Dental CariesPhase 1/2NCT02877888
Effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish in Prevention of Dental Caries in School Children
A Phase 1/2 study testing fluoride varnish 22600ppm in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Peradeniya.
Trial summary
Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among 6year old school children stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 7 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries
- What is being tested?
- fluoride varnish 22600ppm
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to 1 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 7 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children with at least one permanent tooth present.
- Age 6 to 7 years. Children under 6 years of age may be enrolled in the study if at least one permanent tooth has erupted.
- Residing in Kurunegala municipal council region and tap water is consumed (fluoride levels in drinking water is normal).
- Parental consent must be provided. If the parent is not the primary caregiver, a legal guardian or a family member who is the primary care provider must sign the consent form.
Who cannot join
- Children with ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. (These children will be referred for treatment.)
- No permanent teeth present or stainless steel crowns only.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Measure Effectiveness of Sodium Fluoride Varnish to Prevent Dental Caries in School Children Between Age of 6 and 7 Years
Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among 6year old school children stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. Professional fluoride varnish application has become popular as variety of studies has found that it is an efficient method in reducing dental caries. The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children.
Aim of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 6 monthly application of sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of dental caries in permanent incisors and molars in children between 6 and 7 years in a suburban setting in Sri Lanka. This will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. A sample of school children (6-7 years) will be randomized into varnish and control groups. All the children will receive routine caries preventive measures of oral hygiene instructions, dietary advice and professional cleaning. Children in varnish group will receive fluoride varnish professionally applied after prophylaxis every 6 months. Clinical examinations of all children will be performed at the beginning of the study and 1 year and 2 years later. All the caries at the dentinal level of both groups will be stabilized with temporary restorations at the beginning. During this period, each school will be visited four times at 6-month interval for recruitment, dental examinations, and fluoride varnish applications. Recruited children will be randomly assigned to either a treatment (5% NaF varnish) or a control group. Caries examinations will be conducted using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The cost for the dental team's school visits; cost involved in the treatment of dental caries throughout the course of the study in both groups will be evaluated and compared at the end of the study. The sample size is calculated as 160 each arm to detect 5% caries change with 80% power. Analysis The effect of intervention will be measured by number of caries prevented. New caries in the usual care and intervention group will be calculated after the completion of the study. The costs for intervention will be estimated. The costs will be estimated for the dental material, time for human resources and indirect costs.
Read the detailed description
Background
Dental caries remains a significant public health problem with socioeconomic, dietary and microbiological factors playing a major role as risk factors in initiation and progression of the disease. It is the most common cause of toothache and hospital admissions in young children. Dental caries in school children not only causes pain, but also impacts school attendance, parents' work hours, children's ability to eat, play and sleep. Therefore, dental caries when present significantly reduces the health related quality of life of a child.
Evidence-based studies indicate oral health prevention is cost-effective and saves children from pain and lost days of school.Therefore the measures taken to prevent the develop¬ment of dental caries could include bacterial biofilm control, dietary counselling, fluoride toothpastes, mouth rinses, varnishes, gels and foams, and casein-derived remineralisation pastes and placing resin-based/glass-ionomer pit and fissure sealants. ) Professional fluoride varnish application has become popular as variety of studies has discussed its effect in reducing dental caries.
Fluoride varnish was incorporated into clinical dentistry to reduce caries; its use in the U.S. has increased progressively since it was approved by the FDA in 1994. Fluoride varnish's effectiveness in caries prevention, ease of application, and safety give it an advantage over other types of topical fluoride treatments (such as gels and rinses) or other caries management methods. As a result, it is regarded as one of the superior topical fluoride agents for young children. Fluoride varnish also prolongs the contact time between fluoride and tooth surface to reduce caries. Its active ingredient is usually 5% sodium fluoride, or 22,600 ppm fluoride. It also has recently gained much attention in dentistry because the risk of dental fluorosis is also minimal.The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children and in other special needs groups.
Justification
Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among six and seven years old school children in Sri Lanka stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. The prevalence is 78% (83/84), 76.4% (94/95) and 65.5% (2002/2003) whereas the dmft is 4.4, 4.1 and 3.6.
