MelanomaFLARENCT02846714
Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education Study
A study testing FLARE in people with Melanoma and Child, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overall purpose of this study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a family-focused behavioral intervention ("FLARE", which stands for Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education) that aims to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors among children at elevated risk for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 110 years
- What is being tested?
- FLARE
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 110 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Children
- Are 8-17 years old AND
- Are at risk for melanoma due to having a first degree relative with a history of melanoma and/or at least 3 second or third degree relatives on the same side of the family with a history of melanoma AND/OR
- Have personally received genetic testing for the CDKN2A/p16 genetic mutation and/or has one or more family members who received CDKN2A/p16 testing
- Adults
- Are at least 18 years old AND
Show all 10Show fewer
- Are the primary caregiver for the child participating in the study (defined as the individual who is responsible for daily implementation of health-related tasks for the child) AND
- Have at least one child under age 18 who is living in the same household AND
- Have a personal history of melanoma and/or family history of melanoma) AND/OR
- Have personally received genetic testing for the CDKN2A/p16 genetic mutation and/or has one or more family members who received CDKN2A/p16 testing
Who cannot join
- Individuals who do not speak, read/write English will be excluded because FLARE involves regular interaction between study staff and research participants in English and completion of study questionnaires and interviews in English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
About this study
Official title: FLARE: Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education Study for Children With a Familial Risk for Melanoma
The overall purpose of this study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a family-focused behavioral intervention ("FLARE", which stands for Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education) that aims to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors among children at elevated risk for the disease.
Read the detailed description
Test the feasibility and acceptability of FLARE, a family-focused behavioral intervention that is designed to improve and maintain adherence to photoprotection (e.g., use of sunscreen) and screening (e.g., implementation of self skin exams). We expect that the feasibility of the intervention will be supported by at least 75% of participants attending at least 3 intervention sessions. We also expect that the acceptability of the intervention (e.g., overall satisfaction, ease of participation, perceived utility of intervention) will be supported by mean ratings that indicate adequate levels of acceptability across participants (e.g., mean rating of "satisfied" or "very satisfied" for overall satisfaction).
Pilot test the efficacy of the FLARE intervention with children at elevated risk for melanoma and their primary caregiver.
We will also explore the potential impact of the FLARE intervention on melanoma preventive behaviors among siblings of the child who receives the intervention, as well as the child's other parent/caregiver (if another parent/caregiver is available).
- Being tested
- FLARE
- Keywords
- Education, Prevention and Control, Behavioral Research
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FLAREBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FLARE intervention | Experimental | All FLARE participants enrolled will receive the intervention Receives: Behavioral: FLARE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants Retained Throughout Intervention as Assessed by Session Attendance Recorded by Interventionist
Session attendance will be recorded by the interventionist at each scheduled session. The percent of participants who are retained throughout the 3 session intervention will be calculated.
Measured: Week 9 (post-intervention)
Secondary outcomes (12)
Photoprotective Behaviors Assessed With the Sun Habits Survey
"These next questions ask about what you have done in the past month if you were outdoors in the sun for 15 minutes or more. How often did you..." Minimum value = 1; Maximum value = 5; Higher scores indicate a better outcome
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Photoprotective Behaviors Assessed With the PALE Questionnaire
Protection-Adjusted Length of Exposure Index (PALE) Assesses photoprotective behavior during reported activities to yield daily minutes of unprotected sun exposure during each time frame
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Skin Self-exam Occurrence Assessed Via Questionnaire
Number of participants who received a skin self-exam during each time frame
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Skin Self-exam Occurrence Assessed Via Diary
Number of participants who received a skin self-exam during each time frame interval
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Sunburn Occurrence Assessed Via Diary
Number of participants who got a sunburn during each time frame interval
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Sunburn Occurrence Assessed Via Questionnaire
Number of participants who received a sunburn during each time frame.
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Exposure Assessed Via Dosimeter Device
Change of weekly average UV intake from Week 1 (baseline) to Week 9 (post-intervention) and from Week 9 to Week 13 (1-month follow up)
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline),9,13
Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Exposure Assessed Via PALE Questionnaire
Protection-Adjusted Length of Exposure Index (PALE) Assesses UVR exposure during reported activities to yield daily minutes of unprotected sun exposure during each time frame
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Degree of Tan on Skin Assessed Via Reflectance Spectroscopy
Mean degree of tan on skin assessed via reflectance spectroscopy of 4 different body parts (exposed wrist, outer arm, chin, and face) at each time frame. Measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer to quantify skin color. Melanin index values were recorded, with a higher value representing more melanin in the skin (i.e., darker skin).
