AnaemiaPhase 3NCT02879305
Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Dialysis (ASCEND-D)
A Phase 3 study testing Daprodustat, rhEPO and Iron therapy in people with Anaemia and Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 462 sites in 35 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this multi-center event-driven study in participants with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daprodustat. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anaemia, Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary
- What is being tested?
- Daprodustat, rhEPO and Iron therapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2,964 participants
- Where
- 462 sitesin 35 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2016to 9 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 18 to 99 years of age (inclusive).
- Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs): Use of any approved ESA for at least the 6 weeks prior to screening and between screening and randomization.
- Hgb concentration: On Week -8: Hgb 8 to 12 grams per deciliter (g/dL). On randomization (Day 1): Hgb 8 to 11 g/dL and receiving at least the minimum ESA dose. Hgb >11 g/dL to 11.5 g/dL and receiving greater than the minimum ESA dose.
- Dialysis: On dialysis >90 days prior to screening and continuing on the same mode of dialysis from screening (Week -8) through to randomization (Day 1).
- Frequency of Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) >=2 times/week and peritoneal dialysis (PD) >=5 times/week. Home hemodialysis >=2 times/week.
- Compliance with placebo [randomization (Day 1) only]: >=80% and <=120% compliance with placebo during run-in period.
- Informed consent (screening only): capable of giving signed informed consent which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form and in this protocol.
Who cannot join
- Kidney transplant: Planned living-related or living-unrelated kidney transplant within 52 weeks after study start (Day 1).
- Ferritin: <=100 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (<=100 micrograms/liter [L]) at screening.
- Transferrin saturation (TSAT) (screening only): <=20%.
- Aplasias: History of bone marrow aplasia or pure red cell aplasia.
- Other causes of anemia: Untreated Pernicious anemia, thalassemia major, sickle cell disease or myelodysplastic syndrome.
- Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding: Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal, or esophageal ulcer disease or clinically significant GI bleeding <=4 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
Show all 21Show fewer
- MI or acute coronary syndrome: <=4 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack: <=4 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
- Heart failure (HF): Chronic Class IV HF, as defined by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system.
- Current uncontrolled hypertension: Current uncontrolled hypertension as determined by the investigator that would contraindicate the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO).
- Bazett's corrected QT interval (QTcB) (Day 1): QTcB >500 millisecond (msec), or QTcB >530 msec in subjects with bundle branch block. There is no QT Interval Corrected for Heart Rate (QTc) exclusion for subjects with a predominantly ventricular paced rhythm.
- Alanine transaminase (ALT): >2x upper limit of normal (ULN) at screening.
- Bilirubin: >1.5xULN at screening.
- Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment, generally defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
- Malignancy: History of malignancy within the 2 years prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1) or currently receiving treatment for cancer, or complex kidney cyst (example [e.g.] Bosniak Category II F, III or IV) > 3 centimeter (cm); with the exception of localized squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitively treated >=4 weeks prior to screening.
- Severe allergic reactions: History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or hypersensitivity to excipients in the investigational product, or epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa.
- Drugs and supplements: Use of strong inhibitors of Cytochrome P4502C8 (CYP2C8) (e.g., gemfibrozil) or strong inducers of CYP2C8 (e.g., rifampin/rifampicin).
- Other study participation: Use of other investigational agent or device prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
- Prior treatment with daprodustat: Any prior treatment with daprodustat for treatment duration of >30 days.
- Females only: Subject is pregnant [as confirmed by a positive serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test for females of reproductive potential (FRP) only], subject is breastfeeding, or subject is of reproductive potential and does not agree to follow one of the contraceptive options listed in the List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy.
- Other Conditions: Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator considers would put the subject at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance (e.g., intolerance to rhEPO) or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
462 sites in 35 countries.
