Hip OsteoarthritisHipOANCT02884531
Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy and Patient Education in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is rising in western countries due to an ageing population and the epidemic of obesity. Patients with hip OA tend to complain of hip pain and stiffness which affect alignment and mobility of the whole body and typically result in general musculoskeletal pain and disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy and Patient Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women and men with primary OA according to the American College of Rheumatology Clinical Criteria, living in Bergen or within a reasonable travelling distance (judged by the patients).
Who cannot join
- Other known major physical or mental problems or disease that precludes movement training and participation in an educational program, known drug abuse, not speaking or understanding Norwegian language, pregnancy 5-9 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessment and Treatment Responses to Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is rising in western countries due to an ageing population and the epidemic of obesity. Patients with hip OA tend to complain of hip pain and stiffness which affect alignment and mobility of the whole body and typically result in general musculoskeletal pain and disability. Clinical guidelines recommend a combination of exercise therapy, weight loss and education, adjusted to the individuals needs, to be tried out before arthroplasty eventually is offered. However, to obtain a satisfactory long-term outcome is a challenge as patients may not be motivated to comply with a training program including functional strength and mobility training, if not guided by a therapist. Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) may be an alternative training modality with a better potential for lasting effects. It is a low-impact movement therapy focusing on alignment of the body and quality of movements, implemented in daily life activities. In the BBAT learning process by doing, reflecting on and transferring body awareness into daily life movements, the investigators hypothesize that the patients will obtain self-efficacy and mastering, of importance for continued training on their own. This hypothesis will be examined in the present randomized controlled trial, comparing Patient Education combined with BBAT and Patient Education alone. The investigators will, accordingly, examine the supplementary effects of BBAT for patients with hip OA. They will also explore the importance of movement quality as observed by physiotherapist using Body Awareness Rating Scale, and how it relates to how patients perceive their movement performance. In the study the investigators will particularly address long-term effects of the intervention by comparing survival of the native hip in the two groups included in the study. Data from the study will be included in a national database of patients with non-surgical treatment of hip and knee OA (NOAR), giving rise to comparison of different movement therapies.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION Musculoskeletal disorders are reported to be the second largest contributor to years lived with disability worldwide, and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hips and knees among the most prevalent(1). The diagnosis of hip OA should be based on radiographic findings and symptomatic evidence (2), and a prevalence of 5.8% was reported in Norway (3). OA increases with age, every person over 60 years showing signs of osteoarthritis in at least one joint (3).
The dominant factors in OA pathogenesis is loss of articular cartilage accompanied by joint deformation, bone sclerosis, capsule shrinkage, muscle atrophy and varying degrees of synovitis (4). Physical activity is restricted by pain, and patients tend to become increasingly unfit with diminished muscle strength. Intra-articular changes are accompanied by compensatory adjustment in body posture and muscular tension, including a decrease of lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis and asymmetry of the pelvis and the trunk (5). Symptoms and compensational movement adjustments have consequences for patients' daily movement and functioning, social life and self-confidence (6). A substantial increase of primary hip insertions over the last 20 years is shown in Norway by data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (7). The 2014 Annual Report shows 8.099 primary hip prosthesis, and 1284 revisions, arthroplasty being more frequent in women than men (8). The risk for revisions has decreased over the years due to less aseptic loosening of prosthetic components (9), but infection is still a challenge (10).
The impact of being overweight or obese Being overweight or obese is increasingly recognized to be an important risk factor for OA in weight bearing joints (11,12). The evidence of association between obesity and development of hip OA is, however, conflicting (3,13,14). Reduction of body fat for overweight or obese people is still recommended in order to reduce both mechanical and biochemical stressors that contribute to joint degeneration (15-17).
Recommendations for non-surgical management of hip OA. There is insufficient high-quality evidence regarding non-pharmacological and nonsurgical interventions of hip OA (18-21), but clinical guidelines are rather similar in their recommendations (19,21,22).The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends a broad range of topics like patient education, lifestyle changes, exercise modalities, weight loss, assistive technologies and adaptations, footwear and work modification, along with a biopsychosocial approach to assessment and treatment and an individualized treatment plan (21).
