Respiratory InsufficiencyVivaPDTNCT02861001
VivaSight-SL™ Versus Bronchoscopy for Percutaneous Tracheotomy
A study testing conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube in people with Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to 13 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- No consent
- Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20246
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and an Endotracheal Tube Mounted Camera (VivaSight-SL™)
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization.
For feasibility evaluation, ten patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheotomy with optical guidance by the VivaSight-SL tube. If this part is completed with satisfactory results, patients are randomized to receive optical guidance by bronchoscopy or by VivaSight-SL tube. The primary end point is the visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).
Read the detailed description
Background
Long-term ventilated critically ill patients often receive a tracheotomy to facilitate weaning from the ventilator and for prevention of secondary complications by the endotracheal tube [1]. Besides surgical tracheotomy in which a muco-cutaneous fistula is prepared between trachea and outer skin, percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) has been introduced, in which a cannula is being inserted into the trachea. After introduction of a guidewire, the trachea is then dilated [2]. This intervention should be led by optical guidance, i. e. to verify the correct point of tracheal cannulation between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage and to minimize the risk for accidental injury to the membranous part of the trachea [3]. Usually, optical guidance is performed by bronchoscopy [4]. During bronchoscopy in ventilated patients, a drop in minute ventilation or an increase of carbon dioxide partial pressure with a consecutive respiratory acidosis may occur. Recently, an endotracheal tube with an integrated camera at its tip has been introduced that permits a continuous visualization of the trachea on a monitor connected to the camera (VivaSightTM-SL, ETView Ltd., Misgav, Israel) [5]. This tube has been CE and FDA certified (http://www.etview.com/products/ vivasight-sl).
In this study, it is being evaluated whether the optical guidance during PDT can be performed by the VivaSightTM-SL tube. Without the need for bronchoscopy during intervention, patients' ventilation during the procedure may be optimized with a lesser increase of the arterial and the end-expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressures. Furthermore, the procedure itself would be simpler without the need for a bronchoscopy.
In the investigators' institution, the VivaSightTM-SL tube has already been used in two patients together with bronchoscopic guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy. According to the investigators' experience, it seems to be possible to perform the procedure without a bronchoscopy. Therefore, the feasibility of PDT with guidance by the VivaSightTM-SL tube alone without bronchoscopy is tested. After a positive result in the first part of this study, non-inferiority of the VivaSightTM-SL tube in comparison to bronchoscopy is tested.
Methods
Design of Study / No. of Patients:
part 1: observational study, 10 consecutive patients part 2: randomized, prospective study, 46 patients
With a sample size of 46 (randomized 1:1 in 2 groups of 23 each) a difference of 35% on a visualization score [6] may be seen with an α-error of 0,05 and a β-error of 1-0,8.
Procedures:
- screening of for study inclusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria
- changing of the endotracheal tube to the VivaSightTM-SL tube
- percutaneous tracheotomy with Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique [2, 7, 8]
- arterial blood gas sampling (BGA): baseline value from patients' records, prior to skin incision, immediately after insertion of tracheal tube study inclusion:
All patients being treated in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine receiving percutaneous tracheotomy due to long term ventilation are screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Details of study-procedures:
Intubation:
The Intubation with the VivaSightTM-SL endotracheal tube does not differ from an intubation with a conventional tube that is done with respect to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. During the intubation, vital parameters are monitored with respect to the underlying disease and patients' therapy is continuously adjusted. According to the SOP, two physicians are present of which at least one is a fellow or an attending physician with experience in intensive care medicine.
bronchoscopy:
The bronchoscopy for percutaneous tracheotomy is done according to the SOP of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. Furthermore, during this study the bronchoscopy is done by a physician with an experience of more that 200 bronchoscopies.
percutaneous tracheotomy:
The tracheotomy is performed according to the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method [2, 7, 8] (Ciaglia Blue Rhino® G2, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). After skin incision and an optional blunt dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, the trachea is cannulated between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage. Visualization is provided by either the VivaSightTM-SL tube or by conventional bronchoscopy. Should visualization be insufficient (one item of score ≥ 3, see below), a bronchoscope is available as a back-up. The tracheotomy is performed by an experienced fellow or attending physician.
