Repeated Implantation FailurePhase 1NCT02893722
A Randomized Double Blind Comparison of Atosiban in Patients With RIF Undergoing IVF Treatment
A Phase 1 study testing atosiban and 0.9% saline in people with Repeated Implantation Failure, run by Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital.
Trial summary
This study intends to carry out a prospective, randomized, double blind and controlled study to compare the influence of Atosiban and placebo on uterine contraction frequency, endometrial blood flow perfusion, oxytocin and serum concentration of PGF2α, embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate on the RIF… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Repeated Implantation Failure
- What is being tested?
- atosiban and 0.9% saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 3 or more than 3 embryo implantation failure histories previously (or the number of high-quality embryos transplanted is >4);
- Age <40 years;
- Ultrasound or HSG showed normal uterine cavity, endometrium on transplantation day is ≥ 8mm;
- There's at least one good quality embryo on transplantation day.
Who cannot join
- Patients using donor sperm or donor eggs;
- Patients have obvious uterine cavity abnormalities;
- There was a clear hydrosalpinx;
- Natural cycles or IVM patients;
- Patients who cancel the due to the transfer due to various reasons, such as the failure of fertilization, or ovarian transitional stimulus syndrome (OHSS);
- Abnormal karyotype;
- Blastocyst transplantation patients.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double Blind Comparison of Atosiban in Patients With Repeated Implantation Failure Undergoing IVF Treatment
This study intends to carry out a prospective, randomized, double blind and controlled study to compare the influence of Atosiban and placebo on uterine contraction frequency, endometrial blood flow perfusion, oxytocin and serum concentration of PGF2α, embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate on the RIF population after fresh embryo transfer, so as to further clarify the curative effect of Atosiban in the treatment of RIF and provide evidence-based basis for Atosiban for application in RIF population.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale With the rapid development of the technology of reproductive medicine, in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and its related derivatives have become the most important means for the treatment of infertility. IVF-ET pregnancy rate increased from the initial 10% to current more than 50%, but the repeated implantation failure (RIF) has occurred occasionally, which has become a difficult that perplex IVF-ET clinical practices. There is no uniform definition of RIF at present. Coughlan et al called that the women below 40 years old who experienced at least 3 fresh or frozen periods and failed to transplant 4 and more than 4 high-quality embryos as RIF in 2014 [1]. At present, most of the patients have started the reason screening and inspection spontaneously if the transplantation fails after of transplanting 2 high-quality embryos. But the embryo implantation is a complex process, the etiology of RIF can be roughly summed as the embryo factors, uterine factors, genetic factors, immunological factors and so on, the symptomatic treatment according to different causes can improve the success rate of re-transplantation system [2]. However, in most cases, the etiology of RIF still cannot be explained [3].
In recent years, the influence of uterine contraction on embryo implantation has attracted more and more attention. Studies have shown that no matter it's natural menstrual cycle or fertility cycle, moderate Uterine Contraction (UC) is conducive to embryo implantation, but excessive or strong UC will have a negative impact on embryo implantation, and even the embryos to be implanted to the fallopian tube, cervical or vaginal, and even be discharged of the uterus [4-6].
The estrogen levels of excessively physiological state during the process of ovulation induction of IVF can induce the production ofoxytocin in the endometrial cells, and indirectly lead to the synthesis and release of prostaglandin PGF2α, resulting in increased uterine contraction frequency [7-9]. In 1998, Fanchin et al. found that the frequency of uterine contraction of about 30% of the embryos transplantation patients was higher than 5 times /min, which was significantly correlated to the success rate of low pregnancy [5]. The follow-up studies confirmed by ultrasound showed that the frequency of endometrial contraction induced by ovulation induction cycle of IVF[10] is 5-6 times of the natural cycle. Therefore, in addition to the soft operation of the transplant process, the reduction of uterine excessive contraction by drugs may be an effective measure to improve the success rate of IVF pregnancy.