Patient education (PE) Empowerment of the patients by information and counseling is an important element of an up-to-date conservative treatment plan. PE was developed in Sweden by Klässbo et al. (23) aiming to empower the patients, called Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis (BOA www.boaregistret.se). In Sweden PE is implemented all over the country, and participation is required before total hip arthroplasty is offered (Socialstyrelsen 2012). In Denmark, PE (Good Life with osteoarthritsis in Denmark, GLA:D (www.glaid.dk ) is combined with six weeks of individualized supervised neuromuscular exercise. Even better results were shown after this program regarding pain than after BOA (24). A study examining the supplementary effects of supervised exercise vs. education alone is presently carried out on patients with severe hip OA (25). A PE called ActiveA (active living with lower limb osteoarthritis) has also been tried out for patients with hip and knee OA in Oslo (26). PE based on ActiveA principles has now been established at "Lærings- og mestringssenteret", Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis from Hordaland County.
Exercise therapy in hip OA Underlying mechanisms of beneficial effects of non-surgical treatment of hip OA are scarcely understood. Irrespective of joint, there is no evidence for effect of exercise on the pathogenesis of OA (27). It is suggested that exercise works by stabilizing the surrounding musculature of the OA-affected joint. As muscle weakness disposes to osteoarthritis, exercises may halt the progression of the disease. Endurance training can enable the patient to manage weight loss, and improve general physical functioning. Beckwée et al. (28) proposed that neuromuscular, peri-articular, intra-articular, general fitness and health, and psychosocial components might explain exercise induced improvements of pain and function.The scientific evidence for recommending therapeutic exercises for hip OA has been examined in several systematic reviews and meta-analysis (18, 29-35). Strong evidence is claimed for beneficial effects of both land- and water based aerobic and strengthening exercise programs in adults with mild to moderate OA (35), but this applies mainly to short-term effects. Some RCTs were not able to show a difference in long-term change of pain between patients who received PE combined with traditional exercises or manual therapy, versus PE alone (36, 37) or sham therapy (38). Svege et al. (39) demonstrated, however, that PE and exercises combined might postpone arthroplasty.
Recommendations are made that therapeutic exercise programs for hip or knee OA should focus on strengthening of the entire lower limb and the use of non-weight bearing exercises are questioned (32). Neuromuscular training is recommended, aiming to restore neutral functional alignment of the lower extremities, by improving dynamic motor control and functional stability (24). Although physical exercise programs are primarily recommended for patients in the early phase of OA, there is presently moderate quality evidence that preoperative exercise improves function prior to and after THA (40, 41).
How can Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) have a beneficial effect in patients with hip OA?
Empowering the patient by movement awareness learning is considered important to transform dysfunctional movements into more functional movement habits (42-44). Concrete strategies are used in BBAT to improve quality of movement in daily life. Long-lasting conditions, such as hip OA, affect multiple aspects of a persons' ability to move and function. Integrated in the BBAT program are aspects from four perspectives of human movement; biomechanical, physiological, psych-socio-cultural and existential, and movement awareness is considered a prerequisite for movement quality. Basic elements in human movement such as relating to the ground and vertical axis, freeing the breathing and finding the appropriate amount of energy required for a task, are implemented in BBAT. Movements are carried out while lying, sitting, standing, walking and also in interplay with another person (45,46). Between the Basic Body Awareness Therapy sessions, the patients are encouraged to practice movements by a) implementing the training program at home, and b) implementing quality of movements into daily life situations.
BBAT is organized as a group intervention (47, 48), and the focus is on the participants' own search for more optimal balance, core stability, free breathing and awareness, addressing movement coordination of the whole body. Evaluation of the therapy progress is done continuously by the physiotherapist together with the patients.
Pilot study A pilot study of seven patients with hip OA, taking part in Patient Education (2 hours) and Basic Body Awareness Therapy (12 times 1.5 hours weekly), was undertaken in 2014. After four months, four of seven patients demonstrated clinical significant less pain during walking. At follow-up six months later, three of five patients still reported clinical significant less pain during walking (two drop-outs unrelated to hip problem). One patient reported to be unchanged and one worse, both having minimum joint space = 0. Only the patient who reported to be worse was motivated for surgery after 10 months.
Aim for the RCT study:
To examine the supplementary effect of BBAT in patients with hip OA, by comparing the effect of Patient Education alone with Patient Education and BBAT combined.
METHOD Design The randomized controlled trial will include patients with primary hip OA randomized to one of two study arms; 1) Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy, or 2) Patient Education only.
