AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapseNCT02850835

Video Decision Aid in Latina Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

A study testing Video Decision Aid in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a highly prevalent condition among women that impairs quality of life, daily activities and sexual function. Latina women are disproportionally affected, with significantly higher rates of POP compared to women of other ethnicities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What is being tested?
Video Decision Aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
33 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2016to 31 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hispanic Women
  • Referred for evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse for the first time

Who cannot join

  • Women previously referred or treated for pelvic organ prolapse
  • Women who do not live in El Paso, Texas

About this study

Official title: Role of Video Decision Aid in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment Selection in Latina Women

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a highly prevalent condition among women that impairs quality of life, daily activities and sexual function. Latina women are disproportionally affected, with significantly higher rates of POP compared to women of other ethnicities. Decision aids have been used to increase patient knowledge prior to physician intervention and to facilitate informed patient participation on treatment selection. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a video decision aid prior to initial Urogynecology specialist evaluation of Latina women with POP in a border region university-affiliated medical clinic, will increase patient knowledge regarding the condition, decrease decisional conflict regarding selection among different treatment options and increase patient satisfaction with selected treatment.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a highly prevalent condition among women that impairs quality of life, daily activities and sexual function. Latina women are disproportionally affected, with significantly higher rates of POP compared to women of other ethnicities. Counseling Latina women suffering from POP is often complex due to a variety of factors, including language barriers, limited patient understanding of anatomy and disease etiology and confusion regarding surgical versus nonsurgical treatment options. Decision aids have been used to increase patient knowledge prior to physician intervention and to facilitate informed patient participation on treatment selection. The investigators hypothesize that the use of a video decision aid prior to initial Urogynecology specialist evaluation of Latina women with POP will increase patient knowledge regarding the condition, decrease decisional conflict regarding selection among different treatment options and increase patient satisfaction with selected treatment, empowering these women as active participants in their healthcare instead of relying on provider input alone.

Being tested
Video Decision Aid
Keywords
Decision Aid, Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video Decision AidOther

    Also called VDA

    A video decision aid was developed inform patients about pelvic organ prolapse, to include female anatomy, and treatment options.

Study groups in NCT02850835
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Video Decision AidExperimentalThis group will be shown a video decision aid along with their standard of care.
Receives: Other: Video Decision Aid
Standard CareNo interventionThis group will not see the video decision aid and will only receive standard of care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline decisional conflict score at 6 months.

    Decisional Conflict Scale will be used

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change from baseline knowledge of condition score at 6 months.

    12-item questionnaire of female pelvic anatomy and pelvic organ prolapse concepts will be used

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Change from baseline satisfaction with selected treatment at 6 months.

    Satisfaction with Decision Scale-(PFD) will be used

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completion17 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
33 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02850835
Sponsor's protocol ID
E16059
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
7 Jul 2016
Last updated
26 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1278-1283. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96.

    PubMed 19935030
  • Buchsbaum GM, Duecy EE, Kerr LA, Huang LS, Perevich M, Guzick DS. Pelvic organ prolapse in nulliparous women and their parous sisters. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1388-93. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245784.31082.ed.

    PubMed 17138771
  • Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123819.

    PubMed 12066091
  • Jelovsek JE, Barber MD. Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.060.

    PubMed 16647928
  • Andersen R, Lewis SZ, Giachello AL, Aday LA, Chiu G. Access to medical care among the Hispanic population of the southwestern United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1981 Mar;22(1):78-89. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7240708
  • Herman JP, Blangero A, Madelain L, Khan A, Harwood MR. Saccade adaptation as a model of flexible and general motor learning. Exp Eye Res. 2013 Sep;114:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

    PubMed 23597598
  • O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Holmes-Rovner M, Barry M, Jones J. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):731-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731.

    PubMed 10487995
  • Montoya TI, Rondeau NU, Maldonado PA, Mallett VT. Decision Aid Video for Treatment Selection in Latinas With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Randomized Pilot Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000727.

    PubMed 31008776

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video Decision Aid in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline decisional conflict score at 6 months. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02850835, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in