Atosiban is the antagonist of mixed receptor of pitressin VIA and oxytocin, it competes the oxytocin receptor located on the uterine muscle cell membranes, foetal membrane and deciduas with oxytocin to inhibit contraction of the uterus; at the same time, it inhibits the generation of oxytocin induced uterine endometrial prostate element PGF2 α to increase the endometrial blood flow perfusion. Pierzynski et al first applied Atosiban to the field of reproduction in 2007 for the first time, which made the uterine contraction frequency of a RIF patient who failed to transplant for seven times before the oocyte donation embryo transplant decreased significantly, and successful became pregnant [11]. This report immediately caused the reproductive scientists to apply Atosiban to the clinical study of in vitro assisted reproduction. For the general population, there are still disputes on whether use Atosiban during the embryo transplant [12-14]. The prospective and randomized study of He Ye et al showed that Atosiban can significantly reduce the oxytocin of patients with endometriosis and serum concentrations of PGF2 α, reduce the frequency of uterine contraction and improve the implantation rate of quality blastocyst after freeze-thaw treatment and clinical pregnancy rate [15]. In the RIF population, the retrospective study and prospective cohort studies have shown that using low doses of Atosiban during IVF-ET can increase the implantation rate of fresh and thawed quality embryos and clinical pregnancy rate [16-18], which may improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF. But these studies were not randomized placebo-controlled studies, and their conclusions are still to be verified.
Atosiban is currently a safe and effective tocolytic drug for uncomplicated preterm patients, the patients had accelerated heartbeat, nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, flushing, anxiety, tremor and other side effects occasionally. Randomized and double blind controlled trial showed that the side effects with application of Atosiban and placebo in the maternal and child was similar, the difference was not statistically significant [15]. Preclinical studies haven't found that Atosiban has any toxicity to human sperm motility or embryo development in rabbits [20]. It hasn't found the literatures that report the fetal congenital malformations associated with the application of Atosiban. Therefore, the therapeutic dose of Atosiban should be able to be safely used in embryo transfer.
In summary, this study intends to carry out a prospective, randomized, double blind and controlled study to compare the influence of Atosiban and placebo on uterine contraction frequency, endometrial blood flow perfusion, oxytocin and serum concentration of PGF2α, embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate on the RIF population after fresh embryo transfer, so as to further clarify the curative effect of Atosiban in the treatment of RIF and provide evidence-based basis for Atosiban for application in RIF population.
- Conditions
- Repeated Implantation Failure
- Being tested
- atosiban, 0.9% saline
- Keywords
- ivf ,atosiban,repeated implantation failure,RCT
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
atosibanDrug
Also called oxytocin antagonist
give drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer,and intravenous infusion in total dose of 37.5 mg is set in certain infusion rate, and complete the infusion in 3 hours.
0.9% salineDrug
Also called Nacl
give drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer,and intravenous infusion is set in the same rate with experimental group, complete the infusion in 3 hours.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| atosiban | Experimental | Give drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer. First step: give a 37.5 mg Atosiban (Ferring, Germany) to take 0.9 ml, that is, 6.75 mg, conduct intravenous injection in one minute.
Second step: for the remaining 4.1 ml, namely 30.75 mg, dilute to 41 ml, use the venous pump to adjust to 24 ml/h, infuse for 1 hour, namely 18 mg.
Third step: for the remaining 17 ml, use the venous pump to adjust to 8 ml/h, infuse 2.1 hours, namely 12.75 mg. Total administration time is 3 hours, total dose is 37.5 mg. Receives: Drug: atosiban |
| 0.9% salain | Placebo comparator | intravenous injection of 0.9% saline in one minute before transfer. Then use the same dose of normal saline for intravenous infusion to set the same infusion rate with experimental group, complete the infusion in 3 hours. Receives: Drug: 0.9% saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical pregnancy rate
cases of clinical pregnancies / number of transplantation cycles(per patient)
Measured: 4 weeks after embryo transfer
Secondary outcomes (4)
implantation rate
number of pregnancy fetal bursa / total number of transplantation embryos
Measured: 4 weeks after embryo transfer
abortion rate
abortion cases / number of clinical pregnancy cycles
Measured: 6 weeks after embryo transfer
ectopic pregnancy rate
ectopic pregnancy cases / number of clinical pregnancy cycle
Measured: 6 weeks after embryo transfer
frequency of uterine contraction (4 minutes)
times of uterine contraction/4 minutes
Measured: 1 hour before and 1 hour after intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionJan 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (22)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Repeated Implantation FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, chen zhi qin, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02893722
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FERRING-001
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, Cutting R, Ong K, Sallam H, Li TC. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
PubMed 24269084Simon A, Laufer N. Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
PubMed 22464086Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3036-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del305. Epub 2006 Aug 12.
