AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal NeoplasmLesion SSLNCT02861885

Detection and Characterization of Sessile Serrated Lesions (SSL) of the Right Colon

An observational study of Colorectal Neoplasm and Sessile Serrated Lesion, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 6 sites in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

There are a few studies regarding Sessile Serrated Lesions (SSL). They are recently identified as precancerous lesions. Yet, digestive tract serrated lesions would be part of a new colic carcinogenesis way : the serrated tumor way. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Chromoendoscopy
How many people
71 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
24 Feb 2016to 24 Apr 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The population being studied is the cohort of patients referred for a colonoscopy resulting screening indication, digestive syndrome or monitoring.

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patients 18 years of age or older
  • Patient having an indication for colonoscopy to detect colorectal neoplastic lesions, which meet at least one of the following conditions :
  • Positive fecal occult blood test
  • 1st degree family history of colorectal cancer or adenoma before 60 years of age
  • Personal history of colorectal adenoma or colorectal cancer
  • Unexplained digestive symptoms after 50 years of age or those not responding to symptomatic treatment : modification of bowel movements, abdominal pains
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Isolated or repeated rectal bleeding after 50 years of age or occult bleeding
  • Acromegaly
  • Infectious endocarditis with digestive bacteria
  • Suspicion of sessile serrated lesion in the right colon
  • None opposite of patient for participating

Who cannot join

  • History of digestive resection as resection of the right colon (right ileocolectomy, right hemicolectomy) or large colic resection.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • Hôpital Estaing, CHU Clermont Ferrand, NHE Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, 1 place Lucie Aubrac

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

  • Centre Hospitalier Saint JOSEPH Saint Luc, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, 20 quai Claude Bernard

    Lyon, 69004

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, 103 Grande-Rue de la Croix Rousse

    Lyon, 69317

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital E Herriot, Service d'hépatogastroentérologie, 5 place d'Arsonval

    Lyon, 69437

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, Chemin Grand Revoyet

    Pierre-Bénite, 69310

  • Centre Hospitalier Villefranche sur Saône, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Plateux d'Ouilly Gleize

    Villefranche-sur-Saône, 69655

Other trials in France

About this study

There are a few studies regarding Sessile Serrated Lesions (SSL). They are recently identified as precancerous lesions. Yet, digestive tract serrated lesions would be part of a new colic carcinogenesis way : the serrated tumor way. Evolution from polyp to cancer would be faster than through the usual adenoma to cancer way. It would be then responsible of a lot of "missed" lesions or interval cancer. The missed SSL rate is estimated at between 27% and 59%.

Current diagnosis methods show weakness to identify those SSL. In order to improve their detection, the investigators dispose of several coloration techniques. Indigo carmine chromoendoscopy enhance neoplastic lesion detection as part of the hereditary rectal carcinoma screening. NBI electronic coloration, which is faster and easier has not shown any efficacy on the adenoma detection rate, except for patients with Lynch syndrome.

Read more

The objective is to better describe the SSL endoscopic semiology (detection and characterization) and to establish standards for the endoscopic techniques in order to improve the colonoscopy diagnosis quality. The investigators propose to evaluate 2 fundamental endoscopic techniques (Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) and indigo carmine), widely used for other indications, in comparison with the White Light technique (WLI).

Therefore, the investigators propose a prospective, observational, multicentric cohort study in order to 1) define SSL endoscopic various aspects 2) establish which technique (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) is the best to diagnose SSL, namely detection and characterization 3) evaluate the multifocal dimension rate for those lesions at ascending colon level.

The diagnosis impact is immediate, and could allow to consider an update for boh endoscopic NICE and Kudo Pit Pattern classification, and good practice guidances for colonoscopic diagnosis. Better SSL detectability thus their systematic resection could have a long term effect in reducing both colon cancer rate and interval cancer

Being tested
Chromoendoscopy
Keywords
Colonoscopy, sessile serrated lesions, chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging, Indigo Carmin®, Pit pattern, Kudo classification, NICE classification, neoplasms by histologic type
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Histologic Type

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ChromoendoscopyOther

    Colonoscopy will run in accordance with standard procedure, including air insufflation throughout the endoscope rise. The endoscope will be a Olympus NBI videoscope (180 series and latest). First, progression will run until caecum without systematic terminal ileum intubation. Polyps will be searched out during descent phase. The patient will be eligible as soon as the operator suspects an ascendant colon SSL with white light. The operator will have to initiate the WLI colonoscopy. If a SSL is suspected in the colon, the operator will run at the same time, a NBI colon examination, then an indigo carmine chromoendoscopy colon examination. Each lesion will be pictured before and after mucus clean-up. Lesions biopsy or resection will be ran in accordance with standard procedure.

Study groups in NCT02861885
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lesion SSLPatient cohort referred by colonoscopy screening indication, digestive syndrome or monitoring, with ascendant colon macroscopic SSL suspicion throughout white light during colonoscopy
Receives: Other: Chromoendoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. patients with sessile serrated lesions

    Proportion of patient for whom at least one new SSL has been shown macroscopically through NBI and/or indigo carmine chromoendoscopy but not detected with WLI

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. PARIS classification

    All SSL will be characterized using the PARIS classification of colorectal polyps

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  2. Kudo's pit pattern classification

    All SSL will be characterized using the Kudo's pit pattern classification for colorectal neoplasms

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  3. NICE classification

    All SSL will be characterized using the Narrow band imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) of small colorectal polyps.

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  4. Specific mean of macroscopically detected SSL

    Comparison of the mean number of SSL per technique (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  5. SSL histologic characterization

    All SSL will be characterized using the Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia

    Measured: histopathological results (up to 2 weeks)

  6. False positive

    Number of suspected SSL macroscopically but unconfirmed histologically

    Measured: histopathological results (up to 2 weeks)

  7. False negative

    Number of polyps not identified as SSL, but reclassified by histological results

    Measured: histopathological results (up to 2 weeks)

  8. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically suspected SSL by one of the 3 techniques (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) and confirmed by centralized review (macro true positive)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  9. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically suspected SSL by one of the 3 techniques (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) but not confirmed by centralized review (macro false positive)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  10. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically not suspected SSL by one of the 3 techniques (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) and yet seen by centralized review (macro false negative)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  11. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically suspected SSL by one of the 3 techniques (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) and confirmed by expert center (true positive)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  12. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically suspected SSL by one of the 3 techniques (white light, Narrow Band Imaging, indigo carmine chromoendoscopy) but not confirmed by centralized review (false positive)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)

  13. Detection techniques diagnosis performance

    Proportion of macroscopically suspected SSL by the endoscopist and confirmed as SSL with histological results from expert center (false negative)

    Measured: at colonoscopy day (Day 1) + histopathological results (up to 2 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start24 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion24 Apr 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion24 Apr 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02861885
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL16_0158
Acronym
Lesion SSL
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
2 Aug 2016
Last updated
21 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colorectal Neoplasm and Sessile Serrated Lesion, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

patients with sessile serrated lesions (time frame: at colonoscopy day (Day 1)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in