Breast CancerPhase 3PUFFINNCT02896855
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel Versus Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel in Previously Untreated Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Docetaxel, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in China.
Trial summary
This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial in China will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel compared with placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel in participants with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Docetaxel, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 243 participants
- Where
- 15 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 13 Sep 2016to 22 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with locally recurrent or metastatic disease that is suitable for chemotherapy
- HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to (>=) 55 percent (%) at baseline (within 42 days of randomization)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Women of childbearing potential and men should agree to use an effective form of contraception and to continue its use for the duration of study treatment and for at least 7 months after the last dose of study treatment (trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab)
Who cannot join
- History of anti-cancer therapy for MBC (with the exception of one prior hormonal regimen for MBC)
- History of approved or investigative tyrosine kinase/HER inhibitors for breast cancer in any treatment setting, except trastuzumab used in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting
- History of systemic breast cancer treatment in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting with a disease-free interval from completion of the systemic treatment (excluding hormonal therapy) to metastatic diagnosis of less than (<) 12 months
- History of persistent Grade >= 2 hematologic toxicity resulting from previous adjuvant therapy
- Grade >= 3 peripheral neuropathy at randomization
- History of other malignancy within the last 5 years, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin carcinoma that has been previously treated with curative intent
Show all 23Show fewer
- Current clinical or radiographic evidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases
- History of exposure to cumulative doses of anthracyclines
- Current uncontrolled hypertension or unstable angina
- History of congestive heart failure (CHF) of any New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, or serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring treatment
- History of myocardial infarction within 6 months of randomization
- History of LVEF decrease to < 50% during or after prior trastuzumab neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy
- Current dyspnea at rest due to complications of advanced malignancy, or other diseases that require continuous oxygen therapy
- Inadequate organ function within 28 days prior to randomization
- Current severe, uncontrolled systemic disease
- Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to study treatment start or anticipation of the need for major surgery during the course of study treatment
- Pregnant or lactating women
- History of receiving any investigational treatment within 28 days of randomization
- Current known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), or active hepatitis B virus (HBV)
- Receipt of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for infection within 14 days of randomization
- Current chronic daily treatment with corticosteroids (excluding inhaled steroids)
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the protocol-specified study treatments
- Concurrent participation in an interventional or noninterventional study
Trial locations and contacts
15 sites in 1 country.
15 sites in 1 country
China15 sites
CHINESE ACADEMY OF MEDICAL SCIENCE; CANCER INST. & HOSPITAL; Medical ward
Beijing, 100021
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, 100142
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, 100853
the First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, 130021
Changzhou First People's Hospital
Changzhou, 213003
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, 610041
The 900th Hospital of PLA joint service support force
Fuzhou, 110016
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, 510080
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Harbin, 150081
Jiangsu province hospital; surgery on galactophore
Nanjing, 210029
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital
Nanjing, 211100
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, 200120
First Hospital of China Medical University
Shenyang, 110001
Liaoning cancer Hospital & Institute
Shenyang, 110042
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Zhejiang, 310022
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab+Herceptin+Docetaxel Versus Placebo+Herceptin+Docetaxel in Previously Untreated HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial in China will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel compared with placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel in participants with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Docetaxel, Pertuzumab, Placebo, Trastuzumab
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DocetaxelDrug
Docetaxel (75-mg/m^2) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
PertuzumabDrug
Also called Perjeta
Pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 420 mg for subsequent cycles) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo matched to pertuzumab was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
TrastuzumabDrug
Also called Herceptin
Trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Active comparator | Placebo matched to pertuzumab, trastuzumab (8-milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg] loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles), and docetaxel (75-milligrams per square meter [mg/m^2]) were administered by intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Trastuzumab |
| Arm B: Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Experimental | Pertuzumab (840-mg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 420 mg for subsequent cycles), trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles), and docetaxel (75-mg/m^2) were administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Pertuzumab; Drug: Trastuzumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival, as Determined by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progressive disease (PD), as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause within 18 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v1.1, PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 millimeters (mm), and the appearance of new lesions. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate median PFS for each treatment arm. Data for participants who did not have a PFS event were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment (if no tumor assessments performed after baseline, at randomization plus 1 day).
