Lactose IntolerancePhase 4NCT02878876
Incidence of Lactose Intolerance Among Self-reported Lactose Intolerant People
A Phase 4 study testing Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 and Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1 in people with Lactose Intolerance, run by a2 Milk Company Ltd..
Trial summary
This is a 3-sites, double-blinded, randomized, 2X2 cross-over study aiming to compare effects of milk containing only A2 type beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on the gastrointestinal symptoms for the health people who self-reported to be lactose intolerant. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lactose Intolerance
- What is being tested?
- Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 and Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Mar 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 20~50 years old male or female subjects;
- Non-regular milk drinker with self-reported intolerance to commercial milk;
- Suffered from mild to moderate digestive discomfort after milk consumption;
- Have normal electrocardiograms (ECG) and blood pressure during quiet respiration;
- Agree not to take any medication, supplements, nutrition or other dairy products including acidophilus milk;
- Be willing to comply with all the requirements and procedures of the study;
Show all 9Show fewer
- Agree to sign the informed consent form;
- Agree not to enroll in another interventional clinical research study while participating in this study;
- Fully understand the nature, objective, benefit and the potential risks and side effects of the study.
Who cannot join
- Female on pregnant or feeding;
- Have known dairy allergy;
- Have severe response to milk intolerance;
- Have history of faecal impaction;
- Trying to lose weight by following a diet or exercise regimen designed for weight loss, or taking any drug influencing appetite and any drug for weight loss for the last three months ;
- Have participated in similar dairy or probiotics-containing product's clinical trials within 3 months before the screening;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Currently taking medicines for cardiovascular or metabolic disease;
- Have history of or be diagnosed of any of the following diseases that may affect the study results: gastrointestinal disorders, hepatopathy, nephropathy, endocrine disease, blood disorders, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases;
- Current or previous alcohol abuser, currently taking or took illicit drugs, substance or OTC prescription drugs in regular frequency which may affect gastrointestinal disorders and study result;
- Currently suffering from any gastrointestinal disorders or gastrointestinal disease, including but not limited to: irritable bowel syndrome, colitis, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome(IBS);
- Had hospitalizations within 3 months before screening;
- Currently drug frequency user of that may affect the gastrointestinal function or immune system. As judged by investigator.
About this study
This is a 3-sites, double-blinded, randomized, 2X2 cross-over study aiming to compare effects of milk containing only A2 type beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on the gastrointestinal symptoms for the health people who self-reported to be lactose intolerant.
Read the detailed description
Study sites: Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing
Eligible subjects were enrolled in the study and randomized into one of the 2 study arms:
Sequence A1-A2: Oral consumption of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at Visit 1 and milk containing only A2 type beta casein at Visit 2; Sequence A2-A1: Oral consumption of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at Visit 1 and milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at Visit 2.
Washout period: 2 weeks between Visit 1 and Visit 2
- Conditions
- Lactose Intolerance
- Being tested
- Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2, Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1
- Medical subject headings
- Lactose Intolerance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2Dietary supplement
Oral consumption of 300 ml of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 1 (after 12-hour fasting) and 300 ml of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 2 (after 12-hour fasting).
Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1Dietary supplement
Oral consumption of 300 ml of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 1 (after 12-hour fasting) and 300 ml of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 2 (after 12-hour fasting).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence A1-A2 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 |
| Sequence A2-A1 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1 Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gastrointestinal Symptom VAS scores at 3 hours
Gastrointestinal symptoms were self-measured by study subjects on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 9 (severe) at 3 hours after product consumption at Visit 1 and Visit 2. Data was analyzed as a repeated measures design using a mixed effects ANOVA with symptom VAS scores at 3-hour as outcome, study product (A1 or A2) and study visit (1 or 2) as fixed effects, and a random subject effect nested within the sequence of study treatment (A1-A2 or A2-A1) , and adjusted for baseline symptom scores. Type III tests of fixed effects were used for testing the effect of study products. Contrast tests were generated to compare means for each product.