Measured: Weeks 1 (baseline),9,13
Photoprotection Behavior Changes Assessed Via Questionnaire
Mean difference for each photoprotection behavior from Week 1 (pre-intervention) to Week 9 (post-intervention) and from Week 9 to Week 13 (1 month follow-up).
"These next questions ask about what you have done in the past month if you were outdoors in the sun for 15 minutes or more. How often did you..." Minimum value = 1; Maximum value = 5; A higher mean difference indicates a better outcome
Measured: Weeks 1,9,13
Skin Self-exam Behavior Changes
Mean difference for frequency of skin self-exam and thoroughness of skin self-exam (measured by number of body parts examined) from Week 1 (pre-intervention) to Week 9 (post-intervention) and from Week 9 to Week 13 (1 month follow-up). (SSE = skin self-exam)
Change in frequency of SSE: "In the past month, how often did you check your skin for any new or changed moles or growths?" 1 = SSE less than once a month, 2 = SSE once a month, 3 = SSE more than once a month; higher mean difference indicates a better outcome.
Change in thoroughness of SSE: "In the past month, which of the body parts listed below were checked for any new or changed moles or growths" Minimum value = 0 (checked 0 body parts during SSE); Maximum value = 15 (checked 15 body parts during SSE); higher mean difference indicates a better outcome
Measured: Weeks 1,9,13
Acceptability of Intervention Assessed Via Questionnaire
"In these next 15 questions, we want to learn more about your thoughts about what you learned through the FLARE sessions you've had with us in-person and via WebEx or phone. Please indicate how much you agree with each statement." 15 total constructs summed, each was on the same 5 point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree).
Minimum value = 1; Maximum Value = 75; higher score means a better outcome (better acceptability)
Measured: Week 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completionNov 2017
- Study completionNov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of UtahThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yelena Wu, University of Utah
- Investigators
- Yelena Wu, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02846714
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB_00090292
- Other IDs
- K07CA196985
- Acronym
- FLARE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 8 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Glanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M, Saraiya M, Crane LA, Buller DB, Manne S, O'Riordan DL, Heckman CJ, Hay J, Robinson JK. Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.46.
PubMed 18283179Weinstock MA, Risica PM, Martin RA, Rakowski W, Smith KJ, Berwick M, Goldstein MG, Upegui D, Lasater T. Reliability of assessment and circumstances of performance of thorough skin self-examination for the early detection of melanoma in the Check-It-Out Project. Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):761-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.020.
PubMed 15193896Gwadry-Sridhar F, Guyatt GH, Arnold JM, Massel D, Brown J, Nadeau L, Lawrence S. Instruments to measure acceptability of information and acquisition of knowledge in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Dec;5(6):783-91. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00158-2.
PubMed 14675857Kothe EJ, Mullan BA. Acceptability of a theory of planned behaviour email-based nutrition intervention. Health Promot Int. 2014 Mar;29(1):81-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das043. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
PubMed 22942273Gage H, Grainger L, Ting S, Williams P, Chorley C, Carey G, Borg N, Bryan K, Castleton B, Trend P, Kaye J, Jordan J, Wade D. Specialist rehabilitation for people with Parkinson's disease in the community: a randomised controlled trial. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK263782/
PubMed 25642574Stump, T. K., Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Edwards, R., & Leachman, S. A. Validation of the Protection-Adjusted Length of Exposure (PALE) Index - A New Self-Report Measure of UVR Exposure (2014, April). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Wu YP, Boucher K, Hu N, Hay J, Kohlmann W, Aspinwall LG, Bowen DJ, Parsons BG, Nagelhout ES, Grossman D, Mooney K, Leachman SA, Tercyak KP. A pilot study of a telehealth family-focused melanoma preventive intervention for children with a family history of melanoma. Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):148-155. doi: 10.1002/pon.5232. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
PubMed 31520429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- FLARE: Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education Study for Children With a Familial Risk for Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02846714
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLARE / IRB_00090292
- Keywords
- Education, Prevention and Control, Behavioral Research
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Jul 2016
- Primary completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall purpose of this study is to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a family-focused behavioral intervention ("FLARE", which stands for Family Lifestyle Actions and Risk Education) that aims to improve adherence to melanoma preventive behaviors among children at elevated risk for the disease.
Detailed description
Test the feasibility and acceptability of FLARE, a family-focused behavioral intervention that is designed to improve and maintain adherence to photoprotection (e.g., use of sunscreen) and screening (e.g., implementation of self skin exams). We expect that the feasibility of the intervention will be supported by at least 75% of participants attending at least 3 intervention sessions. We also expect that the acceptability of the intervention (e.g., overall satisfaction, ease of participation, perceived utility of intervention) will be supported by mean ratings that indicate adequate levels of acceptability across participants (e.g., mean rating of "satisfied" or "very satisfied" for overall satisfaction).
