AzTrials
AzTrials

Neisseria Gonorrhoeae InfectionpNAATNCT02870101

Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Detection of NG and CT

A study testing Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT and Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT in people with Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection and Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Duke University at 9 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to use participant samples to simultaneously evaluate three nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) diagnostic platforms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT and Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,767 participants
Where
9 sitesUnited States
Study dates
10 Apr 2017to 12 Mar 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Attending a participating clinic for evaluation of sexually transmitted infections (STIs)
  • ≥18 years of age at date of screening
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Willing to comply with study procedures, including collection of 4 swabs each from the pharynx and rectum for NG and CT testing

Who cannot join

  • Receipt of any systemic antibacterial drug in the past 14 days
  • Receipt of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the past 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

United States9 sites
  • Central Texas Clinical Research

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • Denver Health and Hospital Authority

    Denver, Colorado, 80204

  • Wayne State University

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • AIDS Health Foundation - Hollywood

    Hollywood, California, 90028

  • Los Angeles LGBT Clinic

    Los Angeles, California, 90028

  • AIDS Healthcare Foundation - Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33133

  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Louisiana State University

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70119

  • University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Detection of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia Trachomatis in Extragenital Sites

The purpose of this study was to use participant samples to simultaneously evaluate three nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) diagnostic platforms.

Read the detailed description

Background \& Significance: Infections due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) are major threats to public health. Most CT and NG infections are asymptomatic, but infection can lead to serious sequelae, including infertility, chronic pelvic pain, adverse obstetrical outcomes, increased risk of acquiring the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and disseminated infection.

There has also been growing concern over antibiotic resistance. In 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classified drug-resistant NG as one of the three urgent-level resistant bacteria. Improved detection of extragenital NG is thought to be a crucial component of adequate treatment and for prevention of further resistance.

Currently, the CDC recommends using NAATs to screen and diagnose for NG and CT in the genitourinary tract due to their superior sensitivity compared to traditional culture methods. There are currently no FDA-approved commercial NAAT tests for the detection of pharyngeal and rectal NG or CT infections. The goal of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three NAAT assays for detection of extragenital NG and CT infections.

Design \& Procedures: A cross-sectional, single visit study evaluating the performance of three commercial NAATs to detect NG and CT in the rectum and pharynx. A fourth NAAT will be used as a tiebreaker. The performance of the fourth NAAT will not be evaluated. Each manufacturer will provide a specific swab collection kit and transport media.

This research study will take place at healthcare clinics that focus on sexually transmitted infections, women's health, student health, family planning, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health. This research will include specimens collected from adult males, females, and transgender persons seeking sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing at the participating study clinics. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic participants are included in the study population.

Potential participants will be identified, assessed for eligibility, and asked to provide oral informed consent. If a potential participant agrees to take part in the research, the participant will have eight total swabs collected: four swabs from the pharynx and four swabs from the rectum. The swabs needed for routine clinical care are taken first prior to collection of the research study swabs. All study procedures take place during one clinic visit; there are no follow-up visits as part of the study. Participants continue with routine clinical care as directed by their medical providers.

Subject participation is confidential and anonymous. The results of the tests and participation in this research are not placed in the participant's medical records.

Each study swab is used for a specific NAAT and tested at one of the two reference testing laboratories. The Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) is defined by the results of the two other NAATs, and, if necessary, results from the tiebreaker NAAT. Each anatomic site is considered in isolation. If fewer than four swabs at an anatomic site are completed, then the test results from that specific anatomic site are excluded from analysis.

Being tested
Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT
Keywords
Nucleic acid amplification tests, Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, Sexually transmitted infection, Pharynx, Rectum, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections, Genital Diseases, Male, Genital Diseases, Female
Medical subject headings
Gonorrhea, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections, Genital Diseases, Male, Genital Diseases, Female

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CTDiagnostic test

    A combination test using real-time PCR to detect DNA from NG and CT.

  • Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CTDiagnostic test

    A combination test using target amplification to detect RNA from NG and CT.

  • Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CTDiagnostic test

    A combination test using real-time PCR to detect DNA from NG and CT.

