement: 0 for "not at all," 1 for "a little bit," 2 for "somewhat," 3 for "quite a bit," and 4 for "very much. Reported scores were transformed as follows: After taking into account reverse scores for questions constructed in negative form, subscale score for each domain was calculated by multiplying sum of item scores by number of items in subscale, then dividing by number of items answered. Total score was sum of subscale total added together and ranges from 0-148. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2, Acute (Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores) at Months 12 and 24
SF-36 was designed to measure health-related quality of life in adults. The instrument consisted of 36 items, were aggregated into 8 multi-item scales (physical functioning [1=yes, limited a lot to 3=no, not limited at all], role-physical [1=all of time to 5=none of time], bodily pain [1=very severe to 6=none], general health [1=poor to 5=excellent], vitality [1=none of time to 5=all of time], social functioning [1=all of time: to 5=none of time], role emotional [1=all of time to 5=none of time] and mental health [1=all of time to 5=none of the time]). Four domains comprised physical component summary (PCS) score (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health) and remaining 4 domains comprised mental component summary (MCS) score (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health). Reported summary scores were transformed on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores corresponded with higher quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start8 Aug 2016
- Primary completion31 Mar 2022
- Study completion31 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Beta-ThalassemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Himal Lal Thakar, MD, Study director, Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02906202
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HGB-207
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Locatelli F, Thompson AA, Kwiatkowski JL, Porter JB, Thrasher AJ, Hongeng S, Sauer MG, Thuret I, Lal A, Algeri M, Schneiderman J, Olson TS, Carpenter B, Amrolia PJ, Anurathapan U, Schambach A, Chabannon C, Schmidt M, Labik I, Elliot H, Guo R, Asmal M, Colvin RA, Walters MC. Betibeglogene Autotemcel Gene Therapy for Non-beta0/beta0 Genotype beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):415-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113206. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
PubMed 34891223Hamed EM, Meabed MH, Aly UF, Hussein RRS. Recent Progress in Gene Therapy and Other Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Beta Thalassemia. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20(16):1603-1623. doi: 10.2174/1389450120666190726155733.
PubMed 31362654
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Single Arm Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Gene Therapy in Subjects With Transfusion-dependent β-Thalassemia, Who do Not Have a β0/β0 Genotype, by Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells Transduced Ex Vivo With a Lentiviral βA-T87Q-Globin Vector in Subjects ≤50 Years of Age
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02906202
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HGB-207
- Conditions
- Beta-Thalassemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 8 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single-arm, multi-site, single-dose, Phase 3 study in 23 participants less than or equal to (<=) 50 years of age with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT), also known as β-thalassemia major, who do not have a β0 mutation at both alleles of the hemoglobin β (HBB) gene. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product | Experimental | Genetic: LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductParticipants aged less than or equal to (<=) 50 years received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product at a dose of greater than or equal to (>=) 5.0*10^6 CD34 plus (+) cells per kilogram (cells/kg) following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan (termed the Transplant population). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Participants <= 50 years of age at the time of consent or assent (as applicable), and able to provide written consent (adults, or legal guardians, as applicable) or assent (adolescents or children). Provided that the Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) has approved enrolling participants younger than 5 years of age, participants younger than 5 years of age may be enrolled if they weigh a minimum of 6 kilograms (kg) and are reasonably anticipated to be able to provide at least the minimum number of cells required to initiate the manufacturing process.
- Diagnosis of TDT with a history of at least 100 milliliter per kilogram per year (mL/kg/year) of pRBCs in the 2 years preceding enrollment (all participants), or be managed under standard thalassemia guidelines with >= 8 transfusions of pRBCs per year in the 2 years preceding enrollment (participants >= 12 years).
- Clinically stable and eligible to undergo (HSCT).
- Treated and followed for at least the past 2 years in a specialized center that maintained detailed medical records, including transfusion history.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Presence of a mutation characterized as β0 mutation at both alleles of the β-globin gene HBB.
- Positive for presence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1 and HIV-2), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C (HCV).
- A white blood cell (WBC) count less than (<) 3×10^9/Liter (L), and/or platelet count < 100×10^9/L not related to hypersplenism.
- Uncorrected bleeding disorder.