Participants Patients with verified hip OA (by x-rays and clinical symptoms) are recruited among patients who are referred from Primary Health Care to Orthopedic department at Haukeland University Hospital to participate in Patient Education at "Lærings- og mestringssenteret". Written informed consent is a prerequisite for participation.
Sample size Pain by Numeric Rating Scale (scale 0-100): The expected difference in change between the groups is 17 points on the 0-100 Numeric Rating Scale, which is considered the minimum important difference in improvement (53). Based on a previous study (54), the investigators assume a between-participant standard deviation of change of 30 points. The required sample size, with 80% power and type I error of 0.05 is 44 in each group. Allowing for a 15% drop-out, a total of 100 patients is required.
Disability by the HOOS ADL subscale (0-100): Seventy four patients are needed to detect a clinically significant change of 10 points on the HOOS ADL subscale with SD=30, power=0.80 and alpha= 0.05 (55).100 patients will accordingly be a sufficient sample size for HOOS.
Randomization and blinding: A computer-generated block randomization schedule is used to allocate participants into one of two groups after 1) given written informed consent to participate in the study, 2) having filled in questionnaires and been tested by a blinded assessor, and 3) having participated PE. A research coordinator not involved in the randomization procedure, prepares opaque envelopes with allocation to groups.
Interventions Patient Education: The overall focus of Patient Education is empowerment of the patients by increasing their knowledge of the hip OA condition and learning how to deal with it. The patients' own experiences with hip OA and active sharing in the group will be in the forefront. Basic Body awareness Therapy (BBAT): BBAT will be implemented as a group therapy (48). A group will include 5-10 patients, be led by a specialist physiotherapist qualified in BBAT, and offered once a week. Each session last for 90 minutes, and includes movement practice (70 minutes) followed by talk (20 minutes) to let the group members share movement experiences. The participants are consecutively admitted to the class, and participate in 12 sessions. In this way experienced participants will share experiences and motivate novices. BBAT will be offered as group therapy in Primary Health Care.
Analysis of RCT: Comparison of change between the randomized groups will be performed by linear regression (ANCOVA) analysis, controlling for baseline scores. Per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.
Ethical considerations: The project is conducted in conformity with the "Declaration of Helsinki". Approval from the Regional Ethical Committee was recived in September 2015.
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy, Patient Education
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness TherapyOther
Also called PE and BBAT
Patient education (1/2 day) and a Physiotherapy movement modality (12 times, once a week)
Patient EducationBehavioural
Also called PE
Patient education (1/2 day)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Education and BBAT | Experimental | Patients will participate in Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy Receives: Other: Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy; Behavioral: Patient Education |
| Patient Education | Active comparator | Patients will only participate in Patient Education Receives: Behavioral: Patient Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Rating Scale, change in pain
Pain intensity during walking
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), change in ADL
Self-reported disability
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Assesses hip disabilities and effect of treatment on four domains
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
The EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)
A generic health index comprising a five-part questionnaire and a visual analogue self-rating scale
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (ASES)
A questionnaire about self-efficacy regarding pain and symptoms
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Assesses the patients' own impression of change over time
Measured: 4 months and 1 year
6-minutes walking - test
Walking distance (inside) during the time limit of 6 minutes
Measured: Baseline, 4 months
Chair test.
The patient repeats rising up from a chair and sitting down during 30 seconds and the number is counted
Measured: Baseline, 4 months
Stairs test.
The number of seconds used to walk up and down 18 steps x 3 is measured
Measured: Baseline, 4 months
Body Awareness Rating Scale (BARS)
Consists of two assessment parts: 1) observation and assessment of movement quality based on 12 movements and 2) interview with the patient about movement awareness immediately after exploring each movement.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months
UCLA Activity Score
Assesses degree of Activity on ordinal scale
Measured: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionJan 2019
- Study completionJan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (57)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A blinded RCT
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bergen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen University College
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Liv Inger Strand, University of Bergen
- Investigators
- Liv I Strand, Dr.philos., Principal investigator, University of Bergen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884531
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hip osteoarthritis RCT
- Acronym
- HipOA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: After the RCT has been completed, the plan is to enter data in a national register for patients with osteoarthritis, NOAR. The patients give their consent to this.