The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children and in other special needs groups.
Up to date there is no other study carried out on cost effectiveness of fluoride varnish application on teeth in Sri Lankan population. Therefore, the results of the study will be beneficial in implementation and identification of advantages of fluoride varnish application on teeth in young children.
Aim
the main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of six monthly application of sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of dental caries in deciduous teeth, permanent incisors and molars in children between six and seven years in Sri Lanka.
The specific objective is:
- To find out the association between dental caries and the social status of the child (e.g. mother's education, father's education, monthly family income etc.)
Methods
This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The study has been registered with clinical trials registry (NCT02877888).
The study population was school children aged six to seven years, living in Kurunegala district. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the study are described below. The study was conducted at Maliyadeva Adarsha Vidyalaya and Wayamba Royal college, Kurunegala from month year to month year. The sample was selected according to below criteria…
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children with at least one permanent tooth present.
- Age 6 to 7 years. Children under 6 years of age were enrolled in the study if at least one permanent tooth has erupted.
- Residing in Kurunegala municipal council region and tap water is consumed (fluoride levels in drinking water was considered similar).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. (These children were referred for treatment.)
- No permanent tooth present or stainless steel crowns only.
The students meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria was randomly assigned, using block randomization in blocks of four, using a computer generated set of random numbers, to either varnish (5% Sodium Fluoride) or control group. A set of random numbers was used to create an allocation sequence, which was contained in individual opaque envelopes for used by the chief investigator. As the patients were recruited, the next envelope in the sequence was opened and the student was assigned to the stated group. All randomisation, sequence generation, and preparation of group allocation materials was performed by a third party who had no direct contact with the clinical aspects of the trial.
The sample size was calculated as 160 each arm to detect 5% caries change with 80% power. All children in both groups were provided with a self-administered pre tested questionnaire to assess the quality of life associated with presence of dental caries. Further, all the children received routine caries preventive measures of oral hygiene instructions, dietary advice and professional cleaning. Clinical examinations of all children were performed at the beginning of the study and 1 year and 2 years later. All the caries at the dentinal level of both groups were stabilized with temporary restorations at the beginning. Both varnish and control groups were subjected to use of fluoride tooth paste of 1000ppm. Children in the intervention group received fluoride varnish professionally applied after prophylaxis every 6 months combined with counselling on maintenance of oral hygiene and diet for a period of 2 years. The control group was only subjected to counselling on maintenance of oral hygiene and diet.
During the period of two years, a team visited each school four times at six months' interval for recruitment, dental examinations, and fluoride varnish applications. Trained interviewers collected data on oral health habits and sociodemographic characteristics of the children. Caries examinations were conducted using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).
The primary outcome studied was the number of new caries in the two study groups. Students and the interviewers were blinded to the intervention (varnish application or control) and they were blinded to the hypothesis, which was investigated in this study.
Analysis
The mean number of caries between different groups, segregated according to the variables assessed in the study, were compared. The mean number of caries in a particular group was calculated by dividing the total number of caries in a particular group by the total number of students in that group. As the number of caries showed a skewed distribution, Mann-Whitney U test was used compare the groups. Level of significance was considered as p<0.05.
The effect of intervention was measured by the mean number of new caries in different groups. The number of new caries in the usual care and intervention group was calculated at each time point of the survey. The mean number of new caries between the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. To assess the independent effect of the intervention on the incidence of caries, when other factors are controlled, multiple linear regression was applied.
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Being tested
- fluoride varnish 22600ppm
- Keywords
- cost effectiveness, fluoride varnish, dental caries
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
fluoride varnish 22600ppmDrug
Also called 5% duraphat
topical application on teeth every 6months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| drug fluoride varnish /strength 22600ppm | Experimental | intervention: drug :fluoride varnish 22600ppm topical application every 6 months for a total period of 2 years Receives: Drug: fluoride varnish 22600ppm |
| placebo comparator | No intervention | placebo:use of routine dental advice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
number of caries prevented in the intervention and control gropus
Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and the mean number of new dental caries atdifferent points are shown in table 3.