- Any prior or current malignancy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LentiGlobin BB305 Drug ProductAlso: betibeglogene autotemcelLentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product is administered by IV infusion following myeloablative conditioning with busulfan. | Genetic | LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time frame: From 14 to 24 months post-transplant
TI was defined as a weighted average hemoglobin (Hb) >= 9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) without any packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions for a continuous period of >= 12 months at any time during the study after drug product infusion.
24 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Independence (TI) at Month 24
Time frame: At Month 24 post-transplant
Duration of Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time frame: From start of TI up to Month 24
Time From Drug Product Infusion to Achievement of Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time frame: From 14 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Weighted Average Hemoglobin (Hb) During Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time frame: From 60 days after the last pRBC transfusion through Month 24
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Reduction of At Least 50%, 60%, 75%, 90% or 100% in the Annualized pRBCs Transfusion Volume
Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized Number of pRBC Transfusions
Time frame: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Annualized Volume of pRBC Transfusions
Time frame: From 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Time From Drug Product Infusion to Last pRBC Transfusion
Time frame: From start of drug product infusion up to Month 24
Time From Last pRBC Transfusion to Month 24
Time frame: From last pRBC Transfusion up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)
Weighted Average Nadir Hemoglobin (Hb)
Time frame: 12 months post-drug product infusion through Month 24
Unsupported Total Hb Levels at Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Number of Participants With Unsupported Total Hb Levels (>=10 g/dL, >=11 g/dL, >=12 g/dL, >=13 g/dL, and >=14 g/dL) at Months 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Time frame: At Month 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Percentage of Participants Who Have Not Received Chelation Therapy for At Least 6 Months Following Drug Product Infusion
Time frame: Up to Month 24
Time From Last Iron Chelation Use to Last Follow-up
Time frame: Time from last iron chelation up to Month 24 (actual maximum time frame of up to approximately 27 months due to visit window)
Percentage of Participants Who Used Therapeutic Phlebotomy Post Drug Product (DP) Infusion
Time frame: Up to Month 24
Annualized Phlebotomy Therapy Usage Following Drug Product Infusion
Time frame: Up to Month 24
Change From Baseline in Liver Iron Concentration by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Cardiac T2* on MRI
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Ferritin at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Total Scores at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Youth Scale (EQ-5D-Y) VAS Health Status at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in EuroQol Quality of Life 5-Dimension Adult Scale (EQ-5D-3L) VAS Heath Status Score at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Score
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2, Acute (Physical and Mental Component Summary Scores) at Months 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Months 12 and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34891223Locatelli F, Thompson AA, Kwiatkowski JL, Porter JB, Thrasher AJ, Hongeng S, Sauer MG, Thuret I, Lal A, Algeri M, Schneiderman J, Olson TS, Carpenter B, Amrolia PJ, Anurathapan U, Schambach A, Chabannon C, Schmidt M, Labik I, Elliot H, Guo R, Asmal M, Colvin RA, Walters MC. Betibeglogene Autotemcel Gene Therapy for Non-beta0/beta0 Genotype beta-Thalassemia. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):415-427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113206. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31362654Hamed EM, Meabed MH, Aly UF, Hussein RRS. Recent Progress in Gene Therapy and Other Targeted Therapeutic Approaches for Beta Thalassemia. Curr Drug Targets. 2019;20(16):1603-1623. doi: 10.2174/1389450120666190726155733.
Related trials for Beta-Thalassemia
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of KL003 Cell Injection in the Treatment of Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia.
Transfusion-dependent Beta-Thalassemia
RecruitingObservational study
Growth and Development-related Outcomes in Children With Transfusion-dependent Beta-thalassemia After Gene Therapy
Transfusion-dependent Beta-Thalassemia, Gene Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Gene Therapy of Beta Thalassemia Using a Self-inactivating Lentiviral Vector
Beta-Thalassemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
β-Thalassemia Treatment With KL003 Cell Injection
Transfusion-dependent Beta-Thalassemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Participants With Non-Transfusion-Dependent Alpha- or Beta-Thalassemia (α- or β-NTDT)
Non-Transfusion-dependent Alpha-Thalassemia, Non-Transfusion-dependent Beta-Thalassemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Himal Lal Thakar, MD study director
Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc.
8 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing LentiGlobin BB305 Drug Product in people with Beta-Thalassemia, run by Genetix Biotherapeutics Inc. at 8 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States, France, Germany, Italy, Thailand and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Definition of Transfusion Independence (TI) (time frame: From 14 to 24 months post-transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02906202, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2023.