AzTrials
AzTrials

Trisomy 21DIgiT21NCT02872948

Diagnosis Accuracy of Noninvasive Screening by PCR Digital for Down Syndrom

An observational study of Trisomy 21, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to estimate the intrinsic diagnostic qualities of the digital dPCR in the screening of T21 from a multicentrique sample of patients with pregnancies at high risk of T21 (risk > 1/250). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Trisomy 21
What is being tested?
Diagnostic
How many people
1,260 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Aug 2015to Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: Sample multicentrique of patients with pregnancies at high risk of T21 (risk > 1/250)

Who may be able to join

  • major Patients
  • unique(only) Pregnancies
  • Screening combined(organized) by the 1st quarter of the trisomy 21 with risk > 1/250
  • Patients wishing to realize a foetal taking with diagnostic aim
  • Sent in maternity(maternity hospital) for this taking between 12 and 17 weeks of amenorrhea

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusing to participate
  • no Patient beneficiary of the Social Security or other diet
  • Private person of freedom

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hospital center

    Grenoble, 38043

Other trials in France

About this study

The main objective of this study is to estimate the intrinsic diagnostic qualities of the digital dPCR in the screening of T21 from a multicentrique sample of patients with pregnancies at high risk of T21 (risk > 1/250).

The profit expected from this technique is to propose to the encircled women a screening more successful than that of the screening combined(organized) of the 1st quarter, simple of realization and in a moderate cost. We thus propose here an original alternative(alternate) method to the exclusive, expensive and binding techniques of top-debit(-flow). The recent technical improvements and his(her,its) advantages medical - economic allow to envisage a reliable, strong and long-lasting use of the dPCR in clinical routine in the DPNI of T21 in most of the laboratories. This pilot project could serve for the later development of a study of clinical validation multicentrique of large scale(big turntable ladder).

Read the detailed description

Context

Currently, non-invasive screening test for trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) is proposed to every pregnant woman. This first trimester combined test consists of ultrasound nuchal translucency measurement, associated with different maternal serum biochemical assay and maternal age.

Since the discovery of the presence of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), using mainly a massive parallel sequencing (MPS) approach, has been introduced. The chromosomal origin of each sequenced plasma DNA molecule and the over- or under-representation of any chromosome can be identified by MPS in maternal plasma. The specificity and sensibility of such high-throughput techniques are excellent, close to 100 %. However, MPS remains time-consuming, very expensive (> 1000 euros per patient) and can't be used in clinical routine in most genetics laboratories worldwide.

Digital PCR represents an interesting alternative to the MPS due to its targeted approach, cost (>10x less than MPS), speed and relative simplicity allowing a clinical routine practice. However, its clinical an analytical relevance remains insufficiently demonstrated in literature data . Therefore, our main objective is to evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of noninvasive screening by PCR digital for Down syndrome.

Expected results This study will assess the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio with a satisfactory accuracy. The no call rate will be also evaluated and considered as a positive test.

The optimal number of replicates (leading to a false positive rate <5%) will be determined using a ROC curve. Our hypothesis is that the sensitivity of the screening test will be upper to 95% with a false positive rate <5%.

If results are conclusive, this pilot project will be a strong argument in favor of the development of a further large scale study. It may challenge current screening strategy and allow to propose an inexpensive, fast, and accessible NIPT of trisomy 21 to a large number of laboratories in our territory.

Experimental design We will evaluate this approach on a pregnant women cohort with high risk for T21 (>1/250), prospectively recruited from three regional hospitals with a cytogenetics laboratory. We propose to preform single-blind retrospective analyses of cell free DNA of 100 pregnancies (including 70 euploid and 30 T21fetuses). Results obtained with the dPCR approach will be compared with the fetal karyotype beforehand performed. Digital PCR analyses will be performed at the Grenoble University Hospital, our team having a significant experience in digital PCR technology. Digital PCR reactions will be done on a QuantStudio™ 3D (LifeTechnologies) with the commercial high density chips etched with 20,000 consistently-sized nanoscale reaction wells. To improve the analytical sensitivity, 10 replicates will be performed for each patient.

Conditions
Trisomy 21
Being tested
Diagnostic
Keywords
Non invasive prenatal testing, Down Syndrome, Digital PCR
Medical subject headings
Down Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DiagnosticGenetic

Study groups in NCT02872948
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
70 euploïdes foeti samplesPatients with foetus euploïde ("no sick")
Receives: Genetic: Diagnostic
30 trisomies 21 samplesPatients with foetus reached(affected) by trisomy 21 ("sick")
Receives: Genetic: Diagnostic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intrinsic diagnostic qualities of the digital dPCR in the screening of T21 from a sample multicentrique of patients with pregnancies at high risk of T21 (risk > 1/250)

    The main criterion is the estimation of the intrinsic qualities of the dPCR in the screening of T21. The sensibility of the screening will be favored and the reserved value will be the one giving a rate of acceptable positive forgery fixed to 5 %.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,260 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02872948
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC14.185
Acronym
DIgiT21
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
16 Aug 2016
Last updated
1 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Cans C, Amblard F, Devillard F, Pison H, Jalbert P, Jouk PS. Population screening for aneuploidy using maternal age and ultrasound. Prenat Diagn. 1998 Jul;18(7):683-92.

    PubMed 9706649
  • Coutton C, Abada F, Karaouzene T, Sanlaville D, Satre V, Lunardi J, Jouk PS, Arnoult C, Thierry-Mieg N, Ray PF. Fine characterisation of a recombination hotspot at the DPY19L2 locus and resolution of the paradoxical excess of duplications over deletions in the general population. PLoS Genet. 2013 Mar;9(3):e1003363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003363. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

    PubMed 23555282
  • Nadeau G, Coutton C, Amblard F, Michalowicz G, Frasca S, Fertin A, Devillard F, Satre V, Usson Y, Jouk PS. Interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization detection of the 7q11.23 chromosomal inversion in a clinical laboratory: automated versus manual scoring. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Apr;51(4):e41-4. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0416. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23072851
  • Coutton C, Bidart M, Rendu J, Devillard F, Vieville G, Amblard F, Lopez G, Jouk PS, Satre V. 190-kb duplication in 1p36.11 including PIGV and ARID1A genes in a girl with intellectual disability and hexadactyly. Clin Genet. 2013 Dec;84(6):596-9. doi: 10.1111/cge.12113. Epub 2013 Mar 25. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23521658
  • Ben Khelifa M, Coutton C, Zouari R, Karaouzene T, Rendu J, Bidart M, Yassine S, Pierre V, Delaroche J, Hennebicq S, Grunwald D, Escalier D, Pernet-Gallay K, Jouk PS, Thierry-Mieg N, Toure A, Arnoult C, Ray PF. Mutations in DNAH1, which encodes an inner arm heavy chain dynein, lead to male infertility from multiple morphological abnormalities of the sperm flagella. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan 2;94(1):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

    PubMed 24360805

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Trisomy 21, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intrinsic diagnostic qualities of the digital dPCR in the screening of T21 from a sample multicentrique of patients with pregnancies at high risk of T21 (risk > 1/250) (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02872948, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in