462 sites in 35 countries
United States126 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alexandria, Virginia, 22304
GSK Investigational Site
Anaheim, California, 92801
GSK Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
GSK Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30904
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
GSK Investigational Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
GSK Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, 93308
GSK Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, 93309
GSK Investigational Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
GSK Investigational Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70836
GSK Investigational Site
Beaumont, Texas, 77701
GSK Investigational Site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18017
GSK Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
GSK Investigational Site
Bluefield, West Virginia, 24701
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
GSK Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215
GSK Investigational Site
Canton, Ohio, 44718
GSK Investigational Site
Cerritos, California, 90703
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
GSK Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
GSK Investigational Site
Clyde, North Carolina, 28721
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
GSK Investigational Site
Coral Gables, Florida, 33134
GSK Investigational Site
Cordova, Tennessee, 38018
GSK Investigational Site
Crystal Lake, Illinois, 60014
GSK Investigational Site
El Centro, California, 92243
GSK Investigational Site
Escondido, California, 92025
GSK Investigational Site
Fairfax, Virginia, 22033
GSK Investigational Site
Fairfield, California, 94534
GSK Investigational Site
Florissant, Missouri, 63033
GSK Investigational Site
Flushing, New York, 11355
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804
GSK Investigational Site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
GSK Investigational Site
Gallup, New Mexico, 87301
GSK Investigational Site
Glendale, California, 91205
GSK Investigational Site
Granada Hills, California, 91344
GSK Investigational Site
Greenbelt, Maryland, 20770
GSK Investigational Site
Gulfport, Mississippi, 39501
GSK Investigational Site
Hacienda Heights, California, 91745
GSK Investigational Site
Hampton, Virginia, 23666
GSK Investigational Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33024
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77004
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77099
GSK Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35805
GSK Investigational Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
GSK Investigational Site
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
GSK Investigational Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
GSK Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923
GSK Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37924
GSK Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
GSK Investigational Site
La Palma, California, 90623
GSK Investigational Site
Lakewood, California, 90712
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89107
GSK Investigational Site
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33313
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90806
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90807
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90813
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90022
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
GSK Investigational Site
Lufkin, Texas, 75904
GSK Investigational Site
Lynwood, California, 60262
GSK Investigational Site
Meridian, Idaho, 83642
GSK Investigational Site
Merrillville, Indiana, 46410
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33126
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33143
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33150
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33156
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Gardens, Florida, 33169
GSK Investigational Site
Michigan City, Indiana, 46360
GSK Investigational Site
Middlebury, Connecticut, 06762
GSK Investigational Site
Mineola, New York, 11501
GSK Investigational Site
Montebello, California, 90640
GSK Investigational Site
Monterey Park, California, 91754
GSK Investigational Site
Moreno Valley, California, 92553
GSK Investigational Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10029
GSK Investigational Site
Norco, California, 92860
GSK Investigational Site
Northridge, California, 91324
GSK Investigational Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471
GSK Investigational Site
Ontario, California, 91762
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
GSK Investigational Site
Pine Bluff, Arkansas, 71603
GSK Investigational Site
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341
GSK Investigational Site
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33952
GSK Investigational Site
Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 3801
GSK Investigational Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
GSK Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609
GSK Investigational Site
Ridgewood, New York, 11385
GSK Investigational Site
Riverside, California, 92501
GSK Investigational Site
Roseburg, Oregon, 97471
GSK Investigational Site
Roseville, Michigan, 48066
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
GSK Investigational Site
Salem, Virginia, 24153
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78207
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78221
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78251
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92111
GSK Investigational Site
San Luis Obispo, California, 93405
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Clarita, California, 91387
GSK Investigational Site
Shorewood, Wisconsin, 53211
GSK Investigational Site
Simi Valley, California, 93065-091
GSK Investigational Site
Spring Hill, Florida, 34608
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
GSK Investigational Site
Sumter, South Carolina, 29150
GSK Investigational Site
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912-6385
GSK Investigational Site
Tarzana, California, 91356
GSK Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, 10461
GSK Investigational Site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
GSK Investigational Site
Whittier, California, 90602
GSK Investigational Site
Whittier, California, 90603
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27517
GSK Investigational Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
GSK Investigational Site
Yonkers, New York, 10710
GSK Investigational Site
Yorba Linda, California, 92886
South Korea21 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068
GSK Investigational Site
Bucheon-si, 14647
GSK Investigational Site
Busan, 48108
GSK Investigational Site
Daegu, 42601
GSK Investigational Site
Daejeon, 35233
GSK Investigational Site
Goyang-si, 10475
GSK Investigational Site
Goyang-si, 410-719
GSK Investigational Site
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 411706
GSK Investigational Site
Gyeonggi-do, 463-707
GSK Investigational Site
Incheon, 405-760
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 05030
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 05355
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 07061
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 07441
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 134-727
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 135-720
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 150-713
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 158-710
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon, 442-723
GSK Investigational Site
Uijeongbu-si, 11765
GSK Investigational Site
Wŏnju, 26426
Spain21 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alcalá de Henares, 28805
GSK Investigational Site
Aranda de Duero, 09400
GSK Investigational Site
Badalona, 08036
GSK Investigational Site
Badalona, 08916
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08003
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08025
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Real, 13005
GSK Investigational Site
Girona, 17007
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, 19002
