AzTrials
AzTrials

Breakthrough Cancer PainNCT02899884

Characterisation and Epidemiology of Breakthrough Cancer Pain in Spain

An observational study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain, run by Takeda at 36 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain and characterize breakthrough cancer pain in an unselected, representative cohort of cancer outpatients with or without pain who attend consultations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Breakthrough Cancer Pain
How many people
3,765 participants
Where
36 sitesSpain
Study dates
14 Nov 2016to 16 Jul 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with cancer pain will be included in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Participants≥ 18 years old
  • Participants with baseline cancer pain that is adequately controlled with opioids
  • Presence of episodes of breakthrough pain associated with the cancer pain
  • Meeting the diagnostic criteria for breakthrough cancer pain (participant history and Portenoy's criteria) and the Davies algorithm
  • Participants who are not receiving treatment for breakthrough cancer pain. It is not permitted the inclusion of participants receiving treatment for breakthrough cancer pain in order to avoid bias that may affect the characterization or taxonomy of breakthrough cancer pain
  • Signing of the informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Severe mental illness
  • Any medical condition or situation complicating the collection of study data as determined by the investigator

Trial locations and contacts

36 sites in 1 country.

36 sites in 1 country

Spain36 sites
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna

    A Coruña, 15006

  • Centro Oncoloxico de Galicia

    A Coruña, 15009

  • Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias

    Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805

  • Hospital Torrecardenas

    Almería, 4009

  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol de Badalona

    Badalona, Barcelona, 08916

  • Hospital Puerta Del Mar

    Cadiz, 11009

  • Hospital Los Montalvos

    Carrascal de Barregas, Salamanca, 37197

  • Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucia

    Cartagena, Murcia, 30202

  • Hospital Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14004

  • Hospital General Universitario de Elda-Virgen de La Salud

    Elda, Alicante, 3600

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves

    Granada, 18014

  • Hospital de Alta Resolucion de Guadix

    Guadix, Granada, 18500

  • Complejo Hospitalario de Jaen

    Jaén, 23007

  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 8907

  • Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin

    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, 35010

  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular-Materno Infantil

    Las Palmas de Gran Canarias, Canary Islands, 35001

  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz

    Madrid, 28040

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda

    Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222

  • Complejo Hospitalario Regional de Malaga

    Málaga, 29010

  • Hospital Virgen de La Victoria

    Málaga, 29010

  • Complejo Hospital Costa Del Sol

    Marbella, Malaga, 29603

  • Hospital Universitari Son Espases

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 7120

  • Hospital Son Llatzer

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 7198

  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008.

  • Hospital Quiron Madrid

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, 28223

  • Hospital de Especialidades de Puerto Real

    Puerto Real, Cadiz, 11510

  • Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante

    San Juan, Alicante, 3550

  • Hospital Universitario Nuestra Senora de Candelaria

    Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, 38010

  • Hospital Nuestra Senora de Valme

    Seville, 41014

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46010

  • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46014

  • Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset

    Valencia, 46017

Other trials in Spain

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain and characterize breakthrough cancer pain in an unselected, representative cohort of cancer outpatients with or without pain who attend consultations.

Read the detailed description

This study has been designed as a non-interventional, non post-authorization, cross-sectional, epidemiological study to determine the prevalence of breakthrough cancer pain and characterize breakthrough cancer pain in an non-selected, representative cohort of cancer outpatients with or without pain.

The study enrolled 3765 patients. This multicenter trial will be conducted in Spain. Data from participants will be collected through questionnaire and medical history in a single visit (up to 1 month).

Being tested
No Intervention
Keywords
Drug Therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No InterventionOther

Study groups in NCT02899884
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1Participants with cancer pain that is adequately controlled with opioids were observed for a period of 1 month in this observational study.
Receives: Other: No Intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Cancer Participants With Breakthrough Cancer Pain From the Total Number of Cancer Participants Seen in Consultation

    Breakthrough cancer pain was defined as the temporary exacerbation of pain occurring either spontaneously or in relation to a specific, predictable or unpredictable trigger in spite of relatively stable and adequately controlled baseline pain.