rating of visualization of tracheal structures and ventilation during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (mod. after [6]):
Rating (each item 1 to 4 points)
- Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Visualization of tracheal circumference 1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible; 1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.m.; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Quality of Ventilation Before puncture and worst ventilation during PDT, respectively
1 Minute ventilation (MV) as before starting tracheotomy; 2 MV < 2 L/min or oxygen saturation (SO2) 80-90% (>2minutes); 3 MV < 0,5l /min or SO2 70 - 79% (> 2 minutes); 4 MV = 0 or SO2 < 70% (> 2 minutes)
Consent: all patients or their legal surrogate give written informed consent.
Data protection: Data are anonymized.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- Being tested
- conventional bronchoscopy, VivaSight-SL tube
- Keywords
- tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, critical care
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional bronchoscopyDevice
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy
VivaSight-SL tubeDevice
optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| bronchoscopic guidance | Active comparator | optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy Receives: Device: conventional bronchoscopy |
| tube mounted camera guidance | Experimental | optical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube Receives: Device: VivaSight-SL tube |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)
Measured: during tracheotomy
Secondary outcomes (9)
minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Measured: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Measured: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
change in pH-values
Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in paCO2 values
change in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (mmHg)
Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in etCO2 values
change in endtidal carbon dioxide (mmHg)
Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in paO2 values
change in arterial partial pressure of oxygen (mmHg)
Measured: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
changes in peak airway pressure of ventilator
if volume controlled mode is used
Measured: three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
duration of the intervention
Measured: during tracheotomy
adverse events
Measured: up to 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completion13 Jan 2017
- Study completion13 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stefan Kluge, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Head of Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02861001
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VivaPDT
- Acronym
- VivaPDT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.
PubMed 24668495Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
PubMed 3996056Braune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.
PubMed 21630175Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.
PubMed 26271742Huitink JM, Koopman EM, Bouwman RA, Craenen A, Verwoert M, Krage R, Visser IE, Erwteman M, van Groeningen D, Tijink R, Schauer A. Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight() ). Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):74-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12065. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
PubMed 23121322Linstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.
PubMed 20357150Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.
PubMed 20857374Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
PubMed 11004042Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.
PubMed 29284503
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Randomized Study in Ventilated Critically Ill Patients Receiving Percutaneous Tracheotomy. A Comparison of Periinterventional Visualization of Conventional Bronchoscopy and an Endotracheal Tube Mounted Camera (VivaSight-SL™)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02861001
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VivaPDT / VivaPDT
- Conditions
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- Keywords
- tracheotomy, bronchoscopy, critical care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016
- Primary completion
- 13 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Optical guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care is usually performed by bronchoscopy. Recently, an endotracheal tube with a camera mounted at its tip (VivaSight-SL) has been introduced that allows for endotracheal visualization.
For feasibility evaluation, ten patients in intensive care receive percutaneous tracheotomy with optical guidance by the VivaSight-SL tube. If this part is completed with satisfactory results, patients are randomized to receive optical guidance by bronchoscopy or by VivaSight-SL tube. The primary end point is the visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score, see detailed description).
Detailed description
Background
Long-term ventilated critically ill patients often receive a tracheotomy to facilitate weaning from the ventilator and for prevention of secondary complications by the endotracheal tube [1]. Besides surgical tracheotomy in which a muco-cutaneous fistula is prepared between trachea and outer skin, percutaneous tracheotomy (PDT) has been introduced, in which a cannula is being inserted into the trachea. After introduction of a guidewire, the trachea is then dilated [2]. This intervention should be led by optical guidance, i. e. to verify the correct point of tracheal cannulation between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage and to minimize the risk for accidental injury to the membranous part of the trachea [3]. Usually, optical guidance is performed by bronchoscopy [4]. During bronchoscopy in ventilated patients, a drop in minute ventilation or an increase of carbon dioxide partial pressure with a consecutive respiratory acidosis may occur. Recently, an endotracheal tube with an integrated camera at its tip has been introduced that permits a continuous visualization of the trachea on a monitor connected to the camera (VivaSightTM-SL, ETView Ltd., Misgav, Israel) [5]. This tube has been CE and FDA certified (http://www.etview.com/products/ vivasight-sl).