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28007
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28020
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28040
GSK Investigational Site
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
GSK Investigational Site
Málaga, 29530
GSK Investigational Site
Manises (Valencia), 46940
GSK Investigational Site
Mollet del Vallès, 08100
GSK Investigational Site
Palma de Mallorca, 07120
GSK Investigational Site
Sabadell, 08208
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
GSK Investigational Site
Seville, 41071
GSK Investigational Site
Valladolid, 47005
India20 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ahmedabad, 380059
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560054
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560055
GSK Investigational Site
Calicut, 673008
GSK Investigational Site
Chennai, 600 034
GSK Investigational Site
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 006
GSK Investigational Site
Delhi, 110076
GSK Investigational Site
Gūrgaon, 122001
GSK Investigational Site
Hyderabad, 500034
GSK Investigational Site
Jaipur, 302004
GSK Investigational Site
Mumbai, 400016
GSK Investigational Site
Nadiād, 387001
GSK Investigational Site
Nagpur, 440010
GSK Investigational Site
New Delhi, 110017
GSK Investigational Site
New Delhi, 110025
GSK Investigational Site
New Delhi, 110060
GSK Investigational Site
Pune, 411004
GSK Investigational Site
Pune, 411033
GSK Investigational Site
Secunderabad, 560020
GSK Investigational Site
Trivandrum, 695011
Australia16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Birtinya, Queensland, 4575
GSK Investigational Site
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
GSK Investigational Site
Concord, New South Wales, 2139
GSK Investigational Site
Herston, Queensland, 4006
GSK Investigational Site
Kingswood, New South Wales, 2750
GSK Investigational Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
GSK Investigational Site
Murdoch, 6150
GSK Investigational Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
GSK Investigational Site
St Albans, Victoria, 3021
GSK Investigational Site
St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065
GSK Investigational Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
GSK Investigational Site
Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500
GSK Investigational Site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Brazil16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221
GSK Investigational Site
Curitiba, Paraná, 80440-020
GSK Investigational Site
Curitiba, Paraná, CEP 80230-130
GSK Investigational Site
Feira de Santana, 44001-584
GSK Investigational Site
Joinville, Santa Catarina, 89227-680
GSK Investigational Site
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010-080
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, 90035-070
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, 90035-903
GSK Investigational Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40415-065
GSK Investigational Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090-000
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 01323-001
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 01323903
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 04005-000
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 04039-000
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 08270-070
Bulgaria16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Blagoevgrad, 2700
GSK Investigational Site
Dobrich, 9300
GSK Investigational Site
Gabrovo, 5300
GSK Investigational Site
Lom, 3600
GSK Investigational Site
Lovech, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Montana, 3400
GSK Investigational Site
Pazardzhik, 4400
GSK Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4000
GSK Investigational Site
Plovdiv, 4003
GSK Investigational Site
Rousse, 7002
GSK Investigational Site
Smolyan, 4700
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1233
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1309
GSK Investigational Site
Sofia, 1709
GSK Investigational Site
Varna, 9000
GSK Investigational Site
Veliko Tarnovo, 5000
Italy16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bergamo, Lombardy, 24127
GSK Investigational Site
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09100
GSK Investigational Site
Catanzaro, Calabria, 88100
GSK Investigational Site
Foggia, Apulia, 71100
GSK Investigational Site
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
GSK Investigational Site
Imola, 40026
GSK Investigational Site
Lecco, Lombardy, 23900
GSK Investigational Site
Mestre, 30122
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20153
GSK Investigational Site
Monza, Lombardy, 20900
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Pavia, Lombardy, 27100
GSK Investigational Site
Piacenza, Emilia-Romagna, 29100
GSK Investigational Site
Reggio Calabria, Calabria, 89124
GSK Investigational Site
Seriate, Lombardy, 24068
GSK Investigational Site
Turin, Piedmont, 10154
Russia14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Irkutsk, 664049
GSK Investigational Site
Krasnodar, 350029
GSK Investigational Site
Mytischi, 141009
GSK Investigational Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603126
GSK Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630087
GSK Investigational Site
Omsk, 644112
GSK Investigational Site
Orenburg, 460040
GSK Investigational Site
Penza, 440034
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 191104
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 194354
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 196247
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 197110
GSK Investigational Site
Volzhsky, 404120
GSK Investigational Site
Yaroslavl, 150062
United Kingdom14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, B9 5SS
GSK Investigational Site
Derby, DE22 3NE
GSK Investigational Site
Doncaster, DN2 5LT
GSK Investigational Site
Dundee, DD1 9SY
GSK Investigational Site
Fife, KY2 5AH
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow, G51 4TF
GSK Investigational Site
Hull, HU3 2JZ
GSK Investigational Site
London, E1 1BB
GSK Investigational Site
London, SE5 9RS
GSK Investigational Site
Oxford, OX3 7LE
GSK Investigational Site
Preston, Lancashire, PR2 9HT
GSK Investigational Site
Salford, M6 8HD
GSK Investigational Site
Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 4AB
GSK Investigational Site
Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 0QP
Greece13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alexandroupoli, 68100
GSK Investigational Site
Arta, 471 00
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 11527
GSK Investigational Site
Heraklion-Crete, 71110
GSK Investigational Site
Ioannina, 45001
GSK Investigational Site
Ioannina, 45500
GSK Investigational Site
Komotini, 69100
GSK Investigational Site
Larissa, 41110
GSK Investigational Site
Pátrai, 26500
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 546 42
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 54636
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 56403
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 57001
Mexico13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aguascalientes, 20230
GSK Investigational Site
Chihuahua City, 31203
GSK Investigational Site
Chihuahua City, 31217
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad de México, State of Mexico, 14000
GSK Investigational Site
Cuautitlán Izcalli, State of Mexico, 54769
GSK Investigational Site
Durango, Durango, 34000
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44620
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44650
GSK Investigational Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
GSK Investigational Site
México, D.F., 14080
GSK Investigational Site
Querétaro City, Querétaro, 76000
GSK Investigational Site
Saltillo, Coahuila, CP 25230
GSK Investigational Site
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45030
Poland13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Biała Podlaska, 21-500
GSK Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-462
GSK Investigational Site
Grójec, 05-600
GSK Investigational Site
Kielce, 25-736
GSK Investigational Site
Koło, 62-600
GSK Investigational Site
Kołobrzeg, 78-100
GSK Investigational Site
Lodz, 90-262
