Non-Small Cell Lung CarcinomaPhase 3NCT02879097
Efficacy-Safety-Immunogenicity Study of CBT124&EU-sourced Avastin® in Stage 4 NSCLC
A Phase 3 study testing CBT124, EU-sourced Avastin® and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Cipla BioTec Pvt. Ltd..
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CBT124 and Avastin® are comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity; and whether the pharmacokinetics of CBT124 matches that of Avastin® (pharmacokinetics is nested in this study for Indian patients). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- CBT124, EU-sourced Avastin® and Carboplatin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2016to May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects may be entered in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
- Adult subjects aged ≥ 18 to 75 years (≥ 18 to 65 years for India) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
- Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) negative or wild type mutations
- Stage IV (Unresectable recurrent disease or metastatic) NSCLC
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.
- Evaluable disease status or measurable tumor
- Adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function
- Subjects with pre-existing hypertension must be well controlled on a stable regimen of antihypertensive therapy. Have systolic blood pressure ≤ 140 and ≥ 90 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≤ 90 and ≥ 50 mmHg and heart rate ≥ 40 and ≤ 90 bpm at screening and admission.
- Ability to understand risks of participation in the study and willingness provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria: Subjects will not be entered in the study for any of the following reasons:
- Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or combination of SCLC and NSCLC. Squamous-cell tumors and mixed adenosquamous carcinomas of predominantly squamous nature
- Prior therapy with monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors against VEGF or VEGF receptors, including bevacizumab
- Prior therapy with carboplatin or paclitaxel
- Prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy for locally-advanced NSCLC if completed < 12 months prior to screening
- Evidence of a tumor that compresses or invades major blood vessels or tumor cavitation that in the opinion of the Investigator is likely to bleed
- Symptomatic brain metastasis
- Previous malignancy other than NSCLC in the last 5 years except for basal cell cancer of the skin or pre-invasive cancer of the cervix
- Any unresolved toxicity > Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 1 (except alopecia) from previous anticancer therapy (including radiotherapy)
- History or evidence of inherited bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy with the risk of bleeding. Thrombotic or hemorrhagic event ≤ 6 months prior to screening
- History of hemoptysis greater than ½ teaspoon of bright red (fresh) blood in the past 4 weeks
- Subjects receiving long-term aspirin (> 325 mg/day), or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or other drugs known to inhibit platelet function, treatment with dipyridamole, ticlopidine, or clopidogrel
- Subjects receiving anticoagulants
- Subjects who plan to undergo surgery during the study period
- Subjects who have undergone a major surgery, or have had a significant traumatic injury within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Subjects who have a significant non-healing wound, or bone fracture within 4 weeks prior to randomization
- Subjects with history of gastrointestinal perforation or fistula formation
- Subjects with known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of the investigational products, or mammalian cell-derived products
- Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding, planning to be pregnant during the study, or women of child-bearing potential (any woman who is not surgically sterile i.e., bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy or < 2 years post menopause) not using a reliable method of double contraception (e.g. condom plus diaphragm, condom or diaphragm plus spermicidal gel/foam, tubal ligation, or stable dose of hormonal contraception) throughout the study period
- Male subject with a partner of childbearing potential who does not consent to the use of a reliable method of double contraception
- Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension
- Subjects with active infection assessed to be clinically significant by Investigator
- Known history of, or positive test result for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (test for hepatitis C virus antibody [HCVAb]) or hepatitis B virus (test for Hepatitis B surface Antigen [HBsAg])
- History of alcohol or substance abuse
- Prior treatment with any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to screening, or within 5 half-lives of the drug, whichever is longer
- Inability to comply with study requirements
- Other unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Sponsor, make the subject unsuitable for enrollment.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy, Safety & Immunogenicity Study of CBT124 & EU-sourced Avastin® in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in First-line Treatment in (NSCLC)
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CBT124 and Avastin® are comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity; and whether the pharmacokinetics of CBT124 matches that of Avastin® (pharmacokinetics is nested in this study for Indian patients).