Table 3: Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and new dental caries at different time points
Period Mean number of dental caries in the Intervention Group Mean number of dental caries in the Control Group p value# 2015 May 0.94 1.79 <0.001 2015 Dec 1.69 1.77 <0.001 2016 Nov 1.50 1.97 <0.001
#Mann-Whitney U test
Measured: every 6 months for 2 years
Relationship of quality of life of children with dental caries and without dental caries
The total sample consisted of 321 students, with 161 and 162 in control and intervention groups respectively. Mean number of caries was significantly high among those who had difficulty in chewing, difficulty in vigorous chewing, difficulty in taking hot or cold food.
Percentage of students with at least one dental caries at the beginning of the study was compared between different variables. If a student had at least one tooth with dental caries, was taken as positive for dental caries. Of the total population 115 (65.7%) of the students in the 6 age group had at least one tooth with dental caries and equal proportion was found among those who were more than six years as well. Difficulty in chewing (<0.001), difficulty chewing vigorously (<0.001), difficulty taking cold or hot food (<0.001) and difficulty taking sweets (0.034) were experienced more by the students who had at least one dental caries.
Measured: at the beginning of study after examination
Secondary outcomes (1)
Independent association between vanish intervention and new dental caries
To assess the independent effect of the intervention on development of new dental caries, when other factors are controlled, multiple linear regression was applied. Application of vanish was significantly associated with less number of new dental caries at two time points (May 2015 and Nov 2016) of the survey.
Period β coefficient 95% CI p value May 2015 Intervention -0.84 -1.24 - -0.45 <0.001 Control 1 Dec 2015 Intervention 0.09 -0.45 - 0.64 0.733 Control 1 Nov 2016 Intervention -0.49 -1.0 - -0.28 0.043 Control 1
Measured: every 6 months for 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completion30 Oct 2018
- Study completion1 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Peradeniya
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queensland University of Technology
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. RM Jayasinghe, University of Peradeniya
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02877888
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FRC/FDS/UOP-2014/25
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):40-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 19216381Gugwad SC, Shah P, Lodaya R, Bhat C, Tandon P, Choudhari S, Patil S. Caries prevention effect of intensive application of sodium fluoride varnish in molars in children between age 6 and 7 years. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):408-13. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1068.
PubMed 22269229Liu BY, Lo EC, Chu CH, Lin HC. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. J Dent Res. 2012 Aug;91(8):753-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512452278. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
PubMed 22736448Chu CH, Lo E. Uses of sodium fluoride varnish in dental practice. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2008 Jun;19:58-61.
PubMed 19728633Tickle M, Milsom KM, Donaldson M, Killough S, O'Neill C, Crealey G, Sutton M, Noble S, Greer M, Worthington HV. Protocol for Northern Ireland Caries Prevention in Practice Trial (NIC-PIP) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the effects and costs of a dental caries prevention regime for young children attending primary care dental services. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Oct 10;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-27.
PubMed 21985746Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Linsenmeyar KA, Williams A, Mouradian W. Preventive dental care for children in the United States: a national perspective. Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):e544-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1958.
PubMed 17332174Greig V, Conway DI. Fluoride varnish was effective at reducing caries on high caries risk school children in rural Brazil. Evid Based Dent. 2012;13(3):78-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400874.
PubMed 23059920Bali RK, Mathur VB, Talwar PP, Chanana HB. National Oral Health Survey and Fluoride Mapping, 2002-2003, India. Delhi: Dental Council of India; 2004
Child Dental Health Survey 2013: England, Wales and Nothern Ireland 2013
State Oral Health Surveys. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018
Chu CH, Lo EC. A review of sodium fluoride varnish. Gen Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;54(4):247-53.
PubMed 16903196Dimitropoulos Y, Holden A, Gwynne K, Irving M, Binge N, Blinkhorn A. An assessment of strategies to control dental caries in Aboriginal children living in rural and remote communities in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0643-y.
PubMed 30373592James P, Parnell C, Whelton H. The caries-preventive effect of chlorhexidine varnish in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Caries Res. 2010;44(4):333-40. doi: 10.1159/000315346. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
PubMed 20606432Moberg Skold U, Petersson LG, Lith A, Birkhed D. Effect of school-based fluoride varnish programmes on approximal caries in adolescents from different caries risk areas. Caries Res. 2005 Jul-Aug;39(4):273-9. doi: 10.1159/000084833.
