Adjustment DisorderSERENATNCT02905071
Validation of a Scale of Well-being at Work
A study testing filling of Serenat at baseline (T1), Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires and filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1 in people with Adjustment Disorder, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of this work is to explore the psychometric properties of scale of well-being at work called "Serenat" in order to validate it. Secondary objectives are to study the influence of socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects on the results of Serenat and to describe the results on subjects… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adjustment Disorder
- What is being tested?
- filling of Serenat at baseline (T1), Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires and filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 226 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to 26 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- agree to participate, exert a professional activity for at least 3 months at the time of inclusion, consult an occupational doctor or go to consultations related to stress and anxiety, read and be able to respond to the scale,
Who cannot join
- not be acting on work stoppage, nor pregnant, be capable of consent, not benefit from any legal protection regime and not be deprived of freedom.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Well-being at Work: The Serenat Study
The main objective of this work is to explore the psychometric properties of scale of well-being at work called "Serenat" in order to validate it. Secondary objectives are to study the influence of socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects on the results of Serenat and to describe the results on subjects monitored among an adult psychiatric population.
Read the detailed description
This is a cross sectional survey. 200 subjects were selected among people having consulted an occupational doctor to validate the scale in the general population (study 1), and 50 subjects among a psychiatric population for the ancillary study (study 2).
The Serenat Scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 20 items. All items are scored on a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) resulting in a range of 0 to 60. The 20 items are related to different domains. 10 items explore psychological balance at work: relaxation (item 1), sleep quality (item 2), concentration (item 3), form (item 4), sense of security (item 5), satisfaction (item 6), quality of relationships and contacts at work (item 7), voltage or aggressiveness (item 8), optimism for the future from a professional point of view (item 9), life balance (item 10). 10 items are related to working conditions and organization of work: comfort of the working environment (item 11), time constraint (item 12), sense of competence (item 13), decision latitude (item 14), interest at work and variety of tasks (item 15), recognition (item 16), professional support (item 17), communication and transfer of information (item 18), human conflict (item 19), satisfactory work schedules (item 20).
- Conditions
- Adjustment Disorder
- Being tested
- filling of Serenat at baseline (T1), Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires, filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1
- Keywords
- mental health, well-being at work, screening, psychosocial risk, psychometrics, questionnaire, job stress
- Medical subject headings
- Adjustment Disorders, Psychological Well-Being, Occupational Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
filling of Serenat at baseline (T1)Other
Also called filling of Serenat at T1 (baseline)
Patients who consult occupational doctor complete the serenat questionnaire.The time taken to complete the serenat scale is about 5 minutes.
Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnairesOther
Also called Serenat and 3 others questionnaires at T1
Subjects who consult occupational doctor complete the 4 questionnaires.The time taken to complete the 4 questionnaires is about 15 minutes.
filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1Other
Also called filling of Serenat at baseline T1 and T2 (one week later)
Patients who consult a psychiatrist in a stress anxiety unit complete the 4 questionnaires.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 Group 1 G1 (n =50) | Experimental | filling of Serenat at baseline (T1) Receives: Other: filling of Serenat at baseline (T1) |
| Study 1 Group 2 G2 (n=50) | Experimental | Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires Receives: Other: Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires |
| Study 1 Group 3 G3 (n =50) | Experimental | filling of Serenat at baseline T1 and T2 (one week after baseline). Receives: Other: filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1 |
| Study 2 Ancillary study (n=50) | Experimental | filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1 Receives: Other: Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serenat scale
For Group 1, Group 2, Group 3: The Serenat Scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 20 items. All items are scored on a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) resulting in a range of 0 to 60. The 20 items are related to different domains. 10 items explore psychological balance at work. 10 items are related to working conditions and organization of work.
Measured: At baseline (T1)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Serenat scale
For Group 3: The Serenat Scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 20 items. All items are scored on a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) resulting in a range of 0 to 60. The 20 items are related to different domains. 10 items explore psychological balance at work. 10 items are related to working conditions and organization of work.
Measured: one week after baseline (T2)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
For group 2: The scale allows to detect anxiety and depression using 14 items rated from 0-3.
Measured: At baseline (T1)
State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI-Y)
For Group: Self-administered questionnaire of 20 items side on 4 levels from 'not at all' to one side "many" side 4 (total score of 20-80). It measures an intensity of more anxiety and is not related to an anxiety disorder
Measured: At baseline (T1)
The Beck depression inventory (BDI-21)
For Group, Self-assessment questionnaire measuring the severity of depression
Measured: At baseline (T1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completion26 Nov 2017
- Study completion26 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adjustment DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, LilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Lille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dominique SERVANT, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Lille
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905071
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012_63
- Other IDs
- 2013-A00831-44
- Acronym
- SERENAT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Andrea H, Bultmann U, Beurskens AJ, Swaen GM, van Schayck CP, Kant IJ. Anxiety and depression in the working population using the HAD Scale--psychometrics, prevalence and relationships with psychosocial work characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;39(8):637-46. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0797-6.
PubMed 15300374Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health--a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1050.
PubMed 17173201Melchior M, Caspi A, Milne BJ, Danese A, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychol Med. 2007 Aug;37(8):1119-29. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000414. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
PubMed 17407618Servant D, Drumez E, Raynal S, Demarty AL, Salembier A, Deschepper MH, Bizet MA, Pisanu-Zimny A, Culem JB, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Vaiva G. [Elaboration and psychometric properties of a well-being scale at work. The Serenat study among employees in occupational medicine unit]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019 Sep;67(5):303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 28. French.