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CBT124 and Avastin® are comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity; and whether the pharmacokinetics of CBT124 matches that of Avastin® (pharmacokinetics is nested in this study for Indian patients). To test the clinical equivalence in terms of efficacy and safety, a two-sided test approach based on a pre-specified range to test the null hypothesis that the proposed biosimilar is either (1) inferior to the reference product or (2) superior to the reference product based on the pre-specified equivalence margin will be used. The equivalence margins are chosen to enable detection of clinically meaningful differences in effectiveness between CBT124, candidate biosimilar bevacizumab and reference product (EU-sourced Avastin®) at the 95% confidence interval (CI). In this trial, asymmetric equivalence margins will be used, i.e., the upper (superiority) and the lower (inferiority) bounds of the equivalence margin are not symmetric. The goal is to reject the null hypothesis of non-equivalence and accept the alternative hypothesis that the two treatments (in this case, CBT124 and EU-sourced Avastin®) are equivalent (i.e., the differences between the two are not clinically and statistically meaningful). The hypothesis testing will be performed by determining if the difference in the primary end point (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) between the reference product (EUsourced Avastin®) and proposed biosimilar (CBT124) is within the equivalence margin at the 95% CI.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Being tested
- CBT124, EU-sourced Avastin®, Carboplatin, Paclitaxel
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CBT124Biological
Induction Phase: CBT124 15 mg/kg IV infusion-Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. Maintenance Phase: All the subjects who complete the induction phase and are alive at Week 19 without progression of the disease can be included in the maintenance phase and receive CBT124 (bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle) up to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (that precludes further treatment with bevacizumab) or death.
EU-sourced Avastin®Biological
Induction Phase: EU-sourced Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV infusion-Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. Maintenance Phase: All the subjects who complete the induction phase and are alive at Week 19 without progression of the disease can be included in the maintenance phase and receive CBT124 (bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle) up to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (that precludes further treatment with bevacizumab) or death.
CarboplatinDrug
Induction Phase: Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles.
PaclitaxelDrug
Induction Phase: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CBT124 arm | Experimental | CBT124 plus carboplatin and paclitaxel Receives: Biological: CBT124; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel |
| EU Sourced Avastin® arm | Active comparator | EU-sourced Avastin® plus carboplatin and paclitaxel Receives: Biological: EU-sourced Avastin®; Drug: Carboplatin; Drug: Paclitaxel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria (version 1.1). Defined as the proportion of subjects whose best confirmed overall response over Week 1 to Week 19 is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Confirmed best overall response (complete or partial response) may be claimed only if the criteria for each are met after a repeat radiologic tumor assessment (using RECIST criteria version 1.1) 6 weeks later.
Measured: 19 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1 year
Duration of response.
Measured: 1 year
Overall Survival (OS) rate at 1 year
Duration of response.
Measured: 1 year
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax and Ctrough
Cycle 1: Cmax; Cycle 2-6: Ctrough
Measured: Cycle 6
Proportion of subjects with selected adverse events (AE)
Proportion of subjects with selected adverse events (AE) of gastrointestinal perforation, hypertension, proteinuria, and pulmonary haemorrhage
Measured: 1 year
Proportion of subjects with other selected AEs
Proportion of subjects with other selected AEs of hemorrhages, wound healing complications, abscess, and fistula formation
Measured: 1 year
Proportion of subjects with other selected AEs/ SAEs/ Vital signs/Lab abnormalities
proportion of subjects with other selected AEs of Anaphylactic/ hypersensitivity/ infusion-related reactions, arterial and venous thromboembolic events, and febrile neutropenia Incidence of AEs (overall), serious adverse events (SAEs), including changes in vital signs and laboratory abnormalities
Measured: 1 year
Incidence of anti-drug (bevacizumab) antibody formation
Incidence of anti-drug (bevacizumab) antibody formation, including incidence of neutralizing antibodies; Analysis of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive and negative sub-population for PK, safety and efficacy.
Measured: 1 year
Analysis of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive and negative sub-population for PK, safety and efficacy
Analysis of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive and negative sub-population for PK, safety and efficacy
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2016
- Primary completionDec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cipla BioTec Pvt. Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tamal Raha, PhD, Study director, Cipla BioTec
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879097
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CBT124/CT/002
- Other IDs
- 2016-003301-34, 2016
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Study CBT124/CT/002 does not have a FDA regulated intervention.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy, Safety & Immunogenicity Study of CBT124 & EU-sourced Avastin® in Combination With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in First-line Treatment in (NSCLC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879097
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CBT124/CT/002
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cipla BioTec Pvt. Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CBT124 and Avastin® are comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity; and whether the pharmacokinetics of CBT124 matches that of Avastin® (pharmacokinetics is nested in this study for Indian patients).