Pilot test the efficacy of the FLARE intervention with children at elevated risk for melanoma and their primary caregiver.
We will also explore the potential impact of the FLARE intervention on melanoma preventive behaviors among siblings of the child who receives the intervention, as well as the child's other parent/caregiver (if another parent/caregiver is available).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FLARE intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: FLAREAll FLARE participants enrolled will receive the intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 110 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Children
- Are 8-17 years old AND
- Are at risk for melanoma due to having a first degree relative with a history of melanoma and/or at least 3 second or third degree relatives on the same side of the family with a history of melanoma AND/OR
- Have personally received genetic testing for the CDKN2A/p16 genetic mutation and/or has one or more family members who received CDKN2A/p16 testing
- Adults
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals who do not speak, read/write English will be excluded because FLARE involves regular interaction between study staff and research participants in English and completion of study questionnaires and interviews in English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FLARE | Behavioural | FLARE intervention |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants Retained Throughout Intervention as Assessed by Session Attendance Recorded by Interventionist
Time frame: Week 9 (post-intervention)
Session attendance will be recorded by the interventionist at each scheduled session. The percent of participants who are retained throughout the 3 session intervention will be calculated.
12 secondary outcomes
Photoprotective Behaviors Assessed With the Sun Habits Survey
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Photoprotective Behaviors Assessed With the PALE Questionnaire
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Skin Self-exam Occurrence Assessed Via Questionnaire
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Skin Self-exam Occurrence Assessed Via Diary
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Sunburn Occurrence Assessed Via Diary
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Sunburn Occurrence Assessed Via Questionnaire
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Exposure Assessed Via Dosimeter Device
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline),9,13
Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) Exposure Assessed Via PALE Questionnaire
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline), 3,5,7,9,13
Degree of Tan on Skin Assessed Via Reflectance Spectroscopy
Time frame: Weeks 1 (baseline),9,13
Photoprotection Behavior Changes Assessed Via Questionnaire
Time frame: Weeks 1,9,13
Skin Self-exam Behavior Changes
Time frame: Weeks 1,9,13
Acceptability of Intervention Assessed Via Questionnaire
Time frame: Week 9
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18283179Glanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M, Saraiya M, Crane LA, Buller DB, Manne S, O'Riordan DL, Heckman CJ, Hay J, Robinson JK. Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Feb;144(2):217-22. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2007.46.
- Background: PubMed 15193896Weinstock MA, Risica PM, Martin RA, Rakowski W, Smith KJ, Berwick M, Goldstein MG, Upegui D, Lasater T. Reliability of assessment and circumstances of performance of thorough skin self-examination for the early detection of melanoma in the Check-It-Out Project. Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):761-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.020.
- Background: PubMed 14675857Gwadry-Sridhar F, Guyatt GH, Arnold JM, Massel D, Brown J, Nadeau L, Lawrence S. Instruments to measure acceptability of information and acquisition of knowledge in patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003 Dec;5(6):783-91. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(03)00158-2.
- Background: PubMed 22942273Kothe EJ, Mullan BA. Acceptability of a theory of planned behaviour email-based nutrition intervention. Health Promot Int. 2014 Mar;29(1):81-90. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das043. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
- Background: PubMed 25642574Gage H, Grainger L, Ting S, Williams P, Chorley C, Carey G, Borg N, Bryan K, Castleton B, Trend P, Kaye J, Jordan J, Wade D. Specialist rehabilitation for people with Parkinson's disease in the community: a randomised controlled trial. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Dec. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK263782/
- BackgroundStump, T. K., Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Edwards, R., & Leachman, S. A. Validation of the Protection-Adjusted Length of Exposure (PALE) Index - A New Self-Report Measure of UVR Exposure (2014, April). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31520429Wu YP, Boucher K, Hu N, Hay J, Kohlmann W, Aspinwall LG, Bowen DJ, Parsons BG, Nagelhout ES, Grossman D, Mooney K, Leachman SA, Tercyak KP. A pilot study of a telehealth family-focused melanoma preventive intervention for children with a family history of melanoma. Psychooncology. 2020 Jan;29(1):148-155. doi: 10.1002/pon.5232. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yelena Wu, PhD principal investigator
University of Utah
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FLARE in people with Melanoma and Child, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants Retained Throughout Intervention as Assessed by Session Attendance Recorded by Interventionist (time frame: Week 9 (post-intervention)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02846714, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2019.