AzTrials
AzTrials

Colles' FractureNCT02894983

Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly in Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Flexion-ulnar cast and Functional cast in people with Colles' Fracture and Distal Radius Fracture, run by Tampere University Hospital at 3 sites in Finland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There is no consensus about the best conservative treatment for patients with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The previous studies that have examined the most valid method for cast immobilization have lacked uniform and patient-rated outcome measures, proper randomization and sufficient study population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Colles' Fracture, Distal Radius Fracture
What is being tested?
Flexion-ulnar cast and Functional cast
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
114 participants
Where
3 sitesFinland
Study dates
Jun 2016to May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Low energy intra- or extra-articular dorsal primarily stable, reducible DRF within 3 cm of the radiocarpal joint diagnosed with lateral and posterior-anterior radiographs in ER
  • Physician on-call (general practitioner, acute physician, orthopedic resident, orthopedic consult) thinks patient could be appropriate for non-operative treatment

Who cannot join

  • Operative treatment
  • Refuse to participate the study
  • Open fracture more than Gustilo 1 gradus
  • Age under 65 years
  • Chauffeure's or Barton´s fracture
  • Smith´s fracture (volar angulation of the fracture)
  • Does not understand written and spoken guidance in local languages
  • Pathological fracture or previous fracture in the same wrist, forearm or elbow

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Finland3 sites
  • Central Finland Central Hospital

    Jyväskylä

  • Satakunta Central Hospital

    Pori

  • Tampere Univeristy Hospital

    Tampere

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Volar-flexion, Ulnar-deviation and Functional Position Cast Immobilization in the Non-operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly Patients: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

There is no consensus about the best conservative treatment for patients with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. The previous studies that have examined the most valid method for cast immobilization have lacked uniform and patient-rated outcome measures, proper randomization and sufficient study population. The aim of this study is to compare functional position cast to flexion-ulnar -deviation with dorsally displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years or older. The conservative treatment is performed in clinical practice by various health care professionals with different techniques of reduction which are not limited to any specific technique in this pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

Being tested
Flexion-ulnar cast, Functional cast
Keywords
wrist fracture, colles fracture, non-operative, rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Colles' Fracture, Wrist Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Flexion-ulnar castOther

    Also called Conservative treatment

    The group will be treated with closed reduction and flexion-ulnar deviation position cast. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of local infiltration commonly used in Finland. There is no preferable method for performing the reduction. Additional radiographs will be taken to verify the success of the reduction one week after the reduction and after two and five weeks of casting if treating health care professional it requires. The cast will be disposed after 5 weeks.

  • Functional castOther

    Also called Conservative treatment

    The group will be treated with closed reduction and functional position cast. This will take place under local anaesthesia by means of local infiltration commonly used in Finland. There is no preferable method for performing the reduction. Additional radiographs will be taken to verify the success of the reduction one week after the reduction and after two and five weeks of casting if treating health care professional it requires. The cast will be disposed after 5 weeks.

Study groups in NCT02894983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1OtherConservative treatment chosen by physician on-call for dorsally displaced radius fracture.
Receives: Other: Flexion-ulnar cast
Arm 2OtherConservative treatment chosen by physician on-call for dorsally displaced radius fracture.
Receives: Other: Functional cast

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measure is the primary outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in the study

    The PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists three subscales: Pain, Function and Cosmetics.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Disability of the wrist measured with the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

    The QuickDASH is self-reported questionnaire and shortened version of DASH outcome measure to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in 11 dimensions in 1-5 scale.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Quality of life measured with the 15-D.

    The 15D is a validated, generic, self-administered instrument for assessing the health related quality of life among adults. It combines the advantages of a preference-based and single index measure on a 0-1 scale.

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Pain measured in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    The VAS is derived by health care professional question of pain in scale 0 to 10 in which 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.

    Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years

  4. Range of motion (ROM) is measured with a goniometer

    The ROM of the wrist is measured on both hands with a handheld goniometer in degrees.

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer

    Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. It will be numbered in percentage of the uninjured side.

    Measured: 3 months

  6. The pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is measured with a self-administered questionnaire.

    The PCS is designed to measure person's willingness to catastrophize the pain while they are experiencing it. In the questionnaire patients answer questions about how they feel and think when they are in pain and it can be taken while they are not experiencing pain.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2016
  3. Primary completionApr 2018
  4. Study completionMay 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02894983
Sponsor's protocol ID
R16035
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
22 Aug 2016
Last updated
22 May 2018
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Ax M, Reito A, Hevonkorpi TP, Palola V, Kukkonen J, Luokkala T, Laitinen MK, Launonen AP, Mattila VM. A comparison of the functional results and costs of functional cast and volar-flexion ulnar deviation cast at 2-year follow-up in 105 patients aged 65 and older with dorsally displaced distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283946. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37023069
  • Raittio L, Launonen AP, Hevonkorpi T, Luokkala T, Kukkonen J, Reito A, Laitinen MK, Mattila VM. Two casting methods compared in patients with Colles' fracture: A pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232153. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32469881
  • Raittio L, Launonen A, Hevonkorpi T, Luokkala T, Kukkonen J, Reito A, Sumrein B, Laitinen M, Mattila VM. Comparison of volar-flexion, ulnar-deviation and functional position cast immobilization in the non-operative treatment of distal radius fracture in elderly patients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 18;18(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1759-y.

    PubMed 28923035

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Flexion-ulnar cast and Functional cast in people with Colles' Fracture and Distal Radius Fracture, run by Tampere University Hospital at 3 sites in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) measure is the primary outcome measure of wrist pain and disability in the study (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02894983, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in