Publications
Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Nov;19(11):1270-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
PubMed 21907813Grotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK. Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand: an epidemiological study in the general population with 10 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 2;9:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-132.
PubMed 18831740Veje K, Hyllested JL, Ostergaard K. [Osteoarthritis. Pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jun 10;164(24):3173-9. Danish.
PubMed 12082761Truszczynska A, Drzal-Grabiec J, Rapala K, Tarnowski A, Gorniak K, Bialecki J. Characteristics of selected parameters of body posture in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):351-60. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1112959.
PubMed 25058110Dosanjh S, Matta JM, Bhandari M; Anterior THA Research Collaborative. The final straw: a qualitative study to explore patient decisions to undergo total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jun;129(6):719-27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0671-1. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
PubMed 18560849Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip arthroplasty in Norway 1989-2008. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Aug 23;131(16):1543-8. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1091. English, Norwegian.
PubMed 21866193Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O. Improved results of primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):649-59. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537807.
PubMed 21110699Dale H, Fenstad AM, Hallan G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela K, Engesaeter LB. Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):449-58. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733918.
PubMed 23083433Jiang L, Rong J, Wang Y, Hu F, Bao C, Li X, Zhao Y. The relationship between body mass index and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Mar;78(2):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PubMed 20580591Viester L, Verhagen EA, Oude Hengel KM, Koppes LL, van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM. The relation between body mass index and musculoskeletal symptoms in the working population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 12;14:238. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-238.
PubMed 23937768Apold H, Meyer HE, Espehaug B, Nordsletten L, Havelin LI, Flugsrud GB. Weight gain and the risk of total hip replacement a population-based prospective cohort study of 265,725 individuals. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):809-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
PubMed 21524707Mork PJ, Holtermann A, Nilsen TI. Effect of body mass index and physical exercise on risk of knee and hip osteoarthritis: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):678-83. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200834. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
PubMed 22511797Vincent HK, Heywood K, Connelly J, Hurley RW. Obesity and weight loss in the treatment and prevention of osteoarthritis. PM R. 2012 May;4(5 Suppl):S59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.005.
PubMed 22632704Paans N, van den Akker-Scheek I, Dilling RG, Bos M, van der Meer K, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. Effect of exercise and weight loss in people who have hip osteoarthritis and are overweight or obese: a prospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2013 Feb;93(2):137-46. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110418. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
PubMed 23023813Scotece M, Conde J, Gomez R, Lopez V, Lago F, Gomez-Reino JJ, Gualillo O. Beyond fat mass: exploring the role of adipokines in rheumatic diseases. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011;11:1932-47. doi: 10.1100/2011/290142. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
PubMed 22194660
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment and Treatment Responses to Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy in Hip Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02884531
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HipOA / Hip osteoarthritis RCT
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BergenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen University College
- Study start
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The incidence of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is rising in western countries due to an ageing population and the epidemic of obesity. Patients with hip OA tend to complain of hip pain and stiffness which affect alignment and mobility of the whole body and typically result in general musculoskeletal pain and disability. Clinical guidelines recommend a combination of exercise therapy, weight loss and education, adjusted to the individuals needs, to be tried out before arthroplasty eventually is offered. However, to obtain a satisfactory long-term outcome is a challenge as patients may not be motivated to comply with a training program including functional strength and mobility training, if not guided by a therapist. Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) may be an alternative training modality with a better potential for lasting effects. It is a low-impact movement therapy focusing on alignment of the body and quality of movements, implemented in daily life activities. In the BBAT learning process by doing, reflecting on and transferring body awareness into daily life movements, the investigators hypothesize that the patients will obtain self-efficacy and mastering, of importance for continued training on their own. This hypothesis will be examined in the present randomized controlled trial, comparing Patient Education combined with BBAT and Patient Education alone. The investigators will, accordingly, examine the supplementary effects of BBAT for patients with hip OA. They will also explore the importance of movement quality as observed by physiotherapist using Body Awareness Rating Scale, and how it relates to how patients perceive their movement performance. In the study the investigators will particularly address long-term effects of the intervention by comparing survival of the native hip in the two groups included in the study. Data from the study will be included in a national database of patients with non-surgical treatment of hip and knee OA (NOAR), giving rise to comparison of different movement therapies.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION Musculoskeletal disorders are reported to be the second largest contributor to years lived with disability worldwide, and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hips and knees among the most prevalent(1). The diagnosis of hip OA should be based on radiographic findings and symptomatic evidence (2), and a prevalence of 5.8% was reported in Norway (3). OA increases with age, every person over 60 years showing signs of osteoarthritis in at least one joint (3).