GSK Investigational Site
Lodz, 92-213
GSK Investigational Site
Olkusz, 32-300
GSK Investigational Site
Pruszków, 05-800
GSK Investigational Site
Tomaszów Mazowiecki, 97-200
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 02-758
GSK Investigational Site
Żary, 68-200
Ukraine13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chernihiv, 14029
GSK Investigational Site
Chernivtsi, 58005
GSK Investigational Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, 76008
GSK Investigational Site
Kherson, 73039
GSK Investigational Site
Kiev, 04107
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 01023
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 04050
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 04112
GSK Investigational Site
Mykolaiv, 54058
GSK Investigational Site
Ternopil, 46002
GSK Investigational Site
Zaporizhzhya, 69001
GSK Investigational Site
Zaporizhzhya, 69600
GSK Investigational Site
Zhytomyr, 10002
Argentina12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, 1425
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1181ACH
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, CP1431FWO
GSK Investigational Site
Burzaco, Buenos Aires, B1852FZD
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Evita, Buenos Aires, B1778IFA
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, X5016KEH
GSK Investigational Site
Formosa, P3600LLD
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, M5500AFA
GSK Investigational Site
Morón, B1708DPO
GSK Investigational Site
Pergamino, Buenos Aires, B2700CPM
GSK Investigational Site
Pilar, Buenos Aires, 1629
GSK Investigational Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000AHL
Portugal12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amadora, 2700-391
GSK Investigational Site
Corroios, 2855227
GSK Investigational Site
Covilha, 6200-000
GSK Investigational Site
Forte Da Casa, 2625-437
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1069-166
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1250-203
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1400-195
GSK Investigational Site
Lisbon, 1750-130
GSK Investigational Site
Mirandela, 5370-530
GSK Investigational Site
Portimão, 8500-311
GSK Investigational Site
Vila Franca de Xira, 2600-076
GSK Investigational Site
Vila Real (Lordelo), 5000-668
Germany11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bad König, Hesse, 64732
GSK Investigational Site
Cloppenburg, Lower Saxony, 49661
GSK Investigational Site
Dieburg, 64807
GSK Investigational Site
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40210
GSK Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79110
GSK Investigational Site
Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, 67655
GSK Investigational Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
GSK Investigational Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68167
GSK Investigational Site
Minden, 32429
GSK Investigational Site
Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 18059
GSK Investigational Site
Wiesbaden, Hesse, 65191
Taiwan11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 807
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
GSK Investigational Site
Keelung, 204
GSK Investigational Site
New Taipei City, 220
GSK Investigational Site
New Taipei City, 23561
GSK Investigational Site
New Taipei City, 237
GSK Investigational Site
Tainan, 704
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei, 112
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei, 116
GSK Investigational Site
Taoyuan Hsien, 333
GSK Investigational Site
Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei, 10002
Czechia10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Beroun, 26601
GSK Investigational Site
Frýdek-mistek, 738 18
GSK Investigational Site
Ivančice, 664 95
GSK Investigational Site
Jilemnice, 514 01
GSK Investigational Site
Mariánské Lázně, 353 01
GSK Investigational Site
Pardubice, 53203
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 128 08
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 14021
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 142 00
GSK Investigational Site
Sokolov, 356 01
Belgium9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Baudour, 7331
GSK Investigational Site
Bruges, 8310
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1020
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1200
GSK Investigational Site
Hasselt, 3500
GSK Investigational Site
Ieper, 8900
GSK Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4000
GSK Investigational Site
Roeselare, 8800
France9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Annonay, 07103
GSK Investigational Site
Bois-Guillaume, 76230
GSK Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33076
GSK Investigational Site
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100
GSK Investigational Site
Caen, 14033
GSK Investigational Site
Mulhouse, 68100
GSK Investigational Site
Poitiers, 86021
GSK Investigational Site
Reims, 51092
GSK Investigational Site
Tours, 37044
Hungary8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Budapest, 1077
GSK Investigational Site
Eger, 3300
GSK Investigational Site
Esztergom, 2500
GSK Investigational Site
Kecskemét, 6001
GSK Investigational Site
Miskolc, 3526
GSK Investigational Site
Pécs, 7624
GSK Investigational Site
Pécs, 7633
GSK Investigational Site
Szigetvár, 7900
Malaysia6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Batu Caves, 68100
GSK Investigational Site
George Town, 10990
GSK Investigational Site
Ipoh, 30990
GSK Investigational Site
Johor Bahru, 80100
GSK Investigational Site
Kuala Lumpur, 50603
GSK Investigational Site
Kuala Pahang, 28000
Turkey (Türkiye)6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Adana, 01330
GSK Investigational Site
Ankara, 06100
GSK Investigational Site
Antalya, 07059
GSK Investigational Site
Edirne, 22030
GSK Investigational Site
Eskişehir, 26480
GSK Investigational Site
Kayseri, 38039
Denmark5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aalborg, DK-9000
GSK Investigational Site
Holstebro, 7500
GSK Investigational Site
Kolding, 6000
GSK Investigational Site
Odense C, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Svendborg, 5700
Austria4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Graz, 8036
GSK Investigational Site
Sankt Pölten, 3100
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, 1030
GSK Investigational Site
Vienna, A-1130
Romania4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Arad, 310141
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 022328
GSK Investigational Site
Reşiţa, 320166
GSK Investigational Site
Târgu Jiu, 210146
Sweden4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Örebro, SE-701 85
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-141 86
GSK Investigational Site
Stockholm, SE-182 88
GSK Investigational Site
Uppsala, 756 55
Canada3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
GSK Investigational Site
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M3M 0B2
Estonia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Pärnu, 80011
GSK Investigational Site
Tallinn, EE-13419
GSK Investigational Site
Tartu, 50501
Netherlands3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
GSK Investigational Site
Deventer, 7416 SE
GSK Investigational Site
Rotterdam, 3079 DZ
New Zealand3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, 2001
GSK Investigational Site
Hastings, 4156
GSK Investigational Site
Otahuhu, 1640
Singapore3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Singapore, 119074
GSK Investigational Site
Singapore, 169608
GSK Investigational Site
Singapore, 308433
Norway2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Oslo, 0405
GSK Investigational Site
Stavanger, 4011
South Africa2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7500
GSK Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7925
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label (Sponsor-blind), Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center, Event Driven Study in Dialysis Subjects With Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daprodustat Compared to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin, Following a Switch From Erythropoietin-stimulating Agents
The purpose of this multi-center event-driven study in participants with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daprodustat.