PubMed 16905766Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Sher G, McNamee PI, Huang TT, Soto-Albors C. Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase, the cycle before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a descriptive study. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):156-62.
PubMed 1730311Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jul;13(7):1968-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1968.
PubMed 9740459Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Raven G, Maguiness SD. Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum Reprod. 1999 Sep;14(9):2367-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2367.
PubMed 10469712Richter ON, Kubler K, Schmolling J, Kupka M, Reinsberg J, Ulrich U, van der Ven H, Wardelmann E, van der Ven K. Oxytocin receptor gene expression of estrogen-stimulated human myometrium in extracorporeally perfused non-pregnant uteri. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004 May;10(5):339-46. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah039. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
PubMed 15044599Liedman R, Hansson SR, Howe D, Igidbashian S, McLeod A, Russell RJ, Akerlund M. Reproductive hormones in plasma over the menstrual cycle in primary dysmenorrhea compared with healthy subjects. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008 Sep;24(9):508-13. doi: 10.1080/09513590802306218.
PubMed 18958771Zhu L, Li Y, Xu A. Influence of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on uterine peristalsis in infertile women. Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2684-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des257. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
PubMed 22798632Ayoubi JM, Epiney M, Brioschi PA, Fanchin R, Chardonnens D, de Ziegler D. Comparison of changes in uterine contraction frequency after ovulation in the menstrual cycle and in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2003 May;79(5):1101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00179-1.
PubMed 12738502Pierzynski P, Reinheimer TM, Kuczynski W. Oxytocin antagonists may improve infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jul;88(1):213.e19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.017. Epub 2007 May 3.
PubMed 17481622Moraloglu O, Tonguc E, Var T, Zeyrek T, Batioglu S. Treatment with oxytocin antagonists before embryo transfer may increase implantation rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Sep;21(3):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
PubMed 20638340Song XR, Zhao XH, Bai XH, Lu YH, Zhang HJ, Wang YX, Lu R. [Application of oxytocin antagonists in thaw embryo transfer]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):667-70. Chinese.
PubMed 24332133Ng EH, Li RH, Chen L, Lan VT, Tuong HM, Quan S. A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients undergoing IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2687-94. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu263. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
PubMed 25336707He Y, Wu H, He X, Xing Q, Zhou P, Cao Y, Wei Z. Administration of atosiban in patients with endometriosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):416-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
PubMed 27143518
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double Blind Comparison of Atosiban in Patients With Repeated Implantation Failure Undergoing IVF Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02893722
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FERRING-001
- Conditions
- Repeated Implantation Failure
- Keywords
- ivf ,atosiban,repeated implantation failure,RCT
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shanghai First Maternity and Infant HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017
- Primary completion
- Jan 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Sep 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study intends to carry out a prospective, randomized, double blind and controlled study to compare the influence of Atosiban and placebo on uterine contraction frequency, endometrial blood flow perfusion, oxytocin and serum concentration of PGF2α, embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate on the RIF population after fresh embryo transfer, so as to further clarify the curative effect of Atosiban in the treatment of RIF and provide evidence-based basis for Atosiban for application in RIF population.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale With the rapid development of the technology of reproductive medicine, in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) and its related derivatives have become the most important means for the treatment of infertility. IVF-ET pregnancy rate increased from the initial 10% to current more than 50%, but the repeated implantation failure (RIF) has occurred occasionally, which has become a difficult that perplex IVF-ET clinical practices. There is no uniform definition of RIF at present. Coughlan et al called that the women below 40 years old who experienced at least 3 fresh or frozen periods and failed to transplant 4 and more than 4 high-quality embryos as RIF in 2014 [1]. At present, most of the patients have started the reason screening and inspection spontaneously if the transplantation fails after of transplanting 2 high-quality embryos. But the embryo implantation is a complex process, the etiology of RIF can be roughly summed as the embryo factors, uterine factors, genetic factors, immunological factors and so on, the symptomatic treatment according to different causes can improve the success rate of re-transplantation system [2]. However, in most cases, the etiology of RIF still cannot be explained [3].
In recent years, the influence of uterine contraction on embryo implantation has attracted more and more attention. Studies have shown that no matter it's natural menstrual cycle or fertility cycle, moderate Uterine Contraction (UC) is conducive to embryo implantation, but excessive or strong UC will have a negative impact on embryo implantation, and even the embryos to be implanted to the fallopian tube, cervical or vaginal, and even be discharged of the uterus [4-6].
