AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory InsufficiencyVivaPDTNCT02861001

VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy

A study testing conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube in people with Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Insufficiency
What is being tested?
conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
56 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Apr 2016to 13 Jan 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • No consent
  • Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20246

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and an Endotracheal Tube Mounted Camera (VivaSight-SL™)

Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization.

For feasibility evaluation, ten patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheotomy with optical guidance by the VivaSight-SL tube. If this part is completed with satisfactory results, patients are randomized to receive optical guidance by bronchoscopy or by VivaSight-SL tube. The primary end point is the visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).

Read the detailed description

Background

Long-term ventilated critically ill patients often receive a tracheotomy to facilitate weaning from the ventilator and for prevention of secondary complications by the endotracheal tube [1]. Besides surgical tracheotomy in which a muco-cutaneous fistula is prepared between trachea and outer skin, percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) has been introduced, in which a cannula is being inserted into the trachea. After introduction of a guidewire, the trachea is then dilated [2]. This intervention should be led by optical guidance, i. e. to verify the correct point of tracheal cannulation between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage and to minimize the risk for accidental injury to the membranous part of the trachea [3]. Usually, optical guidance is performed by bronchoscopy [4]. During bronchoscopy in ventilated patients, a drop in minute ventilation or an increase of carbon dioxide partial pressure with a consecutive respiratory acidosis may occur. Recently, an endotracheal tube with an integrated camera at its tip has been introduced that permits a continuous visualization of the trachea on a monitor connected to the camera (VivaSightTM-SL, ETView Ltd., Misgav, Israel) [5]. This tube has been CE and FDA certified (http://www.etview.com/products/ vivasight-sl).

In this study, it is being evaluated whether the optical guidance during PDT can be performed by the VivaSightTM-SL tube. Without the need for bronchoscopy during intervention, patients' ventilation during the procedure may be optimized with a lesser increase of the arterial and the end-expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressures. Furthermore, the procedure itself would be simpler without the need for a bronchoscopy.

In the investigators' institution, the VivaSightTM-SL tube has already been used in two patients together with bronchoscopic guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy. According to the investigators' experience, it seems to be possible to perform the procedure without a bronchoscopy. Therefore, the feasibility of PDT with guidance by the VivaSightTM-SL tube alone without bronchoscopy is tested. After a positive result in the first part of this study, non-inferiority of the VivaSightTM-SL tube in comparison to bronchoscopy is tested.

Methods

Design of Study / No. of Patients:

part 1: observational study, 10 consecutive patients part 2: randomized, prospective study, 46 patients

With a sample size of 46 (randomized 1:1 in 2 groups of 23 each) a difference of 35% on a visualization score [6] may be seen with an α-error of 0,05 and a β-error of 1-0,8.

Procedures:

  • screening of for study inclusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria
  • changing of the endotracheal tube to the VivaSightTM-SL tube
  • percutaneous tracheotomy with Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique [2, 7, 8]
  • arterial blood gas sampling (BGA): baseline value from patients' records, prior to skin incision, immediately after insertion of tracheal tube study inclusion:

All patients being treated in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine receiving percutaneous tracheotomy due to long term ventilation are screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Details of study-procedures:

Intubation:

The Intubation with the VivaSightTM-SL endotracheal tube does not differ from an intubation with a conventional tube that is done with respect to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. During the intubation, vital parameters are monitored with respect to the underlying disease and patients' therapy is continuously adjusted. According to the SOP, two physicians are present of which at least one is a fellow or an attending physician with experience in intensive care medicine.

bronchoscopy:

The bronchoscopy for percutaneous tracheotomy is done according to the SOP of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. Furthermore, during this study the bronchoscopy is done by a physician with an experience of more that 200 bronchoscopies.

percutaneous tracheotomy:

The tracheotomy is performed according to the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method [2, 7, 8] (Ciaglia Blue Rhino® G2, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). After skin incision and an optional blunt dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, the trachea is cannulated between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage. Visualization is provided by either the VivaSightTM-SL tube or by conventional bronchoscopy. Should visualization be insufficient (one item of score ≥ 3, see below), a bronchoscope is available as a back-up. The tracheotomy is performed by an experienced fellow or attending physician.

rating of visualization of tracheal structures and ventilation during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (mod. after [6]):

Rating (each item 1 to 4 points)

  1. Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage

1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

  1. Visualization of tracheal circumference 1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
  2. Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage

1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures

  1. Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible; 1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.m.; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
  2. Quality of Ventilation Before puncture and worst ventilation during PDT, respectively

1 Minute ventilation (MV) as before starting tracheotomy; 2 MV < 2 L/min or oxygen saturation (SO2) 80-90% (>2minutes); 3 MV < 0,5l /min or SO2 70 - 79% (> 2 minutes); 4 MV = 0 or SO2 < 70% (> 2 minutes)

Consent: all patients or their legal surrogate give written informed consent.

Data protection: Data are anonymized.

Being tested
conventional bronchoscopy, VivaSight-SL tube
Keywords
tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, critical care
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • conventional bronchoscopyDevice

    optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy

  • VivaSight-SL tubeDevice

    optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube

Study groups in NCT02861001
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bronchoscopic guidanceActive comparatoroptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
Receives: Device: conventional bronchoscopy
tube mounted camera guidanceExperimentaloptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
Receives: Device: VivaSight-SL tube

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)

    Measured: during tracheotomy

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points

    Measured: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy

  2. pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points

    Measured: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy

  3. change in pH-values

    Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula

  4. change in paCO2 values

    change in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (mmHg)

    Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula

  5. change in etCO2 values

    change in endtidal carbon dioxide (mmHg)

    Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula

  6. change in paO2 values

    change in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)

    Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula

  7. changes in peak airway pressure of ventilator

    if volume controlled mode is used

    Measured: three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula

  8. duration of the intervention

    Measured: during tracheotomy

  9. adverse events

    Measured: up to 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completion13 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion13 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02861001
Sponsor's protocol ID
VivaPDT
Acronym
VivaPDT
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
13 Jun 2016
Last updated
23 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.

    PubMed 24668495
  • Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.

    PubMed 3996056
  • Braune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.

    PubMed 21630175
  • Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.

    PubMed 26271742
  • Huitink JM, Koopman EM, Bouwman RA, Craenen A, Verwoert M, Krage R, Visser IE, Erwteman M, van Groeningen D, Tijink R, Schauer A. Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight() ). Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):74-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12065. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

    PubMed 23121322
  • Linstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.

    PubMed 20357150
  • Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.

    PubMed 20857374
  • Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.

    PubMed 11004042
  • Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.

    PubMed 29284503

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube in people with Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score) (time frame: during tracheotomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02861001, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in