- Conditions
- Anaemia, Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary
- Being tested
- Daprodustat, rhEPO, Placebo, Iron therapy
- Keywords
- erythropoiesis stimulating agents, GSK1278863, daprodustat, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hemoglobin, recombinant human erythropoietin
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DaprodustatDrug
Daprodustat dose is based on prior ESA dose, the dose is adjusted thereafter in order to achieve the target range.
rhEPODrug
The initial ESA dose is based on converting the prior ESA dose to the nearest available study rhEPO dose and is administered IV. The dose is adjusted thereafter in order to achieve the target range.
PlaceboDrug
Oral placebo tablets will be taken from Week -4 up to randomization (Day 1).
Iron therapyDrug
Participants will receive supplemental iron therapy if ferritin is <=100 ng/mL or TSAT is <=20%. The investigator will choose the route of administration and dose of iron.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Daprodustat | Experimental | Participants will receive oral daprodustat once daily. Receives: Drug: Daprodustat; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Iron therapy |
| rhEPO | Active comparator | Participants on peritoneal dialysis (PD) will be administered darbepoetin alfa subcutaneously (SC) and participants on hemodialysis (HD) will be administered epoetin alfa intravenously (IV). Receives: Drug: rhEPO; Drug: Placebo; Drug: Iron therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) During Cardiovascular (CV) Events Follow-up Time Period: Non-inferiority Analysis
Time to MACE defined as the time to first occurrence of Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudicated MACE (composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI] and non-fatal stroke) was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) plus (+) 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100 multiplied by [*] number of participants with at least 1 event) divided by [/] first event person-years) is presented along with 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI). First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis, missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputation methods. Change from Baseline was defined as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Secondary outcomes (34)
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE During CV Events Follow-up Time Period: Superiority Analysis
Time to MACE defined as the time to first occurrence of CEC adjudicated MACE was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariate. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period. This endpoint was adjusted for multiplicity using the Holm-Bonferonni method.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Thromboembolic Event During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated MACE or thromboembolic event (vascular access thrombosis, symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or symptomatic pulmonary embolism) was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period. This endpoint was adjusted for multiplicity using the Holm-Bonferonni method.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated MACE or hospitalization for heart failure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period. This endpoint was adjusted for multiplicity using the Holm-Bonferonni method.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Mean Average Monthly On-treatment IV Iron Dose Per Participant
Average monthly IV iron dose (milligrams) per participant from Day 1 to Week 52 was determined by calculating the total IV iron dose per participant from treatment start date + 1 to the earliest of (Week 52 visit date, first blood (red blood cell [RBC] or whole blood) transfusion date, and treatment stop date + 1 day) which corresponds to the time while the participant was on randomized treatment and before receiving a blood transfusion. This total IV iron dose was divided by (the number of days from treatment start date + 1 to the earliest of (Week 52 visit date, first blood transfusion date (RBC or whole blood), and treatment stop date +1) / 30.4375 days). This endpoint was adjusted for multiplicity using the Holm-Bonferonni method.
Measured: Day 1 to Week 52
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated All-Cause Mortality During Vital Status for Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated all-cause mortality was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the vital status for follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for vital status follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated CV Mortality During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated CV mortality was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Myocardial Infarction (MI) (Fatal and Non-Fatal) During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated MI (fatal and non-fatal) was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Stroke (Fatal and Non-Fatal) During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated stroke (fatal and non-fatal) was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Number of Participants With Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure (Recurrent Events Analysis)
Number of participants with adjudicated MACE or hospitalization for heart failure (recurrent events analysis) is presented, categorized by number of occurrences of adjudicated MACE or hospitalization for heart failure per participant.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated CV Mortality or Non-Fatal MI During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated CV mortality or non-fatal MI was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Hospitalization During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
All-cause hospitalization events were hospital admissions recorded on the Hospitalization electronic case report form (eCRF) with a hospitalization duration >=24 hours. Time to first occurrence of all-cause hospitalization was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Hospital Re-admission Within 30 Days During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
All-cause hospital re-admissions within 30days are defined as hospital admissions recorded on hospitalization eCRF with hospitalization duration of >=24 hours and admission date within 30days following previous discharge date of all-cause hospitalization event, where previous hospitalization was >=24 hours. Time to first occurrence of all-cause hospital re-admission within 30days was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date)+1. Incidence rate per 100person years calculated as(100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event+cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure or Thromboembolic Events During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated MACE or hospitalization for heart failure or thromboembolic events were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalization for Heart Failure During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated hospitalization for heart failure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Thromboembolic Events During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time to first occurrence of adjudicated thromboembolic events were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) + 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100*number of participants with at least 1 event)/first event person-years) is presented along with 95% CI. First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Measured: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Change From Baseline in Post-randomization Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Change from Baseline was defined as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. Analysis was performed using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model fitted from Baseline up to Week 52, excluding values collected during the stabilization period, with factors for treatment, time, dialysis type, region, Baseline hemoglobin and Baseline hemoglobin by time and treatment by time interactions.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Number of Hgb Responders in the Hgb Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Mean Hgb during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable Hgb values during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52) including any evaluable unscheduled Hgb values that were taken during this time period. Hemoglobin responders were defined as participants with a mean Hgb during the evaluation period that falls within the Hgb analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL.
