Axial SpondyloarthritisPhase 4STRIKENCT02897115
A Study Treating Participants With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by AbbVie.
Trial summary
A study comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) intense treatment approach with routine treatment (Standard of Care [SOC]) in reducing disease activity in participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 12 Sep 2016to 21 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed written informed consent before start of study-related assessments or procedures
- Diagnosis of axSpA (either ankylosing spondylitis or non-radiographic axSpA) and fulfilling the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA
- Participants aged ≥ 18 years
- Disease duration < 5 years
- Participants must have a Baseline disease activity as defined by an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 or a Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4
- NSAID-naive or not treated with the maximal recommended NSAID dose during the last 2 weeks prior to the Baseline visit
- Participants must never have failed a NSAID taken at maximal recommended dose for 2 weeks or more.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications for NSAIDs or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker according to local labeling
- If entering the study on concomitant NSAIDs, participants taking the maximal recommended dose during the last 2 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit or have failed or developed intolerance to a NSAID taken at maximal recommended dose for 2 weeks or more at any time
- Prior exposure to any anti-TNF therapy; any biologic therapy with a potential therapeutic impact on SpA, or participant has been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to the Baseline visit.
About this study
Official title: STRIKE - Treating Patients With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis to Target - a 1 Year Randomized Controlled Study Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment
A study comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) intense treatment approach with routine treatment (Standard of Care [SOC]) in reducing disease activity in participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
- Conditions
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
- Keywords
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Humira
- Medical subject headings
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called Humira, ABT-D2E7
Administered every other week by subcutaneous injection for up to 48 weeks, depending on participants' disease activity.
Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)Other
Also called Routine practice
ASAS recommended NSAID doses to treat axial spondyloarthritis.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treat-to-Target (T2T) | Experimental | Participants initially received treatment with any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, if the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was ≥ 2.1 or treatment with NSAID 1 was not tolerated, treatment was changed to a second NSAID at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. If ASDAS was ≥ 2.1 after 4 weeks of NSAID 2 or treatment with the chosen NSAID was not tolerated, , participants were switched to receive a combination of NSAID and adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 48 weeks. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
| Standard of Care (SOC) | Active comparator | Participants received treatment as prescribed by their physician according to the local standard of care. Receives: Other: Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 32
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein [CRP] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS < 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Week 32
Secondary outcomes (32)
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-3L is a health state utility instrument that evaluates preference for health status (utility). The 5 items in the EQ-5D-3L comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on 3 levels of severity (1: indicating no problem, 2: indicating some/moderate problems, 3: indicating extreme problems). A single preference-weighted health utility index score was calculated by applying country-specific weights, with scores ranging from approximately 0 (death) to 1 (full health).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Presenteeism
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Absenteeism
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity Impairment
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) axSpA is an axSpA specific questionnaire consisting of 6 questions, based on patient recall of the previous 7 days. WPAI assesses work time missed due to illness (absenteeism), impairment at work due to health (presenteeism), overall work impairment due to health (an aggregate measure of both absenteeism and presenteeism), and total non-occupational activity impairment due to health. WPAI scores are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)
The ASAS HI measures functioning and health across 17 aspects of health in patients with AS, including pain, emotional functions, sleep, sexual function, mobility, self care, and community life. The ASAS HI consists of 17 questions, each answered by the participant as agree (1) or disagree (0). The responses to the 17 dichotomous items are summed up to give a total score ranging from 0 to 17, with a lower score indicating a better and a higher score indicating an inferior health status.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale [NRS]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10 where lower scores indicate less disease activity.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 Response
The BASDAI assesses disease activity by asking the participant to answer 6 questions (each on a 10 point numeric rating scale [NRS]) pertaining to symptoms experienced for the past week. For 5 questions (level of fatigue/tiredness, level of AS neck, back or hip pain, level of pain/swelling in joints, other than neck, back or hips, level of discomfort from any areas tender to touch or pressure, and level of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (none) to 10 (very severe); for Question 6 (duration of morning stiffness), the response is from 0 (0 hours) to 10 (≥ 2 hours). The overall BASDAI score ranges from 0 to 10. Lower scores indicate less disease activity.