PubMed 15942186Neidell M, Shearer B, Lamster IB. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Dental Sealants versus Fluoride Varnish in a School-Based Setting. Caries Res. 2016;50 Suppl 1:78-82. doi: 10.1159/000439091. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
PubMed 27100884
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Trial to Measure Effectiveness of Sodium Fluoride Varnish to Prevent Dental Caries in School Children Between Age of 6 and 7 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02877888
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FRC/FDS/UOP-2014/25
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Keywords
- cost effectiveness, fluoride varnish, dental caries
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PeradeniyaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queensland University of Technology
- Study start
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among 6year old school children stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. Professional fluoride varnish application has become popular as variety of studies has found that it is an efficient method in reducing dental caries. The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children.
Aim of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of 6 monthly application of sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of dental caries in permanent incisors and molars in children between 6 and 7 years in a suburban setting in Sri Lanka. This will be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. A sample of school children (6-7 years) will be randomized into varnish and control groups. All the children will receive routine caries preventive measures of oral hygiene instructions, dietary advice and professional cleaning. Children in varnish group will receive fluoride varnish professionally applied after prophylaxis every 6 months. Clinical examinations of all children will be performed at the beginning of the study and 1 year and 2 years later. All the caries at the dentinal level of both groups will be stabilized with temporary restorations at the beginning. During this period, each school will be visited four times at 6-month interval for recruitment, dental examinations, and fluoride varnish applications. Recruited children will be randomly assigned to either a treatment (5% NaF varnish) or a control group. Caries examinations will be conducted using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). The cost for the dental team's school visits; cost involved in the treatment of dental caries throughout the course of the study in both groups will be evaluated and compared at the end of the study. The sample size is calculated as 160 each arm to detect 5% caries change with 80% power. Analysis The effect of intervention will be measured by number of caries prevented. New caries in the usual care and intervention group will be calculated after the completion of the study. The costs for intervention will be estimated. The costs will be estimated for the dental material, time for human resources and indirect costs.
Detailed description
Background
Dental caries remains a significant public health problem with socioeconomic, dietary and microbiological factors playing a major role as risk factors in initiation and progression of the disease. It is the most common cause of toothache and hospital admissions in young children. Dental caries in school children not only causes pain, but also impacts school attendance, parents' work hours, children's ability to eat, play and sleep. Therefore, dental caries when present significantly reduces the health related quality of life of a child.
Evidence-based studies indicate oral health prevention is cost-effective and saves children from pain and lost days of school.Therefore the measures taken to prevent the develop¬ment of dental caries could include bacterial biofilm control, dietary counselling, fluoride toothpastes, mouth rinses, varnishes, gels and foams, and casein-derived remineralisation pastes and placing resin-based/glass-ionomer pit and fissure sealants. ) Professional fluoride varnish application has become popular as variety of studies has discussed its effect in reducing dental caries.
Fluoride varnish was incorporated into clinical dentistry to reduce caries; its use in the U.S. has increased progressively since it was approved by the FDA in 1994. Fluoride varnish's effectiveness in caries prevention, ease of application, and safety give it an advantage over other types of topical fluoride treatments (such as gels and rinses) or other caries management methods. As a result, it is regarded as one of the superior topical fluoride agents for young children. Fluoride varnish also prolongs the contact time between fluoride and tooth surface to reduce caries. Its active ingredient is usually 5% sodium fluoride, or 22,600 ppm fluoride. It also has recently gained much attention in dentistry because the risk of dental fluorosis is also minimal.The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children and in other special needs groups.
Justification
Despite the availability of free health dental service in Sri Lanka, the prevalence and severity of dental caries among six and seven years old school children in Sri Lanka stand at a very high level according to the results of national oral health survey in 1983/84, 94/95 and 2002/2003. The prevalence is 78% (83/84), 76.4% (94/95) and 65.5% (2002/2003) whereas the dmft is 4.4, 4.1 and 3.6.
The simplicity of its application makes it very suitable and practical for use in dental clinics and outreach dental services, especially in young children and in other special needs groups.