Measured: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52): Non-inferiority Analysis
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time in the analysis range during evaluation period is calculated as time in range during the evaluation period / [Earlier of (Date of the last evaluable Hgb value, Week 52 visit date) - Later of (Date of the first evaluable Hgb value that between Week 16 and Week 52 inclusive, Week 28 visit date)].
Measured: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52): Superiority Analysis
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time in the analysis range during evaluation period is calculated as time in range during the evaluation period / [Earlier of (Date of the last evaluable Hgb value, Week 52 visit date) - Later of (Date of the first evaluable Hgb value that between Week 16 and Week 52 inclusive, Week 28 visit date)].
Measured: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Maintenance Period (Week 28 to End of Study): Non-inferiority Analysis
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the maintenance period (Week 28 to end of study), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time in the analysis range during maintenance period is calculated as time in range during the maintenance period / [Earlier of (Date of the last evaluable Hgb value, End of study date)- Later of (Date of the first evaluable Hgb value that is on or after week 16, Week 28 visit date)].
Measured: Week 28 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Maintenance Period (Week 28 to End of Study): Superiority Analysis
Percentage of days for which a participant's Hgb was within the analysis range of 10-11.5 g/dL (both inclusive) during the maintenance period (Week 28 to end of study), including any unscheduled evaluable Hgb values that were taken during this time period was calculated. Percentage of time in the analysis range during maintenance period is calculated as time in range during the maintenance period / [Earlier of (Date of the last evaluable Hgb value, End of study date)- Later of (Date of the first evaluable Hgb value that is on or after week 16, Week 28 visit date)].
Measured: Week 28 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP) at Week 52
SBP, DBP and MAP were measured in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minutes of rest. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment group + time + dialysis type + region + Baseline value + Baseline value*time + treatment group*time, using an unstructured covariance matrix. Data for post-dialysis BP measurements have been presented.
Measured: Baseline (Week -4) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in SBP, DBP, MAP at End of Treatment
SBP, DBP and MAP were measured in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minutes of rest. MAP is an average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date. This analysis was carried out by using ANCOVA model with terms for treatment group, dialysis type, region and Baseline value. Data for post-dialysis BP measurements have been presented.
Measured: Baseline (Week -4) and 45.1 months
Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years
BP exacerbation was defined (based on post-dialysis) as: SBP >= 25 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) increased from Baseline or SBP >=180 mmHg; DBP >=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP >=110 mmHg. The BP exacerbation events per 100 participant years was estimated using the negative binomial model with treatment, dialysis type and region as covariates and the logarithm of time on-treatment as an offset variable. Data for post-dialysis BP measurements have been presented.
Measured: Day 1 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During Study
BP exacerbation was defined as: SBP >= 25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP >=180 mmHg; DBP >=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP >=110 mmHg. Number of participants with at least one BP exacerbation event is presented.
Measured: Day 1 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Randomized Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria
Percentage of participants permanently stopping randomized treatment due to meeting rescue criteria has been presented.