Measured: From date of randomization until date of PFS event (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks; Final analysis: 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks)
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Event-Free for Progression-Free Survival at 1 to 3 Years, as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progressive disease (PD), as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause within 18 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v1.1, PD is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 mm, and the appearance of new lesions. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for PFS at 1, 2, and 3 years. Data for participants who did not have a PFS event were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment (if no tumor assessments performed after baseline visit, at randomization plus 1 day). At final analysis, the median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B was 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks.
Measured: At 1, 2, and 3 years
Secondary outcomes (11)
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate median OS for each treatment arm. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the time of randomization plus 1 day. The results reported here are from the final analysis. At the primary completion date, the median duration of OS had not been reached and OS data was not considered mature due to the few number of events reported.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Final analysis: 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks)
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Event-Free for Overall Survival at 1 to 3 Years
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for OS (i.e., alive) at 1, 2, and 3 years. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up at the time of the analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the time of randomization plus 1 day. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B was 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks.
Measured: At 1, 2, and 3 Years
Percentage of Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline Who Achieved an Objective Response (Complete or Partial Response), as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
An objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1. As per RECIST v1.1, CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. Also per RECIST v1.1, stable disease (SD) is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum on study; PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 mm, and the appearance of new lesions. The same assessment technique must be used throughout the study for evaluating a particular lesion, and the same investigator should assess all tumor responses for each participant. Participants without a post-baseline tumor assessment were considered non-responders.
Measured: At Baseline and every 9 weeks from date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks)
Duration of Objective Response, as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Duration of objective response was defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response (complete response [CR] or partial response [PR]) to the time of disease progression, as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause within 18 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v1.1, CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate median duration of objective response. Data for participants who did not have an event were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment (if no tumor assessments were performed after baseline visit, at randomization plus 1 day).
Measured: From date of first occurrence of documented objective response to date of event (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
The number of participants per treatment arm experiencing at least one adverse event, including all non-serious and serious adverse events, is reported here. Adverse events reported prior to first crossover treatment were included in the Placebo arm, and in the Crossover arm after that date, for participants in Arm A who crossed over from placebo to pertuzumab. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study treatment with placebo or pertuzumab per arm was: Arm A - Placebo: 52.3 [3-207] weeks; Arm B - Pertuzumab: 66.1 [3-225] weeks; Arm A - Crossover to Pertuzumab: 18.1 [12-24] weeks.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade ≥3 Adverse Event
Adverse event (AE) severity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0); if the AE was not specifically listed, the following grades of severity were used: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening or disabling; and Grade 5 = death. Severe and serious are not synonymous. Severity refers to the intensity of an AE, whereas a serious AE must meet criteria set out in the protocol; both were independently assessed for each AE. AEs reported prior to first crossover treatment were included in the Placebo arm, and in the Crossover arm after that date, for participants in Arm A who crossed over from placebo to pertuzumab. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study treatment with placebo or pertuzumab per arm was: Arm A - Placebo: 52.3 [3-207] weeks; Arm B - Pertuzumab: 66.1 [3-225] weeks; Arm A - Crossover to Pertuzumab: 18.1 [12-24] weeks.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Leading to Withdrawal From Any Treatment
Adverse events reported prior to first crossover treatment were included in the Placebo arm, and in the Crossover arm after that date, for participants in Arm A who crossed over from placebo to pertuzumab. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study treatment with placebo or pertuzumab per arm was: Arm A - Placebo: 52.3 [3-207] weeks; Arm B - Pertuzumab: 66.1 [3-225] weeks; Arm A - Crossover to Pertuzumab: 18.1 [12-24] weeks.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD), as Determined Using Echocardiography (ECHO) or Multiple-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
The number of participants with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) at any time during the study, as determined using echocardiography (ECHO) or multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scan, were summarized by treatment arm. Symptomatic LVSD was evaluated according to NCI CTCAE v4.0 (for "heart failure") and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study treatment with placebo or pertuzumab per arm was: Arm A - Placebo: 52.3 [3-207] weeks; Arm B - Pertuzumab: 66.1 [3-225] weeks; Arm A - Crossover to Pertuzumab: 18.1 [12-24] weeks.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With an Asymptomatic Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Event, as Determined Using ECHO or MUGA Scan
An asymptomatic decline in LVEF event is reported as an adverse event of "ejection fraction decreased" and is defined as either of the following: an absolute decrease in LVEF of ≥10 percentage points from baseline to an LVEF of <50%; or an asymptomatic decrease in LVEF requiring treatment or leading to discontinuation of pertuzumab (or placebo) and trastuzumab. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study treatment with placebo or pertuzumab per arm was: Arm A - Placebo: 52.3 [3-207] weeks; Arm B - Pertuzumab: 66.1 [3-225] weeks; Arm A - Crossover to Pertuzumab: 18.1 [12-24] weeks.