The dominant factors in OA pathogenesis is loss of articular cartilage accompanied by joint deformation, bone sclerosis, capsule shrinkage, muscle atrophy and varying degrees of synovitis (4). Physical activity is restricted by pain, and patients tend to become increasingly unfit with diminished muscle strength. Intra-articular changes are accompanied by compensatory adjustment in body posture and muscular tension, including a decrease of lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis and asymmetry of the pelvis and the trunk (5). Symptoms and compensational movement adjustments have consequences for patients' daily movement and functioning, social life and self-confidence (6). A substantial increase of primary hip insertions over the last 20 years is shown in Norway by data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (7). The 2014 Annual Report shows 8.099 primary hip prosthesis, and 1284 revisions, arthroplasty being more frequent in women than men (8). The risk for revisions has decreased over the years due to less aseptic loosening of prosthetic components (9), but infection is still a challenge (10).
The impact of being overweight or obese Being overweight or obese is increasingly recognized to be an important risk factor for OA in weight bearing joints (11,12). The evidence of association between obesity and development of hip OA is, however, conflicting (3,13,14). Reduction of body fat for overweight or obese people is still recommended in order to reduce both mechanical and biochemical stressors that contribute to joint degeneration (15-17).
Recommendations for non-surgical management of hip OA. There is insufficient high-quality evidence regarding non-pharmacological and nonsurgical interventions of hip OA (18-21), but clinical guidelines are rather similar in their recommendations (19,21,22).The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends a broad range of topics like patient education, lifestyle changes, exercise modalities, weight loss, assistive technologies and adaptations, footwear and work modification, along with a biopsychosocial approach to assessment and treatment and an individualized treatment plan (21).
Patient education (PE) Empowerment of the patients by information and counseling is an important element of an up-to-date conservative treatment plan. PE was developed in Sweden by Klässbo et al. (23) aiming to empower the patients, called Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis (BOA www.boaregistret.se). In Sweden PE is implemented all over the country, and participation is required before total hip arthroplasty is offered (Socialstyrelsen 2012). In Denmark, PE (Good Life with osteoarthritsis in Denmark, GLA:D (www.glaid.dk ) is combined with six weeks of individualized supervised neuromuscular exercise. Even better results were shown after this program regarding pain than after BOA (24). A study examining the supplementary effects of supervised exercise vs. education alone is presently carried out on patients with severe hip OA (25). A PE called ActiveA (active living with lower limb osteoarthritis) has also been tried out for patients with hip and knee OA in Oslo (26). PE based on ActiveA principles has now been established at "Lærings- og mestringssenteret", Haukeland University Hospital (HUS) for patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis from Hordaland County.
Exercise therapy in hip OA Underlying mechanisms of beneficial effects of non-surgical treatment of hip OA are scarcely understood. Irrespective of joint, there is no evidence for effect of exercise on the pathogenesis of OA (27). It is suggested that exercise works by stabilizing the surrounding musculature of the OA-affected joint. As muscle weakness disposes to osteoarthritis, exercises may halt the progression of the disease. Endurance training can enable the patient to manage weight loss, and improve general physical functioning. Beckwée et al. (28) proposed that neuromuscular, peri-articular, intra-articular, general fitness and health, and psychosocial components might explain exercise induced improvements of pain and function.The scientific evidence for recommending therapeutic exercises for hip OA has been examined in several systematic reviews and meta-analysis (18, 29-35). Strong evidence is claimed for beneficial effects of both land- and water based aerobic and strengthening exercise programs in adults with mild to moderate OA (35), but this applies mainly to short-term effects. Some RCTs were not able to show a difference in long-term change of pain between patients who received PE combined with traditional exercises or manual therapy, versus PE alone (36, 37) or sham therapy (38). Svege et al. (39) demonstrated, however, that PE and exercises combined might postpone arthroplasty.