The estrogen levels of excessively physiological state during the process of ovulation induction of IVF can induce the production ofoxytocin in the endometrial cells, and indirectly lead to the synthesis and release of prostaglandin PGF2α, resulting in increased uterine contraction frequency [7-9]. In 1998, Fanchin et al. found that the frequency of uterine contraction of about 30% of the embryos transplantation patients was higher than 5 times /min, which was significantly correlated to the success rate of low pregnancy [5]. The follow-up studies confirmed by ultrasound showed that the frequency of endometrial contraction induced by ovulation induction cycle of IVF[10] is 5-6 times of the natural cycle. Therefore, in addition to the soft operation of the transplant process, the reduction of uterine excessive contraction by drugs may be an effective measure to improve the success rate of IVF pregnancy.
Atosiban is the antagonist of mixed receptor of pitressin VIA and oxytocin, it competes the oxytocin receptor located on the uterine muscle cell membranes, foetal membrane and deciduas with oxytocin to inhibit contraction of the uterus; at the same time, it inhibits the generation of oxytocin induced uterine endometrial prostate element PGF2 α to increase the endometrial blood flow perfusion. Pierzynski et al first applied Atosiban to the field of reproduction in 2007 for the first time, which made the uterine contraction frequency of a RIF patient who failed to transplant for seven times before the oocyte donation embryo transplant decreased significantly, and successful became pregnant [11]. This report immediately caused the reproductive scientists to apply Atosiban to the clinical study of in vitro assisted reproduction. For the general population, there are still disputes on whether use Atosiban during the embryo transplant [12-14]. The prospective and randomized study of He Ye et al showed that Atosiban can significantly reduce the oxytocin of patients with endometriosis and serum concentrations of PGF2 α, reduce the frequency of uterine contraction and improve the implantation rate of quality blastocyst after freeze-thaw treatment and clinical pregnancy rate [15]. In the RIF population, the retrospective study and prospective cohort studies have shown that using low doses of Atosiban during IVF-ET can increase the implantation rate of fresh and thawed quality embryos and clinical pregnancy rate [16-18], which may improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with RIF. But these studies were not randomized placebo-controlled studies, and their conclusions are still to be verified.
Atosiban is currently a safe and effective tocolytic drug for uncomplicated preterm patients, the patients had accelerated heartbeat, nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, flushing, anxiety, tremor and other side effects occasionally. Randomized and double blind controlled trial showed that the side effects with application of Atosiban and placebo in the maternal and child was similar, the difference was not statistically significant [15]. Preclinical studies haven't found that Atosiban has any toxicity to human sperm motility or embryo development in rabbits [20]. It hasn't found the literatures that report the fetal congenital malformations associated with the application of Atosiban. Therefore, the therapeutic dose of Atosiban should be able to be safely used in embryo transfer.
In summary, this study intends to carry out a prospective, randomized, double blind and controlled study to compare the influence of Atosiban and placebo on uterine contraction frequency, endometrial blood flow perfusion, oxytocin and serum concentration of PGF2α, embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate on the RIF population after fresh embryo transfer, so as to further clarify the curative effect of Atosiban in the treatment of RIF and provide evidence-based basis for Atosiban for application in RIF population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| atosiban | Experimental | Drug: atosibanGive drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer. First step: give a 37.5 mg Atosiban (Ferring, Germany) to take 0.9 ml, that is, 6.75 mg, conduct intravenous injection in one minute. Second step: for the remaining 4.1 ml, namely 30.75 mg, dilute to 41 ml, use the venous pump to adjust to 24 ml/h, infuse for 1 hour, namely 18 mg. Third step: for the remaining 17 ml, use the venous pump to adjust to 8 ml/h, infuse 2.1 hours, namely 12.75 mg. Total administration time is 3 hours, total dose is 37.5 mg. |
| 0.9% salain | Placebo comparator | Drug: 0.9% salineintravenous injection of 0.9% saline in one minute before transfer. Then use the same dose of normal saline for intravenous infusion to set the same infusion rate with experimental group, complete the infusion in 3 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 3 or more than 3 embryo implantation failure histories previously (or the number of high-quality embryos transplanted is >4);
- Age <40 years;
- Ultrasound or HSG showed normal uterine cavity, endometrium on transplantation day is ≥ 8mm;
- There's at least one good quality embryo on transplantation day.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients using donor sperm or donor eggs;
- Patients have obvious uterine cavity abnormalities;
- There was a clear hydrosalpinx;
- Natural cycles or IVM patients;
- Patients who cancel the due to the transfer due to various reasons, such as the failure of fertilization, or ovarian transitional stimulus syndrome (OHSS);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| atosibanAlso: oxytocin antagonistgive drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer,and intravenous infusion in total dose of 37.5 mg is set in certain infusion rate, and complete the infusion in 3 hours. | Drug | atosiban |
| 0.9% salineAlso: Naclgive drugs 30 minutes before the start of the embryo transfer,and intravenous infusion is set in the same rate with experimental group, complete the infusion in 3 hours. | Drug | 0.9% salain |
Primary outcome
Clinical pregnancy rate
Time frame: 4 weeks after embryo transfer
cases of clinical pregnancies / number of transplantation cycles(per patient)
4 secondary outcomes
implantation rate
Time frame: 4 weeks after embryo transfer
abortion rate
Time frame: 6 weeks after embryo transfer
ectopic pregnancy rate
Time frame: 6 weeks after embryo transfer
frequency of uterine contraction (4 minutes)
Time frame: 1 hour before and 1 hour after intervention
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2016.