Study groups in NCT02870101
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
InterventionOtherPerformance of three nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) from swabs collected from the pharynx and rectum. Assays include: Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT; Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT; and, Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT; Diagnostic Test: Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT; Diagnostic Test: Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 1 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Pharynx

    NAAT 1 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 2 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  2. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 1 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Rectum

    NAAT 1 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 2 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  3. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 2 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Pharynx

    NAAT 2 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid

    Measured: One day

  4. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 2 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Rectum

    NAAT 2 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  5. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 3 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Pharynx

    NAAT 3 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 2 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  6. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 3 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Rectum

    NAAT 3 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 2 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  7. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 1 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Pharynx

    NAAT 1 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 2 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  8. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 1 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Rectum

    NAAT 1 index test results include negative, positive, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 2 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  9. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 2 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Pharynx

    NAAT 2 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  10. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 2 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Rectum

    NAAT 2 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 3 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  11. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 3 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Pharynx

    NAAT 3 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 2 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

  12. Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 3 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Chlamydia Trachomatis (CT) in Rectum

    NAAT 3 index test results include negative, positive, equivocal, and no result. ASIS reference results are the combination of the NAAT 1 and NAAT 2 index test results. ASIS reference results include negative, positive, indeterminate, and invalid.

    Measured: One day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Apr 2017
  3. Primary completion12 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion12 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,767 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02870101
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00073558
Other IDs
5UM1AI104681
Acronym
pNAAT
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
12 Aug 2016
Last updated
15 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Liu B, Roberts CL, Clarke M, Jorm L, Hunt J, Ward J. Chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections and the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Dec;89(8):672-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051118. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

    PubMed 24005255
  • O'Brien JP, Goldenberg DL, Rice PA. Disseminated gonococcal infection: a prospective analysis of 49 patients and a review of pathophysiology and immune mechanisms. Medicine (Baltimore). 1983 Nov;62(6):395-406.

    PubMed 6415361
  • Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hagdu A, Thompson SE. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Jul-Aug;19(4):185-92.

    PubMed 1411832
  • Rottingen JA, Cameron DW, Garnett GP. A systematic review of the epidemiologic interactions between classic sexually transmitted diseases and HIV: how much really is known? Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Oct;28(10):579-97. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200110000-00005.

    PubMed 11689757
  • Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Ito S. Management of pharyngeal gonorrhea is crucial to prevent the emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jul;56(7):4039-40; author re[ply 4041-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00505-12. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22700700
  • Workowski KA, Bolan GA; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015 Jun 5;64(RR-03):1-137.

    PubMed 26042815
  • Zakher B, Cantor AG, Pappas M, Daeges M, Nelson HD. Screening for gonorrhea and Chlamydia: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 16;161(12):884-93. doi: 10.7326/M14-1022.

    PubMed 25244000
  • Ota KV, Tamari IE, Smieja M, Jamieson F, Jones KE, Towns L, Juzkiw J, Richardson SE. Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in pharyngeal and rectal specimens using the BD Probetec ET system, the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay and culture. Sex Transm Infect. 2009 Jun;85(3):182-6. doi: 10.1136/sti.2008.034140. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

    PubMed 19126571
  • Schachter J, Moncada J, Liska S, Shayevich C, Klausner JD. Nucleic acid amplification tests in the diagnosis of chlamydial and gonococcal infections of the oropharynx and rectum in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2008 Jul;35(7):637-42. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31817bdd7e.

    PubMed 18520976
  • Trebach JD, Chaulk CP, Page KR, Tuddenham S, Ghanem KG. Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis among women reporting extragenital exposures. Sex Transm Dis. 2015 May;42(5):233-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000248.

    PubMed 25868133
  • Bachmann LH, Johnson RE, Cheng H, Markowitz L, Papp JR, Palella FJ Jr, Hook EW 3rd. Nucleic acid amplification tests for diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis rectal infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1827-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02398-09. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

    PubMed 20335410
  • Cosentino LA, Campbell T, Jett A, Macio I, Zamborsky T, Cranston RD, Hillier SL. Use of nucleic acid amplification testing for diagnosis of anorectal sexually transmitted infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jun;50(6):2005-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00185-12. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

    PubMed 22493338
  • Geelen TH, Rossen JW, Beerens AM, Poort L, Morre SA, Ritmeester WS, van Kruchten HE, van de Pas MM, Savelkoul PH. Performance of cobas(R) 4800 and m2000 real-time assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in rectal and self-collected vaginal specimen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;77(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

    PubMed 23891224
  • Moncada J, Schachter J, Liska S, Shayevich C, Klausner JD. Evaluation of self-collected glans and rectal swabs from men who have sex with men for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of nucleic acid amplification tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1657-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02269-08. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

    PubMed 19369445
  • Perry MD, Jones RN, Corden SA. Is confirmatory testing of Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG test Neisseria gonorrhoeae positive samples required? Comparison of the Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG test with an opa/pap duplex assay for the detection of N gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect. 2014 Jun;90(4):303-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051410. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

    PubMed 24653040

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT and Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT in people with Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection and Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, run by Duke University at 9 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) 1 Index Test Results Relative to Anatomic Site Infection Status (ASIS) Reference Results for Neisseria Gonorrhoeae (NG) in Pharynx (time frame: One day). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02870101, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in