Recommendations are made that therapeutic exercise programs for hip or knee OA should focus on strengthening of the entire lower limb and the use of non-weight bearing exercises are questioned (32). Neuromuscular training is recommended, aiming to restore neutral functional alignment of the lower extremities, by improving dynamic motor control and functional stability (24). Although physical exercise programs are primarily recommended for patients in the early phase of OA, there is presently moderate quality evidence that preoperative exercise improves function prior to and after THA (40, 41).
How can Basic Body Awareness Therapy (BBAT) have a beneficial effect in patients with hip OA?
Empowering the patient by movement awareness learning is considered important to transform dysfunctional movements into more functional movement habits (42-44). Concrete strategies are used in BBAT to improve quality of movement in daily life. Long-lasting conditions, such as hip OA, affect multiple aspects of a persons' ability to move and function. Integrated in the BBAT program are aspects from four perspectives of human movement; biomechanical, physiological, psych-socio-cultural and existential, and movement awareness is considered a prerequisite for movement quality. Basic elements in human movement such as relating to the ground and vertical axis, freeing the breathing and finding the appropriate amount of energy required for a task, are implemented in BBAT. Movements are carried out while lying, sitting, standing, walking and also in interplay with another person (45,46). Between the Basic Body Awareness Therapy sessions, the patients are encouraged to practice movements by a) implementing the training program at home, and b) implementing quality of movements into daily life situations.
BBAT is organized as a group intervention (47, 48), and the focus is on the participants' own search for more optimal balance, core stability, free breathing and awareness, addressing movement coordination of the whole body. Evaluation of the therapy progress is done continuously by the physiotherapist together with the patients.
Pilot study A pilot study of seven patients with hip OA, taking part in Patient Education (2 hours) and Basic Body Awareness Therapy (12 times 1.5 hours weekly), was undertaken in 2014. After four months, four of seven patients demonstrated clinical significant less pain during walking. At follow-up six months later, three of five patients still reported clinical significant less pain during walking (two drop-outs unrelated to hip problem). One patient reported to be unchanged and one worse, both having minimum joint space = 0. Only the patient who reported to be worse was motivated for surgery after 10 months.
Aim for the RCT study:
To examine the supplementary effect of BBAT in patients with hip OA, by comparing the effect of Patient Education alone with Patient Education and BBAT combined.
METHOD Design The randomized controlled trial will include patients with primary hip OA randomized to one of two study arms; 1) Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy, or 2) Patient Education only.
Participants Patients with verified hip OA (by x-rays and clinical symptoms) are recruited among patients who are referred from Primary Health Care to Orthopedic department at Haukeland University Hospital to participate in Patient Education at "Lærings- og mestringssenteret". Written informed consent is a prerequisite for participation.
Sample size Pain by Numeric Rating Scale (scale 0-100): The expected difference in change between the groups is 17 points on the 0-100 Numeric Rating Scale, which is considered the minimum important difference in improvement (53). Based on a previous study (54), the investigators assume a between-participant standard deviation of change of 30 points. The required sample size, with 80% power and type I error of 0.05 is 44 in each group. Allowing for a 15% drop-out, a total of 100 patients is required.
Disability by the HOOS ADL subscale (0-100): Seventy four patients are needed to detect a clinically significant change of 10 points on the HOOS ADL subscale with SD=30, power=0.80 and alpha= 0.05 (55).100 patients will accordingly be a sufficient sample size for HOOS.
Randomization and blinding: A computer-generated block randomization schedule is used to allocate participants into one of two groups after 1) given written informed consent to participate in the study, 2) having filled in questionnaires and been tested by a blinded assessor, and 3) having participated PE. A research coordinator not involved in the randomization procedure, prepares opaque envelopes with allocation to groups.
Interventions Patient Education: The overall focus of Patient Education is empowerment of the patients by increasing their knowledge of the hip OA condition and learning how to deal with it. The patients' own experiences with hip OA and active sharing in the group will be in the forefront. Basic Body awareness Therapy (BBAT): BBAT will be implemented as a group therapy (48). A group will include 5-10 patients, be led by a specialist physiotherapist qualified in BBAT, and offered once a week. Each session last for 90 minutes, and includes movement practice (70 minutes) followed by talk (20 minutes) to let the group members share movement experiences. The participants are consecutively admitted to the class, and participate in 12 sessions. In this way experienced participants will share experiences and motivate novices. BBAT will be offered as group therapy in Primary Health Care.
