Fibroid UterusNCT02879058
Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy Patients
A study testing Intraoperative contact ultrasonography in people with Fibroid Uterus and Quality of Life, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibroid Uterus, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- Intraoperative contact ultrasonography
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2016to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Premenopausal and nonpregnant
- Advised to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy by their provider
- Documented imaging with transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic MRI within the past year, which accurately and within reason documents the location and number of leiomyomas present within the uterus
- If deemed necessary by the provider, must have a pelvic MRI prior to surgery that states there are no concerning findings for malignancy
- Must be eligible to undergo laparoscopic surgery and willing to present for clinic and imaging follow up during the 6 months following myomectomy
- Must understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- Appearance of uterus concerning for malignancy on pelvic MRI
- Current pregnancy
- Any contraindication to laparoscopic or robotic surgery
- Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs in the past 36 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Intraoperative Contact Sonography on Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy
This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.
Read the detailed description
In full acknowledgement of the correlation between complete leiomyoma exeresis and symptom relief, the investigators hypothesize that use of contact ultrasonography at the time of laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will enable improved identification and extraction of uterine fibroids which will, in turn, lead to a greater improvement in quality of life among those women who receive intraoperative ultrasound compared to those who do not. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators will augment traditional laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy with intraoperative ultrasound in half the symptomatic patients enrolled in the study. The other half will be randomized to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy without use of intra-operative ultrasound. Both groups will complete Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS- QOL) questionnaires before and after surgery (6 months post procedure) to determine whether use of laparoscopic contact ultrasonography has a positive impact on patients' quality of life.
- Conditions
- Fibroid Uterus, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Intraoperative contact ultrasonography
- Medical subject headings
- Leiomyoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intraoperative contact ultrasonographyProcedure or surgery
In patients randomized to myomectomy with contact ultrasonography, the laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound probe will be advanced through an existing port site into the pelvis after traditional myomectomy has been performed. The face of the ultrasound transducer will be guided over the uterus (including open hysterotomy sites) in systematic strokes, taking special care to note locations of myomas that may have been missed by the preceding excision. Additional hysterotomy sites will be made as necessary in order to remove persistent myomas. Any number of additional ultrasound passes and excisions may be performed in order to achieve the most comprehensive removal of myomas.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Without Ultrasound | No intervention | Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed without aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography |
| With Ultrasound | Experimental | Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed with aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography Receives: Procedure: Intraoperative contact ultrasonography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Quality of Life
Symptom and health-related quality of life will be measured by The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire administered to all study participants before myomectomy and 6 months post-myomectomy.
Measured: Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (3)
Operating Time
Operating time is defined as the total period of time from when the procedure starts until the procedure is deemed complete.
Measured: Measured at surgery
Blood Loss
Blood loss (in mL) will be estimated for all procedures by the primary surgeon and gleaned from the anesthesia operative flowsheet.
Measured: Measured at surgery
Weight of Excised Myomas
After extraction, all myomas will be submitted to pathology. Their cumulative weight will be measured by the Pathologist and gleaned by the research team from the final pathology report.
Measured: Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2016
- Primary completionDec 2018
- Study completionDec 2018
Why it stopped: Due to inadequate enrollment.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fibroid UterusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Katherine Smith, The Cleveland Clinic
- Investigators
- Stephen E Zimberg, MD, Principal investigator, Cleveland Clinic FloridaKatherine A Smith, MD, Principal investigator, Cleveland Clinic Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FLA- 16-031
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Selected de-identified ultrasound images and surgical data will be shared with BK Ultrasound, the manufacturer of the ultrasound device.
Publications
Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. Effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in reducing recurrent fibroids during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Reprod Med. 2006 Sep;51(9):683-8.
PubMed 17039695Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80025-x.
PubMed 9668143Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):654-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70445-3.
PubMed 8623802Radosa MP, Owsianowski Z, Mothes A, Weisheit A, Vorwergk J, Asskaryar FA, Camara O, Bernardi TS, Runnebaum IB. Long-term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
PubMed 25016181Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1795-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136176.
PubMed 8582982Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156298.74317.62.
PubMed 15802421Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Babaki-Fard K, Dubuisson JB. Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):595-602. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.595.
PubMed 11129693Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Nov;8(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60610-x.
PubMed 11677326Piccolboni P, Settembre A, Angelini P, Esposito F, Palladino S, Corcione F. Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability. G Chir. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):5-8.
PubMed 25827662Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
PubMed 11814511Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0228-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
PubMed 21773858Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
PubMed 12719681
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Intraoperative Contact Sonography on Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic or Robotic Myomectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02879058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLA- 16-031
- Conditions
- Fibroid Uterus, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to inadequate enrollment.
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates whether use of intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy impacts quality of life. Half of participants will undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy with use of the intraoperative ultrasound and half will undergo traditional laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy.