A BASDAI 50 response is defined as improvement of 50% or more from baseline in BASDAI score.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is a validated index to determine the degree of functional limitation in patients with AS. BASFI consists of 10 questions assessing participants' ability to perform activities, on a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (easy to perform an activity) to 10 (impossible to perform an activity). The overall score is the mean of the 10 items and ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." Change from baseline in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major Improvement
ASDAS Major Improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -2.0. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with major improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important Improvement
ASDAS clinically important improvement is defined as a change from baseline ≤ -1.1.
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with clinically important improvement in ASDAS calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS < 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with ASDAS low disease activity (defined as ASDAS < 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease Activity
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with ASDAS moderate disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1) calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease Activity
ASDAS high disease activity is defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to < 3.5. ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 to < 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported.
Measured: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease Activity
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with very high disease activity (defined as an ASDAS > 3.5) calculated using CRP is reported
Measured: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response
ASAS20 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 20% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 1 unit (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration (defined as a worsening of ≥ 20% and a net worsening of ≥ 1 unit) in the potential remaining domain:
- Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe);
- Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe);
- Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
- Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 Response
ASAS40 response was defined as improvement of ≥ 40% relative to baseline and absolute improvement of ≥ 2 units (on a scale from 0 to 10) in ≥ 3 of the following 4 domains with no deterioration in the potential remaining domain:
- Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe);
- Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe);
- Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
- Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial Remission
ASAS partial remission is defined as an absolute score of ≤ 2 units on a 0 to 10 scale for each of the four following domains:
- Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none) to 10 (severe);
- Pain, measured by the total back pain NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe);
- Function, measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) which consists of 10 items assessing participants' ability to perform activities on an NRS ranging from 0 (easy) to 10 (impossible);
- Inflammation, measured by the mean of the 2 morning stiffness-related Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) NRS scores (items 5 [level of stiffness] and 6 [duration of stiffness]) each on a scale from 0 (none/0 hours) to 10 (very severe/2 hours or more duration).
Measured: Week 32 and week 52
Change From Baseline in Active Inflammation of the Sacroiliac Joints and Spine
Active inflammation of the sacroiliac (SI) joints as well as the cervical, thoracic and lumbar regions of the spine was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Images were scored by a central reader according to the Berlin MRI Score on a grading scale from 0 to 3, where Grade 0 indicates no active inflammation and Grade 3 indicates > 66% inflammation of the sacroiliac joints or > 50% active inflammation in the spine.
Measured: Baseline and week 52
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (severe disease activity).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
The Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was assessed using an NRS from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (very severe disease activity).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain
The Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed on a NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as it could be).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
An assessment of 66 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The swollen joint count is the number of joints assessed as swollen (0 to 66).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
An assessment of 68 joints was performed by physical examination of each joint. The tender joint count is the number of joints assessed as tender (0 to 68).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at 13 entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone). All sites were scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (from 0 to 13).
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Count
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as 0 for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis count, ranging from 0 to 20, is the total number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate measures the rate of fall (sedimentation) of erythrocytes (red blood cells) in a sample of blood that has been placed into a tall, thin, vertical tube as an indirect measure of the degree of inflammation present in the body.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
CRP is an acute phase reactant is a blood test marker for inflammation in the body. CRP levels rise in response to inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)
The linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin) is a composite score based on 5 direct measurements of spinal mobility: lateral lumbar flexion, tragus-to-wall distance, lumbar flexion, intermalleolar distance, and cervical rotation angle. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate more limited mobility.
Measured: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior Uveitis
Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start12 Sep 2016
- Primary completion21 Dec 2017
- Study completion21 Dec 2017
Why it stopped: The study was terminated due to slow recruitment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Axial SpondyloarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- IST GmbH, Germany, Hannover Medical School, Improvement by Movement GmbH, Germany
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02897115
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- W15-679
- Other IDs
- 2015-005398-18, 2015
- Acronym
- STRIKE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 5 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STRIKE - Treating Patients With Early Axial Spondyloarthritis to Target - a 1 Year Randomized Controlled Study Taking an Intense Treatment Approach Versus Routine Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02897115
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRIKE / W15-679
- Conditions
- Axial Spondyloarthritis
- Keywords
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Humira
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated due to slow recruitment.