PubMed 31262608
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Well-being at Work: The Serenat Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02905071
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SERENAT / 2012_63
- Conditions
- Adjustment Disorder
- Keywords
- mental health, well-being at work, screening, psychosocial risk, psychometrics, questionnaire, job stress
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 226 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, LilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this work is to explore the psychometric properties of scale of well-being at work called "Serenat" in order to validate it. Secondary objectives are to study the influence of socio-demographic characteristics of the subjects on the results of Serenat and to describe the results on subjects monitored among an adult psychiatric population.
Detailed description
This is a cross sectional survey. 200 subjects were selected among people having consulted an occupational doctor to validate the scale in the general population (study 1), and 50 subjects among a psychiatric population for the ancillary study (study 2).
The Serenat Scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 20 items. All items are scored on a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) resulting in a range of 0 to 60. The 20 items are related to different domains. 10 items explore psychological balance at work: relaxation (item 1), sleep quality (item 2), concentration (item 3), form (item 4), sense of security (item 5), satisfaction (item 6), quality of relationships and contacts at work (item 7), voltage or aggressiveness (item 8), optimism for the future from a professional point of view (item 9), life balance (item 10). 10 items are related to working conditions and organization of work: comfort of the working environment (item 11), time constraint (item 12), sense of competence (item 13), decision latitude (item 14), interest at work and variety of tasks (item 15), recognition (item 16), professional support (item 17), communication and transfer of information (item 18), human conflict (item 19), satisfactory work schedules (item 20).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 Group 1 G1 (n =50) | Experimental | Other: filling of Serenat at baseline (T1)filling of Serenat at baseline (T1) |
| Study 1 Group 2 G2 (n=50) | Experimental | Other: Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnairesSerenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires |
| Study 1 Group 3 G3 (n =50) | Experimental | Other: filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1filling of Serenat at baseline T1 and T2 (one week after baseline). |
| Study 2 Ancillary study (n=50) | Experimental | Other: Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnairesfilling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- agree to participate, exert a professional activity for at least 3 months at the time of inclusion, consult an occupational doctor or go to consultations related to stress and anxiety, read and be able to respond to the scale,
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- not be acting on work stoppage, nor pregnant, be capable of consent, not benefit from any legal protection regime and not be deprived of freedom.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| filling of Serenat at baseline (T1)Also: filling of Serenat at T1 (baseline)Patients who consult occupational doctor complete the serenat questionnaire.The time taken to complete the serenat scale is about 5 minutes. | Other | Study 1 Group 1 G1 (n =50) |
| Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnairesAlso: Serenat and 3 others questionnaires at T1Subjects who consult occupational doctor complete the 4 questionnaires.The time taken to complete the 4 questionnaires is about 15 minutes. | Other | Study 1 Group 2 G2 (n=50), Study 2 Ancillary study (n=50) |
| filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1Also: filling of Serenat at baseline T1 and T2 (one week later)Patients who consult a psychiatrist in a stress anxiety unit complete the 4 questionnaires. | Other | Study 1 Group 3 G3 (n =50) |
Primary outcome
Serenat scale
Time frame: At baseline (T1)
For Group 1, Group 2, Group 3: The Serenat Scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 20 items. All items are scored on a four point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 3 (strongly agree) resulting in a range of 0 to 60. The 20 items are related to different domains. 10 items explore psychological balance at work. 10 items are related to working conditions and organization of work.
4 secondary outcomes
Serenat scale
Time frame: one week after baseline (T2)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time frame: At baseline (T1)
State-Trait Anxiety inventory (STAI-Y)
Time frame: At baseline (T1)
The Beck depression inventory (BDI-21)
Time frame: At baseline (T1)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 15300374Andrea H, Bultmann U, Beurskens AJ, Swaen GM, van Schayck CP, Kant IJ. Anxiety and depression in the working population using the HAD Scale--psychometrics, prevalence and relationships with psychosocial work characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;39(8):637-46. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0797-6.
- Background: PubMed 17173201Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health--a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1050.
- Background: PubMed 17407618Melchior M, Caspi A, Milne BJ, Danese A, Poulton R, Moffitt TE. Work stress precipitates depression and anxiety in young, working women and men. Psychol Med. 2007 Aug;37(8):1119-29. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000414. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31262608Servant D, Drumez E, Raynal S, Demarty AL, Salembier A, Deschepper MH, Bizet MA, Pisanu-Zimny A, Culem JB, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Vaiva G. [Elaboration and psychometric properties of a well-being scale at work. The Serenat study among employees in occupational medicine unit]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2019 Sep;67(5):303-309. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 28. French.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Adjustment Disorder
Active, not recruiting
FreeDom: Innovative Strategy for the Management of COPD Exacerbations
Oxygen Deficiency, COPD Exacerbation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
De-Escalation Radiotherapy in Patients With Low-Risk HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Oropharyngeal Cancer
Recruiting
Effects of a Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention on Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
When Death Is Present at Birth: Women's Experiences During Pregnancy
Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dominique SERVANT, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Lille
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing filling of Serenat at baseline (T1), Serenat at baseline T1 and 3 others questionnaires and filling of Serenat, HADS, STAY-Y and BDI at baseline T1 in people with Adjustment Disorder, run by University Hospital, Lille at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serenat scale (time frame: At baseline (T1)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02905071, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2025.