Measured: Three hours after product intervention at each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Secondary outcomes (4)
The percentage of improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms after drinking A2 versus A1
The improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms after drinking A2 versus A1 were classified into 4 mutually exclusive categories according to the following definition:
- No symptom: have no gastrointestinal symptoms after drinking product A2 while having symptoms after drinking product A1.
- Significant improvement: still have gastrointestinal symptom after drinking product A2, the reduction of symptom scores >3
- Slight improvement: still have gastrointestinal symptom after drinking product A2, 1<=reduction of symptom scores<=3
- No difference (not improved or worsen): reduction of symptom scores<=0
The frequency and percentage in each category of improvement for each single gastrointestinal symptom, as well as that for all symptoms, are summarized.
Measured: 1 hour and 3 hours after product intervention
Urinary galactose concentration
Urinary galactose (U-gal) concentration was measured at baseline and 3-hour of each of Visit 1 and Visit 2. Data was analyzed as a repeated measures design using a mixed effects ANOVA with fixed effects of study product (A1 or A2) and study visit (1 or 2) and a random subject effect nested within the sequence of study treatment (A1-A2 or A2-A1) , and adjusted for baseline symptom scores. Type III tests of fixed effects were used for testing the effect of study products. Contrast tests were generated to compare means for each product.
The U-gal measurements over the whole study period (both Visit 1 and Visit 2) for all subjects were also summarized by study product. Product difference was evaluated using one-way ANOVA.
Measured: baseline and 3 hours after product intervention of each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Gastrointestinal Symptom VAS scores at 1 hour
Gastrointestinal symptoms were self-measured by study subjects on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 9 (severe) at 1 hour after product consumption at Visit 1 and Visit 2. Data was analyzed as a repeated measures design using a mixed effects ANOVA with symptom VAS scores at 1-hour as outcome, study product (A1 or A2) and study visit (1 or 2) as fixed effects, and a random subject effect nested within the sequence of study treatment (A1-A2 or A2-A1) , and adjusted for baseline symptom scores. Type III tests of fixed effects were used for testing the effect of study products. Contrast tests were generated to compare means for each product.
Measured: One hour after product intervention at each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Change of urinary galactose concentration from baseline at 3 hours <0.27 mmol/L (Yes/No)
Based on the results of urinary galactose test, subjects were classified as lactose malabsorbers if they had an increase in urinary galactose concentration of <0.27 mmol/L at 3 hours after oral consumption of 15g lactose (corresponding to 300 ml of product A1). And those with an increase in urinary galactose concentration of ≥0.27 mmol/L at 3-hour were classified as lactose absorbers.
Measured: 3 hours after product intervention of each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionMar 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lactose IntoleranceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- a2 Milk Company Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew J Clarke, PhD, Study director, a2 Milk Company Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02878876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15-SC-11-A2-004
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 25 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
He M, Sun J, Jiang ZQ, Yang YX. Effects of cow's milk beta-casein variants on symptoms of milk intolerance in Chinese adults: a multicentre, randomised controlled study. Nutr J. 2017 Oct 25;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0275-0.
PubMed 29070042
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incidence of Lactose Intolerance Among Self-reported Lactose Intolerant People
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02878876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15-SC-11-A2-004
- Conditions
- Lactose Intolerance
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- a2 Milk Company Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a 3-sites, double-blinded, randomized, 2X2 cross-over study aiming to compare effects of milk containing only A2 type beta casein versus milk containing both A1 and A2 beta casein proteins on the gastrointestinal symptoms for the health people who self-reported to be lactose intolerant.
Detailed description
Study sites: Shanghai, Guangzhou, Beijing
Eligible subjects were enrolled in the study and randomized into one of the 2 study arms:
Sequence A1-A2: Oral consumption of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at Visit 1 and milk containing only A2 type beta casein at Visit 2; Sequence A2-A1: Oral consumption of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at Visit 1 and milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at Visit 2.
