AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast AugmentationNCT02905617

Post Market Clinical Experience Study of Sientra 207 Breast Implants

An observational study of Breast Augmentation and Breast Revision-Augmentation, run by Tiger Biosciences, LLC. at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A 12-month study to evaluate the clinical experience with Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implants Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
113 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2016to 15 Jul 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women who receive Sientra Silicone 207 Gel Breast Implants for primary augmentation or revision augmentation

Who may be able to join

  • Is a candidate for primary or revision breast augmentation and is at least 22 years of age,
  • Agrees to Sientra study requirements and to comply with office follow-up visits at months 3, 6 and 12.

Who cannot join

  • Does not meet the Investigator's standard eligibility for breast augmentation or revision surgery
  • Surgeon is planning to use acellular dermal matrix (ADM) or surgical mesh and/or recommend postoperative massage.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Sientra, Inc.

    Santa Barbara, California, 93117

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Post Market Clinical Experience Study of the Sientra 207 High-Strength Cohesive Plus (HSC+) Breast Implants in Primary and Revision Augmentation Participants

A 12-month study to evaluate the clinical experience with Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implants

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to prospectively collect surgeon and participant satisfaction with the Sientra 207 implants in primary and revision augmentation participants over a 12-month time frame.

Being tested
Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant
Keywords
Breast Augmentation, Breast Revision-Augmentation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast ImplantDevice

    The Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant is a textured, round device with high-strength cohesive plus (HSC+) silicone gel fill.

Study groups in NCT02905617
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Primary AugmentationSubjects undergoing general breast enlargement receiving Sientra Style 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant.
Receives: Device: Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant
Revision AugmentationSubjects undergoing revision surgery with Sientra Style 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant to revise or improve the result of a primary breast augmentation surgery.
Receives: Device: Sientra 207 Silicone Gel Breast Implant

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Investigator Overall Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The primary outcome measure of the study is to obtain the Investigator Overall Satisfaction with the device using a 5-point scale where 1=definitely dissatisfied with the device to 5=definitely satisfied with the device.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Investigator Overall Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The primary outcome measure of the study is to obtain the Investigator Overall Satisfaction with the device using a 5-point scale where 1=definitely dissatisfied with the device to 5=definitely satisfied with the device.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Investigator Overall Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The primary outcome measure of the study is to obtain the Investigator Overall Satisfaction with the device using a 5-point scale where 1=definitely dissatisfied with the device to 5=definitely satisfied with the device.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2020

Why it stopped: Low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
113 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02905617
Sponsor's protocol ID
CP-1008
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
9 Sep 2016
Last updated
3 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Schwartz MR, Haws MJ, Phillips G. Results of the Postmarket Clinical Study of the Sientra 207 Highly Cohesive Gel Breast Implants in Primary and Revision Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):40S-48S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004353.

    PubMed 29595717

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Augmentation and Breast Revision-Augmentation, run by Tiger Biosciences, LLC. at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Low enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Investigator Overall Satisfaction Questionnaire (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02905617, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in