Measured: Day 1 to 45.1 months
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Physical Component Score (PCS) Using Short Form (SF)-36 Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). The PCS is an average score derived from 4 domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) representing overall physical health. PCS ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Mental Component Score (MCS) Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). MCS is an average score derived from 4 domains (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) representing overall mental health. MCS ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment SF-36 HRQoL Scores for Bodily Pain, General Health, Mental Health, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, Social Functioning at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: bodily pain, general health, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning (Social fun), physical functioning (Phy. fun) and vitality. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100, higher score indicates a better health state and better functioning. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Vitality Scores Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Vitality score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Physical Functioning Domain Scores Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The SF-36 acute version 2 is a 36-item generic quality of life instrument designed to measure a participant's level of performance in the following 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical (role limitations caused by physical problems), social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role-emotional (role limitations caused by emotional problems), vitality and general health. Each domain is scored from 0 (poorer health) to 100 (better health). Physical functioning score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores represent better health. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus (-) Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Health Utility EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Score at Week 52
EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire,consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care,usual activities,pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale (1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health state). Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value-Baseline value. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at Week 52
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical VAS, ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst health one can imagine and 100 represents the best health one can imagine. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity on a 5-point disease severity scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, or 4=very severe). A higher score indicated worse outcome. Change from Baseline was calculated as on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study start28 Sep 2016
- Primary completion9 Nov 2020
- Study completion9 Nov 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,964 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879305
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200807
- Other IDs
- 2016-000541-31, 2016
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Cunningham JW, Claggett BL, Lopes RD, McMurray JJV, Perkovic V, Carroll K, Hiemstra T, Khavandi K, Lukas MA, Ranganathan P, Shannon J, van Adelsberg J, Singh AK, Solomon SD. Daprodustat and Heart Failure in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;35(5):607-617. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000321. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
PubMed 38383961Macdougall IC, Meadowcroft AM, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Cobitz AR, Godoy S, Jha V, Johansen KL, McMahon G, Obrador GT, Wong MG, Singh AK. Regional Variation of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness in the Global Daprodustat Dialysis Study (ASCEND-D). Am J Nephrol. 2023;54(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000528696. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
PubMed 36739866Singh AK, McCausland FR, Claggett BL, Wanner C, Wiecek A, Atkins MB, Carroll K, Perkovic V, McMurray JJV, Wittes J, Snapinn S, Blackorby A, Meadowcroft A, Barker T, DiMino T, Mallett S, Cobitz AR, Solomon SD. Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Jul 31;38(8):1890-1897. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac342.
PubMed 36565721Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
PubMed 36005278Singh AK, Carroll K, Perkovic V, Solomon S, Jha V, Johansen KL, Lopes RD, Macdougall IC, Obrador GT, Waikar SS, Wanner C, Wheeler DC, Wiecek A, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Cobitz AR, Davies R, Dole J, Kler L, Meadowcroft AM, Zhu X, McMurray JJV; ASCEND-D Study Group. Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2325-2335. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113379. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
PubMed 34739194Singh AK, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Carroll K, Cobitz AR, Davies R, Jha V, Johansen KL, Lopes RD, Kler L, Macdougall IC, McMurray JJV, Meadowcroft AM, Obrador GT, Perkovic V, Solomon S, Wanner C, Waikar SS, Wheeler DC, Wiecek A. Study design and baseline characteristics of patients on dialysis in the ASCEND-D trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Apr 25;37(5):960-972. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab065.
PubMed 33744933
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-label (Sponsor-blind), Active-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-center, Event Driven Study in Dialysis Subjects With Anemia Associated With Chronic Kidney Disease to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Daprodustat Compared to Recombinant Human Erythropoietin, Following a Switch From Erythropoietin-stimulating Agents
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879305
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 200807
- Conditions
- Anaemia, Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary
- Keywords
- erythropoiesis stimulating agents, GSK1278863, daprodustat, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hemoglobin, recombinant human erythropoietin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,964 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Dec 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this multi-center event-driven study in participants with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daprodustat.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Daprodustat | Experimental | Drug: Daprodustat, Drug: Placebo, Drug: Iron therapyParticipants will receive oral daprodustat once daily. |
| rhEPO | Active comparator | Drug: rhEPO, Drug: Placebo, Drug: Iron therapyParticipants on peritoneal dialysis (PD) will be administered darbepoetin alfa subcutaneously (SC) and participants on hemodialysis (HD) will be administered epoetin alfa intravenously (IV). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age: 18 to 99 years of age (inclusive).
- Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs): Use of any approved ESA for at least the 6 weeks prior to screening and between screening and randomization.
- Hgb concentration: On Week -8: Hgb 8 to 12 grams per deciliter (g/dL). On randomization (Day 1): Hgb 8 to 11 g/dL and receiving at least the minimum ESA dose. Hgb >11 g/dL to 11.5 g/dL and receiving greater than the minimum ESA dose.
- Dialysis: On dialysis >90 days prior to screening and continuing on the same mode of dialysis from screening (Week -8) through to randomization (Day 1).
- Frequency of Dialysis: Hemodialysis (HD) >=2 times/week and peritoneal dialysis (PD) >=5 times/week. Home hemodialysis >=2 times/week.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Kidney transplant: Planned living-related or living-unrelated kidney transplant within 52 weeks after study start (Day 1).
- Ferritin: <=100 nanograms (ng)/milliliter (mL) (<=100 micrograms/liter [L]) at screening.
- Transferrin saturation (TSAT) (screening only): <=20%.
- Aplasias: History of bone marrow aplasia or pure red cell aplasia.