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine whether CBT124 and Avastin® are comparable in terms of efficacy, safety, immunogenicity; and whether the pharmacokinetics of CBT124 matches that of Avastin® (pharmacokinetics is nested in this study for Indian patients). To test the clinical equivalence in terms of efficacy and safety, a two-sided test approach based on a pre-specified range to test the null hypothesis that the proposed biosimilar is either (1) inferior to the reference product or (2) superior to the reference product based on the pre-specified equivalence margin will be used. The equivalence margins are chosen to enable detection of clinically meaningful differences in effectiveness between CBT124, candidate biosimilar bevacizumab and reference product (EU-sourced Avastin®) at the 95% confidence interval (CI). In this trial, asymmetric equivalence margins will be used, i.e., the upper (superiority) and the lower (inferiority) bounds of the equivalence margin are not symmetric. The goal is to reject the null hypothesis of non-equivalence and accept the alternative hypothesis that the two treatments (in this case, CBT124 and EU-sourced Avastin®) are equivalent (i.e., the differences between the two are not clinically and statistically meaningful). The hypothesis testing will be performed by determining if the difference in the primary end point (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) between the reference product (EUsourced Avastin®) and proposed biosimilar (CBT124) is within the equivalence margin at the 95% CI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CBT124 arm | Experimental | Biological: CBT124, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: PaclitaxelCBT124 plus carboplatin and paclitaxel |
| EU Sourced Avastin® arm | Active comparator | Biological: EU-sourced Avastin®, Drug: Carboplatin, Drug: PaclitaxelEU-sourced Avastin® plus carboplatin and paclitaxel |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CBT124Induction Phase: CBT124 15 mg/kg IV infusion-Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. Maintenance Phase: All the subjects who complete the induction phase and are alive at Week 19 without progression of the disease can be included in the maintenance phase and receive CBT124 (bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle) up to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (that precludes further treatment with bevacizumab) or death. | Biological | CBT124 arm |
| EU-sourced Avastin®Induction Phase: EU-sourced Avastin® 15 mg/kg IV infusion-Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles; Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. Maintenance Phase: All the subjects who complete the induction phase and are alive at Week 19 without progression of the disease can be included in the maintenance phase and receive CBT124 (bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle) up to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (that precludes further treatment with bevacizumab) or death. | Biological | EU Sourced Avastin® arm |
| CarboplatinInduction Phase: Carboplatin AUC 6 mgXmin/mL (calculation-Calvert formula recommended) on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. | Drug | CBT124 arm, EU Sourced Avastin® arm |
| PaclitaxelInduction Phase: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3-week Cycle for 6 cycles. | Drug | CBT124 arm, EU Sourced Avastin® arm |
Primary outcome
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: 19 weeks
Objective Response Rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria (version 1.1). Defined as the proportion of subjects whose best confirmed overall response over Week 1 to Week 19 is either Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). Confirmed best overall response (complete or partial response) may be claimed only if the criteria for each are met after a repeat radiologic tumor assessment (using RECIST criteria version 1.1) 6 weeks later.
8 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Overall Survival (OS) rate at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Pharmacokinetics: Cmax and Ctrough
Time frame: Cycle 6
Proportion of subjects with selected adverse events (AE)
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of subjects with other selected AEs
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of subjects with other selected AEs/ SAEs/ Vital signs/Lab abnormalities
Time frame: 1 year
Incidence of anti-drug (bevacizumab) antibody formation
Time frame: 1 year
Analysis of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive and negative sub-population for PK, safety and efficacy
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Study CBT124/CT/002 does not have a FDA regulated intervention.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tamal Raha, PhD study director
Cipla BioTec
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing CBT124, EU-sourced Avastin® and Carboplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma, run by Cipla BioTec Pvt. Ltd..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tamal Raha, PhD (+91 7774097577, Tamal.Raha@Cipla.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: 19 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2016.