Measured: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants by the LVEF Abnormality Status Categories Over Time, as Determined by the Change From Baseline in LVEF Using ECHO or MUGA Scans
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the measurement of how much blood is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart with each contraction. LVEF was calculated using the modified Simpson method and must have been ≥55% at baseline as determined by the local facility before a participant could be enrolled in the study. The investigator decided which method of LVEF assessment (ECHO [preferred] or MUGA scan) would be used for each participant at baseline, and the same method was to be used throughout the study, to the extent possible. The LVEF abnormality status categories, as a change relative to LVEF at baseline, included: Increase or no change in LVEF; Decrease of <10 LVEF points; Absolute LVEF value ≥50% and a decrease of ≥10 LVEF points; and Absolute LVEF value <50% and a decrease of ≥10 LVEF points. The overall worst LVEF value was defined as the lowest post-baseline value up to the end of the study, including unscheduled assessments and the post-treatment period.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 81, 90, 99, 108, 117, 126, 135, 144, 153, 162, 171, 180, 189, 198, 207, 216, and 225, Study Drug Discontinuation Visit (up to 4 years, 4 months), and Treatment-Free Follow-Up at 6 months, and 1 and 2 years
Baseline LVEF and Change From Baseline to Maximum On-Treatment Decrease in LVEF at Any Point During the Study
The baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and change from baseline to the maximum on-treatment decrease in LVEF at any point during the study are reported here. LVEF is the measurement of how much blood is being pumped out of the left ventricle of the heart (the main pumping chamber) with each contraction. LVEF was calculated using the modified Simpson method and must have been ≥55% at baseline as determined by the local facility before a participant could be enrolled in the study. The investigator decided which method of LVEF assessment (ECHO [preferred] or MUGA scan) would be used for each participant at baseline, and the same method should have been used throughout the study, to the extent possible. At final analysis, the median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B was 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks.
Measured: Baseline and every 9 weeks from date of randomization until treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study start13 Sep 2016
- Primary completion27 Jun 2018
- Study completion22 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02896855
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- YO29296
- Acronym
- PUFFIN
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Sep 2016
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Xu B, Li W, Zhang Q, Shao Z, Li Q, Wang X, Li H, Sun T, Yin Y, Zheng H, Feng J, Zhang H, Lei G, Restuccia E. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously untreated HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (PUFFIN): a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;182(3):689-697. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05728-w. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
PubMed 32564260
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pertuzumab+Herceptin+Docetaxel Versus Placebo+Herceptin+Docetaxel in Previously Untreated HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02896855
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PUFFIN / YO29296
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial in China will evaluate the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel compared with placebo + trastuzumab + docetaxel in participants with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Active comparator | Drug: Docetaxel, Drug: Placebo, Drug: TrastuzumabPlacebo matched to pertuzumab, trastuzumab (8-milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg] loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles), and docetaxel (75-milligrams per square meter [mg/m^2]) were administered by intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Arm B: Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel | Experimental | Drug: Docetaxel, Drug: Pertuzumab, Drug: TrastuzumabPertuzumab (840-mg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 420 mg for subsequent cycles), trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles), and docetaxel (75-mg/m^2) were administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast with locally recurrent or metastatic disease that is suitable for chemotherapy
- HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to (>=) 55 percent (%) at baseline (within 42 days of randomization)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1
- Women of childbearing potential and men should agree to use an effective form of contraception and to continue its use for the duration of study treatment and for at least 7 months after the last dose of study treatment (trastuzumab and/or pertuzumab)
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- History of anti-cancer therapy for MBC (with the exception of one prior hormonal regimen for MBC)
- History of approved or investigative tyrosine kinase/HER inhibitors for breast cancer in any treatment setting, except trastuzumab used in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting
- History of systemic breast cancer treatment in the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting with a disease-free interval from completion of the systemic treatment (excluding hormonal therapy) to metastatic diagnosis of less than (<) 12 months
- History of persistent Grade >= 2 hematologic toxicity resulting from previous adjuvant therapy
- Grade >= 3 peripheral neuropathy at randomization
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DocetaxelDocetaxel (75-mg/m^2) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm A: Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Arm B: Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel |
| PertuzumabAlso: PerjetaPertuzumab (840-mg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 420 mg for subsequent cycles) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm B: Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel |
| PlaceboPlacebo matched to pertuzumab was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm A: Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel |
| TrastuzumabAlso: HerceptinTrastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose for Cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles) was administered by IV infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm A: Placebo + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel, Arm B: Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Docetaxel |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival, as Determined by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Time frame: From date of randomization until date of PFS event (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks; Final analysis: 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks)
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progressive disease (PD), as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause within 18 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v1.1, PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 millimeters (mm), and the appearance of new lesions. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate median PFS for each treatment arm. Data for participants who did not have a PFS event were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment (if no tumor assessments performed after baseline, at randomization plus 1 day).
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Event-Free for Progression-Free Survival at 1 to 3 Years, as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Time frame: At 1, 2, and 3 years
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to first occurrence of progressive disease (PD), as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause within 18 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v1.1, PD is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 mm, and the appearance of new lesions. The Kaplan-Meier approach was used to estimate the percentage of participants who were event-free for PFS at 1, 2, and 3 years. Data for participants who did not have a PFS event were censored at the time of the last tumor assessment (if no tumor assessments performed after baseline visit, at randomization plus 1 day). At final analysis, the median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B was 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks.
11 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Final analysis: 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks)
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Percentage of Participants Event-Free for Overall Survival at 1 to 3 Years
Time frame: At 1, 2, and 3 Years
Percentage of Participants With Measurable Disease at Baseline Who Achieved an Objective Response (Complete or Partial Response), as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Time frame: At Baseline and every 9 weeks from date of randomization until disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks)
Duration of Objective Response, as Determined by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Time frame: From date of first occurrence of documented objective response to date of event (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With at Least One Grade ≥3 Adverse Event
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event Leading to Withdrawal From Any Treatment
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD), as Determined Using Echocardiography (ECHO) or Multiple-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) Scan
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants With an Asymptomatic Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Event, as Determined Using ECHO or MUGA Scan
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until 42 days after last dose of study drug (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Number of Participants by the LVEF Abnormality Status Categories Over Time, as Determined by the Change From Baseline in LVEF Using ECHO or MUGA Scans
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 9, 18, 27, 36, 45, 54, 63, 72, 81, 90, 99, 108, 117, 126, 135, 144, 153, 162, 171, 180, 189, 198, 207, 216, and 225, Study Drug Discontinuation Visit (up to 4 years, 4 months), and Treatment-Free Follow-Up at 6 months, and 1 and 2 years
Baseline LVEF and Change From Baseline to Maximum On-Treatment Decrease in LVEF at Any Point During the Study
Time frame: Baseline and every 9 weeks from date of randomization until treatment discontinuation (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32564260Xu B, Li W, Zhang Q, Shao Z, Li Q, Wang X, Li H, Sun T, Yin Y, Zheng H, Feng J, Zhang H, Lei G, Restuccia E. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously untreated HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (PUFFIN): a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;182(3):689-697. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05728-w. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
15 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Docetaxel, Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in people with Breast Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 15 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 15 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival, as Determined by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (time frame: From date of randomization until date of PFS event (Median [range] time on study for Arm A vs. Arm B at Primary analysis: 57.14 [3.3-93.3] weeks vs. 59.64 [0.9-90.4] weeks; Final analysis: 145.29 [3.3-225.3] weeks vs. 174.79 [0.9-226.1] weeks)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02896855, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2021.