Up to date there is no other study carried out on cost effectiveness of fluoride varnish application on teeth in Sri Lankan population. Therefore, the results of the study will be beneficial in implementation and identification of advantages of fluoride varnish application on teeth in young children.
Aim
the main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of six monthly application of sodium fluoride varnish in prevention of dental caries in deciduous teeth, permanent incisors and molars in children between six and seven years in Sri Lanka.
The specific objective is:
- To find out the association between dental caries and the social status of the child (e.g. mother's education, father's education, monthly family income etc.)
Methods
This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. The study has been registered with clinical trials registry (NCT02877888).
The study population was school children aged six to seven years, living in Kurunegala district. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the study are described below. The study was conducted at Maliyadeva Adarsha Vidyalaya and Wayamba Royal college, Kurunegala from month year to month year. The sample was selected according to below criteria…
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children with at least one permanent tooth present.
- Age 6 to 7 years. Children under 6 years of age were enrolled in the study if at least one permanent tooth has erupted.
- Residing in Kurunegala municipal council region and tap water is consumed (fluoride levels in drinking water was considered similar).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children with ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. (These children were referred for treatment.)
- No permanent tooth present or stainless steel crowns only.
The students meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria was randomly assigned, using block randomization in blocks of four, using a computer generated set of random numbers, to either varnish (5% Sodium Fluoride) or control group. A set of random numbers was used to create an allocation sequence, which was contained in individual opaque envelopes for used by the chief investigator. As the patients were recruited, the next envelope in the sequence was opened and the student was assigned to the stated group. All randomisation, sequence generation, and preparation of group allocation materials was performed by a third party who had no direct contact with the clinical aspects of the trial.
The sample size was calculated as 160 each arm to detect 5% caries change with 80% power. All children in both groups were provided with a self-administered pre tested questionnaire to assess the quality of life associated with presence of dental caries. Further, all the children received routine caries preventive measures of oral hygiene instructions, dietary advice and professional cleaning. Clinical examinations of all children were performed at the beginning of the study and 1 year and 2 years later. All the caries at the dentinal level of both groups were stabilized with temporary restorations at the beginning. Both varnish and control groups were subjected to use of fluoride tooth paste of 1000ppm. Children in the intervention group received fluoride varnish professionally applied after prophylaxis every 6 months combined with counselling on maintenance of oral hygiene and diet for a period of 2 years. The control group was only subjected to counselling on maintenance of oral hygiene and diet.
During the period of two years, a team visited each school four times at six months' interval for recruitment, dental examinations, and fluoride varnish applications. Trained interviewers collected data on oral health habits and sociodemographic characteristics of the children. Caries examinations were conducted using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).
The primary outcome studied was the number of new caries in the two study groups. Students and the interviewers were blinded to the intervention (varnish application or control) and they were blinded to the hypothesis, which was investigated in this study.
Analysis
The mean number of caries between different groups, segregated according to the variables assessed in the study, were compared. The mean number of caries in a particular group was calculated by dividing the total number of caries in a particular group by the total number of students in that group. As the number of caries showed a skewed distribution, Mann-Whitney U test was used compare the groups. Level of significance was considered as p<0.05.
The effect of intervention was measured by the mean number of new caries in different groups. The number of new caries in the usual care and intervention group was calculated at each time point of the survey. The mean number of new caries between the two groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. To assess the independent effect of the intervention on the incidence of caries, when other factors are controlled, multiple linear regression was applied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| drug fluoride varnish /strength 22600ppm | Experimental | Drug: fluoride varnish 22600ppmintervention: drug :fluoride varnish 22600ppm topical application every 6 months for a total period of 2 years |
| placebo comparator | No intervention | –placebo:use of routine dental advice |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 7 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children with at least one permanent tooth present.
- Age 6 to 7 years. Children under 6 years of age may be enrolled in the study if at least one permanent tooth has erupted.
- Residing in Kurunegala municipal council region and tap water is consumed (fluoride levels in drinking water is normal).
- Parental consent must be provided. If the parent is not the primary caregiver, a legal guardian or a family member who is the primary care provider must sign the consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children with ulcerative gingivitis and stomatitis. (These children will be referred for treatment.)