In this study, it is being evaluated whether the optical guidance during PDT can be performed by the VivaSightTM-SL tube. Without the need for bronchoscopy during intervention, patients' ventilation during the procedure may be optimized with a lesser increase of the arterial and the end-expiratory carbon dioxide partial pressures. Furthermore, the procedure itself would be simpler without the need for a bronchoscopy.
In the investigators' institution, the VivaSightTM-SL tube has already been used in two patients together with bronchoscopic guidance for percutaneous tracheotomy. According to the investigators' experience, it seems to be possible to perform the procedure without a bronchoscopy. Therefore, the feasibility of PDT with guidance by the VivaSightTM-SL tube alone without bronchoscopy is tested. After a positive result in the first part of this study, non-inferiority of the VivaSightTM-SL tube in comparison to bronchoscopy is tested.
Methods
Design of Study / No. of Patients:
part 1: observational study, 10 consecutive patients part 2: randomized, prospective study, 46 patients
With a sample size of 46 (randomized 1:1 in 2 groups of 23 each) a difference of 35% on a visualization score [6] may be seen with an α-error of 0,05 and a β-error of 1-0,8.
Procedures:
- screening of for study inclusion according to inclusion and exclusion criteria
- changing of the endotracheal tube to the VivaSightTM-SL tube
- percutaneous tracheotomy with Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique [2, 7, 8]
- arterial blood gas sampling (BGA): baseline value from patients' records, prior to skin incision, immediately after insertion of tracheal tube study inclusion:
All patients being treated in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine receiving percutaneous tracheotomy due to long term ventilation are screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Details of study-procedures:
Intubation:
The Intubation with the VivaSightTM-SL endotracheal tube does not differ from an intubation with a conventional tube that is done with respect to the standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. During the intubation, vital parameters are monitored with respect to the underlying disease and patients' therapy is continuously adjusted. According to the SOP, two physicians are present of which at least one is a fellow or an attending physician with experience in intensive care medicine.
bronchoscopy:
The bronchoscopy for percutaneous tracheotomy is done according to the SOP of the Dept. for Intensive Care Medicine. Furthermore, during this study the bronchoscopy is done by a physician with an experience of more that 200 bronchoscopies.
percutaneous tracheotomy:
The tracheotomy is performed according to the Ciaglia Blue Rhino method [2, 7, 8] (Ciaglia Blue Rhino® G2, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). After skin incision and an optional blunt dissection of the subcutaneous tissue, the trachea is cannulated between the 2nd and 3rd tracheal cartilage. Visualization is provided by either the VivaSightTM-SL tube or by conventional bronchoscopy. Should visualization be insufficient (one item of score ≥ 3, see below), a bronchoscope is available as a back-up. The tracheotomy is performed by an experienced fellow or attending physician.
rating of visualization of tracheal structures and ventilation during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (mod. after [6]):
Rating (each item 1 to 4 points)
- Identification of: thyroid cartilage, cricoid cartilage, 1st-3rd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Only cricoid cartilage and tracheal cartilages; 3 Only tracheal cartilages; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Visualization of tracheal circumference 1 Complete; 2 circumference 1/3 to 2/3 of circumference; 3 Only small parts of trachea; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Monitoring puncture: midline + level below 1st or 2nd tracheal cartilage
1 Reliable identification; 2 Midline sure Level uncertain, but below the 1st tracheal cartilage; 3 Level of puncture uncertain; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Monitoring dilatation Anterior wall and Pars membranacea (P.m.) visible; 1 Reliable identification; 2 P.m. only; 3 Only small parts of trachea visible, no control of P.m.; 4 No vision on tracheal structures
- Quality of Ventilation Before puncture and worst ventilation during PDT, respectively
1 Minute ventilation (MV) as before starting tracheotomy; 2 MV < 2 L/min or oxygen saturation (SO2) 80-90% (>2minutes); 3 MV < 0,5l /min or SO2 70 - 79% (> 2 minutes); 4 MV = 0 or SO2 < 70% (> 2 minutes)
Consent: all patients or their legal surrogate give written informed consent.