Analysis of RCT: Comparison of change between the randomized groups will be performed by linear regression (ANCOVA) analysis, controlling for baseline scores. Per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.
Ethical considerations: The project is conducted in conformity with the "Declaration of Helsinki". Approval from the Regional Ethical Committee was recived in September 2015.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A blinded RCT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Education and BBAT | Experimental | Other: Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy, Behavioral: Patient EducationPatients will participate in Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy |
| Patient Education | Active comparator | Behavioral: Patient EducationPatients will only participate in Patient Education |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women and men with primary OA according to the American College of Rheumatology Clinical Criteria, living in Bergen or within a reasonable travelling distance (judged by the patients).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Other known major physical or mental problems or disease that precludes movement training and participation in an educational program, known drug abuse, not speaking or understanding Norwegian language, pregnancy 5-9 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness TherapyAlso: PE and BBATPatient education (1/2 day) and a Physiotherapy movement modality (12 times, once a week) | Other | Patient Education and BBAT |
| Patient EducationAlso: PEPatient education (1/2 day) | Behavioural | Patient Education, Patient Education and BBAT |
Primary outcome
Numeric Rating Scale, change in pain
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Pain intensity during walking
Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), change in ADL
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Self-reported disability
9 secondary outcomes
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
The EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale (ASES)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: 4 months and 1 year
6-minutes walking - test
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months
Chair test.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months
Stairs test.
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months
Body Awareness Rating Scale (BARS)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months
UCLA Activity Score
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21907813Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Nov;19(11):1270-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
- Background: PubMed 18831740Grotle M, Hagen KB, Natvig B, Dahl FA, Kvien TK. Obesity and osteoarthritis in knee, hip and/or hand: an epidemiological study in the general population with 10 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Oct 2;9:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-132.
- Background: PubMed 12082761Veje K, Hyllested JL, Ostergaard K. [Osteoarthritis. Pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2002 Jun 10;164(24):3173-9. Danish.
- Background: PubMed 25058110Truszczynska A, Drzal-Grabiec J, Rapala K, Tarnowski A, Gorniak K, Bialecki J. Characteristics of selected parameters of body posture in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):351-60. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1112959.
- Background: PubMed 18560849Dosanjh S, Matta JM, Bhandari M; Anterior THA Research Collaborative. The final straw: a qualitative study to explore patient decisions to undergo total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jun;129(6):719-27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0671-1. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 21866193Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip arthroplasty in Norway 1989-2008. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2011 Aug 23;131(16):1543-8. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.1091. English, Norwegian.
- Background: PubMed 21110699Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O. Improved results of primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop. 2010 Dec;81(6):649-59. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.537807.
- Background: PubMed 23083433Dale H, Fenstad AM, Hallan G, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB, Karrholm J, Garellick G, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela K, Engesaeter LB. Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):449-58. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733918.
- Background: PubMed 20580591Jiang L, Rong J, Wang Y, Hu F, Bao C, Li X, Zhao Y. The relationship between body mass index and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Mar;78(2):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 23937768Viester L, Verhagen EA, Oude Hengel KM, Koppes LL, van der Beek AJ, Bongers PM. The relation between body mass index and musculoskeletal symptoms in the working population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Aug 12;14:238. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-238.
- Background: PubMed 21524707Apold H, Meyer HE, Espehaug B, Nordsletten L, Havelin LI, Flugsrud GB. Weight gain and the risk of total hip replacement a population-based prospective cohort study of 265,725 individuals. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):809-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.03.013. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
- Background: PubMed 22511797Mork PJ, Holtermann A, Nilsen TI. Effect of body mass index and physical exercise on risk of knee and hip osteoarthritis: longitudinal data from the Norwegian HUNT Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):678-83. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200834. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. After the RCT has been completed, the plan is to enter data in a national register for patients with osteoarthritis, NOAR. The patients give their consent to this.
Related trials for Hip Osteoarthritis
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Effects of EDUcation and EXercise Compared to Education Alone on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Liv I Strand, Dr.philos. principal investigator
University of Bergen
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patient Education and Basic Body Awareness Therapy and Patient Education in people with Hip Osteoarthritis, run by University of Bergen at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric Rating Scale, change in pain (time frame: Baseline, 4 months and 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02884531, which also lists 57 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2019.