- No permanent teeth present or stainless steel crowns only.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| fluoride varnish 22600ppmAlso: 5% duraphattopical application on teeth every 6months | Drug | drug fluoride varnish /strength 22600ppm |
Primary outcome
number of caries prevented in the intervention and control gropus
Time frame: every 6 months for 2 years
Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and the mean number of new dental caries atdifferent points are shown in table 3. Table 3: Association between sodium fluoride varnish application and new dental caries at different time points Period Mean number of dental caries in the Intervention Group Mean number of dental caries in the Control Group p value# 2015 May 0.94 1.79 <0.001 2015 Dec 1.69 1.77 <0.001 2016 Nov 1.50 1.97 <0.001 #Mann-Whitney U test
Relationship of quality of life of children with dental caries and without dental caries
Time frame: at the beginning of study after examination
The total sample consisted of 321 students, with 161 and 162 in control and intervention groups respectively. Mean number of caries was significantly high among those who had difficulty in chewing, difficulty in vigorous chewing, difficulty in taking hot or cold food. Percentage of students with at least one dental caries at the beginning of the study was compared between different variables. If a student had at least one tooth with dental caries, was taken as positive for dental caries. Of the total population 115 (65.7%) of the students in the 6 age group had at least one tooth with dental caries and equal proportion was found among those who were more than six years as well. Difficulty in chewing (<0.001), difficulty chewing vigorously (<0.001), difficulty taking cold or hot food (<0.001) and difficulty taking sweets (0.034) were experienced more by the students who had at least one dental caries.
1 secondary outcome
Independent association between vanish intervention and new dental caries
Time frame: every 6 months for 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19216381American Academy on Pediatric Dentistry; American Academy of Pediatrics. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent. 2008-2009;30(7 Suppl):40-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22269229Gugwad SC, Shah P, Lodaya R, Bhat C, Tandon P, Choudhari S, Patil S. Caries prevention effect of intensive application of sodium fluoride varnish in molars in children between age 6 and 7 years. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Nov 1;12(6):408-13. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1068.
- Background: PubMed 22736448Liu BY, Lo EC, Chu CH, Lin HC. Randomized trial on fluorides and sealants for fissure caries prevention. J Dent Res. 2012 Aug;91(8):753-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034512452278. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 19728633Chu CH, Lo E. Uses of sodium fluoride varnish in dental practice. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2008 Jun;19:58-61.
- Background: PubMed 21985746Tickle M, Milsom KM, Donaldson M, Killough S, O'Neill C, Crealey G, Sutton M, Noble S, Greer M, Worthington HV. Protocol for Northern Ireland Caries Prevention in Practice Trial (NIC-PIP) trial: a randomised controlled trial to measure the effects and costs of a dental caries prevention regime for young children attending primary care dental services. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Oct 10;11:27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-11-27.
- Background: PubMed 17332174Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Linsenmeyar KA, Williams A, Mouradian W. Preventive dental care for children in the United States: a national perspective. Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):e544-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1958.
- Background: PubMed 23059920Greig V, Conway DI. Fluoride varnish was effective at reducing caries on high caries risk school children in rural Brazil. Evid Based Dent. 2012;13(3):78-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400874.
- BackgroundBali RK, Mathur VB, Talwar PP, Chanana HB. National Oral Health Survey and Fluoride Mapping, 2002-2003, India. Delhi: Dental Council of India; 2004
- BackgroundChild Dental Health Survey 2013: England, Wales and Nothern Ireland 2013
- BackgroundState Oral Health Surveys. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018
- Results publication: PubMed 16903196Chu CH, Lo EC. A review of sodium fluoride varnish. Gen Dent. 2006 Jul-Aug;54(4):247-53.
- Results publication: PubMed 30373592Dimitropoulos Y, Holden A, Gwynne K, Irving M, Binge N, Blinkhorn A. An assessment of strategies to control dental caries in Aboriginal children living in rural and remote communities in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0643-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing fluoride varnish 22600ppm in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Peradeniya.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
number of caries prevented in the intervention and control gropus (time frame: every 6 months for 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02877888, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2018.