Washout period: 2 weeks between Visit 1 and Visit 2
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sequence A1-A2 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 |
| Sequence A2-A1 | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1Dietary Supplement: Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- 20~50 years old male or female subjects;
- Non-regular milk drinker with self-reported intolerance to commercial milk;
- Suffered from mild to moderate digestive discomfort after milk consumption;
- Have normal electrocardiograms (ECG) and blood pressure during quiet respiration;
- Agree not to take any medication, supplements, nutrition or other dairy products including acidophilus milk;
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Female on pregnant or feeding;
- Have known dairy allergy;
- Have severe response to milk intolerance;
- Have history of faecal impaction;
- Trying to lose weight by following a diet or exercise regimen designed for weight loss, or taking any drug influencing appetite and any drug for weight loss for the last three months ;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2Oral consumption of 300 ml of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 1 (after 12-hour fasting) and 300 ml of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 2 (after 12-hour fasting). | Dietary supplement | Sequence A1-A2 |
| Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1Oral consumption of 300 ml of milk containing only A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 1 (after 12-hour fasting) and 300 ml of milk containing both A1 and A2 type beta casein at 8:00 a.m. on Visit 2 (after 12-hour fasting). | Dietary supplement | Sequence A2-A1 |
Primary outcome
Gastrointestinal Symptom VAS scores at 3 hours
Time frame: Three hours after product intervention at each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Gastrointestinal symptoms were self-measured by study subjects on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 9 (severe) at 3 hours after product consumption at Visit 1 and Visit 2. Data was analyzed as a repeated measures design using a mixed effects ANOVA with symptom VAS scores at 3-hour as outcome, study product (A1 or A2) and study visit (1 or 2) as fixed effects, and a random subject effect nested within the sequence of study treatment (A1-A2 or A2-A1) , and adjusted for baseline symptom scores. Type III tests of fixed effects were used for testing the effect of study products. Contrast tests were generated to compare means for each product.
4 secondary outcomes
The percentage of improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms after drinking A2 versus A1
Time frame: 1 hour and 3 hours after product intervention
Urinary galactose concentration
Time frame: baseline and 3 hours after product intervention of each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Gastrointestinal Symptom VAS scores at 1 hour
Time frame: One hour after product intervention at each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Change of urinary galactose concentration from baseline at 3 hours <0.27 mmol/L (Yes/No)
Time frame: 3 hours after product intervention of each of Visit 1 and Visit 2
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Aug 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29070042He M, Sun J, Jiang ZQ, Yang YX. Effects of cow's milk beta-casein variants on symptoms of milk intolerance in Chinese adults: a multicentre, randomised controlled study. Nutr J. 2017 Oct 25;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0275-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lactose Intolerance
Not yet recruiting
Partially Hydrolysed Whey Based Formula in Differentiation Between Non IgE Gastrointestinal Cow's Milk Protein Allergy and Milk Intolerance
Cow Milk Protein Allergy, Cow Milk Intolerance
Recruiting
Milk for Diabetes Prevention
Lactose Intolerance, Lactose Intolerant
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Lactose Intolerance and Intestinal Permability
Lactose Intolerance, Adult Type, Intestinal Permability
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Screening of Lactose Intolerance Among IBS Patients Diarrhea Dominant
Lactose Intolerance
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of a Low FODMAP Diet in the Absence of Lactose Malabsorption in Moderate to Severe ROME IV IBS.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew J Clarke, PhD study director
a2 Milk Company Ltd.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Oral consumption of milk with sequence A1-A2 and Oral consumption of milk with sequence A2-A1 in people with Lactose Intolerance, run by a2 Milk Company Ltd..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gastrointestinal Symptom VAS scores at 3 hours (time frame: Three hours after product intervention at each of Visit 1 and Visit 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02878876, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Aug 2016.