AzTrials
AzTrials

Current Major Depressive DisorderNCT02847741

Predictive Nature of Total Cholesterol Threshold: Possible Link to Suicidal Behavior

A study testing patient's routine care in people with Current Major Depressive Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Suicidal behavior (SB) is a public health problem. The clinical model currently admitted to the understanding of SB is a stress vulnerability model, but so far, all scientific works has no clinical application. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Current Major Depressive Disorder
What is being tested?
patient's routine care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
555 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jun 2012to Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Major
  • Meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM) criteria for a major depressive episode
  • Subject who signed the non-opposition form
  • Able to understand the nature, purpose and methodology of the study
  • Able to understand and perform the clinical and neuropsychological evaluations.

Who cannot join

  • Subject whose primary psychiatric diagnosis is not a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV criteria (the existence of psychiatric comorbidity is not a criterion for non-inclusion)
  • Refusal of participation
  • Subject Deprived of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision)
  • Subject protected by law (guardianship)
  • Subject exclusion period in relation to another protocol
  • Subject for which the maximum annual amount of allowances of € 4,500 has been reached
  • Subject not affiliated to a social security scheme or not being the beneficiary of such a scheme.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Montpelleir University Hospital

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Suicidal behavior (SB) is a public health problem. The clinical model currently admitted to the understanding of SB is a stress vulnerability model, but so far, all scientific works has no clinical application. The management of psychiatric patients, including depressed subjects, faces the inability to detect those with a high risk of SB. Many studies have shown a link between low cholesterol and SB. A study has recently proposed a total cholesterol threshold below which the risk of suicide could be increased. However, a prospective study is needed to assess the predictive nature of such an indicator.

Read the detailed description

Investigators propose to assess, within a cohort of patients, the predictive value of a total cholesterol threshold in the occurrence of SB.

555 inpatients suffering from a current Major depressive disorder (MDD), hospitalized in the Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Post Acute Care will be recruited.

Each patient will attend a total of 5 visits during a follow-up period of 18 months (visits at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months)

Being tested
patient's routine care
Keywords
Depression, Cholesterol, Suicidal behavior, Predictive factor
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • patient's routine careOther

    Interview by psychiatrists, questionnaires, blood analysis

Study groups in NCT02847741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Major depressive episodeOtherDepressive patients will be assessed by interview (psychiatrists), questionnaires and blood sampling, as the inpatients's routine care
Receives: Other: patient's routine care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. frequency of suicide attempts

    frequency of suicide attempts during the 18months follow-up, according to the total cholesterol threshold at baseline. The biological sampling is carried out after 12 hours of fasting.

    Measured: at 18 month

Secondary outcomes (40)
  1. number of past SB

    Studying the relation between the number of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  2. moral pain

    Studying the relation between moral pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  3. physical pain

    Studying the relation between physical pain (assessed Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  4. suicidal ideation

    Studying the relation between suicidal ideation (assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, the Scale of Suicidal Ideation) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  5. depression (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)

    Studying the relation between score to the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  6. history of childhood abuse

    Studying the relation between an history of childhood abuse (assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  7. National Adult Reading Test score

    Studying the relation between NART score (assessment of intellectual level) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  8. scores to California Verbal Learning Test

    Studying the relation between scores to California Verbal Learning Test (assessment of verbal memory) and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  9. scores to Iowa Gambling Task Time frame: 18 months

    Studying the relation between scores to the Iowa Gambling Task (assessment of decision making) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  10. score to the brixton test

    Studying the relation between score to the brixton test (assessment of mental flexibility) and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  11. scores to verbal fluency

    Studying the relation between scores to verbal fluency and the occurrence of SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  12. scores to Reversal Learning Task

    Studying the relation between scores to Reversal learning task (assessment of decision making) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  13. scores to the Attentional Stroop test

    Studying the relation between scores to Attentional Stroop test and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  14. relation between inflammatory markers and the occurrence of SB

    Studying the relation between inflammatory markers at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-

    Measured: at 18 month

  15. relation between thyroid function and the occurrence of SB

    Studying the relation between thyroid function at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  16. relation between lipid profile and the occurrence of SB

    Studying the relation between lipid profile at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  17. relation between pharmacological assays and the occurrence of SB

    Studying the relation between pharmacological assays at baseline and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  18. relation between the characteristic of the mood depressive disorder (unipolar or bipolar depression) and the predictive or vulnerability factors of SB

    Studying the potential specificity of predictive or vulnerability factors of SB depending on whether the diagnosis is unipolar or bipolar depression

    Measured: at 18 month

  19. the characteristic of past SB

    Studying the relation between the number and the lethality of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form, the Risk Rescue Rating Scale, the Suicidal Intent Scale ) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  20. moral pain

    Studying the relation between moral pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  21. physical pain

    Studying the relation between physical pain (assessed by Likert scale from 0 to 10) at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  22. suicidal ideation

    Studying the relation between suicidal ideation (assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, the Scale of Suicidal Ideation) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  23. depression level (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)

    Studying the relation between score to the Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  24. history of childhood abuse

    Studying the relation between an history of childhood abuse (assessed by the childhood trauma questionnaire) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  25. National Adult Reading Test score ( NART)

    Studying the relation between NART score (assessment of intellectual level ) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  26. scores to California Verbal Learning Test

    Studying the relation between scores to California Verbal Learning Test (assessment of verbal memory) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  27. scores to Iowa Gambling Task

    Studying the relation between scores to Iowa Gambling Task (assessment of decision making) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  28. score to the brixton test

    Studying the relation between score to the brixton test (assessment of mental flexibility) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  29. verbal fluency

    Studying the relation between score to verbal fluency and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  30. scores to Reversal Learning Task

    Studying the relation between scores to Reversal learning task (assessment of decision making) and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  31. scores to the Attentional Stroop test

    Studying the relation between scores to Attentional Stroop test and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  32. relation between inflammatory markers and the response to antidepressant treatment

    Studying the relation between inflammatory markers at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  33. relation between thyroid function and the response to antidepressant treatment

    Studying the relation between thyroid function at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  34. relation between lipid profile and the response to antidepressant treatment

    Studying the relation between lipid profile at baseline and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  35. relation between pharmacological assays and the response to antidepressant treatment

    Studying the relation between pharmacological assays at baseline and t the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  36. lethality of past SB

    Studying the relation between the lethality of past SB (assessed by the Columbia Suicide History Form) and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  37. Depression (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)

    Studying the relation between score to the Inventory Of Depressive Symptomatology and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  38. Depression (Beck Depression Inventory)

    Studying the relation between score to the Beck Depression Inventory and the occurrence of new SB during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  39. depression level (Beck depression Inventory)

    Studying the relation between score to the Beck depression Inventory and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

  40. depression level (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology)

    Studying the relation between score to the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology and the response to antidepressant treatment during the 18 months follow-up

    Measured: at 18 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
555 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02847741
Sponsor's protocol ID
UF 8921
Other IDs
2011-A01657-34
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
15 Jul 2016
Last updated
28 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing patient's routine care in people with Current Major Depressive Disorder, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

frequency of suicide attempts (time frame: at 18 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in