- Other causes of anemia: Untreated Pernicious anemia, thalassemia major, sickle cell disease or myelodysplastic syndrome.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DaprodustatDaprodustat dose is based on prior ESA dose, the dose is adjusted thereafter in order to achieve the target range. | Drug | Daprodustat |
| rhEPOThe initial ESA dose is based on converting the prior ESA dose to the nearest available study rhEPO dose and is administered IV. The dose is adjusted thereafter in order to achieve the target range. | Drug | rhEPO |
| PlaceboOral placebo tablets will be taken from Week -4 up to randomization (Day 1). | Drug | Daprodustat, rhEPO |
| Iron therapyParticipants will receive supplemental iron therapy if ferritin is <=100 ng/mL or TSAT is <=20%. The investigator will choose the route of administration and dose of iron. | Drug | Daprodustat, rhEPO |
Primary outcome
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) During Cardiovascular (CV) Events Follow-up Time Period: Non-inferiority Analysis
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to MACE defined as the time to first occurrence of Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudicated MACE (composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI] and non-fatal stroke) was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with treatment group, dialysis type and region as covariates. Time to the first occurrence was computed as (event date minus randomization date) plus (+) 1. The incidence rate per 100 person years calculated as (100 multiplied by [*] number of participants with at least 1 event) divided by [/] first event person-years) is presented along with 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI). First event person years=(cumulative total time to first event for participants who have the event + cumulative total of censored time for participants without the event)/365.25, based on the CV follow-up time period.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (Hgb) Levels During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis, missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputation methods. Change from Baseline was defined as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date.
34 secondary outcomes
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE During CV Events Follow-up Time Period: Superiority Analysis
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Thromboembolic Event During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Mean Average Monthly On-treatment IV Iron Dose Per Participant
Time frame: Day 1 to Week 52
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated All-Cause Mortality During Vital Status for Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for vital status follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated CV Mortality During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Myocardial Infarction (MI) (Fatal and Non-Fatal) During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Stroke (Fatal and Non-Fatal) During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Number of Participants With Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure (Recurrent Events Analysis)
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated CV Mortality or Non-Fatal MI During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Hospitalization During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of All-Cause Hospital Re-admission Within 30 Days During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated MACE or Hospitalization for Heart Failure or Thromboembolic Events During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Hospitalization for Heart Failure During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Thromboembolic Events During CV Events Follow-up Time Period
Time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period
Change From Baseline in Post-randomization Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Number of Hgb Responders in the Hgb Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52): Non-inferiority Analysis
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52): Superiority Analysis
Time frame: Week 28 to Week 52
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Maintenance Period (Week 28 to End of Study): Non-inferiority Analysis
Time frame: Week 28 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) During Maintenance Period (Week 28 to End of Study): Superiority Analysis
Time frame: Week 28 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Blood Pressure (MAP) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Week -4) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in SBP, DBP, MAP at End of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline (Week -4) and 45.1 months
Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years
Time frame: Day 1 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During Study
Time frame: Day 1 to end of study (3.9 person-years for follow-up time period)
Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Randomized Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria
Time frame: Day 1 to 45.1 months
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Physical Component Score (PCS) Using Short Form (SF)-36 Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Mental Component Score (MCS) Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment SF-36 HRQoL Scores for Bodily Pain, General Health, Mental Health, Role-Emotional, Role-Physical, Social Functioning at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Vitality Scores Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Physical Functioning Domain Scores Using SF-36 HRQoL Questionnaire at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Health Utility EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Change From Baseline in On-Treatment Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) at Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1), Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38383961Cunningham JW, Claggett BL, Lopes RD, McMurray JJV, Perkovic V, Carroll K, Hiemstra T, Khavandi K, Lukas MA, Ranganathan P, Shannon J, van Adelsberg J, Singh AK, Solomon SD. Daprodustat and Heart Failure in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;35(5):607-617. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000321. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36739866Macdougall IC, Meadowcroft AM, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Cobitz AR, Godoy S, Jha V, Johansen KL, McMahon G, Obrador GT, Wong MG, Singh AK. Regional Variation of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness in the Global Daprodustat Dialysis Study (ASCEND-D). Am J Nephrol. 2023;54(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1159/000528696. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36565721Singh AK, McCausland FR, Claggett BL, Wanner C, Wiecek A, Atkins MB, Carroll K, Perkovic V, McMurray JJV, Wittes J, Snapinn S, Blackorby A, Meadowcroft A, Barker T, DiMino T, Mallett S, Cobitz AR, Solomon SD. Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Jul 31;38(8):1890-1897. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac342.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36005278Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34739194Singh AK, Carroll K, Perkovic V, Solomon S, Jha V, Johansen KL, Lopes RD, Macdougall IC, Obrador GT, Waikar SS, Wanner C, Wheeler DC, Wiecek A, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Cobitz AR, Davies R, Dole J, Kler L, Meadowcroft AM, Zhu X, McMurray JJV; ASCEND-D Study Group. Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2325-2335. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113379. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33744933Singh AK, Blackorby A, Cizman B, Carroll K, Cobitz AR, Davies R, Jha V, Johansen KL, Lopes RD, Kler L, Macdougall IC, McMurray JJV, Meadowcroft AM, Obrador GT, Perkovic V, Solomon S, Wanner C, Waikar SS, Wheeler DC, Wiecek A. Study design and baseline characteristics of patients on dialysis in the ASCEND-D trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Apr 25;37(5):960-972. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab065.
Related trials for Anaemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
462 sites in 35 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Daprodustat, rhEPO and Iron therapy in people with Anaemia and Aspergillosis, Allergic Bronchopulmonary, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 462 sites in 35 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 462 sites in United States, South Korea, Spain, India, Australia and 30 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Dec 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to First Occurrence of Adjudicated Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) During Cardiovascular (CV) Events Follow-up Time Period: Non-inferiority Analysis (time frame: Up to 3.9 person-years for CV follow-up time period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02879305, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2021.