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- IST GmbH, Germany, Hannover Medical School, Improvement by Movement GmbH, Germany
- Study start
- 12 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A study comparing a treat-to-target (T2T) intense treatment approach with routine treatment (Standard of Care [SOC]) in reducing disease activity in participants with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treat-to-Target (T2T) | Experimental | Biological: AdalimumabParticipants initially received treatment with any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, if the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) was ≥ 2.1 or treatment with NSAID 1 was not tolerated, treatment was changed to a second NSAID at full anti-inflammatory dose for 4 weeks. If ASDAS was ≥ 2.1 after 4 weeks of NSAID 2 or treatment with the chosen NSAID was not tolerated, , participants were switched to receive a combination of NSAID and adalimumab 40 mg every other week for up to 48 weeks. |
| Standard of Care (SOC) | Active comparator | Other: Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)Participants received treatment as prescribed by their physician according to the local standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Signed written informed consent before start of study-related assessments or procedures
- Diagnosis of axSpA (either ankylosing spondylitis or non-radiographic axSpA) and fulfilling the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for axSpA
- Participants aged ≥ 18 years
- Disease duration < 5 years
- Participants must have a Baseline disease activity as defined by an ASDAS ≥ 2.1 or a Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≥ 4
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Contraindications for NSAIDs or tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker according to local labeling
- If entering the study on concomitant NSAIDs, participants taking the maximal recommended dose during the last 2 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit or have failed or developed intolerance to a NSAID taken at maximal recommended dose for 2 weeks or more at any time
- Prior exposure to any anti-TNF therapy; any biologic therapy with a potential therapeutic impact on SpA, or participant has been treated with any investigational drug of chemical or biologic nature within a minimum of 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) of the drug prior to the Baseline visit.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: Humira, ABT-D2E7Administered every other week by subcutaneous injection for up to 48 weeks, depending on participants' disease activity. | Biological | Treat-to-Target (T2T) |
| Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)Also: Routine practiceASAS recommended NSAID doses to treat axial spondyloarthritis. | Other | Standard of Care (SOC) |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 32
Time frame: Week 32
ASDAS is a composite disease activity outcome measure which combines patient reported back pain, duration of morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, patient assessment of peripheral joint pain and swelling and an acute phase reactant (C-reactive protein [CRP] or erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) as an objective measure of inflammation. The overall score ranges from 0 with no defined upper score; published ranges for disease activity states as defined by the ASDAS are: < 1.3 for "inactive disease"; ≥ 1.3 to < 2.1 for "moderate disease activity"; ≥ 2.1 to ≤ 3.5 for "high disease activity" and > 3.5 for "very high disease activity." The percentage of participants with ASDAS inactive disease (defined as ASDAS < 1.3) calculated using CRP is reported.
32 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Presenteeism
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Absenteeism
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Work Productivity Impairment
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Axial Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-axSpA): Total Activity Impairment
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Health Index (HI)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a BASDAI 50 Response
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in ASDAS(CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Major Improvement
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASDAS(CRP) Clinically Important Improvement
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Inactive Disease at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Low Disease Activity
Time frame: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Moderate Disease Activity
Time frame: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS High Disease Activity
Time frame: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants With ASDAS Very High Disease Activity
Time frame: Week 32 and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 Response
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS 40 Response
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving ASAS Partial Remission
Time frame: Week 32 and week 52
Change From Baseline in Active Inflammation of the Sacroiliac Joints and Spine
Time frame: Baseline and week 52
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Pain
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Count
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Change From Baseline in Linear Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMIlin)
Time frame: Baseline, week 32, and week 52
Number of Participants With New Onset Anterior Uveitis
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jul 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Axial Spondyloarthritis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Resistance Exercise on Enthesitis in Patients With Spondyloarthritis
Spondyloarthritis (SpA), Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Adalimumab and Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in people with Axial Spondyloarthritis, run by AbbVie.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of Inactive Disease at Week 32 (time frame: Week 32). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2019.