    Measured: Month 1

  2. Percentage of Cancer Participants With Breakthrough Cancer Pain From the Number of Cancer Participants With Pain Seen in Consultation

    Breakthrough cancer pain was defined as the temporary exacerbation of pain occurring either spontaneously or in relation to a specific, predictable or unpredictable trigger in spite of relatively stable and adequately controlled baseline pain.

    Measured: Month 1

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of New Participants Diagnosed With Breakthrough Cancer Pain From the Total Number of Cancer Participants Seen in Consultation

    Participants diagnosed during the study and were not diagnosed previously were reported as new participants with breakthrough cancer pain. Breakthrough cancer pain was defined as the temporary exacerbation of pain occurring either spontaneously or in relation to a specific, predictable or unpredictable trigger in spite of relatively stable and adequately controlled baseline pain.

    Measured: Month 1

  2. Percentage of New Participants Diagnosed With Breakthrough Cancer Pain From the Number of Cancer Participants With Pain Seen in Consultation

    Participants diagnosed during the study and were not diagnosed previously were reported as new participants with breakthrough cancer pain. Breakthrough cancer pain was defined as the temporary exacerbation of pain occurring either spontaneously or in relation to a specific, predictable or unpredictable trigger in spite of relatively stable and adequately controlled baseline pain.

    Measured: Month 1

  3. Pain Characterization With the Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment

    The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool (ABPAT) consisted of a participant's self-reporting section (15 questions) out of which 4 questions of the tool were not included as they were related to the treatment for breakthrough cancer pain. The questions included: Q1-Relationship to baseline pain, Q2a-Last time experienced, Q3b-Frequency, Q4b-Intensity of pain at peak, Q5-Location (most frequent - ≥5%), Q6-Quality (those present in ≥20%), Q7-Time from onset to peak intensity, Q8-Time from onset [take medication] to end of episode, Q9-Cause(s) (triggers) (Those present in ≥20%), Q10-Predictability, Q11-General relief (those present in ≈20% or more participants) and questions completed by nurse/physician (N/P), Q1-Etiology of breakthrough pain, Q2-Inferred pathophysiology of breakthrough pain. Percentage of participants were categorized into the answers for each of these questions.

    Measured: Month 1

  4. Pain Severity and Pain Interference as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Questionnaire Score

    The BPI questionnaire was used to assess the pain intensity (4 items) and interference with activities of daily living (7 items). Each item was given a score on a numerical scale from 0 (no pain/interference with activities of daily living) to 10 (worst pain imaginable/maximum impact on activities of daily living). The total score for pain intensity is the average of the four pain items. The total score of pain interference is the average score of the seven interference items. The higher score represents high impact.

    Measured: Month 1

  5. Pain Assessment Using the Numeric Rating Scale

    Measured: Month 1

  6. Quality of Life Assessment Using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) Questionnaire Score

    The SF-12 health questionnaire is a 12 question assessment of functional health and well-being. The survey asks about various health aspects, including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health (psychological distress and psychological well-being). Two summary measures are derived: the Physical and the Mental Health Component Summary. For each component summary, survey items were weighted and summed to create a summary score between 0 (poor mental and physical quality of life) and 100 (better mental and physical quality of life).

    Measured: Month 1

  7. Participant's Performance as Assessed by the Karnofsky Scale Score

    Karnofsky performance score is used to quantify participant's general well-being and activities of daily life and participants are classified based on their functional impairment. Karnofsky performance score is 11 level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (participant asymptomatic with no evidence of illness). Higher score means higher ability to perform daily tasks. Participants with missing values in the Karnofsky scale were assigned to the worst score of 0, however, in these cases it is not 'death'.

    Measured: Month 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start14 Nov 2016
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion16 Jul 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
3,765 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02899884
Sponsor's protocol ID
Fentanyl-5001
Other IDs
CARPEDIO Study
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
9 Sep 2016
Last updated
22 Nov 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breakthrough Cancer Pain, run by Takeda at 36 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 36 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Nov 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Cancer Participants With Breakthrough Cancer Pain From the Total Number of Cancer Participants Seen in Consultation (time frame: Month 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in