Data protection: Data are anonymized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| bronchoscopic guidance | Active comparator | Device: conventional bronchoscopyoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy |
| tube mounted camera guidance | Experimental | Device: VivaSight-SL tubeoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients receiving percutaneous tracheotomy in the Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- No consent
- Direct laryngoscopy according to Cormack-Lehane ≥ 3
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional bronchoscopyoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by conventional bronchoscopy | Device | bronchoscopic guidance |
| VivaSight-SL tubeoptical guidance of percutaneous tracheotomy is done by the VivaSight-SL tube | Device | tube mounted camera guidance |
Primary outcome
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score)
Time frame: during tracheotomy
9 secondary outcomes
minute ventilation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Time frame: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
pulse oxymetric oxygen saturation according to score generated from 4 point Likert scale at 2 time points
Time frame: two time points: 1. during identification of landmark structures before puncture of trachea, 2. during puncture, dilatation and tracheotomy
change in pH-values
Time frame: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in paCO2 values
Time frame: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in etCO2 values
Time frame: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
change in paO2 values
Time frame: three time points: baseline value (up to 1h before tracheotomy), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
changes in peak airway pressure of ventilator
Time frame: three time points: baseline value (before sterile drapes are applied), 0 min before skin incision, and 0 min before insertion of tracheal cannula
duration of the intervention
Time frame: during tracheotomy
adverse events
Time frame: up to 1 week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2017.
- Background: PubMed 24668495Dreher M, Kluge S. [Airway devices in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2014 Jun;68(6):371-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365318. Epub 2014 Mar 25. German.
- Background: PubMed 3996056Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure; preliminary report. Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.87.6.715.
- Background: PubMed 21630175Braune S, Kluge S. [Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 Jun;136(23):1265-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280549. Epub 2011 May 31. No abstract available. German.
- Background: PubMed 26271742Vargas M, Sutherasan Y, Antonelli M, Brunetti I, Corcione A, Laffey JG, Putensen C, Servillo G, Pelosi P. Tracheostomy procedures in the intensive care unit: an international survey. Crit Care. 2015 Aug 13;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1013-7.
- Background: PubMed 23121322Huitink JM, Koopman EM, Bouwman RA, Craenen A, Verwoert M, Krage R, Visser IE, Erwteman M, van Groeningen D, Tijink R, Schauer A. Tracheal intubation with a camera embedded in the tube tip (Vivasight() ). Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):74-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12065. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 20357150Linstedt U, Zenz M, Krull K, Hager D, Prengel AW. Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: a comparison of visibility of intratracheal structures. Anesth Analg. 2010 Apr 1;110(4):1076-82. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d27fb4.
- Background: PubMed 20857374Baumann HJ, Kemei C, Kluge S. [Tracheostomy in the intensive care unit]. Pneumologie. 2010 Dec;64(12):769-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255743. Epub 2010 Sep 20. German.
- Background: PubMed 11004042Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: ciaglia blue rhino versus the basic ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg. 2000 Oct;91(4):882-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29284503Grensemann J, Eichler L, Kahler S, Jarczak D, Simon M, Pinnschmidt HO, Kluge S. Bronchoscopy versus an endotracheal tube mounted camera for the peri-interventional visualization of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy - a prospective, randomized trial (VivaPDT). Crit Care. 2017 Dec 29;21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1901-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Insufficiency
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Response in Elderly for Acute Monitoring
Acute Dyspnea, Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
Modified Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Ventilated Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), Nitric Oxide
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Thickened Feeds on Clinical Outcomes in Children With Brief Resolved Unexplained Event
Brief Resolved Unexplained Event, Apparent Life Threatening Event
Recruiting
Platform of Randomized Adaptive Clinical Trials in Critical Illness
Respiratory Insufficiency, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Expanded Studies on the SCAPIS Stockholm Reexamination Cohort
Coronary Artery Disease, Arterial Stiffness, Blood Pressure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stefan Kluge, MD, PhD principal investigator
Head of Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional bronchoscopy and VivaSight-SL tube in people with Respiratory Insufficiency, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
visualization through the tube camera of endotracheal landmark structures for tracheotomy and visualization of the needle insertion (according to score) (time frame: during tracheotomy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02861001, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2017.