Detailed description
In full acknowledgement of the correlation between complete leiomyoma exeresis and symptom relief, the investigators hypothesize that use of contact ultrasonography at the time of laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will enable improved identification and extraction of uterine fibroids which will, in turn, lead to a greater improvement in quality of life among those women who receive intraoperative ultrasound compared to those who do not. In this blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators will augment traditional laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy with intraoperative ultrasound in half the symptomatic patients enrolled in the study. The other half will be randomized to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy without use of intra-operative ultrasound. Both groups will complete Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS- QOL) questionnaires before and after surgery (6 months post procedure) to determine whether use of laparoscopic contact ultrasonography has a positive impact on patients' quality of life.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Without Ultrasound | No intervention | –Laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed without aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography |
| With Ultrasound | Experimental | Procedure: Intraoperative contact ultrasonographyLaparoscopic or robotic myomectomy will be performed with aid of intraoperative contact ultrasonography |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Premenopausal and nonpregnant
- Advised to undergo laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy by their provider
- Documented imaging with transvaginal ultrasound or pelvic MRI within the past year, which accurately and within reason documents the location and number of leiomyomas present within the uterus
- If deemed necessary by the provider, must have a pelvic MRI prior to surgery that states there are no concerning findings for malignancy
- Must be eligible to undergo laparoscopic surgery and willing to present for clinic and imaging follow up during the 6 months following myomectomy
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Appearance of uterus concerning for malignancy on pelvic MRI
- Current pregnancy
- Any contraindication to laparoscopic or robotic surgery
- Treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs in the past 36 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative contact ultrasonographyIn patients randomized to myomectomy with contact ultrasonography, the laparoscopic or robotic ultrasound probe will be advanced through an existing port site into the pelvis after traditional myomectomy has been performed. The face of the ultrasound transducer will be guided over the uterus (including open hysterotomy sites) in systematic strokes, taking special care to note locations of myomas that may have been missed by the preceding excision. Additional hysterotomy sites will be made as necessary in order to remove persistent myomas. Any number of additional ultrasound passes and excisions may be performed in order to achieve the most comprehensive removal of myomas. | Procedure or surgery | With Ultrasound |
Primary outcome
Change in Quality of Life
Time frame: Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery
Symptom and health-related quality of life will be measured by The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) questionnaire administered to all study participants before myomectomy and 6 months post-myomectomy.
3 secondary outcomes
Operating Time
Time frame: Measured at surgery
Blood Loss
Time frame: Measured at surgery
Weight of Excised Myomas
Time frame: Measured at the time of Pathology evaluation.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to inadequate enrollment.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2019.
- Background: PubMed 17039695Shimanuki H, Takeuchi H, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kinoshita K. Effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound in reducing recurrent fibroids during laparoscopic myomectomy. J Reprod Med. 2006 Sep;51(9):683-8.
- Background: PubMed 9668143Nezhat FR, Roemisch M, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Nezhat CR. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1998 Aug;5(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(98)80025-x.
- Background: PubMed 8623802Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;174(2):654-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70445-3.
- Background: PubMed 25016181Radosa MP, Owsianowski Z, Mothes A, Weisheit A, Vorwergk J, Asskaryar FA, Camara O, Bernardi TS, Runnebaum IB. Long-term risk of fibroid recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Sep;180:35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.05.029. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 8582982Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum Reprod. 1995 Jul;10(7):1795-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136176.
- Background: PubMed 15802421Hanafi M. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156298.74317.62.
- Background: PubMed 11129693Fauconnier A, Chapron C, Babaki-Fard K, Dubuisson JB. Recurrence of leiomyomata after myomectomy. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):595-602. doi: 10.1093/humupd/6.6.595.
- Background: PubMed 11677326Doridot V, Dubuisson JB, Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Babaki-Fard K. Recurrence of leiomyomata after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Nov;8(4):495-500. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60610-x.
- Background: PubMed 25827662Piccolboni P, Settembre A, Angelini P, Esposito F, Palladino S, Corcione F. Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability. G Chir. 2015 Jan-Feb;36(1):5-8.
- Background: PubMed 11814511Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
- Background: PubMed 21773858Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0228-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 12719681Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003 May;41(5):582-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Selected de-identified ultrasound images and surgical data will be shared with BK Ultrasound, the manufacturer of the ultrasound device.
Related trials for Fibroid Uterus
Active, not recruiting
Prospective Study of TVRFA Treatment for FIGO Type 3-5 Uterine Fibroids
Leiomyoma (Uterine Fibroids)
RecruitingObservational study
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis Renal Cell Cancer - Study of the Genetic Cause and the Predisposition to Renal Cancer
Renal Tumor Histology, Cutaneous Leiomyoma
Active, not recruiting
Life Study: Lifestyle Intervention in Fibroid Elimination
Uterine Fibroid
Not yet recruiting
Office Hysteroscopy Versus Operating-room Hysteroscopy for Uterine Lesions
Uterine Polyps, Uterine Fibroids
RecruitingObservational study
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large and Very Large Uteri
Uterine Fibroids, Hysterectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen E Zimberg, MD principal investigator
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Katherine A Smith, MD principal investigator
Cleveland Clinic Florida
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intraoperative contact ultrasonography in people with Fibroid Uterus and Quality of Life, run by The Cleveland Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Due to inadequate enrollment.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Quality of Life (time frame: Measured at baseline (before surgery) and 6 months post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02879058, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2019.