- Results publication: PubMed 24269084Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, Liu F, Demirol A, Gurgan T, Cutting R, Ong K, Sallam H, Li TC. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Jan;28(1):14-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 22464086Simon A, Laufer N. Repeated implantation failure: clinical approach. Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 16905766Margalioth EJ, Ben-Chetrit A, Gal M, Eldar-Geva T. Investigation and treatment of repeated implantation failure following IVF-ET. Hum Reprod. 2006 Dec;21(12):3036-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del305. Epub 2006 Aug 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 1730311Knutzen V, Stratton CJ, Sher G, McNamee PI, Huang TT, Soto-Albors C. Mock embryo transfer in early luteal phase, the cycle before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a descriptive study. Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):156-62.
- Results publication: PubMed 9740459Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jul;13(7):1968-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.7.1968.
- Results publication: PubMed 10469712Lesny P, Killick SR, Robinson J, Raven G, Maguiness SD. Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum Reprod. 1999 Sep;14(9):2367-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2367.
- Results publication: PubMed 15044599Richter ON, Kubler K, Schmolling J, Kupka M, Reinsberg J, Ulrich U, van der Ven H, Wardelmann E, van der Ven K. Oxytocin receptor gene expression of estrogen-stimulated human myometrium in extracorporeally perfused non-pregnant uteri. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004 May;10(5):339-46. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gah039. Epub 2004 Mar 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 18958771Liedman R, Hansson SR, Howe D, Igidbashian S, McLeod A, Russell RJ, Akerlund M. Reproductive hormones in plasma over the menstrual cycle in primary dysmenorrhea compared with healthy subjects. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008 Sep;24(9):508-13. doi: 10.1080/09513590802306218.
- Results publication: PubMed 22798632Zhu L, Li Y, Xu A. Influence of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on uterine peristalsis in infertile women. Hum Reprod. 2012 Sep;27(9):2684-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des257. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 12738502Ayoubi JM, Epiney M, Brioschi PA, Fanchin R, Chardonnens D, de Ziegler D. Comparison of changes in uterine contraction frequency after ovulation in the menstrual cycle and in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2003 May;79(5):1101-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00179-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 17481622Pierzynski P, Reinheimer TM, Kuczynski W. Oxytocin antagonists may improve infertility treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007 Jul;88(1):213.e19-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.017. Epub 2007 May 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 20638340Moraloglu O, Tonguc E, Var T, Zeyrek T, Batioglu S. Treatment with oxytocin antagonists before embryo transfer may increase implantation rates after IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Sep;21(3):338-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Apr 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Repeated Implantation Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Thymosin-α1 for Recurrent Implantation Failure
Recurrent Implantation Faliure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Endometrial Immune Profile in Recurrent Implantation Failure
Recurrent Implantation Failure, Infertility (IVF Patients)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Acupuncture Techniques on the Success Rate in Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure
Implantation Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing atosiban and 0.9% saline in people with Repeated Implantation Failure, run by Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhi Qin Chen, master (86-21-54035206 ext. 2078, ptchen1@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical pregnancy rate (time frame: 4 weeks after embryo transfer). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02893722, which also lists 22 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2016.